题名

不對稱地位的法制化強固：NPT建制核武國核保防特權的深化與影響

并列篇名

Legalized Solidification of the Asymmetrical Status: Strengthening and Impacts of the Nuclear Safeguards Privileges for the Nuclear-Weapon States in the NPT Regime

DOI

10.6229/CPSR.202112_(72).0001

作者

曾雅真(Yea-Jen Tseng)

关键词

地位 ； 肯認 ； 核不擴散 ； 核保防 ； 核燃料銀行 ； Status ； Recognition ； Nuclear Non-Proliferation ； Nuclear Safeguards ； Fuel Bank

期刊名称

政治學報

卷期/出版年月

72期（2021 / 12 / 01）

页次

1 - 42

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

國家間的不對稱地位，是國際社會的重要特徵。國際條約的談判定稿、簽署、批准，以及生效的法制化過程，反映締約國對某些概念或對於彼此相對地位的合意（consent），它是國家肯認（recognition）的重要指標。國際核不擴散條約（Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, NPT）透過核保防（nuclear safeguards）協議暨其附加議定書的法制化路徑，差異化核武國與非核武國核保防的權利暨義務。國際鈾濃縮中心（International Uranium Enrichment Center）核燃料銀行（fuel bank）的法制化，肯認俄羅斯自願核保防協定的例外，對非核武國施加額外的核保防制約，再度強固核武國的國際優勢地位。核保防協議是全球核不擴散建制（nuclear non-proliferation regime）的核心機制，它是肯認某些強權具備國際不對稱地位的法制化典範。研究發現，國際造法的法制化過程，可以利於國際差序地位的固化。生效暨遵循核不擴散條約暨各種核保防協議，不但突顯國際原子能總署（International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA）核保防建制反映的國際地位不對稱現象，並且進一步產出強權國際地位強固效果，是對於NPT建制產出國際差序地位的持續肯認。
英文摘要

