揭露知識更要自我學習：標準必要專利的宣告與深化性學習

Revealing Knowledge while Self-Learning: The Declaration of Standard Essential Patents and Exploitative Learning

10.6160/SYSMR.202403_32(1).0001

許經明(Jing-Ming Shiu)；黃韋菱(Wei-Ling Huang)

選擇性揭露 ； 標準必要專利 ； 排他性專利 ； 深化性學習 ； 標準制定組織 ； Selective Revealing ； Standard Essential Patents ； Proprietary Patents ； Exploitative Learning ； Standard-Setting Organization

中山管理評論

32卷1期（2024 / 03 / 01）

3 - 50

繁體中文;英文

本研究分析企業在第三代合作夥伴計畫通訊標準制定組織中，標準必要專利與排他性專利之間的引用關係。焦點企業宣告標準必要專利並且基於FRAND來授權給其它企業，正是一個增加獲取價值的方式。然而，焦點企業的標準必要專利的技術知識被其它企業所學習與模仿，就成為非預期性的知識外溢。換言之，其它企業引用焦點企業的標準必要專利來申請獲取成為新型排他型專利，就將限制了焦點企業持續獲取價值的空間。本研究則是發現標準必要專利的價值性與時效性，以及創新能力，會讓焦點企業在申請新的排他型專利時，增加對自家標準必要專利的自我引用。專利的自我引用是一種深化性學習。本研究的分析結果進一步說明了企業在選擇性揭露中進行深化性學習的原因。

This study analyzes the citation relationship between standard essential patents (SEPs) and proprietary patents of firms, who participate in the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) telecommunication standard-setting organization. The focal firm declares standard essential patents and licenses them to other firms based on FRAND (Fair, Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory), which is a means for value creation. However, the technical knowledge of the standard essential patents of the focal firm is learned and imitated by other firms, which may become unexpected knowledge spillovers. In other words, other firms cite standard essential patents of the focal firm to apply for new proprietary patents will limit the space for the focal firm to capture value. This study finds that the value and timeliness of standard essential patents and the innovative capacity of the focal firm will increase the self-citation of proprietary patents from focal firms' standard essential patents. Patent's self-citation is keen on exploitative learning. Our analysis results further explain how firms conduct exploitative learning in selective revealing.

1. Afuah, A. and Tucci, C. L., 2012, “Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 37, No. 3, 355-375.
   連結：
2. Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., and Garsten, C., 2000, “Standardizing Through Organization” in Brunsson, N. and Jacobsson, B. (eds.), A World of Standards, 1st edtition, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 50-70.
   連結：
3. Ahuja, G. and Brunsson, N., 2005, “Organizations and Meta-Organizations,” Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, 429-449.
   連結：
4. Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., and Novelli, E., 2013, “The Second Face of Appropriability: Generative Appropriability and Its Determinants,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, 248-269.
   連結：
5. Alexy, O., George, G., and Salter, A., 2013, “Cui Bono? The Selective Revealing of Knowledge and Its Implications for Innovative Activity,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, 270-291.
   連結：
6. Allen, R., 1983, “Collective Invention,” Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-24.
   連結：
7. Almirall, E. and Casadesus-Masanell, R., 2010, “Open Versus Closed Innovation: A Model of Discovery and Divergence,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 35, No. 1, 27-47.
   連結：
8. Alnuaimi, T. and George, G., 2016, “Appropriability and the Retrieval of Knowledge after Spillovers,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 7, 1263-1279.
   連結：
9. Andriopoulos, C. and Lewis, M., 2009, “Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation,” Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, 696-717.
   連結：
10. Arora, A., 1995, “Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and the Market for Know-How,” Economics of Innovation New Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 41-60.
    連結：
11. Arthur, B., 1989, “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, No. 394, 116-131.
    連結：
12. Atuahene-Gima, K. and Murray, J., 2007, “Exploratory and Exploitative Learning in New Product Development: A Social Capital Perspective on New Technology Ventures in China,” Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1-29.
