批判國際政治經濟學的發展、途徑與啟示

The Development, Approaches and Inspiration of Critical International Political Economy

10.6229/CPSR.2013.55.02

曾怡仁(Yi-Ren Dzeng)；李政鴻(Cheng-Hung Lee)

不列顛學派 ； 批判國際政治經濟學 ； 美國學派 ； 國際政治經濟學 ； American School ； British School ； Critical International Political Economy ； International Political Economy

政治學報

55期（2013 / 06 / 01）

27 - 51

繁體中文

現代國際政治經濟學（International Political Economy, IPE）是試圖在國際層次上進行國家、市場與社會互動關係之整合研究。美國學者吉爾平（Robert Gilpin）最早針對IPE提出經濟民族主義、自由主義與馬克思主義等三個不同的意識形態觀點，近年來的IPE研究則趨向多元發展，包括學科定位、研究議題與方法論等面向。特別是，IPE美國學派（American School）和不列顛學派（British School）之間的爭辯，進一步展現了IPE研究的獨特性與學術社群的成熟化。批判國際政治經濟學（Critical International Political Economy, Critical IPE）是不列顛學派的核心，也是對主流美國學派的反思，然而學者對其解釋並不一致。本文從IPE跨大西洋分歧當中耙梳Critical IPE的發展進程，探討學者如何界定「批判性」（critical）一詞，以及Critical IPE主要研究途徑（女性主義、環境主義、建構主義和新葛蘭西主義）的特色，並探求這些研究途徑的共性關聯。最後，本文總結Critical IPE對於整體IPE發展的貢獻與啟示，希冀有助於國內讀者理解IPE這門學科的新發展。

The subfield of International Political Economy (IPE) tries to integrate political, societal and economic aspects into studying international economic issues. Robert Gilpin was the first scholar to pay much attention to IPE research, who identified three major ideologies in IPE: Liberalism, Economic Nationalism and Marxism. The recent debates between the American School and the British School of IPE mean that an increasing number of issues, approaches and methodologies have been adopted by academic community. In other words, the IPE has become a well-developed discipline, with its own independent characteristics distinct from IR. Critical International Political Economy is the central part of British School which undertakes critical perspective to defy mainstream IPE. However, scholars have not had a general consensus about ”what is Critical IPE?” yet. The first purpose of this article is to clarify the academic context of IPE from which Critical IPE is derived. Secondly, this article tries to summarize the statements of the term ”critical” by scholars; furthermore, we will discuss those meanings on theory and practice of IPE. Third, this article intends to examine four critical approaches of Feminism, Environmentalism, Constructivism and Neo-Gramscianism and find some commonalities among them. Finally, we would conclude how the Critical IPE has inspired and contributed to the study of IPE. Hopefully, this article could help readers to further understand the recent developments of IPE.

