大一學生網路上不同來源之社會支持、網路沉迷及孤寂感之研究

A Study of Different Resources of Online Social Support, Pathological Internet Use and Loneliness for University Freshman

10.30074/FJMH.200806_21(2).0002

方紫薇(Tzu-Wei Fang)

社會支持 ； 網路沉迷 ； 孤寂感 ； social support ； pathological internet use ； loneliness

中華心理衛生學刊

21卷2期（2008 / 06 / 01）

139 - 168

繁體中文

研究目的：1.了解大一學生利用網路獲得社會支持之對象。2.比較由初級支持系統與由次級支持系統處得到社會支持者在各變項上之差異。3.探討社會支持、孤寂感等變項對網路沉迷之預測。4.比較高低孤寂感與網路沉迷者在各項社會支持功能上之差異。研究方法：本研究針對使用網路之大一學生進行調查研究，共施測312位大一新生。研究結果：經統計分析後其結果顯示，大一學生在網路上主要是由好友及親人等初級支持系統處得到社會支持，其在各項社會支持功能上顯著高於由次級支持系統處得到社會支持者；而後者較花時間在打電玩及設計或維護網頁、網站上；在預測網路沉迷總分上，以孤寂感最能有效預測網路沉迷。高孤寂感者比低孤寂感者得到各項之社會支持較少，且覺得較不被接納了解。高沉迷組比低沉迷組覺得較有得到社會支持，但也覺得較不被接納了解。研究結論：本研發現大一學生高孤寂者易沈迷網路，且知覺到的社會支持較少，因此提供一些具體建議供教師、父母及諮商師參考。

Purpose: This study was focused on the following four subjects: 1. to explore the main resources which provide social-support on-line. 2. To compare the difference of various variables between the primary and secondary online support system, which they choose. 3. To study the difference of social-support functions and the amount of time of Internet-activity among the high-and low- loneliness and excessive-Internet-use groups. 4. To examine the effects of the amount of time of Internet-activity, social-support functions and loneliness on the score of pathological Internet uses. Methods: The study was conducted to a survey of 312 freshmen that are using Internet. Results: The results indicate that freshmen usually receive social support from familiar good friends and family members. In addition, those who get social-support from primary support system perceive more social-support from their support provider. However, those who get social-support from secondary support system spend more time on play game, design and maintain homepage, and blog. Loneliness is the strongest factor that can predict the score of pathological Internet use. Finally, the high-loneliness groups feel receiving less social-support and not being accepted than those of the low–loneliness groups. The high-pathological Internet use groups feel unaccepted but more social-support than those of the low-pathological Internet use groups. Conclusions: The high-loneliness students spend more time on Internet, but percept less social-support. The result of this research may provide some useful suggestion to teachers, parents, and counselors.

