華人已婚女性代間矛盾情感之特色與測量

Intergenerational Ambivalence in Chinese Married Women Construct Clarification and Measurement Development

10.30074/FJMH.200712_20(4).0003

利翠珊(Tsui-Shan Li)

代間關係 ； 矛盾 ； 婆媳 ； 已婚女性 ； intergenerational relationships ； ambivalence ； parents-in-laws ； married women

中華心理衛生學刊

20卷4期（2007 / 12 / 01）

357 - 386

繁體中文

研究目的：本研究以先前本土華人女性代間關係的質化訪談研究為基礎，呼應西方近年來對代間矛盾現象之重視，測量成年女性與上一代之間的矛盾情感，並探討其代間介入與個人身心健康之間的關聯。研究方法：本研究採用14組正負向配對題的方式，編製代間矛盾情感測量，並與其他測量合編問卷題本，透過15名聯絡人的協助，邀請600名居住在台灣北部地區的已婚婦女填答。研究結果：相關分析的結果顯示，與上一代互動越多的已婚女性，對父母越容易出現愛憎矛盾與罪疚矛盾，對公婆也會產生罪疚矛盾。本研究也發現，不論是「想要又擔心」的「愛憎矛盾感」，或是「想給又為難」的「罪疚矛盾感」，已婚女性對公婆的矛盾情感都要大過對父母的矛盾情感。進一步的迴歸分析顯示，父母的介入、公婆的介入，以及對公婆的罪疚矛盾感，均對已婚女性的身心健康有顯著的預測力。其中公婆介入與對公婆的罪疚矛盾對身心健康的影響是負面的，但父母的介入對身心健康卻反而有正向的效應。研究結論：本研究發現已婚女性與公婆及父母間存在著不同類型的代間矛盾情感，指出代間矛盾情感與已婚女性的身心健康之間存在著顯著的關聯，值得後續研究進一步探討成年子女與父母複雜的代間關係。

Purpose: Building on previous conceptualizations derived from a qualitative research, this study investigated adult women's intergenerational ambivalences toward parents/parents-in-law. Relationships among intergenerational ambivalence, international intrusion, and physical/psychological were also explored in this study. Methods: This study developed 14 paired questions to measure intergenerational ambivalence. A questionnaire packet including other measures was given to 600 married women living in the northern part of Taiwan. They were recruited through 15 contact persons. Results: Findings from our sample suggested that, married women with higher frequency of intergenerational interaction tended to have more affectionate ambivalence (or wanting/worrying ambivalence), as well as obligated ambivalence (or willing/reluctant ambivalence) toward their parents. Those women had more obligated ambivalence toward their parents-in-law as well. It was also found that intergenerational ambivalence experienced by married women was higher toward their parents-in-law than toward their parents, which is true in both affectionate ambivalence as well as obligated ambivalence. Regression analyses further indicated that obligated ambivalence toward parents-in-law and parents-in-law's intrusion both negatively predicted married women's health. On the other hand, parent's intrusion positively predicted married women's health. Conclusions: Results of the study indicated that there existed different types of intergenerational ambivalence among adult women and their parents/parents-in-law. It was also evidenced that intergenerational ambivalence was correlated with adult women's physical/psychological health. Future research should further study the complicated nature of intergeneration relationships.

