薩提爾模式家庭探源團體療效研究－參與者觀點的分析

Research on Therapeutic Effects of A Family Exploration Group with Satir Model – A Participants' Perspective

10.30074/FJMH.200309_16(3).0002

卓紋君(Wen-Chun Cho)；黃創華(Chuang-Hua Huang)

薩提爾模式 ； 團體治療 ； 團體治療因素 ； Satir model ； group counseling ； therapeutic factors

中華心理衛生學刊

16卷3期（2003 / 09 / 01）

31 - 59

繁體中文

本研究依據薩提爾的理念設計了一個短期、連續三個週六，總時數達二十小時的家庭探源團體，參加成員有十八位社區女性，年齡介於20至54歲之間。研究者採用事後焦點團體訪談探討此團體的成效，並以Yalom (1985)的團體治療因素量表（七點量尺）分析此團體的療效因素。分析成員自陳的結果發現：短期薩提爾模式團體對成員知覺自己的溝通模式最有幫助，對成員瞭解或轉化溝通型態也有幫助；但整體而言，（一）在知覺自己的模式和實際付出行動間仍稍有差距，（二）短期薩提爾模式團體對成員生活規條的轉化或選擇有幫助，（三）短期薩提爾模式團體對成員改善人際關係有幫助。（四）短期薩提爾模式團體對部份成員提升自我價值感有幫助。本研究也發現此團體有效的治療因素依序為：1.存在的因素，2.自我的瞭解，3.團體凝聚力及家庭經驗的矯正性重現並列，4.普遍性，5.注入希望，6.情緒宣洩，7.認同仿效，8.人際學習，9.利他性，10.資訊傳遞。此結果反映出短期薩提爾模式家庭探源團體最重要的治療因素是存在的因素，此與薩提爾所說的自我價值的重建（我是我自己）頗有關連。研究者據此結果加以討論，並提出研究的方向與實務應用的重點。

This study aims to explore to what degree and what aspects that a family exploration group counseling based on Satir-model is helpful to the members. Eighteen females whose age were between 20 and 54, in Kaohsiung participated a three weeks, 20 hours in total, growth group. The results showed that the group counseling helped the members in many aspects. Firstly, group members reported an increase in awareness of their communication stances, family rules, and how their family of origin had influenced their life. Secondly, some members improved their relationships with significant others as well as transformed their family rules and expanded their views for choices they had. Thirdly, some members enhanced their self-esteem. It was also found that existential factor is the most reported therapeutic factor for the group. The limitations of this study were discussed, some suggestions for future research and group counseling with Satir model were addressed.

