题名

「世界化」與「全球化」中的國際關係研究：連結「全球歷史社會學」與「全球國際關係研究」的對話

并列篇名

The Worlding and Globalizing International Relations: Connecting the Dialogue Between Global Historical Sociology and Global International Relations

DOI

10.6229/CPSR.202112_(72).0002

作者

郭雪真(Hsueh-Chen Kuo)

关键词

全球歷史社會學 ； 全球國際關係研究 ； 非西方國際關係理論 ； 後西方國際關係理論 ； 國際關係歷史社會學 ； Global Historical Sociology ； Global International Relations ； Non-Western International Relation Theory ； Post-Western International Relations Theory ； Historical Sociology in International Relations

期刊名称

政治學報

卷期/出版年月

72期（2021 / 12 / 01）

页次

43 - 83

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

國際關係研究是以歐洲為中心的西方國際關係研究，有些學者質疑為何沒有非西方觀點的國際關係研究，遂促使出現更多非西方或後西方的國際關係理論觀點。從亞洲學派開始以本土成長的理論化，進行國際關係理論的世界化與全球化歷程。國際關係理論研究遂出現了「本土成長轉向」或「後西方轉向」，主張國際關係理論應該脫離西方的觀點，以本土成長或後西方的觀點發展國際關係理論。藉由廣泛地檢視及批判西方國際關係理論，要發展非西方或後西方國際關係理論，或是「去除（歐洲）中心化國際關係」或「世界化國際關係」，進而推動超越西方和非西方的「全球國際關係研究」。既有的「國際關係歷史社會學」或「全球歷史社會學」理論批判西方歐洲中心主義、西方與非西方權力不對稱，主張各文明之間對話、全球社會轉型與分殊化等基本概念與觀點，提供了「全球國際關係研究」反思批判西方國際關係研究的後設理論觀點，吸納非西方歷史社會的經驗與觀點，顯示其與「全球國際關係研究」的相同主張，作為探討連結兩者對話的基礎，以擴展國際關係研究的深度與廣度，從西方歐美、非西方、後西方走向全球研究層次的內容發展。
英文摘要

