题名

持續與變遷-政治資訊對大學生政治信任感影響之定群追蹤研究

并列篇名

Continuity and Change: A Panel Study of the Influence of Political Information on College Students' Political Trust

DOI

10.6229/CPSR.2010.50.04

作者

劉嘉薇(Jia-Wei Liu);黃紀(Chi Huang)

关键词

定群追蹤研究 ; 政治支持 ; 政黨認同 ; 傳播媒介 ; mass media ; panel study ; party identification ; political support

期刊名称

政治學報

卷期/出版年月

50期(2010 / 12 / 01)

页次

111 - 146

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

政治信任感攸關人民對於權威當局的政治支持,而大學生為社會未來之中堅份子,其政治信任感如何受到大眾傳播媒介的影響,實值得關注。本文以定群追蹤資料,從媒介政治資訊的角度,討論政治信任感的持續與變遷。研究發現,大學生的政治信任感在四波調查研究之間約有四成維持穩定,另外約有六成則不斷變動。至於影響的因素,本文發現大學生對媒介公正性評估愈高,政治信任感則會隨之提升,符合「良性循環論」。再者,當大學生為泛綠認同者,暴露程度高且認為媒介公正時,其政治信任感比起暴露程度低者更低,符合「媒介抑鬱論」。

英文摘要

Political trust among the general public determines citizens' support to the political system. College students are the future elites of the society and therefore how their sense of political trust is shaped by the mass media deserves close examination. This article analyzes the continuity and change of college students' political trust in Taiwan from the viewpoint of political communication of mass media based on a four-wave panel study. We find that from year to year about 40% of our respondents remain stab le in their political trust while about 60% of them change all the time. Two determinants are most significant. One is the subjective evaluation of the fairness of the mass media report, i.e., the more they feel media coverage is fair, the stronger sense of political trust they have. This finding fits the ”virtuous circle theory.” The other key factor is party identification, i.e., the pan-green identifiers who expose more to the media or believe that the media coverage is fair tend to have lower political trust than those low exposure. This finding fits the ”media malaise theory.”