    連結：
13. Balasubramanian, N. and Lieberman, M., 2010, “Industry Learning Environments and the Heterogeneity of Firm Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, 390-412.
    連結：
14. Baldwin, C. Y. and Henkel, J., 2012, “The impact of Modularity on Intellectual Property and Value Appropriation.” Working Paper, Harvard Business School, 12-040.
    連結：
15. Baldwin, C. Y. and Von Hippel, E., 2011, “Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation,” Organization Science, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1399-1417.
    連結：
16. Barro, R. J., 1990, “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogeneous Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5, 103-125.
    連結：
17. Bekkers, R., Bongard, R., and Nuvolari, A., 2011, “An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Essential Patent Claims in Compatibility Standards,” Research Policy, Vol. 40, No. 7, 1001-1015.
    連結：
18. Bekkers, R., Catalini, C., Martinelli, A., Righi, C., and Simcoe, T., 2023, “Disclosure Rules and Declared Essential Patents,” Research Policy, Vol. 52, No. 1, 104618.
    連結：
19. Bekkers, R., Duysters, G., and Verspagen, B., 2002, “Intellectual Property Rights, Strategic Technology Agreements and Market Structure: The Case of GSM,” Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 7, 1141-1161.
    連結：
20. Bekkers, R. and Martinelli, A., 2012, “Knowledge Positions in High-Tech Markets: Trajectories, Standards, Strategies and True Innovators,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 79, No. 7, 1192-1216.
    連結：
21. Bekkers, R. and West, J., 2009, “The Limits to IPR Standardization Policies as Evidenced by Strategic Patenting in UMTS,” Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 33, No. 1-2, 80-97.
    連結：
22. Bengtsson, M. and Kock, S., 2014, “Coopetition—Quo Vadis? Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 43, No. 2, 180-188.
    連結：
23. Berger, F., Blind, K., and Thumm, N., 2012, “Filing Behaviour Regarding Essential Patents in Industry Standards,” Research Policy, Vol. 41, No. 1, 216-225.
    連結：
24. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M., 1995, “Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, 343-378.
    連結：
25. Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., and Zhang, H., 2009, “Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects,” Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, 781-796.
    連結：
26. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R., 2002, “R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium,” American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 4, 1169-1184.
    連結：
27. Chesbrough, H. W., 2003, “The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property,” California Management Review, Vol. 45, No. 3, 33-58.
    連結：
28. Chiao, B., Lerner, J., and Tirole, J., 2007, “The Rules of Standard‐Setting Organizations: An empirical Analysis,” The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 38, No. 4, 905-930.
    連結：
29. Chintagunta, P., Jain, D., and Vilcassim, N., 1991, “Investigating Heterogeneity in Brand Preferences in Logit Models for Panel Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, No. 4, 417-428.
    連結：
30. Clarkson, G. and Toh, P. K., 2010, “Keep Out Signs: The Role of Deterrence in the Competition for Resources,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 11, 1202-1225.
    連結：
31. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1990, “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, 128-152.
    連結：
32. Dahlander, L. and Gann, D. M., 2010, “How Open Is Innovation?” Research Policy, Vol. 39, No. 6, 699-709.
    連結：
33. David, P. and Greenstein, S., 1990, “The Economics of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction to Recent Research,” Economics of Innovation New Technology, Vol. 1,No. 1-2, 3-41.
    連結：
34. Davies, A., 1996, “Innovation in Large Technical Systems: the Case of Telecommunications,”Industrial Corporate Change, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1143-1180.
    連結：
35. Davies, A. and Brady, T., 2000, “Organisational Capabilities and Learning in ComplexProduct Systems: Towards Repeatable Solutions,” Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 7-8,931-953.
    連結：
36. De Carolis, D., 2003, “Competencies and Imitability in the Pharmaceutical Industry: AnAnalysis of Their Relationship With Firm Performance,” Journal of Management, Vol.29, No. 1, 27-50.
    連結：
37. De Rassenfosse, G., Palangkaraya, A., and Webster, E., 2016, “Why do Patents FacilitateTrade in Technology? Testing the Disclosure and Appropriation Effects,” ResearchPolicy, Vol. 45, No. 7, 1326-1336.