1. 左正東(2011)。國際政治經濟學的典範問題與經濟民族主義的再檢視。國際關係學報，32，51-90。
   連結：
2. 黃瑞祺、黃之棟(2007)。環境正義理論的問題點。臺灣民主季刊，4(2)，113-140。
   連結：
3. Alderson, K.,Hurrell, A.(2000).Hedley Bull on International Society.London:Macmillan Press.
4. Bakker, I.,Gill, S.(2003).Power, Production and Social Reproduction: Human in/ Security in Global Political Economy.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Balaam, D. N.,Veseth, M.(2008).Introduction to International Political Economy.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall.
6. Baylis, J.,Smith, S.(1997).The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations.New York:Oxford University Press.
7. Belfrage, C.,Worth, O.(2012).Critical International Political Economy: Renewing Critique and Ontologies.International Politics,49(2),131-135.
8. Blyth, M.(2002).Great Transformation: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century.Cambridge, NY:Cambridge University Press.
9. Braun, B.(2010).On the Politics of Economics: New Keynesian Governability and the Practice of Inflation Targeting.7th Pan-European Conference on IR: 'Politics in Hard Times',Stockholm, Sweden:
10. Clapp, J.,Dauvergne, P.(2005).Paths to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
11. Cohen, B. J.(2008).International Political Economy: An Intellectual History.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
12. Cohn, T. H.(2009).Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice.New York:Longman.
13. Cox, R. W.(1981).Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.Millennium: Journal of International Studies,10(2),126-155.
14. Cox, R. W.(1987).Production, Power, and World Orders: Social Forces in the Making of History.New York:Columbia University Press.
15. Dunn, B.(2009).Global Political Economy: A Marxist Critique.London:Pluto Press.
16. Folbre, N.(1994).Who Pays for the Kids?: Gender and the Structures of Constraint.New York:Routledge.
17. Germain, R. D.(2007).Critical' Political Economy, Historical Materialism and Adam Morton.Politics,27(2),127-131.
18. Gilpin, R.(1987).The Political Economy of International Relations.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
19. Gilpin, R.(1981).War and Change in World Politics.Cambridge, NY:Cambridge University Press.
20. Griffin, P.(2007).Refashioning IPE: What and How Gender Analysis Teaches International (Global) Political Economy.Review of International Political Economy,14(4),719-736.
21. Held, D.(ed.),Koenig-Archibugi, M.(ed.)(2003).Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
22. Helleiner, E.(2000).Think Globally, Transact Locally: Green Political Economy and the Local Currency Movement.Global Society,14(1),35-51.
23. Helleiner, E.(1996).International Political Economy and the Greens.New Political Economy,1(1),59-77.
24. Jones, R. E.(1981).The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure.Review of International Studies,7(1),1-13.
25. Keohane, R. O.(2009).The Old IPE and the New.Review of International Political Economy,16(1),34-46.
26. Kessler, O.(2012).Sleeping with the Enemy? On Hayek, Constructivist Thought, and the Current Economic Crisis.Review of International Studies,38(2),275-299.
27. Laferrière, E.(2000).International Political Economy and the Environment: A Radical Ecological Perspective.The International Political Economy of the Environment: Critical Perspectives,Boulder, CO:
28. Lake, D. A.(2009).Open Economy Politics: A Critical Review.The Review of International Organizations,4(3),219-244.
29. Leysens, A.(2008).The Critical Theory of Robert W. Cox Fugitive or Guru?.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
30. Locher, B.,Prugl, E.(2001).Feminism and Constructivism: Worlds Apart or Sharing the Middle Ground?.International Studies Quarterly,45,111-129.
31. McNamara, K. R.(1999).The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
32. Miller, R. C.(2008).International Political Economy: Contrasting World Views.London:Routledge.
33. Murphy, C. N.(2009).Do the Left-Out Matter?.New Political Economy,14(3),357-365.
34. Murphy, C. N.(ed.),Tooze, R.(ed.)(1991).The New International Political Economy.Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner.
35. Murphy, C. N.,Nelson, D. R.(2001).International Political Economy: A tale of two heterodoxies.British Journal of Politics and International Relations,3(3),393-412.
36. Murphy, C. N.,Nelson, D. R.(2002).Conclusion: Explaining a Thriving Heterodoxy.Critical Perspectives on International Political Economy,Basingstoke, UK:
37. Murphy, C. N.,Tooze, R.(1991).The New International Political Economy.Boulder, CO:Lynne Rienner.
38. O'Hara, P. A.(ed.)(2001).Encyclopedia of Political Economy.New York:Routledge.
39. Phillips, N.(ed.),Weaver, C.(ed.)(2010).International Political Economy: Debating the Past, Present and Future.London:Routledge.
40. Rai, S. M.(2002).Gender and the Political Economy of Development: From Nationalism to Globalization.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
41. Rogowski, R.(1989).Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
42. Ruggie, J. G.(1998).What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge?.International Organization,52(4),855-885.
43. Ruggie, J. G.(1983).International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.International Regimes,Ithaca, NY:
44. Seabrooke, L.(2006).The Social Sources of Financial Power: Domestic Legitimacy and International Financial Orders.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
45. Seabrooke, L.(2007).The Everyday Social Sources of Economic Crises: From "Great Frustrations" to "Great Revelations" in Interwar Britain.International Studies Quarterly,51(4),791-810.
46. Seabrooke, L.(2007).Varieties of Economic Constructivism in Political Economy: Uncertain Times Call for Disparate Measures Measures.Review of International Political Economy,14(2),371-385.
47. Steans, J.(2006).Gender and International Relations: Issues, Debates and Future Directions.Malden, MA:Polity Press.
48. Strange, S.(1988).States and Markets: An Introduction to the International Political Economy.London:Pinter.
49. Suganami, H.(2010).The English School in a Nutshell.Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies,9,15-28.
50. Suganami, H.(2003).British Institutionalists, or the English School, 20 Years On.International Relations,17(3),253-272.
51. Underhill, G. R. D.(2000).States, Market, and Global Political Economy: Genealogy of an (Inter-?) Discipline.International Affairs,76(4),805-824.
52. Wallerstein, I.(1974).The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century.New York:Academic Press.
53. Watson, M.(2005).Foundations of International Political Economy.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
54. Waylen, G.(2006).You Still Don't Understand: Why Troubled Engagements Continue Between Feminists and (Critical)IPE.Review of International Studies,32(1),145-164.
55. Whitworth, S.(1997).Feminism and International Relations: Towards a Political Economy of Gender in Interstate and Non-Governmnental Institutions.London:Macmillan Press.
56. Widmaier, W.(2003).The Keynesian Bases of a Constructivist Theory of the International Political Economy.Millennium: Journal of International Studies,32(1),87-107.
57. Widmaire, W. W.,Blyth, M.,Seabrooke, L.(2007).Exogenous Shocks or Endogenous Constructions? The Meanings of Wars and Crises.International Studies Quarterly,51(4),747-759.
58. Worth, O.(2011).Where Did the Critical Go?.Journal of International Relations and Development,14(3),358-365.
59. Youngs, G.(2004).Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender are Essential to Understanding the World 'We' Live in.International Affairs,80(1),75-87.
60. 王勇(2011)。國際政治經濟學美英學派的論戰─學術分野、國家地位與中國議題。國際政治研究，2011(1)，137-152。
61. 白雲真(2010)。國際政治經濟學中的跨大西洋分歧。世界經濟與政治，2010(4)，139-154。
62. 吉密(2007)。全球化背景下的國際政治經濟學─分析基礎與研究綱領的擴展。世界經濟與政治，2007(2)，67-73。
63. 宋國友(2011)。基於中國的國際政治經濟學研究。世界經濟與政治，2011(1)，59-76。
64. 李建新(2011)。激進國際政治經濟學。上海:上海人民出版社。
65. 李英桃(2006)。女性主義國際關係學。浙江:浙江人民出版社。
66. 李巍(2012)。IPE在中國的發展與現狀評估。國際政治科學，2012(1)，138-175。
67. 曾怡仁、李政鴻(2013)。女性主義國際政治經學的發展與挑戰。世界經濟與政治，389，93-115。
68. 黃光國(2001)。社會科學的理路。臺北:心理。
69. 楊道昀(2009)。Thinking Outside the Orthodoxy─建構一個真正全球性的國際政治經濟學。政治科學季評，21，1-17。
70. 鐘飛騰、門洪華(2010)。中國國際政治經濟學學科的發展歷程。教學與研究，2010(6)，85-93。

1. 邱明斌,林宬葦(2023)。國際政治經濟學研究現況與未來展望。問題與研究，62(1)，85-128。