性與暴力犯罪者之敵意與性錯覺關連反應

Are Sexual Aggressors Immersed in Hostile-Sexual Misperception?

10.30074/FJMH.200909_22(3).0002

黃健(Chien Huang)

性犯罪 ； 敵意 ； 性 ； 認知基模 ； 錯覺關連 ； sexual offense ； hostility ； sex ； cognitive schema ； illusory correlation

中華心理衛生學刊

22卷3期（2009 / 09 / 01）

241 - 267

繁體中文

研究目的：對性犯罪行為而言，敵意與性是兩個重要且相互關連的基模，影響個人知覺與判斷外在刺激的方式。本研究透過錯覺關連實驗法，探討性犯罪組、暴力犯罪組與一般男性成人組之內在認知結構中，敵意與性此兩基模之特徵及兩者間連結關係。研究方法：有兩部分：前測是為了挑選恰當的實驗素材。正式實驗是以錯覺關連實驗比較三組受試者對字詞配對之再認確定程度與出現頻率估計是否有明顯的差異。研究結果：性犯罪組對「敵意－性」的再認確定程度明顯高於一般男性成人組。而暴力犯罪組則對單純只有「敵意」的再認確定程度明顯高於一般男性成人組。單純只有「性」時，兩犯罪組之再認確定程度皆明顯高於一般男性成人組。此外，兩犯罪組均明顯較一般男性成人組高估字詞配對的出現頻率。兩犯罪組之間則無顯著差異。研究結論：部分支持了所提之假設：「敵意」與「性」基模在性犯罪組之認知結構的連結關係明顯較一般男性成人強，但性犯罪組與暴力犯罪組兩組差異並不顯著。

Purpose: Hostility and sex are important inter-connected schemas for sexual offenders that affect the way they perceive and judge incoming information. This study explores the characteristics of hostility and sex, and the connection between them, which underlie personal cognitive structure. Methods: The study had 2 parts, the pretest and the actual experiment. Appropriate word stimuli were selected during the pretest stage of the procedure. All participants were Taiwanese. A sample of 41 sexual offenders (mean age 31) and 13 adult men from the general population (mean age 36) completed free association on target words. Another sample of 30 sexual offenders (mean age 28) and 29 general adult men (mean age 33) evaluated these words' associative strength to sex and hostility. The actual experiment utilized an illusory correlation method to compare the responses of 42 sexual offenders (mean age 29), 49 violent offenders (mean age 31), and 58 general adult men (mean age 31) on a recognition confidence and a frequency estimation task in a series of word pairings. Results: Sexual offenders' recognition confidence on hostility-sex word pairings was significantly higher than the general adult male group. The violent offenders’ recognition confidence on hostility-neutral word pairings was significantly higher than the general adult male group. Both the sexual and violent offenders' recognition confidence on sex-neutral word pairings were significantly higher than the general adult male group. Moreover, both the sexual and violent offenders displayed over-estimation with hostility and sexual schema-related word pairings. The two offender groups did not significantly differ in the frequency estimation task. Conclusions: The results partially supported the proposed hypotheses. Sexual offenders' cognitive structures in which hostility and sex schemas are inter-connected were significantly stronger than those of the general adult male respondents. However, no significant difference was found between the sexual offenders and the violent offenders.