    連結：
38. Dittrich, K. and Duysters, G., 2007, “Networking as a Means to Strategy Change: the Case ofOpen Innovation in Mobile Telephony,” Journal of Product Innovation Management,Vol. 24, No. 6, 510-521.
    連結：
39. Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., and Van Alstyne, M., 2009, “Opening Platforms: How, Whenand Why?” in Gawer, A. (ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation, 2nd edition,Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 131-162.
    連結：
40. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., and Chesbrough, H. W., 2009, “Open R&D and Open Innovation:Exploring the Phenomenon,” R&D Management, Vol. 39, No. 4, 311-316.
    連結：
41. Ernst, H., 2002, “Success Factors of New Product Development: A Review of the EmpiricalLiterature,” International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-40.
    連結：
42. Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., and Tribó, J., 2009, “Managing External Knowledge Flows: TheModerating Role of Absorptive Capacity,” Research Policy, Vol. 38, No. 1, 96-105.
    連結：
43. Farrell, J. and Simcoe, T., 2012, “Choosing the Rules for Consensus Standardization,” TheRAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 43, No. 2, 235-252.
    連結：
44. Fleming, L., 2001, “Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search,” ManagementScience, Vol. 47, No. 1, 117-132.
    連結：
45. Fleming, L. and Sorenson, O., 2001, “Technology as a Complex Adaptive System: Evidencefrom Patent Data,” Research Policy, Vol. 30, No. 7, 1019-1039.
    連結：
46. Funk, J. L., 2002, Global Competition Between and Within Standards: the Case. ofMobile Phones, 3rd, Berlin: Springer.
    連結：
47. Funk, J. L. and Methe, D. T., 2001, “Market-and Committee-Based Mechanisms in theCreation and Diffusion of Global Industry Standards: the Case of Mobile Communication,”Research Policy, Vol. 30, No. 4, 589-610.
    連結：
48. Garud, R. and Kumaraswamy, A., 1993, “Changing Competitive Dynamics in NetworkIndustries: An Exploration of Sun Microsystems' Open Systems Strategy,” StrategicManagement Journal, Vol. 14, No. 5, 351-369.
    連結：
49. Gibson, C. and Birkinshaw, J., 2004, “The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Roleof Organizational Ambidexterity,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2,209-226.
    連結：
50. Goldsmith, A., 2005, Wireless Communications, 1st, Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511841224
    連結：
51. Goodman, D. J. and Myers, R. A., 2005, “3G Cellular Standards and Patents.”, 2005International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and MobileComputing, Maui, USA.
    連結：
52. Granstrand, O. and Holgersson, M., 2014, “The Challenge of Closing Open Innovation: TheIntellectual Property Disassembly Problem,” Research Technology Management, Vol.57, No. 5, 19-25.
    連結：
53. Gulati, R., Puranam, P., and Tushman, M., 2012, “Meta‐Organization Design: RethinkingDesign in Interorganizational and Community Contexts,” Strategic ManagementJournal, Vol. 33, No. 6, 571-586.
    連結：
54. Hagedoorn, J. and Zobel, A.-K., 2015, “The Role of Contracts and Intellectual PropertyRights in Open Innovation,” Technology Analysis Strategic Management, Vol. 27, No.9, 1050-1067.
    連結：
55. Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., and Von Hippel, E., 2003, “Profiting from Voluntary InformationSpillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations,” ResearchPolicy, Vol. 32, No. 10, 1753-1769.
    連結：
56. Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F., and Vopel, K., 1999, “Citation Frequency and the Value ofPatented Inventions,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 81, No. 3, 511-515.
    連結：
57. He, Z.-L. and Wong, P.-K., 2004, “Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of theAmbidexterity Hypothesis,” Organization Science, Vol. 15, No. 4, 481-494.
    連結：
58. He, Z. L., Lim, K., and Wong, P. K., 2006, “Entry and Competitive Dynamics in the MobileTelecommunications Market,” Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 8, 1147-1165.
