親密伴侶殺人案件之分析：以男性謀殺女性案件為例

Intimate Partner Femicide

10.30074/FJMH.201206_25(2).0003

王珮玲(Pei-Ling Wang)

親密伴侶殺人 ； 親密伴侶暴力 ； 殺人自殺 ； 保護令 ； intimate partner femicide ； intimate partner violence ； murder-suicide ； protection order

中華心理衛生學刊

25卷2期（2012 / 06 / 01）

231 - 266

繁體中文

研究目的：親密伴侶暴力事件中最嚴重的就是導致被害人死亡之殺人案件，本研究以男性為加害者、女性為被害人之親密伴侶殺人案件為研究範圍，探討加害人與被害人之個人特性因素，雙方生活狀況與暴力情形，以及殺人事件之動機、方法、情境因素與結果。研究方法：採質性資料內容分析法，分析80件親密伴侶殺人案件之司法文書資料，以及其中46件具有通報家庭暴力案件資料庫之資料。研究結果：親密伴侶殺人案件重要之加害人個人特性相關因素包括加害人具有犯罪前科、酗酒及有精神疾病；而殺人案件發生前之重要前置因素有加害人施暴於被害人、懷疑被害人感情不忠及被害人提出分手。多數之親密伴侶殺人案件被害人有遭加害人施暴之經驗，但被害人向正式資源求助之比例低。殺害行為以無預謀情形為多，而加害人懷疑被害人感情不忠是最重要之動機因素，雙方分手時機是重要促發情境。另加害者於殺害被害人後，有二成以上之案件有加害人殺人－自殺之行為發生。研究結論：研究者提出了與相關研究的對話，並對本土未來學術研究與實務防治策略提出建議。

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze intimate partner femicide incidents, the characteristics of the offenders, and the relationship between the offenders and the victims in Taiwan. The prior violent behavior of the couple and the victim's help-seeking record were also examined. Understanding the offenders' motives, killing methods, situational factors, and the case results are additional study goals. Methods: Eighty intimate partner femicide cases were identified from court verdicts. Among them, 46 of the deceased had reported domestic violence to authorities prior to their murder. The court documents and the violence records were both reviewed. Results: Results indicated that offenders had a history of other criminal behavior, alcohol abuse, and mental illness. More than half of the victims were abused by their offender, although few had asked for help from the authorities. Nine victims had protection orders when they were killed The majority of the homicides were initiated without previous planning, implying the importance of situational factors. The main reason for the homicide was the offender's suspicion of the victim's infidelity and the most dangerous time frame was when the couple initiated a break up or started legal separation. Over 20 percent were murder-suicides. Conclusions: This study suggested a femicide incident's diagram, and future studies could pay more attention on the difference of domestic violence femicide and other murder cases. Moreover, this study also suggested that victims' services should include a danger assessment and consider safety plans in addition to protection orders.