Asymmetrical status is an important character in the international society. The legalization process of negotiation, drafting, signature, ratification and entering into force of the international convention reflect the consent that contracting states agreed to certain ideas or their relative status, it is an important indication to state’s recognition. With the legalization of the nuclear safeguards agreement as well as the additional protocol, the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) differentiated the rights and duties between the nuclear weapon states and the non-nuclear weapon states. The legalization of the International Uranium Enrichment Center (IUEC) fuel bank recognized the exception of Russia's voluntary offer safeguards agreement, imposed additional safeguards constraints on the non-nuclear weapon states, and solidified the international supreme status. The nuclear safeguards agreement is the core of the NPT regime. It is the legalization example for recognizing that certain great powers possess international asymmetrical status. This paper discovered that legalization process of the international law-making is promoting the solidification of the international hierarchical status. The coming into force and the compliance with the NPT and its relative nuclear safeguards agreements showed the asymmetry of the international status and produced solidification effectiveness to the international great power status. It is the continuous recognition to the international hierarchical status.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 袁易(2005)。不擴散核武器條約」之再審視：一個權力政治與身份政治的解析。問題與研究，44(4)，101-150。
    連結：
  2. 陳欣之(2010)。霸權治理的省思：權力消長與權威起伏。問題與研究，49(1)，59-85。
    連結：
  3. 曾雅真(2018)。伊朗核協議對國際核燃料供應建制發展的影響。政治科學論叢，78，69-103。
    連結：
  4. 曾雅真(2019)。核能規範國際法治化？IAEA於哈薩克設立低濃縮鈾銀行設立協議的探索。政治學報，68，1-37。
    連結：
  5. Abbott, K. W.(2000).The Concept of Legalization.International Organiza-tion,54(3),401-419.
  6. Alberque, W., 2017. “The NPT and the Origins of NATO’s Nuclear Sharing Arrange-ments.” in Ifri: https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/alberque_npt_ origins_nato_nuclear_2017.pdf, Available: 2021/10/15.
  7. Asada, M.(2004).Arms Control Law in Crisis? A Study of the North Korean Nu-clear Issue.Journal of Conflict & Security Law,9(3),331-355.
  8. Atomic Energy Council, Executive Yuan, 2021. “Agreement for Cooperation Between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States and the American Institute in Taiwan Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.” in Atomic Energy Council, Executive Yuan: https://www.aec.gov.tw/share/file/law/2wLmnKXF~bbUoz6VHsrKvQ__.pdf, Available: 2021/10/15.
  9. Baeckmann, A. V.(1988).IAEA Safeguards in Nuclear-Weapon States: A Review of Objectives, Purposes, and Achievements.IAEA Bulletin,30(1),22-25.
  10. Bunn, G.(2007).Nuclear Safeguards—How Far Can Inspectors Go?.IAEA Bulletin,48(2),49-55.
  11. Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, 2009. “Agreement Between the United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United States (and Protocol Thereto).” in U. S. Department of State: https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/5209.htm, Available: 2021/2/15.
  12. Burley, A. S.(1993).International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda.American Journal of International Law,87(2),205-239.
  13. Cha, V.(2016).Role of Sport in International Relations: National Rebirth and Re-newal.Asian Economic Policy Review,11(1),139-155.
  14. Congress, 2002. “The Protocol to the Agreement of the International Atomic Energy Agency Regarding Safeguards in the United States.” in Congress.gov: https://www.congress.gov/107/cdoc/tdoc7/CDOC-107tdoc7.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  15. Daase, C.(2015).Recognition in International Relations: Rethinking a Political Concept in a Global Context.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Dimitrova, A.(2013).The Politics of Recognition in International Conflicts.Millennium: Journal of International Studies,41(3),663-668.
  17. European Atomic Energy Community, 2018. “Treaty Establishing the European Atom-ic Energy Community (EURATOM).” in EUR-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11957A/TXT&from=EN, Available: 2021/2/15.
  18. Fischer, D.(1997).Safeguards: Past, Present and Future.IAEA Bulletin,39(4),31-36.
  19. Fischer, D.(2007).Nuclear Safeguards: The First Steps.IAEA Bulletin,49(1),7-10.
  20. Foreign Relations of the United State, 1980. “Telegram from the Mission in Geneva to the Department of State.” in Office of the Historian: https://history.state.gov/his-toricaldocuments/frus1977-80v26/d360, Available: 2021/10/15.
  21. Fraser, N.(2008).Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Global-izing World.New York:Columbia University Press.
  22. Gilpin, R.(1981).War and Change in World Politics.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
  23. Goldstein, J.(2000).Introduction: Legalization and World Politics.Interna-tional Organization,54(3),385-399.
  24. Götz, E.(2021).Status Matters in World Politics.International Studies Review,23(1),228-247.
  25. Greenhill, B.(2008).Recognition and Collective Identity Formation in International Politics.European Journal of International Relations,14(2),343-368.
  26. Hayden, P.,Schick, K.(2016).Recognition and the International: Meanings, Limits, Manifestations.Recognition and Global Poli-tics: Critical Encounters Between State and World,Manchester, UK:
  27. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005c. “Protocol Additional to the Agreement between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Europe-an Atomic Energy Community and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and North-ern Ireland in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1978/infcirc263a1.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  28. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2009a. “Communication Dated 13 March 2009 Received from the Resident Representative of the Russian Federation to the IAEA on the Russian Initiative to Establish a Guaranteed Reserve of Low En-riched Uranium.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/2009/infcirc748.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  29. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2021b. “Plan of Action to Promote the Con-clusion of Safeguards Agreements and Additional Protocols.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/21/09/sg-plan-of-action-2020-2021.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  30. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1978. “The Text of the Agreement of 6 Septem-ber 1976 between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the European Atomic Energy Community and the Agency in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1978/infcirc263.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  31. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2008. “Protocol between the Russian Federa-tion and the International Atomic Energy Agency Additional to the Agreement between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1985/infcirc327a1.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  32. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2002. “Protocol Additional to the Agreement between the People’s Republic of China and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in China.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1989/infcirc369a1.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  33. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2019. “Safeguards Statement for 2019.” in In- ternational Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/20/06/statement-sir-2019.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  34. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2009c. “Protocol Additional to the Agreement between the United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United States of America.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/pub-lications/documents/infcircs/1981/infcirc288a1.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  35. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2009b. “Model Agreement Between the Interna-tional Atomic Energy Agency and the Government of […] for the Supply of Low Enriched Uranium for the Operation of the […] Nuclear Power Plant in […].” in Arms Control Wonk: http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/files/2011/01/Angarsk.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  36. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1981b. “The Text of the Agreement of 27 July 1978 between France, the European Atomic Energy Community and the Inter-national Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in France.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/pub-lications/documents/infcircs/1981/infcirc290.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  37. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2021a. “Agreement between the United King-dom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/2021/infcirc951.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  38. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2021d. “Status List: Conclusion of Safeguards Agreements, Additional Protocols and Small Quantities Protocols.” in Interna-tional Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/20/01/sg-agreements-comprehensive-status.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  39. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005a. “Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Expert Group Report to the Director General of the IAEA.” IN-FCIRC/640. in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/mna-2005_web.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  40. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1997. “Model Protocol Additional to the Agreement(s) between State(s) and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/1997/infcirc540c.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  41. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1972b. “The Text of a Safeguards Transfer Agreement Relating to a Bilateral Agreement between the Republic of China and the United States of America.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1972/infcirc158.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  42. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1965. “The Text of the Safeguards Transfer Agreement Relating to the Bilateral Agreement Between China and the United States of America.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/infcirc72.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  43. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1972a. “The Structure and Content of Agree-ments between the Agency and States Required in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/in-fcircs/1972/infcirc153.