题名

慢性病患者之死亡威脅、慢性病威脅與憂鬱:個人建構理論的觀點

并列篇名

Death Threat, Chronic Disease Threat, and Depression of Patients with Chronic Disease: The Viewpoint of Personal Construct Theory

DOI

10.30074/FJMH.200803_21(1).0003

作者

鄭逸如(Yih-Ru Cheng);吳治勳(Chih-Hsun Wu);黃芸新(Yun-Hsin Huang)

关键词

慢性病威脅 ; 死亡威脅 ; 憂鬱 ; 個人建構理論 ; 威脅指標 ; chronic disease threat ; death threat ; depression ; personal construct theory ; Threat Index

期刊名称

中華心理衛生學刊

卷期/出版年月

21卷1期(2008 / 03 / 01)

页次

51 - 73

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

研究目的:探討慢性病與死亡對患者所造成的威脅及其與憂鬱之間的關係。研究方法:以個人建構理論的觀點為基礎,翻譯與編修根據此理論所設計的工具-威脅指標(the Threat Index),以某醫學中心之家庭醫學部門診患者為對象收集與分析相關現象,初步探索慢性病患者是否可能在患病過程中經歷了建構的調整。研究結果:(1)慢性病組並未比無慢性病組自覺不健康及感到憂鬱。(2)慢性病組感受到的慢性病與死亡的威脅比無慢性病組低。(3)慢性病組雖能調適慢性病與死亡對真實自我造成的威脅,但理想中仍懷抱與慢性病有較大落差的理想自我,此落差越大,越覺得自己不健康。(4)無論是慢性病組或無慢性病組,都是自我實現的失落越大,主觀健康自評越低,也越憂鬱。研究結論:本研究結果初步支持個人建構理論,顯示慢性病患者可能在調適的過程中主動建構了自己的慢性病與死亡,因此減輕了慢性病與死亡的威脅以及憂鬱。