1. 吳嘉瑜(2004)。以多重觀點建構代間矛盾經驗之新嘗試。中華心理衛生學刊，17(1)，75-111。
   連結：
2. 吳嘉瑜(2004)。子代夫妻對偶代間關係經驗：「他」的矛盾？「她」的矛盾？。中華輔導學報，15，123-149。
   連結：
3. 胡幼慧、周雅容(1996)。婦女與三代同堂：老年婦女的經濟依賴與居住困境探討。婦女與兩性學刊，7，27-57。
   連結：
4. 蔡采秀(1992)。工業化對台灣親屬關係的影響。婦女與兩性學刊，3，59-86。
   連結：
5. Bengtson, V.(2001).Beyond nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds.Journal of Marriage and the Family,63,1-16.
6. Bengtson, V. L.,Rosenthal, C. L.,Burton, L. M.,R. H. Binstock (Eds.),L. K. George (Eds.)(1995).Handbook of a aging and the social sciees.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
7. Boszormenyi-Nage, I.,Krasner, B. R.(1986).Between give and take: A clinical guide to contextual theory.New York:Brunner/Mazel, Inc..
8. Braiker, H. B.,Kelley, H. H.,R. Burgess (Eds.),T. L. Huston (Eds.)(1979).Social exchange in developing relationships.NY:Academic Press.
9. Coser, R. L.(1966).Role distance, sociological ambivalence, and transitional status systems.American Journal of Sociology,72(2),173-187.
10. George, L.,K. Pillemer (Eds.),R. Wolf (Eds.)(1986).Elder abuse: Conflict in the family.Dover, MA:Auburn House Publishing Company.
11. Holder, A.(1975).Theoretical and clinical aspects of ambivalence.The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child,30,197-220.
12. Kramer, J. R.(1985).Family interfaces: Transgenerational patterns.New York:Brunner/Mazel, Inc..
13. Luescher, K.,Pillemer, K.(1998).Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life.Journal of Marriage and the Family,60,413-425.
14. Pyke, K.(1999).The micro politics of care in relationships between aging parents and adult children: Individualism, Collectivism, and power.Journal of Marriage and the family,61,661-672.
15. Reinharz, S.,K. Pillemer,R. Wolf (Eds.)(1986).Elder abuse: Conflict in the family.Dover, Massachusetts:Auburn House Publishing Co..
16. Speare, A.,Avery, R.(1993).Who helps whom older parent-child families.Journal of Gerontology,48,64-73.
17. Thompson, M. M.,Holmes, J. G.,R. M. Sorrentin (Eds.),E. T. Higgins (Eds.)(1996).Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context.Houston, Tx:The Guilford Press.
18. Thompson, M. M.,Zanna, M. P.,Griffin, D. W.(1992).A latent variable analysis of attitudinal ambivalence.University of Waterloo.
19. Thompson, M. M.,Zanna, M. P.,Griffin, D. W.,R. E. Petty (Eds.),A. Krosnick (Eds.)(1995).Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences.Hillsdale, NY:Erlbaum.
20. Willson, A. E.,Shuey, K. M.,Elder, G. H.(2003).Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to aging parents and in-laws.Journal of Marriage and Family,65,1055-1072.
21. 孔祥明(1999)。婆媳過招為哪樁？。應用心理研究，4，57-96。
22. 87年度台灣地區現住家庭成年人口之親屬概況
23. 利翠珊(1996)。已婚女性家庭系統的交會：親情與角色的兩難。中華心理衛生學刊，12(3)，1-21。
24. 利翠珊(1999)。已婚女性與上一代的互動關係與情感連結。中華家政學刊，28，31-46。
25. 利翠珊(2000)。已婚女性代間情感糾結的經驗與內涵。中華心理衛生學刊，13(4)，77-107。
26. 吳嘉瑜(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學研究所。
27. 周玉慧、莊義利(2000)。晚年生活壓力、社會支持與老年身心健康之變遷：長期資料分析。人文及社會科學集刊，12(2)，281-317。
28. 胡幼慧、周雅容(1996)。婆婆媽媽經。台北:鼎言傳播事業公司。
29. 翁樹澍、王大維譯、I. Goldenberg、H. Goldenberg著(1999)。家族治療理論與技術。台北:揚智。

1. 唐先梅、李青芬(2013)。編織翁婿的生命花布：翁婿關係發展之初探。應用心理研究，57，219-250。
2. 蕭英玲、鄧皓引、陳富美、利翠珊、丁品瑄(2018)。本土夫妻共識形成與情感增溫－以參與式行動研究深化家庭理論建構與教育實踐。本土心理學研究，49，207-276。
3. 謝珮玲、應宗和、曾英珍、張孝純(2014)。產科病房心理支持方案之可行性研究：以某醫學中心為例。教育心理學報，45(3)，329-348。
4. 趙淑珠,林倩如(2023)。已婚女兒照顧失智父親之關係變化：系統觀點的探究。輔導與諮商學報，45(1)，1-37。
5. 鄭忍嬌、周麗端(2013)。一個勞動階級都市原住民女性的母職生活經驗─妊命、認命、訒命與韌命的歷程。人類發展與家庭學報，15，83-105。
6. 鍾金原、鍾秉融、謝宏仁(2017)。我還不想結婚：七位女性對於婚姻的共同想像。人文社會學報，13(3)，191-217。