题名

國際關係歷史社會學的理論:發展與批判

并列篇名

The International Relations Historical Sociology Theory: The Development and Critique

DOI

10.6229/CPSR.201912_(68).0003

作者

郭雪真(Hsueh-Chen Kuo)

关键词

全球化理論 ; 全球社會分殊化 ; 全球轉型 ; 國際關係歷史社會學 ; Differentiation of Global Society ; Global Transformation ; Globalization Theory ; Historical Sociology in International Relations

期刊名称

政治學報

卷期/出版年月

68期(2019 / 12 / 01)

页次

75 - 108

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

國際關係學者質疑為什麼沒有一致的全球化理論,國際關係理論又要如何因應全球轉型呢?以國際關係歷史社會學而言,其內部的全球化理論爭論主要呈現在Martin Shaw、Justin Rosenberg及Mathias Albert等人的著作,以及其引發其他學者的批評及回應,尤其是Rosenberg在2005年對於全球化理論研究的嚴苛批評引發了廣泛的回應。Shaw以全球社會理論、Albert和Barry Buzan以全球社會(分殊化)理論充實全球化理論,Albert以社會學者Niklas Luhmann的現代系統理論或功能分殊化概念發展全球社會理論,也受到其他學者的批評。Buzan及George Lawson則以全球社會理論或全球轉型理論,發展其全球化理論。相較於其他的國際關係理論,國際關係歷史社會學提出了較一致的全球化理論。

