隨機反應法於敏感性資料之調查一模式檢驗與案例探討

Surveys on Sensitive Issues via Randomized Response Technique - the Model Reexamination and a Case Study

10.30074/FJMH.200409_17(3).0001

許聰鑫(Tsong-Shin Sheu)；王延皊(Yan-Lin Wan)；蘇完女(Wan-Nu Su)；李麗日(Li-Jih Lee)；王郁茗(Yu-Ming Wang)

隨機反應法 ； 敏感性議題 ； warner 模式 ； 「非相關問題」模式 ； 婚前性行為比例 ； randomized response technique ； sensitive issues ； Warner model ； unrelated question model ； proportion of pre-martial sexual behavior

中華心理衛生學刊

17卷3期（2004 / 09 / 01）

1 - 22

繁體中文

隨機反應法是調查敏感性議題的有效工具，它的基本邏輯是：如果受訪者的隱私愈受到保護，則對於敏感性議題的調查他們必然會愈願意誠實回答。長久以來，文獻上的發展一直著重於受訪的隱私保護與安全感，以提高調查的合作度。相對地，本文則從統計理論著手，證明 Warner 模式與「非相關問題」模式中的估計式是優良的估計式，所以它們是可以讓調查者「放心使用」的估計式。再者，本文加入「成功性」的考量以幫助模式中的關鍵參數p（受訪者抽到敏感問題之機率）的設定。本文進而採「非相關問題」模式，針對中部地區校園內婚前性行為比例進行主題調查。從受訪者的隱私保護、調查者的「放心使用」、以及應用範圍的廣泛等三個角度來看，隨機反應法應用於敏感議題調查的空間是較匿名問卷調查為優的。

Randomized response technique is an efficient tool in the investigation of sensitive issues. Its essential logic is based on the protection of privacy. The more the personal privacy is protected, the more the respondent is willing to give honest answers for sensitive issues. For a long time, the development of randomized response technique has focused on the improvement of privacy protection to raise the sense of security and cooperation for investigation. In this paper, based on statistics, we prove that the sensitive behavior estimators appeared in Warner model and unrelated question model are superior; therefore, investigators can apply it with confidence. In addition, we further include the validity consideration of estimators to assist with the determination of model’s key parameter p (p is the probability that respondents pick the sensitive issue). In the end, we conduct an investigation for the proportion of pre-martial sexual behavior in campus via unrelated question model. From the viewpoints of privacy protection, confidence in application and application scope, the randomized response technique is superior to anonymous questionnaire.