1. Amichai-Hamburger, Y.,Ben-Artzi, E.(2003).Loneliness and Internet use.Computers in Human Behavior,19,71-80.
2. Burger, J.(1997).Personality.Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole.
3. Chan, D. W.,Hui, E. K. P.(1998).Stress, support and psychological symptoms among guidance and non-guidance second secondary school teachers in Honk Kong.School Psychology International,19(2),169-178.
4. Chou, C.(2001).Internet heavy Use and Addiction among Taiwanese College Students: An Online Interview Study.CyberPsychology & Behavior,4(5),573-585.
5. Clark, H. H.(1996).Using language.New York:Cambridge University Press.
6. Cohen, S.,Wills, T. A.(1985).Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin,98(2),310-357.
7. Cotten, S. R.(2001).Implications of Internet technology for medical sociology in the new millennium.Sociological Spectrum,21,319-340.
8. Cummings, J.,Sproull, L.,Kiesler, S.(2002).Beyond hearing: where real world and online support meet.Group Dynamics,6,78-88.
9. Danet, B,S. G. Jones (Ed.)(1998).In, Cyber society 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community.Thousand Oaks, Ca:Sage.
10. Davis, R. A.(2001).A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use.Computers in Human Behavior,17,187-195.
11. Eastin, M. S.,LaRose, R.(2005).Alt. Support: modeling social support online.Computers in Human Behavior,21,977-992.
12. Internet Addiction Disorder
13. Griffiths, M.,J. Gackenbach (ed.)(1998).Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications.NY:Academic Press.
14. Gross, E. F.,Juvonen, J.,Gable, S. L.(2002).Internet use and well-being in adolescence.Journal of Social Issues,58,75-90.
15. Hittner, J. B.,Swickert, R. J.(2001).Modeling functional and structural social support via confirmatory factor analysis: evidence for a second-order global support construct.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,16,69-80.
16. Jackson, P. B.,Finney, M.(2002).Negative life events and psychological distress among young adults.Social Psychology Quarterly,65,186-201.
17. Katz, J. E.,Aspden, P.(1997).A nation of strangers?.Communications of the ACM,40,81-86.
18. Kraut, R.,Patterson, M.,Lundmark, V.,Kiesler, S.,Mukopadhyay, T.,Scherlis, W.(1998).Internet Paradox - a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?.American Psychologist,53(9),1017-1031.
19. Journal of Online Behavior
20. Leung, L.,Lee, P. S. N.(2005).Multiple determinants of life quality: the roles of Internet activities, use of new media, social support, and leisure activities.Telematics and Informatics,22,161-180.
21. Lieberman, M. A.,Golant, M.,Giese-Davis, J.,Winzlenberg, A.,Benjamin, H.,Humphreys,K., Kronenwtter, C.,Russo, S.,Spiegel, D.(2003).Electronic support-groups for breast carcinoma–A clinical trial of effectiveness.Cancer,97,920-925.
22. Morahan-Martin, J.(1999).The relationship between loneliness and Internet use and abuse.CyberPsychology & Behavior,2(5),431-439.
23. Morahan-Martin, J.,Schumacher, P.(2003).Loneliness and social uses of the Internet.Computers in Human Behavior,19,659-671.
24. Morahan-Martin, J.,Schumacher, P.(2000).Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students.Computers in Human Behavior,16,13-29.
25. Morgan, C.,Cotten, S. R.(2003).The relationship between Internet activities and depressive symptoms in a sample of college freshmen.CyberPsychology & Behavior,6(2),133-142.
26. Nie, N.(2001).Stability, interpersonal relationships and the Internet: reconciling conflicting findings.American Behavioral Scientist,45,420-435.
27. Internet and society: a preliminary report. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Science
28. Getting serious online: as Americans gain experience, they use the Web more at work, write emails with more significant content, perform more online transactions, and pursue more serious activities
29. Rheingold, H.(1993).The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier.MA:Addison-Wesley, Reading.
30. Rich, A. R.,Scovel, M.(1987).Causes of depression in college students: a cross-lagged panel correlational analysis.Psychological Reports,60,27-30.
31. Russell, D.,Peplau, L.,Cutrona, C.(1980).The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale Concurrent and discriminate validity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39(3),472-480.
32. Sanders, C. E.,Field, T. M.,Diego, M.,Kaplan, M.(2000).The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents.Adolescence,35,237-242.
33. Sax, L. J.(1997).Health trends among college freshmen.Journal of American College Health,45,252-266.
34. Shaw, L. H.,Gant, C. S. W.(2002).In defense of the Internet: the relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support.CyberPsychology & Behavior,5,157-171.
35. Swickert, R. J.,Hittner, J. B.,Harris, J. L.,Herring, J. A.(2002).Relationships among Internet use, personality, and social support.Computers in Human Behavior,18,437-451.
36. Thoits, P. A.(1982).Conceptual methodological and theoretical problem in studying social support as a buffer against life stress.Journal of Health and Social behavior,23,145-159.
37. Tichon, J. G.,Shapiro, M.(2003).The process of sharing social support in cyberspace.CyberPsychology & Behavior,6,161-170.
38. Turkle, S.(1995).Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet.New York:Simon & Schuster.
39. Turner, J. W.,Grube, A.,Meyers, J.(2001).Developing an optimal match within online communities: an exploration of CMC supports communities and traditional support.Journal of Communication,51,231-251.
40. Vitkus, J.,Horowitz, L.(1987).Poor social performance of lonely people lacking a skill or adopting a role?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(6),1266-1273.
41. Wallace, P.(1999).The Psychology of the Internet.New York:Cambridge University Press.
42. Walther, J. B.,Boyd, S.In C. A. Lin,D. Atkin (Eds.)(2002).Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses.Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press.
43. Wright, K.(2000).Computer-mediated social support, older adults and coping.Journal of Communication,50,100-119.
44. Young, K. S.(1998).Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder.CyberPsychology & Behavior,1(3),237-244.
45. Young, K. S.(1996).Psychology of Computer Use: XL. Addictive Use of the Internet: A case that breaks the stereotype.Psychological Reports,79,899-902.
46. Young, K. S.,Rogers, R. C.(1998).The relationship between depression and Internet addiction..CyberPsychology and Behavior,1(1),25-28.
47. 方紫薇(2002)。高低網路沉迷者在自我認同、情緒調整及人際互動上之差異。中華心理衛生學刊，15(2)，65-97。
48. 朱美慧(2000)。彰化，大葉大學資訊管理研究所。
49. 吳姝蒨(1996)。台北，國立政治大學新聞研究所。
50. 周倩(1999)。我國學生電腦網路沉迷現象之整合研究－子計畫二：網路沉迷現象之教育傳播觀點研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
51. 陳淑惠(1999)。網路沉迷現象的心理病理之初探(2/2)。國科會科教處「網路科技對教育的影響」專題研究計畫成果報告。
52. 陳淑惠(1998)。網路沉迷症」之初探。論文發表於「Net`98 Taixvan －網路新紀元」國際研討會，台北:
53. 游森期(2001)。彰化，彰化師範大學教育研究所。
54. 黃德祥(1994)。青少年發展與輔導。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。
55. 蕭銘鈞(1998)。新竹，國立交通大學傳播研究所。
56. 韓佩凌(2000)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文（未出版）。