英文摘要

International Relations scholars have questioned "Why don't we have coherent theories of international relations about globalization?" and how do international relations theories to copy with global transformations? For historical sociology in international relations (HSIR), there are different perspectives about globalization theory. The globalization debates within HSIR present mainly in the works of Martin Shaw, Justin Rosenberg, and Mathias Albert, and the critics and responses of other scholars. In 2005, Rosenberg's rigorous critics on the research of globalization theory that leads to widespread responses for some years. Shaw, Albert, and Barry Buzan enriched the globalization theory with the theory of global society or the differentiation theory of global society. Albert referenced the sociologist Niklas Luhmann's modern system theory or concept of functional differentiation to develop their globalization theory, other scholars critiques their theory. Meanwhile, Buzan and George Lawson developed globalization theory with world (global) society theory or global transformation theory. Compare with other international relations theory, HSIR provide more coherent globalization theory.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 余家哲,李政鴻(2009)。歷史社會學與國際關係理論的交會:歷史社會學的國家理論。政治科學論叢,40,127-152。
    連結:
  2. 洪朝輝(2000)。全球化—跨世紀的顯學。問題與研究,39(8),73-84。
    連結:
  3. 郭雪真(2015)。評析國際關係歷史社會學理論的「國際系統」觀點。問題與研究,54(2),33-65。
    連結:
  4. 郭雪真(2013)。國際關係歷史社會學理論的發展與評析。問題與研究,52(3),63-96。
    連結:
  5. Albert, M.(2009).Globalization and World Society Theory: A Reply.International Political Sociology,3(1),126-128.
  6. Albert, M.(2004).On the Modern Systems Theory of Society and IR: Contacts and Disjunctures between Different Kinds of Theorizing.Observing International Relations: Niklas Luhmann and World Politics,London, UK:
  7. Albert, M.(2007).'Globalization Theory’: Yesterday’s Fad or More Lively than Ever?.International Political Sociology,1(2),165-182.
  8. Albert, M.,Barry B.,Michael, Z.(2013).Introduction: Differentiation Theory and International Relations.Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory,New York:
  9. Albert, M.,Buzan, B.(2013).International Relations Theory and the ‘Social Whole’: Encounters and Gaps between IR and Sociology.International Political Sociology,7(2),117-135.
  10. Anievas, A.(2008).Theory of the Global State: Globality as an Unfinished Revolution a Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and the State in a Transnational World.Historical Materialism,16(2),190-206.
  11. Anievas, A.(2016).History, Theory, and Contingency in the Study of Modern International Relations: The Global Transformation Revisited.International Theory,8(3),468-480.
  12. Appelbaum, R. P.(2013).Comment on Jan Nederveen Pieterse’s Essay, ‘What Is Global Studies?'.Globalizations,10(4),545-550.
  13. Archer, K.(2013).Searching for the Global in Global Studies.Globalizations,10(4),521-525.
  14. Axford, B.(2013).You Had Me on ‘Global’ and ‘Studies’ Too, I Think.Globalizations,10(6),779-784.
  15. Axford, B.(2007).In at the Death? Reflections on Justin Rosenberg’s ‘Post-Mortem’ on Globalization.Globalizations,4(2),171-191.
  16. Axford, B.(2013).Theories of Globalization.New York:Polity Press.
  17. Barry, B.,Albert, M.(2010).Differentiation: A Sociological Approach to International Relations Theory.European Journal of International Relations,16(3),315-337.
  18. Bartelson, J.(2000).Three Concepts of Globalization.International Sociology,15(2),180-196.
  19. Bartelson, J.(2009).Is There a Global Society?.International Political Sociology,3(2),112-115.
  20. Bhambra, G. K.(2011).Talking among Themselves? Weberian and Marxist Historical Sociologies as Dialogues without ‘Others'.Millennium: Journal of International Studies,39(3),667-681.
  21. Buzan, B.,Albert, M.(2010).Differentiation: A Sociological Approach to International Relations Theory.European Journal of International Relations,16(3),315-337.
  22. Buzan, B.,Lawson, G.(2016).The Impact of the ‘Global Transformation’ on Uneven and Combined Development.Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée,New York:
  23. Buzan, B.,Lawson, G.(2014).Capitalism and the Emergent World Order.International Affairs,90(1),74-85.
  24. Buzan, B.,Lawson, G.(2015).The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  25. Buzan, B.,Lawson, G.(2016).Omissions and Extensions.European Political Science,15(1),124-129.
  26. Buzan, B.,Lawson, G.(2018).Explanation, Geopolitics, and Liberalism: A Reply to Luke Cooper.Journal of Historical Sociology,31(1),e92-e97.
  27. Buzan, B.,Lawson, G.(2016).Author’s Response by Barry Buzan and George Lawson.H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable,8(10),14-15.
  28. Buzan, B.,Lawson, G.(2013).The Global Transformation: The Nineteenth Century and the Making of Modern International Relations.International Studies Quarterly,57(3),620-634.
  29. Buzan, B.,Lawson, G.(2016).Theory, History, and the Global Transformation.International Theory,8(3),502-522.