英文摘要

Purpose: Exploring the threat of disease and death and its relationship with depression. Methods: This study based on personal construct theory. The Threat Index scale, established on it, was modified and used on patients of Department of Family Medicine of a medical center. Results: (1) Relative to non-chronic disease group (Gnc), chronic disease group (Gc) did not evaluate themselves more unhealthy nor feel more depressed. (2) Threat related with chronic disease and death of Gc were lower than that of Gnc. (3) For Gc, subjective health rating negatively correlated with threat of chronic disease to preferred self. (4) Depression positively correlated with threat of preferred self for both groups. Conclusions: The results supported the viewpoint of personal construct theory. It also showed Gc possibly reconstrued their chronic disease and death, and less depressed than those without chronic disease.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
参考文献
  1. Bannister, D.,Mair, J. M. M.(1986).The evaluation of personal constructs.London:Academic Press.
  2. Brannon, H.(2004).Chronic physical pain and psychosocial-spiritual suffering: A holistic perspective.Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Science & Engineering,64(11),5831.
  3. Hendon, M. K.,Epting, F. R.(1989).A comparison of hospice patients with recovering and ill patients.Death Studies,13,567-578.
  4. Kelly, G. A.(1995).The psychology of personal constructs.New York:W.W. Norton & Company.
  5. Krieger, S. R.,Epting, F. R.,Hays, C. H.(1979).Validity and reliability of provided constructs in assessing death threat..Omega: Journal of Death and Dying,10,87-95.
  6. Krieger, S. R.,Epting, F. R.,Leitner, L. M.(1974).Personal constructs, threat, and attitudes toward death..Omega: Journal of Death and Dying,5,299-310.
  7. Leung, K. K.,Lue, B. H.,Lee, M. B.,Tang, L. Y.(1997).Screening of depression in patients with chronic medical diseases in a primary care setting.Family Practice,15(1),67-75.
  8. Moore, M. K.,Neimeyer, R. A(1991).A confirmatory factor analysis of the Threat Index.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,60,122-129.
  9. Neimeyer, R. A.(1983).Toward a personal construct conceptualization of depression and suicide..Death Education,7,127-173.
  10. Neimeyer, R. A.,Brunt, D. V.,H. Wass,R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.)(1995).Dying: Facing the facts.New York:Hemisphere.
  11. Neimeyer, R. A.,Epting, F. R.,R. A. Neimeyer, G. J. Neimeyer (Eds.)(1992).Measuring personal meanings of death: 20 years of research using the Threat Index..Advances in personal construct psychology,2
  12. Neimeyer, R. A.,H. Wass,R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.)(1988).Dying: Facing the facts.New York:Hemisphere.
  13. Neimeyer, R. A.,Moore, M. K.,Bagley, K. J.(1988).A preliminary factor structure for the Threat Index.Death Studies,12,217-225.
  14. Neimeyer, R. A.,Moser, R. P.,Wittkowski, J.(2003).Assessing attitudes toward dying and death: Psychometric considerations.Omega: Journal of Death and Dying,47(1),45-76.
  15. Neimeyer, R. A.,R. A. Neimeyer (Ed.)(1994).The threat index and related methods..Death anxiety handbook: Research, instrumentation, and application. London: Taylor & Francis.
  16. Neimeyer, R. A.,R. A. Neimeyer (Ed.)(1994).Death anxiety handbook: Research, instrumentation, and application.London:Taylor & Francis.
  17. Neimeyer, R. A.,Wittkowski, J.,Moser, R. P.(2004).Psychological research on death attitudes: An overview and evaluation..Death Studies,28,309-340.
  18. Neimeyer, R.A.,Dingemans, P.M.,Epting, F. R.(1977).Convergent validity, situational stability and meaningfulness of the Threat Index..Omega: Journal of Death and Dying,8,251-265.
  19. Neter, J.,Wasserman, W.,Whitmore, G. A.(1981).Applied statistics.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
  20. Rainey, L. C.,F. R. Epting, R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.)(1984).Personal meanings of death: Applications of personal construct theory to clinical practice.New York:Hemisphere.
  21. Rigdon, M. A.,Epting, F. R.,Neimeyer, R. A.,Krieger, S. R.(1979).The threat index.Death Education,3,245-270.
  22. Stevens, D. E.,Merikangas, K. R.,Merikangas, J. R.,E. E. Beckham,W. R. Leber (Eds.)(1995).Handbook of depression.New York:The Guilford Press.
  23. Stillion, J. M.,H. Wass,R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.)(1995).Dying: Facing the facts.New York:Hemisphere.
  24. Templer, D. I.(1971).Death anxiety as related to depression and health of retired persons.Journal of Gerontology,26,521-523.
  25. Tomer, A.,R. A. Neimeyer (Ed.)(1994).Death anxiety handbook: Research, instrumentation, and application.London:Taylor & Francis.
  26. Viney, L. L.In E. Button (Ed.)(1985).Personal construct theory and mental health: Theory, research and practice.London:Croom Helm.
  27. 行政院衛生署網站
  28. 林清山(1983)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。
  29. 孫嘉玲、王秀香、陳佩英(2004)。安寧療護課程對護生死亡恐懼與態度之影響。安寧療護,9(4),353-365。
  30. 張利中、林志龍、洪栩隆(2001)。醫學系與護理系學生自我概念落差與死亡焦慮之關係。醫學教育,5(1),40-51。
  31. 黃宇達(1997)。死亡焦慮:性別、年齡與死亡焦慮歸因之角色的探討。桃園:私立中原大學心理學研究所。
  32. 劉德威(1997)。青少年生死態度與自殺危險程度關係之研究。桃園:私立中原大學心理學研究所。
  33. 鄭逸如、吳英璋、呂碧鴻(1999)。生物心理社會取向之壓力衡鑑與壓力調適之效果評估。應用心理學研究,3,191-217。
被引用次数
  1. 鄭逸如,陳秀蓉,吳治勳(2020)。慢性病患者病後生活變動、罹病情緒、預期控制、自我照顧與憂鬱的關係:疾病調適雙路徑探討。中華心理學刊,62(1),31-50。
  2. 鄭逸如、吳治勳(2014)。探討初診斷慢性病患者之個人建構組型—「威脅指標—台灣版」之臨床應用。中華心理衛生學刊,27(4),561-582。