1. Abul-Ela, A. A.,Greenberg, B. G.,Horvitz, D. G.(1967).A multiproportions randomized response model.Journal of the American Statistical Association,991-1008.
2. Begin, G.,Boivin, M.,Bellerose, J.(1979).Sensitive data collection through the random response technique: some improvements.Journal of Psychology,53-65.
3. Bhargava, M.,Singh, Ravindra(2002).On the efficiency comparison of certain randomized response strategies,191-197.
4. Carr, J. W.,Marascuilo, L. A.,Busk, P.(1982).Optimal randomized response models and methods for hypothesis testing.Journal of Educational Statistics,295-310.
5. Chang, H. J.,Liang, T. H(1996).A note on an indirect randomized response model.International Journal of Information and Management Sciences,21-31.
6. Chow, L. P.,Gruhn, W.,Chang, W. P(1979).Feasibility of the randomized response technique in rural Ethiopia.American Journal of Public Health,273-276.
7. Crino, M. D.,Rubenfeld, S. A.,Willoughby, F. W(1985).The random response techniques as an indicator of questionnaire item social desirability/personal sensitivity.Educational and Psychological Measurement,453-468.
8. Dalton, D. R.,Wimbush, J. C.,Daily, C. M(1996).Candor, privacy, and “legal immunity” in business ethics research: an empirical assessment of the randomized response technique (RRT).Business Ethics Quarterly,87-99.
9. Danermark, B.,Swensson, B(1987).Measuring drug use among Swedish adolescents.Journal of Official Statistics,439-448.
10. Dowling, T. A.,Shachman, R(1975).On the relative efficiency of randomized response models.Journal of the American Statistical Association,990-1008.
11. Eriksson, S. A(1973).A new model for randomized response.International Statistical Review,101-113.
12. Fidler, D. S.,Kleinknecht, R. E(1977).Randomized response versus direct questioning: two data collection methods for sensitive information.Psychological Bulletin,1045-1049.
13. Fox, J. A.,Tracy, P.E(1980).The randomized response approach: applicability to criminal justice research and evaluation.Evaluation Review,601-622.
14. Gold, M(1966).Undected delinquent behavior.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,27-46.
15. Greenberg, B. G.,Abul-Ela, A. A.,Simmons, W. R.,Horvitz, D. G(1969).The unrelated question randomized response model: theoretical framework.Journal of the American Statistical Association,520-539.
16. Greenberg, B. G.,Kubler, R. R.,Abernathy, J. R.,Horvitz, D.G(1971).Application of the randomized response technique in obtaining quantitative data.Journal of the American Statistical Association,243-250.
17. Horvitz, D. G.,Shah, B. V.,Simmons, W. R(1967).The unrelated question randomized response model.Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association,65-72.
18. Kuk, A. Y. C(1990).Asking sensitive questions indirectly.Biometrika,436-438.
19. Loynes, R. M(1976).Asymptotically optimal randomized response procedures.Journal of the American Statistical Association,924-928.
20. Mangat, N. S.,Singh, R(1990).An alternative randomized response procedure.Biometrika,439-454.
21. Mendenhall, W.,Scheaffer, R. L.,Wackerly, D. D(1982).Mathematical statistics with applications.Massachusetts:Duxbury Press.
22. Miller, I. D(1981).Complexities of the randomized response solution.American Sociological Review,928-930.
23. Miller, J. D.,Cisin, I. H(1984).The item-count/paired lists technique: an indirect method of surveying deviant behavior.Washington, DC:George Washington University, Social Research Group.
24. Miller, J. D.,Cisin, I. H.,Harrell, A. V(1986).A new technique for surveying deviant behavior: item-count estimates of marijuana, cocaine, and heroin. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St.
25. Moors, J. J. A(1971).Optimization of the unrelated question RR model.Journal of the American Statistical Association,627-629.
26. Mukhopadhyay, P(1980).Project Report, Indian Statistical Institute.
27. Nathan, Gad(1988).A bibliography on randomized response: 1965-1987.Survey Methodology,331-346.
28. Reinmuth, J. E.,Geurts, M. D(1975).The collection of sensitive information using a two-stage randomized response model.Journal of Marketing Research,402-407.
29. Singh, Sarjinder(2002).A new stochastic randomized response model,131-142.
30. Warner, S. L(1965).Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias.Journal of the American Statistical Association,63-69.
31. Web, E. J.,Campbell, D. T.,Schwartz, R. D.,Sechrest, L(1966).Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences.Chicago:Rand McNally.
32. Zimmerman, R. S.,Langer, L. M(1995).Improving estimates of prevalence rates of sensitive behaviors: the randomized lists technique and consideration of self-reported honesty.The Journal of Sex Research,107-117.
33. 余佩芬(1996)。多分類敏感性問題的二個隨機作答程序。
34. 呂昌明(1994)。影響大學生婚前性行為因素的性別差異之研究。衛生教育論文集刊，7，78-87。
35. 周文賢(1997)。統計學。台北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。
36. 林惠生(2002)。台灣性教育協會第五屆第二次年度大會暨學術研討會專題演講內容。
37. 晏涵文、林燕卿、張利中(1998)。青少年婚前性行為及其趨勢之探討。台灣性學學刊，4(2)，1-14。
38. 馬德人(1981)。非抽樣誤差之推測與控制之研究。政治大學統計研究所。
39. 張絃炬、梁德馨(1996)。二個敏感性問題隨機作答程序的研究。民意研究季刊，195，1-17。
40. 張黎文(2003)。十大性聞之首四分之一少男五分之一少女有性經驗。中國時報，13
41. 鄭光甫、韋端(1995)。抽樣方法，8

1. 潘淑滿,劉一龍,林雅容,林東龍(2023)。敏感性問題訪問調查的挑戰：以婦女遭受親密伴侶暴力為例。臺大社會工作學刊，48，37-67。