International Relations (IR) is the Western International Relations Theory (IRT) based on the development of Eurocentric world politics. Some scholars have questioned ＂why there is no Non-Western International Relations＂. It has promoted more scholars to provide more Non-Western or Post-Western approaches into IR. Starting from the Asian School with homegrown theorizing, the IR is ongoing a worlding and globalizing process to Global International Relations (GIR). Therefore, there is a ＂homegrown turn＂ or ＂Post-Western turn＂ in the IRT, to advocate IRT should break away from Western perspectives and to develop on the homegrown, local or post-western perspectives. Scholars widely reviewed and criticize the Western IR, not only searching for building the Non-Western IR which has always been existed in, but also developing the Non-Western or Post-Western IR, or decentering IR or (re)worlding IR, to promote the GIR. With the International Relations and Historical Sociology (IRHS) or Global Historical Sociology (GHS)'s basic concepts and perspectives such as critique the Western Eurocentrism, the unbalance of power in the West between Non-West, the dialogues among civilizations, the transformation and differentiation of global society, to connect the dialogue between GIR and GHS to extend the breadth and depth of IR, from the Western, Non-Western, Post-Western toward to Global levels and contents.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 余家哲,李政鴻(2009)。歷史社會學與國際關係理論的交會：歷史社會學的國家理論。政治科學論叢，40，127-152。
    連結：
  2. 郭雪真(2013)。國際關係歷史社會學理論的發展與評析。問題與研究，52(3)，63-96。
    連結：
  3. 郭雪真(2019)。國際關係歷史社會學的理論：發展與批判。政治學報，68，75-108。
    連結：
  4. Acharya, A.(2016).Advancing Global IR: Challenges, Contentions, and Contribu-tions.International Studies Review,18(1),4-15.
  5. Acharya, A.(2014).Rethinking Power, Institutions and Ideas in World Politics: Whose IR?.New York:Routledge.
  6. Acharya, A.(2017).Theorising the International Relations of Asia: Necessity or In-dulgence?’ Some Reflections.The Pacific Review,30(6),816-828.
  7. Acharya, A.(2011).Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West.Millennium: Journal of International Studies,39(3),619-637.
  8. Acharya, A.(2014).Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.International Studies Quarterly,58(4),647-659.
  9. Acharya, A.(2015).An IR for the Global South or a Global IR?.Global South Re-view,2(2),175-177.
  10. Acharya, A.(ed.),Buzan, B.(ed.)(2010).Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia.New York:Routledge.
  11. Acharya, A.,Buzan, B.(2007).Conclusion: On the Possibility of a Non-Western IR Theory in Asia.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific,7(3),427-438.
  12. Acharya, A.,Buzan, B.(2007).Why Is There No Non-Western International Rela-tions Theory? An Introduction.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific,7(3),287-312.
  13. Acharya, A.,Buzan, B.(2017).Why is there no Non-Western International Rela-tions Theory? Ten Years On.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific,17(3),341-370.
  14. Acharya, A.,Buzan, B.(2019).The Making of Global International Relations: Ori- gins and Evolution of IR at Its Centenary.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  15. Albert, M.,Buzan, B.(2013).International Relations Theory and the ‘Social Whole’: Encounters and Gaps between IR and Sociology.International Political Sociology,7(1),117-135.
  16. Albert, M.,Buzan, B.,Zürn, M.(2013).Introduction: Differentiation Theory and In-ternational Relations.Bringing Sociol-ogy to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory,New York:
  17. Alejandro, A.(2017).Eurocentrism, Ethnocentrism, and Misery of Position: Interna-tional Relations in Europe—A Problematic Oversight.European Review of In-ternational Studies,4(1),5-20.
  18. Anderl, F.,Witt, A.(2020).Problematising the Global in Global IR.Mil-lennium: Journal of International Studies,49(1),32-57.
  19. Anievas, A.,Nişancioğlu, K.(2015).How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism.London, UK:Pluto Press.
  20. Aydinli, E.(2020).Methodology as a Lingua Franca in International Relations: Pe-ripheral Self-Reflections on Dialogue with the Core.The Chinese Journal of International Politics,13(2),287-312.
  21. Aydinli, E.(ed.),Biltekin, G.(ed.)(2018).Widening the World of International Relations: Homegrown Theorizing.London, UK:Routledge.
  22. Aydinli, E.,Biltekin, G.(2018).Widening the World of IR: A Typology of Home-grown Theorizing.All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,7(1),45-68.