    連結：
59. Henderson, R. M. and Clark, K. B., 1990, “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration ofExisting,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No.1, 9-30.
    連結：
60. Henkel, J., 2006, “Selective Revealing in Open Innovation Processes: The Case of EmbeddedLinux,” Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 7, 953-969.
    連結：
61. Henkel, J., Baldwin, C. Y., and Shih, W., 2013, “IP Modularity: Profiting from Innovation byAligning Product Architecture with Intellectual Property,” California ManagementReview, Vol. 55, No. 4, 65-82.
    連結：
62. Henkel, J., Schöberl, S., and Alexy, O., 2014, “The Emergence of Openness: How and WhyFirms Adopt Selective Revealing in Open Innovation,” Research Policy, Vol. 43, No. 5,879-890.
    連結：
63. Hippel, E. v. and Krogh, G. v., 2003, “Open Source Software and the Private-CollectiveInnovation Model: Issues for Organization Science,” Organization Science, Vol. 14, No.2, 209-223.
    連結：
64. Hobday, M., 2001, “The Electronics Industries of the Asia–Pacific: Exploiting InternationalProduction Networks for Economic Development,” Asian‐Pacific Economic Literature,Vol. 15, No. 1, 13-29.
    連結：
65. Hoetker, G. and Agarwal, R., 2007, “Death Hurts, But It Isn't Fatal: The Postexit Diffusion ofKnowledge Created by Innovative Companies,” Academy of Management Journal,Vol. 50, No. 2, 446-467.
    連結：
66. Holgersson, M. and Granstrand, O., 2017, “Patenting Motives, Technology Strategies, andOpen Innovation,” Management Decision, Vol. 55, No. 6, 1265-1284.
    連結：
67. Hsiao, C., 2007, “Panel Data Analysis-Advantages and Challenges,” Test, Vol. 16, No. 1,1-22.
    連結：
68. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., and Gawer, A., 2018, “Towards a Theory of Ecosystems,”Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 8, 2255-2276.
    連結：
69. Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T., and Augier, M., 2006, “Benefiting from Innovation: ValueCreation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures,” Research Policy,Vol. 35, No. 8, 1200-1221.
    連結：
70. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R., 1993, “Geographic Localization ofKnowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,” The Quarterly Journal ofEconomics, Vol. 108, No. 3, 577-598.
    連結：
71. James, S. D., Leiblein, M. J., and Lu, S., 2013, “How Firms Capture Value from TheirInnovations,” Journal of Management, Vol. 39, No. 5, 1123-1155.
    連結：
72. Kang, B. and Bekkers, R., 2013, “Just-in-Time Inventions and the Development of Standards: How Firms Use Opportunistic Strategies to Obtain Standard-Essential Patents (SEPs).”,2013 8th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation inInformation Technology (SIIT), Sophia-Antipolis, France.
    連結：
73. Kang, B. and Motohashi, K., 2015, “Essential Intellectual Property Rights and Inventors’Involvement in Standardization,” Research Policy, Vol. 44, No. 2, 483-492.
    連結：
74. Kapoor, R. and Lee, J. M., 2013, “Coordinating and Competing in Ecosystems: HowOrganizational Forms Shape New Technology Investments,” Strategic ManagementJournal, Vol. 34, No. 3, 274-296.
    連結：
75. Katila, R. and Ahuja, G., 2002, “Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study ofSearch Behavior and New Product Introduction,” Academy of Management Journal,Vol. 45, No. 6, 1183-1194.
    連結：
76. Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C., 1986, “Technology Adoption in the Presence of NetworkExternalities,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 4, 822-841.
    連結：
77. Kim, C., Song, J., and Nerkar, A., 2012, “Learning and Innovation: Exploitation andExploration Trade-offs,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 65, No. 8, 1189-1194.
    連結：
78. Lakhani, K. and Von Hippel, E., 2003, “How Open Source Software Works,” ResearchPolicy, Vol. 32, No. 6, 923-943.
    連結：
79. Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., and Pathak, S., 2006, “The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: ACritical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct,” Academy of Management Review,Vol. 31, No. 4, 833-863.