1. Alloy, L. B.,Tabachnik, N.(1984).Assessment of covariation by human and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information.Psychological Review,91,112-149.
2. Anderson, C. A.,Bushman, B. J.(2002).Human aggression.Annual Review of Psychology,53,27-51.
3. Bargh, J. A.,Raymond, P.,Pryor, J. B.,Strack, F.(1995).Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power→sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,68,768-781.
4. Beech, A. R.,Fisher, D.,Ward, T.(2005).Sexual murders' implicit theories.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,20,1366-1389.
5. Berkowitz, L.(1993).Pain and aggression: Some findings and implications.Motivation & Emotion,17,277-293.
6. Berman, J. S.,Kenny, D. A.(1976).Correlational bias in observer rating.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,34,263-273.
7. Brennan, J. H.,Hemsley, D. R.(1984).Illusory correlations in paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenia.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,23,225-226.
8. Buss, A. H.,Perry, M.(1992).The Aggression Questionnaire.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,63,452-459.
9. Chapman, L. J.(1967).Illusory correlation in observational report.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,6,151-155.
10. Chapman, L. J.,Chapman, J. P.(1967).Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,6,151-155.
11. Check, J. V. P.,Malamuth, N. M.,Elias, B.,Barton, S. A.(1985).On hostile ground: Do you have feelings of hostility toward the opposite sex.Psychology Today,19(4),56-61.
12. Craissati, J.,Beech, A. R.(2003).A review of dynamic variables and their relationship to risk prediction in sex offenders.Journal of Sexual Aggression,9,41-55.
13. de Jong, P. J.,Merckelbach, H.,Bögels, S.,Kindt, M.(1998).Illusory correlation and social anxiety.Behaviour Research and Therapy,36,1063-1073.
14. Fiske, S. T.,Taylor, S. E.(1991).Social cognition.New York:McGraw-Hill.
15. Gannon, T. A.,Collie, R. M.,Ward, T.,Thakker, J.(2007).Rape: Psychopathology, theory and treatment.Clinical Psychology Review,28,982-1008.
16. Gannon, T. A.,Polaschek, D. L. L.,Ward, T.,M. McMurran(Eds.),J. McGuire(Eds.)(2005).Social problem solving and offending: Evidence, evaluation and evolution.New York:John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
17. Gnys, J. A.,Willis, W. G.,Faust, D.(1995).School psychologists' diagnoses of learning disability: A study of illusory correlation.Journal of School Psychology,33,59-73.
18. Gray, N. S.,Brown, A. S.,MacCulloch, M. J.,Smith, J.,Snowden, R. J.(2005).An implicit test of the associations between children and sex in pedophiles.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,114(2),304-308.
19. Greenwald, A. G.,Banji, M. R.,Rudman, L. A.,Farnham, S. D.,Nosek, B. A.,Mellot, D. S.(2002).A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.Psychological Review,109(1),3-25.
20. Greenwald, A. G.,McGhee, D. E.,Schwartz, J. L. K.(1998).Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74,1464-1480.
21. Groth, A. N.(1979).Men who rape: The psychology of the offender.New York:Plenum Press.
22. Hanson, R. K.,Bussière, M. T.(1998).Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,66,348-362.
23. Hanson, R. K.,Harris, A. J.(2000).Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism.Criminal Justice and Behavior,27(1),6-35.
24. Hanson, R. K.,Morton-Bourgon, K. E.(2005).The Characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,73(6),1154-1163.
25. Harvey, A. G.,Watkins, E.,Manshell, W.,Shafran, R.(2004).Cognitive behavioral process across psychological disorders: A transdiagnostic approach to research & treatment.UK:Oxford University Press.
26. Hollon, S. D.,Garber, J.,L. Y. Abramson (Ed.)(1988).Social cognition and clinical psychology: A synthesis.New York:Guilford.
27. Ingram, R. E.,Kendall, P. C.,R. E. Ingram (Ed.)(1986).Information Processing Approaches to Clinical Psychology.New York:Academic Press.
28. Jackson, J. W.(2000).Demonstrating the concept of illusory correlation.Teaching of Psychology,27(4),273-276.
29. Johnston, L.,Ward, T.(1996).Social cognition and sexual offending: A theoretical framework.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,8(1),55-80.
30. Kahneman, D.,Tversky, A.(2000).Choice, values, and frames.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
31. King, R. N.,Koehler, D. J.(2000).Illusory correlations in graphological influence.Journal of Experiential Psychology: Applied,6(4),336-348.