  30. Buzan, B.,Schouenborg, L.(2018).Global International Society: A New Framework for Analysis.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  31. Callinicos, A.(2005).Epoch and Conjuncture in Marxist Political Economy.International Politics,42(3),353-363.
  32. Chase-Dunn, C.(2013).Response to Barry Buzan and George Lawson: The Global Transformation: The 19th Century and the Making of Modern International Relations.International Studies Quarterly,57(3),635-636.
  33. Cooper, L.(2018).The Global Transformation: Critical Reflections on the Historical Sociology of the Long Nineteenth Century.Journal of Historical Sociology,31(1),e78-e91.
  34. Gamble, A.(2005).Globalization: Getting the ‘Big Picture’ Right, A Comment on Justin Rosenberg.International Politics,42(2),364-371.
  35. Giddens, A.(1991).The Consequences of Modernity.New York:Polity Press.
  36. Giddens, A.(1981).A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism: Power, Property and the State.London, UK:Macmillan.
  37. Go, J.,Lawson, G.(2017).Introduction: For a Global Historical Sociology.Global Historical Sociology,New York:
  38. Harvey, D.(1989).The Conditions of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change.Cambridge, UK:Blackwell.
  39. Held, D.(ed.)(1999).Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  40. Helmig, J.,Kessler, O.(2007).Space, Boundaries, and the Problem of Order: A View from Systems.International Political Sociology,1(3),240-256.
  41. Hindess, B.(2009).How Useful Is the Concept of Global Society?.International Political Sociology,3(1),122-125.
  42. Hobson, J. M.(2005).Deconstructing Rosenberg’s ‘Contribution to the Critique of Global Political Economy’: A (Re)view from a Non-Eurocentric Bridge of the World.International Politics,42(3),372-380.
  43. Hobson, J. M.(2016).Navigating Non-Eurocentrism and Trotskyist Integrity in the New Trotskyist IR of World History.Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée,New York:
  44. Hobson, J. M.(2007).Restructuring International Relations through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global-Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations.International Politics,44(4),414-430.
  45. Holzer, B.(ed.),Kastner, F.(ed.),Werron, T.(ed.)(2013).From Globalization to World Society.New York:Routledge.
  46. Jaeger, H. M.(2007).'Global Civil Society’ and the Political Depoliticization of Global Governance.International Political Sociology,1(3),257-277.
  47. Jones, A.(2010).Globalization: Key Thinkers.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  48. Joseph, J.(2006).Globalization and Governmentality.International Politics,43(3),402-418.
  49. Juergensmeyer, M.(2013).What Is Global Studies?.Globalizations,10(6),765-769.
  50. Kacowicz, A. M.,Mitrani, M.(2016).Why Don’t We Have Coherent Theories of International Relations about Globalization?.Global Governance,22(2),189-208.
  51. Kaldor, M.(ed.),Anheuer, H.(ed.),Glasius, M.(ed.)(2003).Global Civil Society.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  52. Keene, E.,Church, C.(2016).Review by Edward Keene, Christ Church, The University of Oxford.H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable,8(10),5-7.
  53. Kessler, O.(2012).World Society, Social Differentiation, and Time.International Political Sociology,6(1),77-94.
  54. Kessler, O.(2009).Toward a Sociology of the International? International Relations Between Anarchy and World Society.International Political Sociology,3(1),87-108.
  55. Khondker, H. H.(2013).Globalization, Glocalization, or Global Studies: What’s in a Name?.Globalizations,10(4),527-531.
  56. Kiely, R.(2014).Imperialism or Globalisation? Or Imperialism and Globalisation: Theorising the International after Rosenberg’s ‘Post-Mortem'.Journal of International Relations and Development,17(2),274-300.
  57. Lames, P.,Steger, M. B.(2014).A Genealogy of ‘Globalization’: The Career of a Concept.Globalizations,11(4),417-434.
  58. Lawson, G.(2005).Rosenberg’s Ode to Bauer, Kinkel and Willich.International Politics,42(3),381-389.
  59. Leander, A.(2009).'Globalization Theory’: Feeble… and Hijacked.International Political Sociology,3(1),109-112.
  60. London School of Economics and Political Science, 2016. “Research Group on Global Historical Sociology.” in London School of Economics and Political Science: http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalRelations/centresandunits/globalhistoricalsociologygroup.aspx, Available: 2017/11/12.
  61. Mann, M.(1997).Has Globalization Ended the Rise of the Rise of Nation-State?.Review of International Political Economy,4(3),472-496.
  62. Martell, L.(2007).The Third Wave in Globalization Theory.International Studies Review,9(2),173-196.
  63. Misco, T.(2013).What’s Global Studies Good for? A Commentary on Jan Nederveen Pieterse’s ‘What is Global Studies?'.Globalizations,10(4),539-544.
  64. Mittelman, J. H.(2013).What’s in a Name? Global, International, and Regional.Globalizations,10(4),515-519.
