兒童知覺的雙重家庭暴力經驗與其適應行為之相關研究

A Study of the Relationship between Dual-Violence Families and Child Behavior

10.30074/FJMH.200503_18(1).0002

沈瓊桃(April Chiung-Tao Shen)

婚姻暴力 ； 兒童虐待 ； 兒童行為 ； 雙重家庭暴力 ； Marital violence ； child abuse ； child behavior ； dual-violence family

中華心理衛生學刊

18卷1期（2005 / 03 / 01）

25 - 64

繁體中文

研究目的：本研究旨在檢視兒童在家庭生活中，經驗到雙重家庭暴力的嚴重程度，及其與兒童在情緒與行為方面的關係。 研究方法：本研究以台北市國小五、六年級的學生為研究對象。樣本選取以分層叢集隨機抽樣的方式，針對台北市十二個行政區，每區抽取一個學校，以問卷調查的方式收集資料。預試共回收有效樣本144份；正式施測回收有效問卷為632份。本研究所使用的測量工具是自編的問卷，共包括五個部分：基本資料、「父母衝突量表」、「兒童感受量表」、「父母管教方式」與「兒童行為量表」。 研究結果：1.受雙重暴力兒童佔研究樣本12.7%，顯示有超過十分之一的兒童在家庭生活中曾經看到父母之間的肢體暴力，也曾遭受父母的肢體暴力，是家庭暴力的雙重受害者。兒童目睹婚暴與受肢體暴力之間有顯著的正相關(r=.45)。2.兒童目睹婚暴與受暴程度有其性別差異。男童目睹婚暴程度、受父母肢體暴力程度、以及受雙重暴力的程度，皆顯著地高於女童。3.受雙重暴力兒童之外向性行為（攻擊、違規行為）與內向性行為（憂鬱、恐懼焦慮及退縮）的嚴重程度皆高於受暴兒童、目睹婚暴兒童、與一般兒童。4.影響兒童外向性行為的顯著因素包括：遭受父母言語暴力程度、性別、代罪羔羊、目睹父母言語暴力程度。內向性行為的預測因素包括：遭受父母言語暴力程度、代罪羔羊、受雙重暴力程度。正向性行為的預測因素包括：代罪羔羊、親職化、性別、年級。本文最後根據研究結果提供建議。

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to examine the severity of marital violence and child maltreatment experienced by children in these families, as well as their association with children's behavior and emotional functioning. Methods: Participants in this study were 632 fifth-and sixth-grade students from 12 primary schools obtained from a proportionate stratified community sample in Taipei. The sample was stratified by 12 districts in Taipei City to increase representativeness. Data were collected through a questionnaire including five parts: demographics, Marital Conflict Scale, Children's Perception Scale, Child Maltreatment Scale, and Child Behavior Scale. Results: (1) Of the participants, 12.7% both witnessed physical marital violence and experienced physical child violence in family. The correlation between witnessing marital violence and experiencing physical violence is .45. (2) Boys and girls exhibited different adjustment problems. Boys had significantly higher exposure to marital violence and physical violence. Boys scored significantly higher on externalizing behavior problems. (3) There are significant differences in children's positive, externalizing, and internalizing behaviors among the following four groups: children experiencing no family violence, children witnessing marital violence, children experiencing physical violence, and children who were both witnesses and victims. (4) The significant predictors of children's externalizing behaviors include: the degree of child's experience of parents' verbal violence, gender, scapegoat, and the degree of child's exposure to verbal marital violence. The significant predictors of children's internalizing behaviors include: the degree of child's experience of parents' verbal violence, scapegoat, and the degree of exposure to both marital violence and physical child violence. The significant predictors of children's positive behaviors include: scapegoat, parentification, gender, and grade. Suggestions are made according to the research findings.