1. 方紫薇(2010)。網路沉迷、因應、孤寂感與網路社會支持之關係：男女大學生之比較。教育心理學報，41(4)，773-798。
2. 韓意慈(2016)。探究藥癮者之社會支持網絡樣貌—以某戒治所之男性個案為例。東吳社會工作學報，30，31-59。
3. 賀欣音、郭丁熒(2012)。學生知覺學校支持與學生霸凌行為關係之研究～以臺南市國中為例。教育學誌，27，83-131。
4. 洪敏玲、林錦雲(2015)。一位男性國中教師沉迷網海的生命探究。學校行政，99，91-103。
5. 黃士安、陳麗如、陳怡廷(2015)。樂當低頭族？智慧型手機行動應用程式之使用行為與孤寂感的關聯。Electronic Commerce Studies，13(1)，61-85。
6. 廖俞榕、連廷嘉(2012)。阿德勒取向團體諮商對於青少年網路成癮的諮商成效。教育實踐與研究，25(2)，67-95。
7. 蕭佳純(2022)。學校支持對教師創造力教學行為影響之研究：角色認定與專業學習社群的多層次中介分析。教育理論與實踐學刊，46，1-29。
8. 楊淳斐(2014)。臺灣大學生網路成癮盛行率與心理性危險因子之調查研究。國立臺中科技大學通識教育學報，3，113-136。
9. 鄭志平、呂傑華(2014)。學生網咖消費行為與家長管教方式、同儕人際關係之研究：以新北市國小高年級生為例。教育傳播與科技研究，108，49-70。