  65. Mitzen, J.(2016).Review by Jennifer Mitzen, Ohio State University.H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable,8(10),8-11.
  66. Musgrave, P.,Nexon, D. H.(2013).Singularity or Aberration? A Response to Buzan and Lawson.International Studies Quarterly,57(3),637-639.
  67. Musgrave, P.,Nexon, D. H.(2016).The Global Transformation: More Than Meets the Eye.International Theory,8(3),436-447.
  68. Nienass, B.(2013).Performing the Global.Globalizations,10(4),533-538.
  69. Oke, N.(2009).Globalizing Time and Space: Temporal and Spatial Considerations in Discourses of Globalization.International Political Sociology,3(3),310-326.
  70. Owens, P.(2016).International Historical What?.International Theory,8(3),448-457.
  71. Palan, R.(ed.)(2000).Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories.London, UK:Routledge.
  72. Phillips, A.(2016).The Global Transformation, Multiple Early Modernities, and International Systems Change.International Theory,8(3),481-491.
  73. Phillips, A.(2013).From Global Transformation to Big Bang-A Response to Buzan and Lawson.International Studies Quarterly,57(3),640-642.
  74. Pieterse, J. N.(2013).Response to Commentaries: Global 3.0.Globalizations,10(4),551-556.
  75. Pieterse, J. N.(2014).Global Studies: Have Catechism, Will Travel.Globalizations,11(2),165-169.
  76. Pieterse, J. N.(2013).What Is Global Studies?.Globalizations,10(4),499-514.
  77. Robertson, R.(2009).Differentiational Reductionism and the Missing Link in Albert’s Approach to Globalization Theory.International Political Sociology,3(1),119-122.
  78. Robinson, W. I.(2001).Theory of Global State: Globality as an Unfinished Revolution by Martin Shaw.American Political Science Review,95(4),1045-1047.
  79. Rosenau, J. N.(2004).Many Globalizations, One International Relations.Globalizations,1(1),7-14.
  80. Rosenberg, J.(2007).And the Definition of Globalization Is…? A Reply to ‘In at the Death?’ by Barrie Axford.Globalizations,4(3),417-421.
  81. Rosenberg, J.(2005).Globalization Theory: A Post-Mortem.International Politics,42(1),2-74.
  82. Rosenberg, J.(2016).Uneven and Combined Development: ‘The International.Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée,New York:
  83. Rosenberg, J.(2000).The Follies of Globalization Theory: Polemical Essays.London, UK:Verso.
  84. Rosenberg, J.(2007).International Relations-The ‘Higher Bullshit’: A Reply to the Globalization Theory Debate.International Politics,44(4),450-482.
  85. Scholte, J. A.(2005).Premature Obituaries: A Response to Justin Rosenberg.International Politics,42(3),390-399.
  86. Scholte, J. A.(2005).Globalization: A Critical Introduction.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  87. Shaw, M.(2001).The Historical Transformation of Our Times: The Question of Globality in Historical Sociology.Cambridge Review of International Affairs,14(2),273-289.
  88. Shaw, M.(2013).Historical Sociology and International Relations: The Question of Genocide.E-International Relations
  89. Shaw, M.(1997).The State of Globalization: Toward a Theory of State Transformation.Review of International Political Economy,4(3),497-513.
  90. Shaw, M.(1998).The Historical Sociology of the Future.Review of International Political Economy,5(2),321-326.
  91. Shaw, M.(2000).Theory of Global State: Globality as an Unfinished Revolution.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  92. Shaw, M., 2008. “Theory of the Global State Revisited.” in Martin Shaw: https://martinshaw.org/2008/06/17/theory-of-the-global-state-revisited, Available: 2019/12/17.
  93. Shaw, M.(1994).Global Society and International Relations: Sociological Concepts and Political Perspectives.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  94. Shaw, M.(ed.)(1999).Politics and Globalisation: Knowledge, Ethics and Agency.London, UK:Routledge.
  95. Spohn, W.(2011).An Appraisal of Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt’s Global Historical Sociology.The Journal of Classical Sociology,11(3),281-301.
  96. Steger, M. B.(2013).It’s About Globalization, After All: Four Framings of Global Studies. A Response to Jan Nederveen Pieterse’s ‘What is Global Studies?'.Globalizations,10(6),771-777.
  97. Stetter, S.(2007).Territorial Conflicts in World Society: Modern Systems Theory, International Relations and Conflict Studies.New York:Routledge.
  98. Thomas, G. M.(2009).World Polity, World Culture, World Society.International Political Sociology,3(1),115-119.
  99. Veseth, M.(2005).Globaloney: Unraveling the Myths of Globalization.Lanham, MA:Rowman and Littlefield.
  100. Veseth, M.(2010).Globaloney 2.0: The Crash of 2008 and the Future of Globalization.Lanham, MA:Rowman and Littlefield.
  101. 王軍(2006)。國際關係的歷史社會學:基於流派的考察。國際論壇,8(2),7-12。
  102. 王軍(2006)。國際關係的歷史社會學:關於跨學科特點的分析。國際論壇,8(5),1-6。
  103. 王軍(2007)。國際關係的歷史社會學:基本概念、理論演進與價值。社會理論,3,26-51。
  104. 包宗和(編)(2011).國際關係理論.臺北:五南.
被引用次数
  1. 郭雪真(2021)。「世界化」與「全球化」中的國際關係研究:連結「全球歷史社會學」與「全球國際關係研究」的對話。政治學報,72,43-83。