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  44. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1989b. “Statute: As Amended up to 28 Decem-ber 1989.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/statute.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  45. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1998. “The Evoluation of IAEA Safeguards.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publica-tions/PDF/NVS2_web.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  46. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1968. “The Agency’s Safeguards System (1965, as provisionally extended in 1966 and 1968).” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/in-fcircs/1965/infcirc66r2.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  47. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005b. “Protocol Additional to the Agreement between France, the European Atomic Energy Community and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in France.” in Inter-national Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publica- tions/documents/infcircs/1981/infcirc290a1.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  48. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1970. “Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nu-clear Weapons.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1970/infcirc140.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  49. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1989a. “Agreement of 20 September 1988 between the People’s Republic of China and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in China.” in International Atomic En-ergy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/infcirc369.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  50. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1985. “The Text of the Agreement of 21 Febru- ary 1985 between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.” in Interna-tional Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/infcirc327.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  51. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2021c. “Protocol Additional to the Agreement between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/2021/infcirc951a1.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  52. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1981a. “The Text of the Agreement of 18 No-vember 1977 between the United States of America and the Agency for the Ap-plication of Safeguards in the United States of America.” in International Atomic Energy Agency: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/infcirc288.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  53. International Uranium Enrichment Center, 2019. “Scheduled IAEA Inspection was Held at the Stock of Nuclear Materials of JSC IUEC in Angarsk,” in Internation-al Uranium Enrichment Center: http://eng.iuec.ru/press/news/?id=171, Available: 2021/2/15.
  54. International Uranium Enrichment Center, 2007c. “Fuel Bank.” in International Uranium Enrichment Center: http://eng.iuec.ru/activities/fuel_bank/, Available: 2021/2/15.
  55. International Uranium Enrichment Center, 2007a. “Articles of Association.” in Inter-national Uranium Enrichment Center: http://eng.iuec.ru/docs/ustav/, Available: 2021/2/15.
  56. International Uranium Enrichment Center, 2010. “Agreement between the Govern-ment of the Russian Federation and the International Atomic Energy Agency Re-garding the Establishment on the Territory of the Russian Federation of a Physi-cal Reserve of Low Enriched Uranium and the Supply of Low Enriched Uranium therefrom to the International Atomic Energy Agency for Its Member States.” in International Uranium Enrichment Center: http://www.iuec.ru/files/IAEA_agree-ment_eng.tif, Available: 2021/2/15.
  57. International Uranium Enrichment Center, 2007b. “Corporate Structure.” in Inter-national Uranium Enrichment Center: http://eng.iuec.ru/about/corp_structure/, Available: 2021/2/15.
  58. Joyner, D. H.(2009).International Law and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  59. Katzenberg, B.(2013).The Impact of the Additional Protocol and Strengthened Safe-guards: Effects on the International Atomic Energy Agency and on States.Nu-clear Law Bulletin,2012(2),71-99.
  60. Kessler, J. C.(2013).Technical Negotiations in a Political Environment: Why the Hexapartite Safeguards Project Succeeded.The Nonproliferation Review,20(3),493-508.
  61. Khlopkov, A., & Chekina, V., 2014. “Governing Uranium in Russia.” in Danish Insti-tute for International Studies: https://pure.diis.dk/ws/files/80235/report2014_19_governing_U_Russia.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  62. Kilb, W.(2016).The Nuclear Safeguards Regime of EURATOM: A Regional Cor-nerstone of the Verification of Non-Proliferation Obligations in the European. Union.Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law: Verification and Compliance,The Hague, Neth-erlands:
  63. Lake, D. A.(1996).Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Rela-tions.International Organization,50(1),1-33.
  64. Larson, D. W.,Paul, T. V.,Wohlforth, W. C.(2014).Status and World Order.Status in World Politics,Cambridge, UK:
  65. Larson, D. W.,Shevchenko, A.(2019).Quest for Status: Chinese and Rus-sian Foreign Policy.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