  23. Aydinli, E.,Mathews, J.(2008).Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia.Review of International Stud-ies,34(4),693-712.
  24. Beier, J. M.(2005).International Relations in Uncommon Places: Indigeneity, Cos-mology, and the Limits of International Theory.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Bentil, S.(2020).When You Think of a Global IR Theory, Think Uhuru Na Uja-maa?.Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Science,10(1),8-20.
  26. Bilgin, P.(2008).Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR?.Third World Quarterly,29(1),5-23.
  27. Bilgin, P.(2020).Opening up International Relations, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Non-Western IR.Handbook of Criti-cal International Relations,Northampton, MA:
  28. Bilgin, P.(2016).Contrapuntal Reading’ as a Method, an Ethos, and a Metaphor for Global IR.International Studies Review,18(1),134-146.
  29. Bilgin, P.(2016).How to Remedy Eurocentrism in IR? A Complement and a Chal-lenge for the Global Transformation.International Theory,8(3),492-501.
  30. Bilgin, P.(2010).Looking for ‘the International’ Beyond the West.Third World Quar-terly,31(5),817-828.
  31. Bischoff, P.-H.(ed.),Aning, K.(ed.),Acharya, A.(ed.)(2016).Africa in Global International Relations: Emerging Approaches to Theory and Practice.London, UK:Rout-ledge.
  32. Blaney, D. L.,Tickner, A. B.(2017).Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possi-bility of a Decolonial IR.Millennium: Journal of International Studies,45(3),293-311.
  33. Butcher, C. R.,Griffiths, R. D.(2017).Between Eurocentrism and Babel: A Frame-work for the Analysis of States, State Systems, and International Orders.Inter-national Studies Quarterly,61(2),328-336.
  34. Buzan, B.(2016).Could IR Be Different?.International Studies Review,18(1),155-157.
  35. Buzan, B.,Lawson, G.(2016).Author’s Response by Barry Buzan and George Lawson, London School of Economics and Political Science.H-Diplo,8(10),14-18.
  36. Buzan, B.,Lawson, G.(2015).The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  37. Buzan, B.,Little, R.(2010).World History and the Development of Non-Western International Relations Theory.Non-Western International Relations Theory,London, UK:
  38. Cardoso, F. H.,Faletto, E.,Urquidi, M. M.(Trans.)(1979).Dependency and Development in Latin America.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  39. Chen, C.-C.(2011).The Absence of Non-Western IR Theory in Asia Reconsidered.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific,11(1),1-23.
  40. Choi, J. K.(2008).Theorizing East Asian International Relations in Korea.Asian Perspective,32(1),193-216.
  41. Clifford, S., 2011. “Theory Talk #42: Amitav Acharya on the Relevance of Regions, ASEAN, and Western IR’s False Universalisms.” in Theory Talks: http://www.theory-talks.org/2011/08/theory-talk-42.html, Available: 2019/11/20.
  42. Cotton, J.(2013).The Australian School of International Relations.New York:Pal-grave Macmillan.
  43. Deciancio, M.(2016).International Relations from the South: A Regional Research Agenda for Global IR.International Studies Review,18(1),106-119.
  44. Duzgun, E.(2020).Against Eurocentric Anti-Eurocentrism: International Relations, Historical Sociology and Political Marxism.Journal of International Relations and Development,23(2),285-307.
  45. Eisenstadt, S. N.(2000).Multiple Modernities.Daedalus,129(1),1-29.
  46. Ersoy, E.(2018).Conceptual Cultivation and Homegrown Theorizing: The Case of/for the Concept of Influence.All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,7(2),47-64.
  47. Eun, Y.-S.(2018).What Is at Stake in Building “Non-Western” International Relations Theory?.London, UK:Routledge.
  48. Eun, Y.-S.(2019).Global IR through Dialogue.The Pacific Review,32(2),131-149.
  49. Femia, J.(2005).Gramsci, Machiavelli and International Relations.The Political Quarterly,76(3),341-349.
  50. Gardner, P.(2015).Transnational Theory, Global World: Theory Matters, Not Ge-ography.Global Politics Review,1(1),8-17.
  51. Gelardi, M.(2019).Moving Global IR Forward—A Road Map.International Studies Review,22(4),830-852.
  52. Go, J.(2014).Occluding the Global: Analytic Bifurcation, Causal Scientism, and Al-ternatives in Historical Sociology.Journal of Globalization Studies,5(1),122-146.
  53. Go, J.(ed.),Lawson, G.(ed.)(2017).Global Historical Sociology.Cambridge, UK:Cam-bridge University Press.
  54. Griffiths, M.,Roach, S. C.,Solomon, M. S.(2009).Fifty Key Thinkers in Interna-tional Relations.New York:Routledge.
  55. Hobson, J. M.(2004).The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  56. Hobson, J. M.(2007).Is Critical Theory Always for the White West and for West-ern Imperialism? Beyond Westphilian Towards a Post-Racist Critical IR.Review of International Studies,33(S1),91-116.
