题名 |
《隆平集》釋疑 |
并列篇名 |
Analysis of "Longping Collected Works" |
DOI |
10.29439/FJHJ.201203.0002 |
作者 |
王瑞來(Rui-Lai Wang) |
关键词 |
曾鞏 ; 隆平集 ; 晁公武 ; 余嘉錫 ; 宋代 ; Zenggong ; Longping Collected works ; Chagongwu ; Yujiaxi ; Song Dynasty |
期刊名称 |
輔仁歷史學報 |
卷期/出版年月 |
28期(2012 / 03 / 01) |
页次 |
35 - 70 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
中文摘要 |
《隆平集》是否為曾鞏所作,自宋人提出質疑後,遂成聚訟。本文在先輩學者余嘉錫先生的研究基礎上,運用校勘學方法,對偽托說從根柢上加以解構。對於此書的性質,本文則透過大量內證,指出此書分類立傳實出曾鞏之手,具體內容則主要是國史資料的簡單匯集,曾鞏幾乎未遑過多加筆。惟其如此,此書保存了北宋史料難得之原生態。本文還通過與《宋史》、《東都事略》相比勘,具體揭櫫了此書的研究價值。並通過回溯刊刻源流,完成了對史書《隆平集》的基礎研究。 |
英文摘要 |
The book ”Longping Collected works” has been in dispute Since the Scholar of Song Dynasty questioned that whether its author is Zenggong. Based on the study of advanced scholar Yujiaxi, while According to textual criticism method, I proved the truth in this paper. However, this paper also has a unique insights of the nature of the book. Through deliberating on a large number of internal evidence, I Put forward that the classification of biography was done by Zenggong. However specific content is mainly history data in simple pooling that Zenggong almost add nothing to. therefore the documents of Northern Song Dynasty is well preserved. Compared the book with the survey of ”History of the Song” and ”Things of East Capital” I specifically Illustrate the research value of this book. In addition, I have complete the basic research of ”Longping Collected works” through original versions. |
主题分类 |
人文學 >
歷史學 |
参考文献 |
|