    連結：
80. Lavie, D., Stettner, U., and Tushman, M. L., 2010, “Exploration and Exploitation Within andAcross Organizations,” Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 4, No. 1, 109-155.
    連結：
81. Layne-Farrar, A., 2011, “Innovative or Indefensible? An Empirical Assessment of Patentingwithin Standard Setting,” International Journal of IT Standards andStandardization Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1-18.
    連結：
82. Leiponen, A. E., 2008, “Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of StandardSetting in Wireless Telecommunications,” Management Science, Vol. 54, No. 11,1904-1919.
    連結：
83. Lemley, M. A., 2002, “Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations,”Calif. L. Rev., Vol. 90, 1889.
    連結：
84. Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G., 1993, “The Myopia of Learning,” Strategic ManagementJournal, Vol. 14, No. S2 , 95-112.
    連結：
85. Lichtenthaler, U. and Lichtenthaler, E., 2009, “A Capability‐Based Framework for OpenInnovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity,” Journal of Management Studies,Vol. 46, No. 8, 1315-1338.
    連結：
86. March, J. G., 1991, “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” OrganizationScience, Vol. 2, 71-87.
    連結：
87. Martin, D. L. and Meyer, C. D., 2006, “Patent Counting, a Misleading Index of Patent Value:A Critique of Goodman and Myers and Its Uses,” Available at SSRN 949439,http://ssrn.com/abstract=949439, accessed on December 4, 2006.
    連結：
88. Mortara, L. and Minshall, T., 2011, “How do Large Multinational Companies ImplementOpen Innovation?” Technovation, Vol. 31, No. 10-11, 586-597.
    連結：
89. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., and Silverman, B. S., 1996, “Strategic Alliances and InterfirmKnowledge Transfer,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. S2, 77-91.
    連結：
90. Nagle, F., 2018, “Learning by Contributing: Gaining Competitive Advantage ThroughContribution to Crowdsourced Public Goods,” Organization Science, Vol. 29, No. 4,569-587.
    連結：
91. Nohria, N. and Gulati, R., 1996, “Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation?” Academy ofManagement Journal, Vol. 39, No. 5, 1245-1264.
    連結：
92. Pacheco‐de‐Almeida, G. and Zemsky, P. B., 2012, “Some Like It Free: Innovators' StrategicUse of Disclosure to Slow Down Competition,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.33, No. 7, 773-793.
    連結：
93. Partha, D. and David, P., 1994, “Toward a New Economics of Science,” Research Policy,Vol. 23, No. 5, 487-521.
    連結：
94. Petersen, T. and Koput, K. W., 1991, “Density Dependence in Organizational Mortality:Legitimacy or Unobserved Heterogeneity?” American Sociological Review, Vol. 56,No. 3, 399-409.
    連結：
95. Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., and Kock, S., 2014, “The Coopetition Paradox and Tension inCoopetition at Multiple Levels,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 43, No. 2,189-198.
    連結：
96. Romer, P. M., 1986, “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of PoliticalEconomy, Vol. 94, No. 5, 1002-1037.
    連結：
97. Rosenkopf, L. and Nerkar, A., 2001, “Beyond Local Search: Boundary ‐ Spanning,Exploration, and Impact in the Optical Disk Industry,” Strategic Management Journal,Vol. 22, No. 4, 287-306.
    連結：
98. Rysman, M. and Simcoe, T., 2008, “Patents and the Performance of VoluntaryStandard-Setting Organizations,” Management Science, Vol. 54, No. 11, 1920-1934.
    連結：
99. Sanchez, R., 1995, “Strategic Flexibility in Product Competition,” Strategic ManagementJournal, Vol. 16, No. S1, 135-159.
    連結：
100. Schilling, M. A., 2000, “Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application toInterfirm Product Modularity,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 2,312-334.
     連結：
101. Schilling, M. A., 2002, “Technology Success and Failure in Winner-Take-All Markets: TheImpact of Learning Orientation, Timing, and Network Externalities,” Academy ofManagement Journal, Vol. 45, No. 2, 387-398.