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 王鼎銘(2004)。日本自民黨之選票穩定度研究:1993、1996及2000年眾議院選舉之定群追蹤分析。選舉研究,11(2),81-109。
    連結:
  2. 洪雅慧(2009)。北、高網路選民大不同?—媒介使用、媒人重要性評估與政治犬儒主義、投票行爲之關連性研究。東吳政治學報,27(2),1-45。
    連結:
  3. 張卿卿(2002)。大學生的政治媒介認知、政治媒介行爲與其政治效能與政治參與之間的關係。選舉研究,9(2),37-62。
    連結:
  4. 盛治仁(2003)。台灣民眾民主價值及政治信任感研究—政黨輪替前後的比較。選舉研究,10(1),115-169。
    連結:
  5. 陳陸輝(2002)。政治信任感與台灣地區選民投票行爲。選舉研究,9(2),65-84。
    連結:
  6. 陳陸輝(2003)。政治信任感、施政表現與民眾對台灣民主的展望。台灣政治學刊,7(2),1-40。
    連結:
  7. 陳陸輝(2006)。政治信任感的政治後果—以2004年立法選舉爲例。台灣民主季刊,3(2),39-62。
    連結:
  8. 陳憶寧、羅文輝(2006)。媒介使用與政治資本。新聞學研究,88,83-134。
    連結:
  9. 彭芸(2000)。2000年總統大選的媒介使用、選舉參與及投票對象。選舉研究,7(1),21-52。
    連結:
  10. 黃紀(2005)。投票穩定與變遷之分析方法:定群類別資料之馬可夫鍊模型。選舉研究,12(1),1-35。
    連結:
  11. 黃紀、王鼎銘、郭銘峰(2005)。日本眾議院1993及1996年選舉自民黨之選票流動分析。人文及社會科集刊,17(4),853-883。
    連結:
  12. 劉嘉薇(2006)。大眾傳播媒介與大學生政治信任感關聯性之研究。東亞研究,37(1),162-196。
    連結:
  13. Agresti, A.(2002).Categorical Data Analysis.New York:Wiley.
  14. Ansolabehere, S.,Iyengar, S.(1995).Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate.New York:Free Press.
  15. Cappella, J. N.,Jamieson, K. H.(1997).Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good.New York:Oxford University Press.
  16. Citrin, J.(1974).Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government.American Political Science Review,68(3),973-988.
  17. Cleveland, H.(ed.),Lasswell, H. D.(ed.)(1962).Ethics and Bigness: Scientific, Academic, Religious, Political and Military.New York:Harper and Brothers.
  18. Dale, A.(ed.),Davies, R. B.(ed.)(1994).Analyzing Social and Political Change: A Casebook of Methods.London:Sage.
  19. Dennis, E. E.(2002).Media Debates: Great Issues for the Digital Age.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
  20. Dunleavy, P.,O'' Leary, B.(1987).Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy.Basingstoke, UK:Macmillan Education.
  21. Easton, D.(1965).A Systems Analysts of Political Life.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  22. Easton, D.,Dennis, J.(1969).Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  23. Fallows, J.(1996).Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy.New York:Pantheon Books.
  24. Fiss, O. M.(1996).The Irony of Free Speech.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  25. Gamson, W. A.(1968).Power and Discontent.Homewood, IL:The Dorsey Press.
  26. Garment, S.(1991).Scandal: The Crisis of Mistrust in American Politics.New York:Times Books.
  27. Goodin, R. E.(ed.),Klingemann, Hans-Dieter(ed.)(1996).A New Handbook of Political Science.New York:Oxford University Press.
  28. Gross, K.,Aday, S.,Brewer, P. R.(2004).A Panel Study of Media Effects on Political and Social Trust after September 11, 2001.Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics,9(4),49-73.
  29. Gunther, R.(2005).Comparative Analysis of the Political Impact of Values and Changes of Information Intermediation: Initial Findings and Future Research.International Conference on Taiwan's Election and Democratization Study 2005: Cross-national Survey Studies,Taipei:
  30. Hagemann, C.,Gras, A.(2006).Political Support and Media Use.International Communication Association, 2006 Annual Meeting,Dresden, Germany:
  31. Hagenaars, J. A.(ed.),McCurcheon, A. L.(ed.)(2002).Applied Latent Class Analysis.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  32. Halaby, C. N.(2004).Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice.Annual Review of Sociology,30,507-544.
  33. Hetherington, M. J.(2005).Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  34. Hovland, C. I.,Weiss, W.(1951).The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness.Public Opinion Quarterly,15(4),635-650.
  35. Iyengar, S.,Kinder, D. R.(1987).News that Matters.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  36. Jennings, M. K.,Niemi, R. G.(1974).The Political Character of Adolescence: The Influence of Families and Schools.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  37. Jennings, M. K.,Niemi, R. G.(1981).Generations and Politics, A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  38. Jones, D. A.(2002).The Polarizing Effect of New Media Messages.International Journal of Public Opinion Research,14(2),158-174.
  39. Jones, D. A.(2004).Why American Don't Trust the Media: A Preliminary Analysis.The International Journal of Press/Politics,9(2),60-75.