1. Appel, A. E.,Holden, G. W.(1998).The co-occurrence of spouse and physical child abuse: A review and appraisal.Journal of Family Psychology,12(4),578-599.
2. Bancroft, L.,Silverman, J. G.(2002).The batterer as parent: Assessing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics.
3. Barnett, O. W.,Miller-Perrin, C. L.,Perrin, R. D.(1997).Family violence across the lifespan: An introduction.
4. Family Violence Prevention Fund
5. Edleson, J. L.(1999).The overlap between child maltreatment and woman battering.Violence Against Women,5(2),134-154.
6. Grych, J. H.,Jouriles, E. N.,Swank, P. R.(2000).Patterns of adjustment among children of battered women.Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology,68(1),84-94.
7. Hughes, H. M.(1988).Psychological and behavioral correlates of family violence in child witnesses and victims.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,58(1),77-90.
8. Hughes, H. M.,Parkinson, D.,Vargo, M.(1989).Witnessing spouse abuse and experiencing physical abuse: A “double whammy”?.Journal of Family violence,4(2),197-209.
9. Kruttschnitt, C.,Dornfeld, M.(1992).Will they tell? Assessing preadolescents` reports of family violence.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,29,136-147.
10. McGuigan, W. M.,Pratt, C. C.(2001).The predictive impact of domestic violence on three types of child maltreatment.Child Abuse & Neglect,25,869-883.
11. Moore, T. E.,Pepler, D. J.(1998).Correlates of adjustment in children at risk.Children exposed to marital violence,157-184.
12. O`Keefe, M.(1995).Predictors of child abuse in martially violent families.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,10,3-25.
13. O`Keefe, M.,Lebovics, S.(1998).Intervention and treatment strategies with adolescents from martially violent homes.Battered women and their families: Intervention strategies and treatment programs
14. Rossman, B. B.(1998).Descartes`s error and posttraumatic stress disorder: Cognition and emotion in children who are exposed to parental violence.Children exposed to marital violence,223-256.
15. Straus, M. A.,Gelles, R. J.,Smith, C.(1990).Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families.
16. U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect(1995).A nation`s shame: Fatal child abuse and neglect in the United States: Fifth report.
17. Wiehe, V. R.(1998).Understanding family violence: Treating and preventing partner, child, sibling, and elder abuse.
18. 王清峰(2001)。家暴法與性侵害法制之沿革與婦女人身安全。家庭暴力與性侵害學術論文研討會，彰化:
19. 王淑娟(1998)。東吳大學社會工作研究所。
20. 吳秋月、吳麗娟(1999)。子女知覺父母婚姻暴力經驗、社會支持和共依附之關係。教育心理學報，31(1)，63-88。
21. 沈慶鴻(2001)。被遺忘的受害者－談婚姻暴力目睹兒童的影響和介入策略。社區發展季刊，94，241-250。
22. 沈慶鴻(2001)。由代間傳遞的觀點探索婚姻暴力對目睹兒童的影響。中華心理衛生學刊，14(2)，65-86。
23. 沈瓊桃(2004)。,國科會補助專題研究計劃成果報告書。
24. 周月清(1995)。婚姻暴力
25. 林淑娥(2000)。國立台灣大學社會學研究所。
26. 胡美齡(1999)。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所。
27. 翁毓秀、莊靜宜(2003)。目睹兒童與受暴母親之親子關係研究。二十一世紀兒童及少年福利與醫療福利學術研討會，台中:
28. 張虹雯(1999)。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所。
29. 陳卉瑩(2003)。中國文化大學教育心理與輔導學系。
30. 陳怡如(2001)。婚姻暴力目睹兒童處遇現況之探討。社區發展季刊，94，252-267。
31. 陳怡如(2003)。輔仁大學社會工作學系。
32. 曾慶玲(1998)。國立台北師範大學家政教育研究所。
33. 曾慶玲、周麗端(1999)。父母婚姻暴力對兒童問題行為影響研究。家政教育學報，2，66-89。
34. 湯慎思(1998)。國立陽明大學社區護理研究所。
35. 黃志中(1999)。以家庭為導向的家庭暴力防治策略。婚姻暴力合併兒童虐待處遇研討會，高雄:
36. 黃富源、黃翠紋(2000)。婚姻暴力對於兒童、青少年行為影響及其防處策略之探討。警學叢刊，30(4)，239-261。
37. 趙小玲(1999)。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所。
38. 劉秀娟(1996)。家庭暴力(Intimate Violence in Families)。

1. 蔡麗芳、洪家慧(2013)。遊戲治療中目睹家庭暴力兒童的家庭暴力認知與行為問題改變情形之個案研究。台灣遊戲治療學報，3，113-138。
2. 黃有志、陳竹上(2014)。壞先生是否也是壞爸爸？：家庭暴力防治法第四十三條之理論與實證分析。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，36，77-90。
3. 潘國仁(2012)。婚姻暴力問題對目睹兒童受創之影響研究。犯罪學期刊，15(1)，89-121。
4. 沈瓊桃(2006)。婚暴併兒虐發生率之初探—以南投縣為例。中華心理衛生學刊，19(4)，331-363。
5. 譚子文、董旭英、葉雅馨(2010)。社會緊張因素與台灣大學生內化適應問題關聯性之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，28，143-185。
6. 童伊迪,沈瓊桃(2018)。婚暴併兒虐家庭之多元模式與發生情境。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，14(2)，73-104。
7. 童伊迪、沈瓊桃(2005)。婚姻暴力目睹兒童之因應探討。臺大社會工作學刊，11，129-165。
8. 王純琪(2013)。親子遊戲治療對婚暴目睹兒童及其受暴母親親子互動行為處遇成效之分析研究。台灣遊戲治療學報，3，93-112。
9. 張景茹、郎亞琴(2011)。家暴目睹兒防治課程對國小高年級學童家暴知識與態度之影響。教育科學期刊，10(2)，47-68。
10. (2014)。青少年偏差行為與家庭。社區發展季刊，146，171-183。
11. (2024)。受暴母親及目睹兒童親子藝術治療互動的歷程分析。藝術教育研究，47，1-45。