查彬援史證《易》之特色與目的

The Features and purpose of reference from The Book of Change of Cha Bin

邱君奎(Chiu Chun-Kuei)

查彬 ； 《六十四卦經史彙參》 ； 援史證《易》 ； 乾嘉《易》學 ； Cha Bin ； 64 qua jing shi hui can ； Reference from The Book of Change ； Ch'ien-lung and Chia-ch'ing Zhouyi

輔仁中文學報

49期（2019 / 12 / 01）

65 - 100

繁體中文

查彬（1762－1821），清中葉經學家，少嗜篤學，精力過人，自弱冠通籍，歷官三十餘載，未曾嘗一日廢書，有所得輙隨筆錄之，至老不倦。查氏治學以《易》為宗，承襲宋儒楊萬里援史證《易》之精神，所著《六十四卦經史彙參》一書，援史事藉古鑑今，以顯窮經致用之旨。釋《易》先明爻義，再援史事，復闡其理，且一爻往往所引之史事，多達十數例，遍及各朝代，為此書特點，提供後世學者豐富史證為鑑。其次，查彬身處乾隆晚期，貪官汙吏充斥，尤以和珅之惡為首，故其援史證《易》目的之一，即在藉古諷今，透過品評歷朝歷代所發生之史事，褒貶人物優劣，且書中所援引之例證，大凡都會有正反對照組，以便讀者參照，故此書堪為清中葉史事《易》學著作佳構。

Cha Bin ( 1762-1821, courtesy name is Bo-Ye and art name is Hsianghsiang daoren) was a Confucian scholar in the middle of the Qing Dynasty. He, devoted to study from his childhood, was energetic in light that he became an expert of the study of classics when he was twenty years old, and never gave up the study during his thirty odd years after being a minister. Moreover, he always recorded his thoughts whenever he was inspired, even till old age. Cha Bin's study was on Yijing principally and he inherited the spirit of Yang Wan-Li, a Confucian scholar in the Song Dynasty, who used the historical past to verify what Yijing taught. Cha Bin wrote 64 qua jing shi hui can, which he used the historical past to view the present in order to distinguish the theme that the study of classics would lead to practical use. In that book, lines had to be understood before Yijing was interpreted, and then the historical events were used to interpret the theories of Yijing. Further, 64 qua jing shi hui can was characteristic that the quantity of the historical events used by a line was usually over ten and the historical events were through various dynasties. As a masterpiece in the ＂historical events Yijing＂ category in the middle Qing Dynasty, it offered abundant historical evidence for the subsequent scholars to view. This study, aimed to explore the characteristics of Cha Bin's using history in verifying Yijing, described briefly his purpose and characteristics in interpreting Yijing and his thoughts of Yi learning. It was expected that the current study would facilitate the scholars to know Cha Bin and the complete 64 qua jing shi hui can of him.

1. 陳慶元(2015)。石祟「士當身名俱泰」辨。國文學報，57，29-56。
   連結：
2. (2000).四庫未收書輯刊.北京:北京出版社.
3. （元）脫脫(2004).宋史.上海:漢語大詞典出版社.
4. （宋）司馬光(1996).資治通鑑.北京:中華書局.
5. 宋．洪邁:《容齋續筆》，《四部叢刊續編》(臺北:商務印書館，1934年)。
6. （宋）楊萬里(1970).誠齋易傳.臺北:臺灣中華書局.
7. （宋）歐陽修(2004).新唐書.上海:漢語大詞典出版社.
8. （明）陳邦瞻(1977).宋史紀事本末.臺北:三民書局.
9. （唐）房玄齡(2004).晉書.上海:漢語大詞典出版社.
10. （唐）魏徵(2004).隋書.上海:漢語大詞典出版社.
11. （晉）陳壽(2004).三國志．魏書.上海:漢語大詞典出版社.
12. （晉）劉昀(2004).舊唐書.上海:漢語大詞典出版社.
13. （清）王夫之(1985).讀通鑒論.臺北:里仁書局.
14. （清）任啟運(1986).周易洗心.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
15. （清）朱駿聲(2009).六十四卦經解.北京:中華書局.
16. （清）吳曰慎(1995).周易本義爻徵.上海:上海古籍出版社.
17. （清）李光地(1971).周易折中.臺北:真善美出版社.
18. （清）歐陽厚均,方紅姣（校點）(2013).歐陽厚均集一.湖南:嶽麓書社.
19. （漢）班固(2004).漢書.上海:漢語大詞典出版社.
20. 李純瑀(2017)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學國文學系。
21. 李燾(2008).續資治通鑑長編.北京:中華書局.
22. 娟芷(2013).可惡又成功的奸臣們.臺北:崧博出版事業有限公司.
23. 黃忠天(2008)。世變與易學─清初史事易學述要。經學研究集刊，5，125-144。
24. 黃忠天(2007)。史事宗易學研究方法析論。周易研究，12-13。
25. 錢霆(2006)。錢陳群傳記。嘉興市文史資料通訊，46，6-56。