  40. Keith, B. E.(1992).The Myth of the Independent Voter.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  41. Kuklinski, J. H.(ed.)(2002).Thinking about Political Psychology.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  42. Langeheine, R.,van de Pol, F.(1989).A Unifying Framework for Markov Modeling in Discrete Space and Discrete Time.Sociological Methods and Research,18(4),416-441.
  43. Lewis-Beck, M. S.(ed.),Bryman, A.(ed.),Liao, T. F.(ed.)(2004).The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  44. Miller, A. H.,Goldenberg, F.,Erbring, L.(1979).Type-set Politics: Impact of Newspapers on Public Confidence.American Political Science Review,73(1),67-84.
  45. Moy, P.,Pfau, M.(2000).With Malice toward All?: The Media and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions.Westport, CT:Praeger.
  46. Muller, E. N.,Jukam, T. O.(1977).On the Meaning of Political Support.American Political Science Review,71(4),1561-1595.
  47. Neuhaus, J. M.,Kalbfleisch, J. D.(1998).Between-and Within-Cluster Covariate Effects in the Analysis of Clustered Data.Biometrics,54(2),638-645.
  48. Neuman, W. R.,Just, M. R.,Crigler, A. N.(1992).Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  49. Newton, K.(1999).Mass Media Effects: Mobilization or Media Malaise?.British Journal of Political Science,29(4),577-599.
  50. Norris, P.(2000).The Virtuous Circle.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  51. Paletz, D. L.(1999).The Media in American Politics: Contents and Consequences.New York:Longman.
  52. Patterson, T. E.(1993).Out of Order.New York:Alfred A. Knopf.
  53. Pharr, S. J.(ed.),Putnam, R. D.(ed.)(2000).Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries?.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  54. Pinkleton, B. E.,Austin, E. W.,Fortman, K. K. J.(1998).Relationships of Media Use and Political Disaffection to Political Efficacy and Voting Behavior.Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,42(1),34-49.
  55. Popkin, S. L.(1991).The Reasoning Voter.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  56. Putnam, R. D.(2000).Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York:Simon & Schuster.
  57. Rabe-Hesketh, S.,Skrondal, A.(2008).Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata.College Station, TX:Stata Press.
  58. Rahn, W. M.,Rudolph, T. J.(2005).A Tale of Political Trust in American Cities.Public Opinion Quarterly,69(4),530-560.
  59. Robinson, M. J.(1976).Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of 'The Selling of the Pentagon'.American Political Science Review,70(2),409-432.
  60. Sabato, L.(1991).Feeding Frenzy: How Attack Journalism has Transformed American Politics.New York:Free Press.
  61. Sada, M. S. A.(1998).Party Identification and Political Attitudes in an Emerging Democracy: A Summary.American Journal of Political Science,42(2),712-715.
  62. Sears, D. O.,Funk, C.(1999).Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults' Political Predispositions.Journal of Politics,61(1),1-28.
  63. Singer, J. D.,Willett, J. B.(2003).Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence.Oxford, NY:Oxford University Press.
  64. Torney-Purta, J.,Barber, C. H.,Richardson, W. K.(2004).Trust in Government-related Institutions and Political Engagement among Adolescents in Six Countries.Acta Politica,39,380-406.
  65. Warren, M. E.(ed.)(1999).Democracy and Trust.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  66. Whitehead, J. L.(1968).Factors of Source Credibility.Quarterly Journal of Speech,54(1),59-63.
  67. Yanovitzky, I.,Cappella, J. N.(2001).Effect of Call-in Political Talk Radio Shows on Their Audiences: Evidence from a Multi-wave Panel Analysis.International Journal of Public Opinion Research,13(4),377-397.
  68. 徐火炎(1995)。「李登輝情結」與省市長選舉的投票行爲:一項政治心理學的分析。選舉研究,2(2),1-36。
  69. 陳文俊編(1996)。台灣的民主化:回顧、檢討、展望。高雄:中山大學。
  70. 陳義彥(2001)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,台北:政治大學選舉研究中心。
  71. 陳義彥、陳陸輝(2006)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,台北:政治大學選舉研究中心。
  72. 陳義彥、陳陸輝(2005)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,台北:政治大學選舉研究中心。
  73. 陳義彥、陳陸輝(2004)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,台北:政治大學選舉研究中心。
  74. 彭芸(2004)。我國大學生的媒介使用、社會資本與政治信任感對象之關連性研究。新聞學研究,79,91-133。
  75. 羅文輝(2002)。媒介依賴與媒介使用對選舉新聞可信度的影響:五種媒介的比較。新聞學研究,74,19-44。
被引用次数
  1. 陳陸輝、陳映男(2016)。政治情緒對兩岸經貿交流的影響:以臺灣的大學生為例。選舉研究,23(2),55-86。
  2. 陳雅玫(2016)。學生臉書使用與政治參與:以太陽花學運為例。中國行政評論,22(4),61-91。
  3. 邱師儀(2017)。公民教育的知識效果:一項定群追蹤的探索性研究。人文及社會科學集刊,29(1),127-171。
  4. 余一鳴(2019)。隔離還是聚合?民主轉型過程中軍人政治態度持續與變遷。文官制度季刊,11(1),73-107。
  5. (2021)。互聯網使用對政府信任的影響-基於CGSS2010數據的研究。傳播與社會學刊,55,57-91。