32. Langton, C.,Marshall, W. L.(2001).Cognition in rapists: Theoretical patterns by typological breakdown.Aggression and Violent Behavior,6,499-518.
33. Looman, J.,Abracen, J.,DiFazio, R.,Maillet, G.(2004).Alcohol and drug use among sexual and nonsexual offenders: Relationship to intimacy deficits and coping strategy.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,16,177-189.
34. Malamuth, N. M.(2003).Criminal and noncriminal sexual aggressors: Integrating psychopathy in a hierarchical-mediational confluence model.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,989,33-58.
35. Malamuth, N. M.(1986).Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50,953-962.
36. Malamuth, N. M.,Linz, D.,Heavey, C. L.,Barnes, G.,Acker, M.(1995).Using confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women: A ten-year follow-up study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69,353-369.
37. Malamuth, N. M.,Sockloskie, R. J.,Koss, M. P.,Tanaka, J. S.(1991).Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,59,670-681.
38. Markus, H.(1977).Self-schemata and processing information about the self.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,35(1),63-78.
39. Markus, H.,Smith, J.,Moreland, R. L.(1985).Role of the self-concept in the perception of others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49(6),1494-1512.
40. Marshall, W. L.,Moulden, H.(2001).Hostility toward women and victim empathy in rapists.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,13,249-255.
41. McConnell, A. R.,Leibold, J. M.,Sherman, S. J.(1997).Within-target illusory correlation and the formation of context-dependent attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73(4),675-686.
42. Mihailides, S.,Devilly, G. J.,Ward, T.(2004).Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,16(4),333-350.
43. Polaschek, D. L. L.,Gannon, T.(2004).The implicit theories of rapists: What convicted offenders tell us.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,16,299-314.
44. Polaschek, D. L. L.,Hudson, S. M.(2004).Pathways to rape: Preliminary examination of patterns in the offence processes of rapists and their rehabilitation implication.Journal of Sexual Aggression,10(1),7-20.
45. Polaschek, D. L. L.,Ward, T.(2002).The implicit theories of potential rapists: What our questionnaires tell us.Aggression and Violent Behavior,7,385-406.
46. Pollack, N. L.,Hashmall, J. M.(1991).The excuse of child molesters.Behavioral Sciences & the Law,9,53-59.
47. Prentky, R. A.,Knight, R. A.(1991).Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapist.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,59(5),643-661.
48. Pryor, J. B.,Stoller, L. M.(1994).Sexual cognition processes in men high in the likelihood to sexually harass.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,20,163-169.
49. Sherman, S. J.,Judd, C. M.,Park, B.(1989).Social cognition.Annual Review of Psychology,40,281-326.
50. Smallbone, S. W.,Wheaton, J.,Hourigan, D.(2003).Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,15,49-60.
51. Spielberger, C. D.,Jacobs, G.,Russell, S.,Crane, R. S.,J. N. Butcher(Eds.),C. D. Spielberger(Eds.)(1983).Advances in personality assessment.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
52. Stone, M. H.,Thompson, E. H.(2001).Executive function impairment in sexual offenders.The Journal of Individual Psychology,57(1),51-59.
53. Thornton, D.(2002).Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,4,139-154.
54. Ward, T.(2000).Sexual offenders' cognitive distortions as implicit theories.Aggression and Violent Behavior,5,491-507.
55. 柯永河(1999)。性侵害加害人心理狀態評估工具編製研究。台北:內政部性侵害防治委員會。
56. 陳學志(1999)。認知及認知的自我監控：中文詞聯想常模的建立。行政院國科會研究計畫結案報告，計畫編號NSC-87-2418-H-030-006。
57. 黃軍義(2000)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。
58. 蔣世光(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。私立中原大學心理學研究所。
59. 鄭昭明(2006)。認知心理學－理論與實踐。台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
60. 鍾昭瑛(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學心理學研究所。

1. 陳學志、陳彥丞、張雨霖、胡中凡、卓淑玲、宋曜廷(2017)。1200 個中文雙字詞的聯想常模與其被聯想反應參照表。教育心理學報，49(1)，137-160。
2. 黃健、吳英璋(2012)。性侵害與暴力攻擊行為之促發與抑制途徑分析。中華心理衛生學刊，25(2)，267-297。
3. 黃軍義(2014)。敵視女性態度、強暴迷思、與強暴行為。教育心理學報，45(3)，393-412。
4. 黃軍義,林耀盛,李嘉豐(2019).Effects of Impersonal-promiscuous Sex, Hostility toward Women,Acceptance of Violence, and Affective Empathy on Sexual Aggression.亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,15(1),1-22+24.
5. (2010)。羈押實體理由的判斷標準—從德國法出發。華岡法粹，47，127-180。