     連結：
102. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H. R., 1999, “The Art of Standards Wars,” California ManagementReview, Vol. 41, No. 2, 8-32.
     連結：
103. Smith, W. K. and Tushman, M., 2005, “Managing Strategic Contradictions: A TopManagement Model for Managing Innovation Streams,” Organization Science, Vol. 16,No. 5, 522-536.
     連結：
104. Somaya, D., 2003, “Strategic Determinants of Decisions Not to Settle Patent Litigation,”Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 17-38.
     連結：
105. Somaya, D., 2012, “Patent Strategy and Management: An Integrative Review and ResearchAgenda,” Journal of Management, Vol. 38, No. 4, 1084-1114.
     連結：
106. Sørensen, J. B. and Stuart, T. E., 2000, “Aging, Obsolescence, and OrganizationalInnovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 1, 81-112.
     連結：
107. Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J. W., and Fleming, L., 2006, “Complexity, Networks and KnowledgeFlow,” Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 7, 994-1017.
     連結：
108. Spencer, J. W., 2003, “Firms’ Knowledge-Sharing Strategies in the Global Innovationsystem:Empirical Evidence from the Flat Panel Display Industry,” Strategic ManagementJournal, Vol. 24, No. 3, 217–233.
     連結：
109. Teece, D. J., 1986, “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration,Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy,” Research Policy, Vol. 15, No. 6, 285-305.
     連結：
110. Teece, D. J., 2006, “Reflections on Profiting from Innovation,” Research Policy, Vol. 35, No.8, 1131-1146.
     連結：
111. Teece, D. J., 2018, “Profiting from Innovation in the Digital Economy: EnablingTechnologies, Standards, and Licensing Models in the Wireless World,” ResearchPolicy, Vol. 47, No. 8, 1367-1387.
     連結：
112. Toh, P. K. and Miller, C. D., 2017, “Pawn to Save a Chariot, or Drawbridge into the Fort?Firms’ Disclosure During Standard Setting and Complementary Technologies withinEcosystems,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 11, 2213-2236.
     連結：
113. Tsai, W., 2001, “Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of NetworkPosition and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance,”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 5, 996-1004.
     連結：
114. Tushman, M. L. and O’Reilly, C., 1996, “The Ambidextrous Organization: ManagingEvolutionary and Revolutionary Change,” California Management Review, Vol. 38,No. 4, 8-30.
     連結：
115. Von Burg, U. and Kenney, M., 2000, “Venture Capital and the Birth of the Local AreaNetworking Industry,” Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 9, 1135-1155.
     連結：
116. Wadhwa, A., Bodas Freitas, I. M., and Sarkar, M., 2017, “The Paradox of Openness andValue Protection Strategies: Effect of Extramural R&D on Innovative Performance,”Organization Science, Vol. 28, No. 5, 873-893.
     連結：
117. Wei, Z., Yi, Y., and Guo, H., 2014, “Organizational Learning Ambidexterity, StrategicFlexibility, and New Product Development,” Journal of Product InnovationManagement, Vol. 31, No. 4, 832-847.
     連結：
118. West, J., 2003, “How Open Is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source PlatformStrategies,” Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 7, 1259-1285.
     連結：
119. West, J. and Bogers, M., 2014, “Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review ofResearch on Open Innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 31,No. 4, 814-831.
     連結：
120. West, J. and Gallagher, S., 2006, “Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of FirmInvestment in Open‐Source Software,” R&D Management, Vol. 36, No. 3, 319-331.
     連結：
121. Yalcinkaya, G., Calantone, R. J., and Griffith, D. A., 2007, “An Examination of Explorationand Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and ,MarketPerformance,” Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 4, 63-93.
     連結：
122. Yang, H., Phelps, C., and Steensma, H. K., 2010, “Learning from What Others Have Learnedfrom You: The Effects of Knowledge Spillovers on Originating Firms,” Academy ofManagement Journal, Vol. 53, No. 2, 371-389.