  57. Hobson, J. M.(2012).The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western Inter-national Theory, 1760-2010.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  58. Hobson, J. M.(2007).Reconstructing International Relations Through World Histo-ry: Oriental Globalization and the Global–Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civiliza-tional Relations.International Politics,44(4),414-430.
  59. Hobson, J. M.(2014).Re-viewing the Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: A Re-sponse to Knutsen, Ling, Schmidt, Tickner and Vitalis.Millennium: Journal of International Studies,42(2),485-514.
  60. Hobson, J. M.,Hobden, S.(2002).On the Road Toward an Historicised World Soci-ology.Historical Sociology of International Relations,Cambridge, UK:
  61. Hobson, J. M.,Sajed, A.(2017).Navigating Beyond the Eurofetishist Frontier of Critical IR Theory: Exploring the Complex Landscapes of Non-Western Agency.International Studies Review,19(4),547-572.
  62. Holliday, S. J.(2020).Populism, the International and Methodological Nationalism: Global Order and the Iran-Israel Nexus.Political Studies,68(1),3-19.
  63. Huang, C.-C.(2015).Balance of Relationship: The Essence of Myanmar’s China Poli-cy.The Pacific Review,28(2),189-210.
  64. Hurrell, A.(2016).Towards the Global Study of International Relations.Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional,59(2),1-18.
  65. Hutchings, K.(2011).Dialogue between Whom? The Role of the West/ Non-West Distinction in Promoting Global Dialogue in IR.Millennium: Journal of Inter-national Studies,39(3),639-647.
  66. Ikeda, J.(2010).The Post-Western Turn in International Theory and the English School.Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies,9,29-44.
  67. Inayatullah, N.,Blaney, D. L.(1996).Knowing Encounters: Beyond Parochialism in International Relations Theory.The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory,Boulder, CO:
  68. Jackson, P. T.,Nexon, D. H.(1999).Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics.European Journal of International Relations,5(3),291-332.
  69. Jones, B. G.(ed.)(2006).Decolonizing International Relations.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield.
  70. Jorgensen, K. E.(2018).Would 100 Global Workshops on Theory Building Make A Difference?.All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,7(2),65-80.
  71. Kaczmarska, K.(2020).Making Global Knowledge in Local Contexts: The Politics of International Relations and Policy Advice in Russia.London, UK:Routledge.
  72. Katzenstein, P. J.(2018).The Second Coming? Reflections on a Global Theory of In-ternational Relations.The Chinese Journal of International Politics,11(4),373-390.
  73. Katzenstein, P. J.(ed.)(2012).Sinicization and the Rise of China: Civilizational Process-es Beyond East and West.London, UK:Routledge.
  74. Kavalski, E.(2018).Chinese Concepts and Relational International Politics.All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,7(1),87-102.
  75. Kavalski, E.(2017).The Guanxi of Relational International Theory.London, UK:Routledge.
  76. Kayaoglu, T.(2010).Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory.International Studies Review,12(2),193-217.
  77. Kim, H. J.(2016).Will IR Theory with Chinese Characteristics be a Powerful Alter-native?.The Chinese Journal of International Politics,9(1),59-79.
  78. Knutsen, T. L.(2016).A History of International Relations Theory.Manchester, UK:Manchester University Press.
  79. Kuru, D.(2018).Homegrown Theorizing: Knowledge, Scholars, Theory.All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,7(1),69-86.
  80. Kuru, D.(2020).Dialogue of the ‘Globals’: Connecting Global IR to Global Intellec-tual History.All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,9(2),229-248.
  81. Larus, J.(ed.)(1964).Comparative World Politics: Readings in Western and Premodern Non-Western International Relations.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
  82. Ling, L. H. M.(2018).Heart and Soul for World Politics: Advaita Monism and Daoist Trialectics in IR.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific,18(3),313-337.
  83. Mallavarapu, S.(2009).Development of International Relations Theory in India.Inter-national Studies,46(1-2),165-183.
  84. Millerman, M., 2015. “Theory Talk #71: John M. Hobson on Eurocentrism, Histori-cal Sociology and the Curious Case of Postcolonialism.” in Theory Talks: http://www.theory-talks.org/2015/09/theory-talk-71.html, Available: 2019/11/25.