1. 張包意琴 Cheung, Grace、 陳麗雲 Chan, Cecilia(2001)。和諧中變革：易經與華人的心理輔導。本土心理學研究 Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies，14
   連結：
2. Andreas, S.(1991).Virginia Satir: The Patterns of Her Magic.Palo Alto, CA:Science and Behavior Books.
3. Banmen, J.(2002).The Satir Modle: Yesterday and Today.Contemporary Family Therapy,24(1)
4. Banmen, J.(1986).Virginia Satir's Family Therapy Model.Individual Psychology,42(4)
5. Bozeman, J. C.(1985).An Investigation of Virginia Satir's Concept of Communication to Determine Possible Implications for Education in Marital Communication.Dissertation Abstracts International,46(3)
6. Chan, P.(1996).The Application of the Satir Model of Family Therapy to the Families in Hong Kong: A Personal Reflection.Contemporary Family Therapy,18(4)
7. Corsini, R., Rosenberg, B.(1955).Mechanisms of Group Psychotherapy Process and Dynamics.Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology,51
8. Englander-Golden, P., Golden, E. D.(1996).The Impact of Virginia Satir on Prevention of Destructive Behaviors and Promotion of Wellness.Journal of Couples Therpay,6
9. Getz, H., Gunn, W. B.(1988).Parent Education from A Family-systems Perspective.The School Counselor,35
10. Innes, M.(2002).Satir's Therapeutically Oriented Educational Process: A Critical Appreciation.Contemporary Family Therapy,24(1)
11. Lee, B. K.(2002).Congruence in Satir's Model: It's Spiritual and Religious Significance.Contemporary Family Therapy,24(1)
12. Lieblich, A., Tuvak-Mashiach, R., Zilber, T.(1998).Narrative Research.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
13. Lum, W.(2000).Vancouver, Canada,University of British Columbia.
14. Pan, P. J. D.(2000).The Effectiveness of Structured and Semistructured Satir Model Groups on Family Relationships with College Students in Taiwan.Journal for Specialists in Group Work,25(3)
15. Ribeiro, J.(1998).Counseling Psychology: Integrating Theory, Research and Supervised Practice.NY:Routledge.
16. Ruger, R. P., Barry, D.(1990).Overcoming Denial Through the Group: A Test of Acceptance Theory.Small Group Behavior,21
17. Satir, V., Balswin, M.(1983).Satir Step by Step: A Guide to Creating Change in Families.PaloAlto, CA:Science and Behavior Books.
18. Wach, K. H.(1992).Early Marriage (Couple Communication).Dissertation Abstracts International,53(3)
19. Willett, L. C.(1996).Using Instructional Videotape to Teach Couples Communication, Conflict Resolution, and Problem-solving.Ann Arbor, Michigan:A Bell ＆ Howell Company.
20. Yalom, I. D.(1985).The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy.New York:Basic Books.
21. Yalom, I. D.(1995).The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy.New York:Basic Books.
22. 王文秀 Wang, Wen-Hsiu(1990)。團體輔導的治療因素。諮商與輔導 Counseling & Guidance，54
23. 何紀瑩(1994)。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所。
24. 吳就君 Wu, Chew-Chung(1983)。家庭如何塑造人。台北:時報。
25. 李玉嬋 Li, Yuh-Chain(1992)。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所。
26. 卓紋君 Cho, Wen-Chun、 簡文英 Chien, Wen Ying(2003)。薩提爾模式親職成長團體對國中生家長輔導效果之研究。高師大學報，15
27. 林沈明瑩(1999)。薩提爾系統短期治療諮商訓練課程實務研習手冊。台北:呂旭立紀念文教基金會。
28. 林沈明瑩 、 陳登義 Chen, Teng-Yi、 楊蓓(1998)。薩提爾的家族治療模式 The Satir model: Family therapy and beyond。台北:張老師文化。
29. 林美珠 Lin, Meei-Ju、 王文秀 Wang, Wen-Hsiu(1998)。團體治療性與反治療性重要事件之分析。中華輔導學報 Chinese Annual Report of Guidance and Counseling，6
30. 翁樹澍 、 王大維 Wang, Ta-wei(1999)。家族治療理論與技術。台北:揚智。
31. 莊雅婷(1999)。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所。
32. 陳奕良 Chen, I-Liang(2001)。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所。
33. 鄭玉英 Cheng, Yu-Ying(1993)。家庭重塑的轉化過程－一場家庭重塑的個案研究。東吳社會學報 Soochow Journal of Sociology，2
34. 賴念華 Lai, Nien-Hwa(2001)。薩提爾模式－治療師探索案主冰山的引導方式。輔導季刊 Guidance Quarterly，37(1)

1. 陳奕吟、卓紋君(2017)。夫妻原生家庭溝通姿態、婚姻溝通姿態、婚姻調適策略與婚姻滿意度之對偶分析。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，31，7-51。
2. 林俊德(2020)。高齡者參與賦能取向式園藝治療團體之治療因素探究。中華輔導與諮商學報，59，103-136。
3. 羅筠雅,張有恒(2022)。對中輟高危險群學生進行團體工作模式之行動研究。學生事務與輔導，60(4)，52-75。
4. 孫頌賢(2019)。愛情練習曲：未婚伴侶在情緒取向伴侶諮商的經驗研究。應用心理研究，71，137-181。
5. 葉貞雯、葉貞屏(2008)。親子遊戲輔導團體療效研究。臺北市立教育大學學報：教育類，39(2)，105-133。
6. 鍾雨潔,謝佑暄(2023)。使用薩提爾模式提升自我價值感：以個案為例。學生事務與輔導，61(4)，49-54。