分手的認知及調適之評量研究

Research of the Assessment of Cognition and Adaptation to Dissolution

10.30074/FJMH.200709_20(3).0001

王慶福(Ching-Fu Wang)；王郁茗(Yu-Ming Wang)

分手 ； 分手認知 ； 分手調適 ； 愛情基模 ； 愛情關係 ； breakup ； cognition to dissolution ； coping process to dissolution ； love schemas ； romantic relationship

中華心理衛生學刊

20卷3期（2007 / 09 / 01）

205 - 233

繁體中文

研究目的：本研究探討大學生對分手的認知及調適歷程，並發展分手諮商評量工具。研究方法：根據先前研究對大學生深度訪談的結果，編製分手認知與分手調適量表，以746位大學生為樣本，進行量表題項分析、結構分析與效度分析。研究結果：分手認知四個分量表共34題，內部一致性信度α係數為．70-90。分手調適量表15個分量表共115題，α係數介於．78-93。分手認知與分手調適共19個分量表，得到四個高層因素，可作為分量表選擇的依據。效度驗證發現，有分手經驗者比沒有分手經驗者，更能認清分手的意義與體會建立自我的重要。主動分手者痛苦較低但有較高的自責；被動分手者分手後有較大痛苦與較多困惑，自我懷疑與否定以及報復衝動都有較高的傾向。不同依附風格者在分手調適量表的15個分量表中共有11個達到顯著差異。研究結論：經由量表與分手經驗變項、人際依附風格之問的關係，初步支持了量表的效度。並對量表在分手諮商的應用與未來研究提出建議。

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to develope assessment inventories for the cognitive adaptation and coping process of college students facing the break up of romantic relationships. On purpose that these assessment tools could provide for the use in counseling process and help whom were maladjust to the breakup of romantic relationship due to cognitive and adaptating problems. Methods: According to the previous results of in-depth interview with college students, the inventories regarding the cognitive adaptation and coping process to the breaking up of love relationships were developed. A sample of 746 subjects were used in quantitative studies for item analysis, structure analysis, and validity study of this new inventories. Results: Factorial analysis of the Cognitive Adaptation to Dissolution Scale (CADS) resulted in 34 items and four subscales including (1) realizing the autonomous of love, (2) cynical attitude to love, (3) recognizing the meaning of breaking up, and (4) realizing the importance of the establishing of self. The alpha coefficients were. 70-.90. On the other hand, factorial analysis of the Coping to Dissolution Scale (CDS) resulted in 115 items and 15 subscales including (1) distressful, (2) learning as a growth experience, (3) relieve from the grief, (4) self-doubt, (5) favorable memories, (6) revenge impulse, (7) shifting life focus, (8) self-blame, (9) confused, (10) perplexed by opposite sex and love, (11) self hurt or making injury , (12) recovery, (13) understanding the opposite sex, (14) self-awareness to affective needs, (15) self-affirmation. The alpha coefficients were. 78-.93. Second order factor analysis of the above 19 subscales indicated that these scales included four factors including (1) traumatized and stumbled by breakup, (2) revise of love schemas, (3) growth and learning from breakup, and (4) favorable memories. These factors comprised the three dimensions of the assessment of loss by Schneider (1984), including ”what's lost”, ”what's left”, and ”what's possible”. More results about relationships among different intimacy states, attachment styles, and adaptation process for breaking up were reported. The students experienced breakup were more recognizing the meaning of breaking up and the importance of the establishing of self, than who did not experienced breakup. The leaver experienced less distress but more self-blame than the abandomed. The abandomed were more distressful, more confused, and score higher on subscales of self-doubt and revenge impulse. The students with avoidant attachment style experienced breakup with more self-doubt and more perplexed by opposite sex and love. The students with dismissing attachment style were easier shifting life focus and less confused to breakup, but also less in learning as a growth experience. The students with safe attachment style experienced less distress, easier to relieve from the grief, less self-doubt, easier to shift life focus and were most benefited from breakup learning as a growth experience. Conclusions: Based on these results, the validity of these two scales were being supported but need further accumulations of experiences in counseling process and validations from research studies. Some implications for counseling strategies were discussed and suggestions for future research were also proposed.