  85. Min, B. W.(2016).Not So Universal? The Search for Indigenous International Rela-tions Theories in South Korea.The Korean Journal of International Studies,14(3),461-487.
  86. Mishra, A.(2014).Indigenism in Contemporary IR Discourses in India: A Critique.Stud-ies in Indian Politics,2(2),119-135.
  87. Moshirzadeh, H.(2018).Iranian Scholars and Theorizing International Relations: Achievements and Challenges.All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,7(1),103-120.
  88. Murray, C.(2020).Imperial Dialectics and Epistemic Mapping: From Decolonisation to Anti-Eurocentric IR.European Journal of International Relations,26(2),419-442.
  89. Nordin, A. H. M.(2019).Towards Global Relational Theorizing: a Dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone Scholarship on Relationalism.Cambridge Review of International Affairs,32(5),570-581.
  90. Nuruzzaman, M.(2018).Western and Islamic International Theories: A Com-parative Analysis.International Studies,55(2),106-129.
  91. O’Hagan, J.(2002).Conceptualizing the West in International Relations: From Spen-gler to Said.London, UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
  92. Owens, P.(2016).International Historical What?.International Theory,8(3),448-457.
  93. Peng, L.(2019).Chinese IR Sino-Centrism Tradition and Its Influence on the Chinese School Movement.The Pacific Review,32(2),150-167.
  94. Peters, I.(ed.),Wemheuer-Vogelaar, W.(ed.)(2016).Globalizing International Relations: Scholarship Amidst Divides and Diversity.London, UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
  95. Petito, F.(2016).Dialogue of Civilizations in a Multipolar World: Toward a Multiciv-ilizational-Multiplex World Order.International Studies Review,18(1),78-91.
  96. Phillips, A.(2016).The Global Transformation, Multiple Early Modernities, and In-ternational Systems Change.International Theory,8(3),481-491.
  97. Phillips, A.(2016).Global IR Meets Global History: Sovereignty, Modernity, and the International System’s Expansion in the Indian Ocean Region.International Studies Review,18(1),62-77.
  98. Qin, Y.(2007).Why Is There No Chinese International Relations Theory?.Interna-tional Relations of the Asia-Pacific,7(3),313-340.
  99. Qin, Y.(2020).Introduction: The Global Turn in IR and Non-Western IR Theory.Globalizing IR Theory: Critical Engagement,London, UK:
  100. Qin, Y.(2016).A Relational Theory of World Politics.International Studies Review,18(1),33-47.
  101. Qin, Y.(2016).Development of International Relations Theory in China: Progress through Debates.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific,11(3),231-257.
  102. Qin, Y.(2018).A Relational Theory of World Politics.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
  103. Qin, Y.(2009).Relationality and Processual Construction: Bringing Chinese Ideas into International Relations Theory.Social Sciences in China,15(3),5-20.
  104. Rood, T.(2010).Herodotus’ Proem: Space, Time, and the Origins of International Re-lations.Ariadne,16(16),43-74.
  105. Rösch, F.(ed.),Watanabe, A.(ed.)(2018).Modern Japanese Political Thought and International Relations.New York:Rowman & Littlefield International.
  106. Rösch, F.,Watanabe, A.(2017).Approaching the Unsynthesizable in International Politics: Giving Substance to Security Discourses through Basso Ostinato?.European Journal of International Relations,23(3),609-629.
  107. Shahi, D.(2019).Introducing Sufism to International Relations Theory: A Prelimi-nary Inquiry into Epistemological, Ontological, and Methodological Pathways.European Journal of International Relations,25(1),250-275.
  108. Shahi, D.(2018).Advaita as a Global International Relations Theory.London, UK:Routledge.
  109. Shahi, D.(2019).Kautilya and Non-Western IR Theory.Cham, Switzerland:Palgrave Pivot.
  110. Shahi, D.,Ascione, G.(2016).Rethinking the Absence of Post-Western Internation- al Relations Theory in India: ‘Advaitic Monism’ as an Alternative Epistemologi-cal Resource.European Journal of International Relations,22(2),313-334.
  111. Shani, G.(2008).Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory.International Studies Review,10(4),722-734.
  112. Shaw, M.(2000).Historical Sociology and Global Transformation.Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories,London, UK:
  113. Shaw, M.(2001).The Historical Transition of Our Times: The Question of Globality in Historical Sociology.Cambridge Review of International Affairs,14(2),273-289.
  114. Shih, C.-y.(2019).China and International Theory: The Balance of Relation-ships.London, UK:Routledge.