  66. Lee, C.-W.(2020).The North Korean Nuclear Crisis and Its Implications for South Korea’s Policy Choice: The Law and Politics of the NPT Regime.The Ko-rean Journal of Defense Analysis,32(1),101-119.
  67. Liles, M.(2007).Did Kim Jong-II Break the Law―A Case Study on How North Korea Highlights the Flaws of the Non-Proliferation Regime.North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation,33(1),103-146.
  68. Lindemann, T.(2010).Causes of War: The Struggle for Recognition.Colchester, UK:ECPR Press.
  69. Mallard, G.(2014).Crafting the Nuclear Regime Complex (1950–1975): Dynamics of Harmonization of Opaque Treaty Rules.European Journal of International Law,25(2),445-472.
  70. Ministry of Justice, Republic of China, 1998. “Exchange of Letters Relating to Pro-tocol Additional to the Agreement between the IAEA and the Government of the ROC for the Application of Safeguards.” in Laws & Regulations Data-base of the Republic of China: https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=Y0070297, Available: 2021/10/15.
  71. Murray, M.(2019).The Struggle for Recognition in International Relations: Sta-tus, Revisionism, and Rising Powers.Oxford, NY:Oxford University Press.
  72. Murray, M.(2012).Recognition, Disrespect, and the Struggle for Morocco: Rethink-ing Imperial Germany’s Security Dilemma.International Politics of Recognition,Boulder, CO:
  73. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2020. “Summary Record of a Meeting of the Council Held at the Headquarters, Brussels, on Wednesday, 6th December, 1967 at 10.15 a.m.” in North Atlantic Treaty Organization: https://archives.nato.int/uploads/r/nato-archives-online/2/8/1/281177ec0dc371e41b877d24615155c24 200a03236279bf7be78e5f75e0e7ba4/143_-_C-R_67_53_ENG.pdf, Available: 2021/10/15.
  74. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2021. “NATO’s Nuclear Deterrence Policy and Forces.” in North Atlantic Treaty Organization: https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/na-tohq/topics_50068.htm, Available: 2021/2/15.
  75. Office of Multilateral Nuclear and Security Affairs, 2020. “The International Atomic Energy Agency.” in U.S. Department of State: https://www.state.gov/iaea/, Avail-able: 2021/2/15.
  76. Quester, G. H.(1972).Soviet Policy on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.Cornell International Law Journal,5(1),17-34.
  77. Renshon, J.(2016).Status Deficits and War.International Organization,70(3),513-550.
  78. Renshon, J.(2017).Fighting for Status: Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  79. Ringmar, E.(2012).Introduction The International Politics of Recognition.International Politics of Recognition,Boulder, CO:
  80. Rockwood, L.(2002).The IAEA’s Strengthened Safeguards System.Journal of Con-flict & Security Law,7(1),123-136.
  81. Rockwood, L.,Johnson, L.(2016).Verification of Correctness and Completeness in the Implementation of IAEA Safeguards: The Law and Practice.Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law: Verifi-cation and Compliance,The Hague, Netherlands:
  82. Shaw, M. N.(2017).International Law.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
  83. Strange, S.(1987).The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony.International Organiza-tion,41(4),551-574.
  84. United Nations, 2019. “Implementation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons in the People’s Republic of China.” in United Nations: https://undocs.org/en/NPT/CONF.2020/PC.III/8, Available: 2021/2/15.
  85. United Nations, 1995a. “1995 Review and Extension Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: Final Document Part I.” in United Nations: https://undocs.org/NPT/CONF.1995/32(PartI), Available: 2021/2/15.
  86. United Nations, 2015a. “Activities of the International Atomic Energy Agency Rel-evant to Article III of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” in United Nations: https://undocs.org/NPT/CONF.2015/13, Available: 2021/2/15.
  87. United Nations, 2015b. “National Report Submitted by the Russian Federation.” in United Nations: https://undocs.org/NPT/CONF.2015/48, Available: 2021/2/15.
  88. United Nations, 1995b. “Decision 3: Extension of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” in United Nations: https://unoda-web.s3-accelerate.ama-zonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/assets/WMD/Nuclear/1995-NPT/pdf/NPT_CONF199503.pdf, Available: 2021/2/15.
  89. Wendt, A.,Friedheim, D.(1995).Hierarchy Under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State.International Organization,49(4),689-721.
  90. Young, O. R.(1991).Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Develop-ment of Institutions in International Society.International Organization,45(3),281-308.
  91. 行政院原子能委員會，2019，〈核子保防簡介〉，行政院原子能委員會：https://www.aec.gov.tw/%E6%96%BD%E6%94%BF%E8%88%87%E6%B3%95%E8%A6%8F/%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E5%90%88%E4%BD%9C/%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E6%A0%B8%E5%AD%90%E4%BF%9D%E9%98%B2%E6%B4%BB%E5%8B%95/%E6%A0%B8%E5%AD%90%E4%BF%9D%E9%98%B2%E4%BB%8B%E7%B4%B9/%E6%A0%B8%E5%AD%90%E4%BF%9D%E9%98%B2%E7%B0%A1%E4%BB%8B--2_16_83_934_936.html。2021/10/15。
  92. 行政院原子能委員會，2021，〈駐美國臺北經濟文化代表處與美國在臺協會核能和平利用合作協定〉，行政院原子能委員會：https://www.aec.gov.tw/share/file/law/Ee147X89Uq9GK4nqXWzLEQ__.pdf。2021/10/15。
  93. 法務部，1955，〈中華民國政府與美利堅合眾國政府民用原子能合作協定（譯文）〉，全國法規資料庫：https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=Y0070286。2021/10/15。
被引用次数
  1. 陳欣之(2022)。概念化逐霸國家行為：戰國時代秦國逐霸過程的啟示。問題與研究，61(4)，1-45。
  2. (2024)。AI自主性武器系統之國際規範秩序：省思與前瞻。遠景基金會季刊，25(1)，65-134。
print cancel