1. Akert, R. M.(1992).Terminating romantic relationships: The role of personal responsibility and gender.Wellesley College.
2. Bartholomew, K.,Horowitz, L. M.(1991).Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61,226-244.
3. Choo, P.,Levine, T.,Hatfield, E.(1996).Gender, love schemas, and reactions to romantic break-ups.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,11(5),143-160.
4. Collins, N. L.,Read, S. J.(1990).Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58,644-663.
5. Dahlstrom, C. J.(1995).Response to the loss of a romantic relationship: Differences by time since the loss, gender, and attachment style.Dissertation Abstracts International,56(1),504.
6. Dahlstrom, C. J.(1994).The University of North Dakota.
7. Dawis, R. V.(1987).Scale construction.Journal of Counseling Psychology,34,481-489.
8. Duck, S.(1982).Personal relation: Dissolving Personal Relationships.London:Academic Press.
9. Feeney, B. C.,Kirkpatrick, L. A.(1996).Attachment styles as a predictor of romantic partners on physiological reponses to stress.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70,255-270.
10. Feeney, J. A.,Noller, P.(1992).Attachment styles and romantic love: relationship dissolution.Australian Journal of Psychology,44,69-74.
11. Ferring, D.,Filipp, S-H.,J. H. Harvey (Eds.),E. D. Miller. (Eds.)(2000).Loss and trauma.Philadelphia, PA:Brunner-Routledge.
12. Hatfield, E.,Rapson, R. P.(1996).Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives.New York:Allyn & Bacon.
13. Hazan, C.,Shaver, P.(1987).Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52,511-524.
14. Helgeson, V. S.(1994).Long-distance romantic relationships: Sex differences in adjustment and breakup.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,20,254-265.
15. Hill, C. T.,Rubin, Z.,Peplau, L. A.(1976).Breakup before marriage: The end of 103 affairs.Journal of Social Issues,32(1),147-168.
16. Hoff, L. A.(1995).People in crisis: Understanding and helping.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
17. Kaczmarek, P.,Backlund, B.,Biemer, P.(1990).The dynamic of ending a romantic relationship: an empirical assessment of grief in college students.Journal of College Student Development,31,319-324.
18. Parkes, C. M.,Weiss, R.(1983).Recovery from bereavement.New York:International University Press.
19. Pistole, M. C.(1995).College students' ended love relationships: attachment style and emotion.Journal of College Student Development,36(1),53-60.
20. Robak, R. W.,Weitzman, S. P.(1995).Grieving the loss of romantic relationships in young adults: An empirical study of disenfranchised grief.Omega,30(4),269-281.
21. Schneider, J.(1984).Stress, loss and grief.Baltimore:University Park Press.
22. Schneider, J.(1994).Finding my way: Healing and transformation through loss and grief.Colfax WI:Seasons Press.
23. Seldman, R. S.(1993).Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
24. Simpson, J. A.(1990).Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationship.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,59(5),971-980.
25. Sprecher, S.,Felmlee, D.,Metts, B.,Vanni, D.(1998).Factor associated with distress following the breakup of a close relationship.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,15(6),791-809.
26. Taylor, S. E.(1983).Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.American Psychologist,38,1161-1173.
27. Timmerck, T. C.(1990).Overcoming the loss of a love: Preventing love addiction and promoting positive emotional health.Psychological Reports,66,515-528.
28. Weiss, R. S.(1975).Marital seperation.New York:Basic Books.
29. 王郁茗、王慶福、蘇完女(2002)。大學生對分手的調適與復原歷程初探。中國輔導學會2002年年會暨諮商心理與輔導專業學術研討會
30. 王慶福(2002)。分手的調適與改變歷程及評量工具之發展與研究(l/2)。國科會專題研究計劃期中報告。
31. 王慶福(2000)。當男孩愛上女孩：人際依附風格類型搭配、愛情關係與關係適應之研究。中華輔導學報，5，177-201。
32. 王慶福、林幸台、張德榮(1997)。人際依附風格、性別角色取向與人際親密能力之評量。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，2，63-78。
33. 余德慧(1991)。中國人的愛與苦。臺北:張老師出版社。
34. 余德慧、顧瑜君、王幼玲(1987)。中國人的愛情觀。臺北:張老師出版社。
35. 李佩怡(1996)。台灣地區大學生失落事件、失落反應與調適行為之描述性研究－以北部四所大學為例。中華心理衛生學刊，9(1)，27-54。
36. 李美枝(1996)。從兩性親密關係的研究闡釋研究者主體性的位階。中國心理學會通訊，31，12-26。
37. 柯淑敏(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學應用心理學研究所。
38. 修慧蘭、孫頌賢(2003)。大學生愛情關係分手歷程之研究。中華心理衛生學刊，15(4)，71-92。
39. 陳月靜(2001)。大學生愛情關係分手的研究。中國醫藥大學通識教育學刊，3，29-42。
40. 陳勤惠(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所。
41. 黃君瑜(2003)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立政治大學心理學研究所。
42. 劉惠琴(1995)。大學生“分手”行為研究－結構因素與歷程因素。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。

1. 陳書梅(2014)。愛情小說之情緒療癒效用研究—以遭遇感情困擾的大學生為例。圖書資訊學刊，12(2)，39-79。
2. 陳宛婷,陳宇平(2023)。女同志分手後關係連結、社會支持與分手調適之探究。輔導與諮商學報，45(1)，39-69。
3. 簡美華、王詩茜(2015)。成年前期女性知覺和因應分手暴力之探究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，11(1)，47-78。
4. 羅子琦、賴念華(2010)。大學生走出愛情分手困頓經驗之心理歷程研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊，9，1-32。
5. 魏郁潔、江承曉(2009)。大學生分手調適能力之團體成效研究。嘉南學報（人文類），35，367-381。
6. 謝文宜(2016)。台灣同志伴侶的分手調適─生命歷程的觀點。中華輔導與諮商學報，47，113-144。
7. 謝文宜,曾秀雲(2019)。同志分手調適：外在壓力源與身分認同的影響。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，45，93-142。
8. 顏禎瑩,董杏姿,黃政昌,彭偉旗,洪婷玉(2019)。「分手暴力評估」的內涵與方式之探討。諮商與輔導，406，55-59。
9. 葉瑋妮、陳書梅(2016)。電影的情緒療癒效用研究－以失戀之大學生為例。圖書資訊學刊，14(2)，21-57。
10. (2009)。大學生分手認知與情緒智能相關研究。樹德科技大學學報，11(1)，259-278。
11. (2014)。臺灣性別與情感教育研究之回顧分析：知識生產的挑戰與展望。臺灣教育社會學研究，14(2)，109-163。
12. (2024)。單身行不行？大學生單身處境的性別觀點分析。中華輔導與諮商學報，71，87-127。