  115. Shih, C.-y.(2018).Roundtable Discussion on Homegrown Theorizing.All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,7(2),108-109.
  116. Shih, C.-y.(2017).Transcending Hegemonic International Relations Theorization: Nothingness, Re-Worlding, and Balance of Relationship.All Azimuth: A Jour-nal of Foreign Policy and Peace,6(2),19-42.
  117. Shih, C.-y.,Huang, C. C.(2014).Harmonious Intervention: China’s Quest for Rela-tional Security.Farnham, UK:Ashgate.
  118. Shih, C.-y.,Hwang, Y.-J.(2018).Re-Worlding the ‘West’ in Post-Western IR: the Reception of Sun Zi’s The Art of War in the Anglosphere.International Rela-tions of the Asia-Pacific,18(3),421-448.
  119. Shih, C.-y.,Yu, P.-t.(2015).Post-Western International Relations Reconsidered: The Pre-Modern Politics of Gongsun Long.London, UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
  120. Shilliam, R.(2011).Non-Western Thought and International Relations.International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colo-nialism and Investigations of Global Modernity,London, UK:
  121. Shimizu, K.(2008).Is There A Japanese IR? Seeking an Academic Bridge through Japan’s History of International Relations.Shiga, Japan:Afrasian Re-search Centre for Peace and Development Studies, Ryukoku University.
  122. Smith, K.(2018).Reshaping International Relations: Theoretical Innovations from Af-rica.All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,7(2),81-92.
  123. Spohn, W.(2011).An Appraisal of Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt’s Global Histori-cal Sociology.Journal of Classical Sociology,11(3),281-301.
  124. Sune, E.(2016).Non-Western International Relations Theory and Ibn Khaldun.All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace,5(1),79-88.
  125. Supachalasai, C.(2017).Decolonial Epistemology and the Future of Thai IR Theory.Journal of Social Science,47(1),37-62.
  126. Tickner, A. B.(2003).Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World.Millen-nium: Journal of International Studies,32(2),295-324.
  127. Tickner, A. B.(ed.),Blaney, D. L.(ed.)(2012).Thinking International Relations Differ-ently.London, UK:Routledge.
  128. Tickner, A. B.(ed.),Blaney, D. L.(ed.)(2013).Claiming the International.London, UK:Routledge.
  129. Tickner, A. B.(ed.),Waever, O.(ed.)(2009).International Relations Scholarship Around the World.London, UK:Routledge.
  130. Vasilaki, R.(2012).Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory.Millennium: Journal of International Studies,41(1),3-22.
  131. Voskressenski, A. D.(2017).Non-Western Theories of International Relations: Con-ceptualizing World Regional Studies.Cham, Switzerland:Palgrave Macmillan.
  132. Wallerstein, I.(1974).The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Ori-gins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century.New York:Aca-demic Press.
  133. Weaver, O.(1998).The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.International Organization,52(4),687-727.
  134. Wemheuer-Vogelaar, W.,Peters, I.(2016).Introduction: Global(izing) International Relations: Studying Geo-Epistemological Divides and Diversity.Globalizing International Relations: Scholar-ship Amidst Divides and Diversity,London, UK:
  135. Yalvaç, F.(2016).International Relations Theory.Islam and International Relations: Contributions to Theory and Practice,London, UK:
  136. Yan, X.(2019).Leadership and the Rise of Great Powers.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  137. Zhang, Y.(ed.),Chang, T.(ed.)(2016).Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations Ongoing Debates and Sociological Realities.London, UK:Routledge.
  138. Zhang, Y.,Kristensen, P. M.(2017).The Curious Case of ‘Schools’ of IR: From the Sociology to the Geopolitics of Knowledge.The Chinese Journal of Interna-tional Politics,10(4),429-454.
  139. Zhou, F.(2011).Equilibrium Analysis of the Tributary System.The Chinese Journal of International Politics,4(2),147-178.
  140. 方萬全(2001)。翻譯、詮釋與不可共量性。孔恩：評論集，臺北:
  141. 王江麗(2013)。中國國際關係研究的歷史轉向。浙江大學學報（人文社會科學版），43(4)，77-92。
  142. 王軍(2007)。國際關係的歷史社會學：基本概念、理論演進與價值。社會理論，1，21-46。
  143. 石之瑜(2010)。國際關係研究的亞洲地方性學派。國際政治科學，3，51-73。
  144. 余瀟楓,章雅荻(2019)。和合主義：國際關係理論的中國範式。世界經濟與政治，7，49-76。
  145. 余麗(2010)。先秦中原文化區域國際政治思想主幹及其當代價值。世界經濟與政治，2，101-118。
  146. 汪宏倫(2011)。國家與戰爭：歷史社會學與國際關係的邂逅。國際關係理論，臺北:
  147. 周方銀(2012)。鬆散等級體系下的合法性崛起—春秋時期「尊王」爭霸策略分析。世界經濟與政治，6，4-34。
  148. 徐進(2012)。春秋時期「尊王攘夷」戰略的效用分析。國際政治科學，2，38-61。
  149. 秦亞青(2016)。國際政治關係理論的幾個假定。世界經濟與政治，10，19-28。
  150. 秦亞青(2015)。國際政治理論的新探索—國際政治的關係理論。世界經濟與政治，2，4-10。
  151. 秦亞青(2005)。國際關係理論的核心問題與中國學派的生成。中國社會科學，3，165-176。
  152. 秦亞青(2020)。全球國際關係學與中國國際關係理論。國際觀察，2，27-45。
print cancel