     連結：
123. Yang, H. and Steensma, H. K., 2014, “When do Firms Rely on Their Knowledge SpilloverRecipients for Guidance in Exploring Unfamiliar Knowledge?” Research Policy, Vol.43, No. 9, 1496-1507.
     連結：
124. Yayavaram, S. and Ahuja, G., 2008, “Decomposability in Knowledge Structures and ItsImpact on the Usefulness of Inventions and Knowledge-Base Malleability,”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 2, 333-362.
     連結：
125. Zahra, S. A. and George, G., 2002, “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization andExtension,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 185-203.
     連結：
126. Zobel, A.-K., Balsmeier, B., and Chesbrough, H., 2016, “Does Patenting Help or HinderOpen Innovation? Evidence from New Entrants in the Solar Industry,” Industrial andCorporate Change, Vol. 25, No. 2, 307-331.
     連結：
127. 3GPP, 2017, “3rd Generation Partnership Project, Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects, Technical Specification Group working methods,” Technical Report 21.900 v14.0.0, Release 14.
128. Bekkers, R., 2001, Mobile Telecommunications Standards: Gsm, Umts, Tetra, and Ermes, 1st, Boston: Artech House.
129. Davies, A., 1999, “Innovation and Competitiveness in Complex Product Systems: The Caseof Mobile Phone Systems” in Mitter, S. and Bastos, M. I. (eds.), Europe andDeveloping Countries in the Globalised Information Economy: Employment andDistance Education, 3rd edition, London, CA: Routledge, 107-125.
130. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G., 1986, “Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, ProductPreannouncements, and Predation,” The American Economic Review, 940-955.
131. Gassmann, O. and Bader, M., 2006, “Intellectual Property Management in Inter-Firm R&DCollaborations,” Taiwan Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, 217-236.
132. Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E., 2004, “Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three. CoreProcess Archetypes.”, R&D Management Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
133. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M., 2001, “The NBER Patent Citation Data File:Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools,” https://www.nber.org/papers/w8498.pdf,accessed on October 18, 2001.
134. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M., 2005, “Market Value and Patent Citations,” TheRAND Journal of Economics, 16-38.
135. Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R. I., 2000, “Building an Innovation Factory,” Harvard BusinessReview, Vol. 78, No. 3, 157-157.
136. Henkel, J., 2004, “Open Source Software from Commercial Firms–Tools, Complements, andCollective Invention,” Zeitschrift Für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 4, 1-23.
137. Hsiao, C., 1986, Analysis of Panel Data, 1st, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
138. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Fogarty, M., 2002, “The Meaning of Patent Citations :Report on the NBER Case-Western Reserve Survey of Patentees” in Jaffe, A. B. andTrajtenberg, M. (eds.), Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on theKnowledge Economy, 1st edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 379-401.
139. Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C., 1985, “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility,”American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, 424-440.
140. Marshall, A., 1920, Principles of Economics, 8th, London: Macmillan.
141. Mock, D., 2005, The Qualcomm Equation: How a Fledgling Telecom Company. Forged aNew Path to Big Profits and Market Dominance, 1st, New York: Amacom.
142. Raspe, O. and Van Oort, F., 2008, “Firm Growth and Localized Knowledge Externalities,”Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Vol. 38, No. 2, 100-116.
143. Raymond, E. S., 1999, The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and OpenSource by an Accidental Revolutionary, 8th, Sebastopol: Oreilly
144. Simcoe, T., 2006, “Open Standards and Intellectual Property Rights” in Chesbrough, H. W.,Vanhaverbeke, W., and West, J. (eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a NewParadigm, 1st edition, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 161-183.
145. Trajtenberg, M., 1990, Economic Analysis of Product Innovation: The Case of CTScanners, 1st, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
146. Vanhaverbeke, W., 2006, “The Interorganizational Context of Open Innovation” inChesbrough, H. W., Vanhaverbeke, W., and West, J. (eds.), Open Innovation:Researching a New Paradigm, 1st edition, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press,205-219.
147. Von Burg, U., 2001, The Triumph of Ethernet: Technological Communities and theBattle for the LAN Standard, 1st, Redwood: Stanford University Press.