1. 王珮玲(2010)。親密伴侶暴力案件保護令成效與相關因素之研究：以禁制、遷出及遠離令為例。社會政策與社會工作學刊，14(2)，1-47。
   連結：
2. 王珮玲(2012)。台灣親密關係暴力危險評估表（TIPVDA）之建構與驗證。社會政策與社會工作學刊，16(1)，1-58。
   連結：
3. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2010). The FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program's Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR). Retrieved July 31, 2010, from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2007/offenses/expanded_information/homicide.html
4. 內政部警政署刑事警察局(2009)：《97年中華民國刑案統計》。台北：內政部警政署刑事警察局
5. Adams, D.(2007).Why do they kill? Men who murder their intimate partners.Nashville, Tennessee:Vanderbilt University Press.
6. Aldridge, M. L.,Browne, K. D.(2003).Perpetrators of spousal homicide: A review.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,4(3),265-276.
7. Banks, L.,Crandall, C.,Sklar, D.,Bauer, M.(2008).A comparison of intimate partner homicide to intimate partner homicide-suicide: One hundred and twenty-four New Mexico cases.Violence Against Women,14(9),1065-1078.
8. Barber, C. W.,Azrael, D.,Hemenway, D.,Olson, L. M.,Nie, C.,Schaechter, J.(2008).Suicides and suicide attempts following homicide: Victim-suspect relationship, weapon type, and presence of antidepressants.Homicide Studies,12(3),285-297.
9. Block, C. R.,Christakos, A.(1995).Intimate partner homicide in Chicago over 29 Years.Crime & Delinquency,41(4),496-526.
10. Campbell, J. C.(Ed.)(1995).Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers.Thousand Oak, CA:Sage.
11. Campbell, J. C.,Glass, N.,Sharps, P. W.,Laughon, K.,Bloom, T.(2007).Intimate partner homicide: Review and implications of research and policy.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,8(3),246-269.
12. Campbell, J. C.,Webster, D. W.,Koziol-McLain, J.,Block, C. R.,Campbell, D. W.,Curry, M. A.(2003).Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study.American Journal of Public Health,93(7),1089-1097.
13. Dawson, M.,Gartner, R.(1998).Differences in the characteristics of intimate femicides: The role of relationship state and relationship status.Homicide Studies,2(4),378-399.
14. Dobash, R. E.,Dobash, R. P.,Cavanagh, K.,Lewis, R.(2004).Not a ordinary killer-Just an ordinary guy. When men murder an intimate woman partner.Violence Against Women,10(6),577-605.
15. Dutton, D.,Kerry, G.(1999).Modus operandi and personality disorder in incarcerated spousal killers.International Journal of Law & Psychiatry,22(3-4),287-299.
16. Frye, V.,Hosein, V.,Waltermaurer, E.,Blaney, S.,Wilt, S.(2005).Femicide in New York City, 1990 to 1999.Homicide Studies,9,204-228.
17. Harper, D. W.,Voigt, L.(2007).Homicide followed suicide : An integrated theoretical perspective.Homicide Studies,11(4),295-318.
18. Hilton, N. Z.,Harris, G. T.,Rice, M. E.(2010).Risk assessment for domestically violentmen.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
19. Holtzworth-Munroe, A.,Stuart, G. L.(1994).Typologies of male batterers: Three aubtypes and the differences among them.Psychological Bulletin,116(3),476-497.
20. Kropp, P. R.,Hart, S. D.(2000).The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offender.Law and Human Behavior,24(1),101-118.
21. Lempert, L. B.(1997).The other side of help: Negative effects in the help-seeking processes of abused women.Qualitative Sociology,20(2),289-309.
22. Logan, T.,Shannon, L.,Walker, R.,Faragher, T. M.(2006).Protective orders: Questions and conundrums.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,7(3),175-205.
23. Logan, T.,Walker, R.(2009).Civil protective order outcomes-violations and perceptions of effectiveness.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,24(4),675-692.
24. McFarlane, J.,Campbell, J. C.,Wilt, S.,Sachs, C. J.,Ulrich, Y.,Xu, X.(1999).Stalking and intimate partner femicide.Homicide Studies,3(4),300-316.
25. Rosenbaum, M.(1990).The role of depression in couples involved in murder-suicide and homicide.American Journal of Psychiatry,147(8),1036-1039.
26. Sharps, P.,Campbell, J.,Campbell, D.,Gary, F.,Webster, D.(2001).The role of alcohol in intimate partner femicide.American Journal of Addictions,10(2),122-135.
27. Spitzberg, B. H.(2002).The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,3(4),261-288.
28. Stark, E.(2007).Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life.New York:Oxford University Press.
29. Tjaden, P.,Thoennes, N.(2000).Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women.Washington, DC:National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
30. Websdale, N.(1999).Understanding domestic homicide.Boston:Northeastern University Press.
31. Wilson, M.,Daly, M.(1993).Spousal homicide risk and estrangement.Violence and Victims,8(1),3-16.
32. Wilson, M.,Daly, M.(1992).Who kills whom in spouse killings? On the exceptional sex ratio of spousal homicides in the Unite states.Criminology,30(2),189-215.
33. Wilson, M.,Daly, M.,Wright, C.(1993).Uxoricide in Canada: Demographic risk patterns.Canadian Journal of Criminology,35(3),263-291.
34. Wilson, M.,Jordan, C. E.,Daly, M.(1995).Lethal and nonlethal violence against wives.Canadian Journal of Criminology,37(3),331-361.
35. 王珮玲(2010)。內政部委託研究報告內政部委託研究報告,台北:內政部。
36. 王珮玲、范國勇(2009)。桃園縣家庭暴力暨性侵害防治中心委託研究桃園縣家庭暴力暨性侵害防治中心委託研究,桃園:桃園縣家庭暴力暨性侵害防治中心。
37. 林秀美(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所。
38. 侯崇文(1999)。殺人事件中犯罪者與被害者關係研究。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集〈二〉，台北:
39. 柯麗評、王珮玲、張錦麗(2005)。家庭暴力：理論政策與實務。台北:巨流出版社。
40. 許春金(2007)。犯罪學。台北:三民書局。
41. 葉宇記、劉絮愷、林信男、林憲(1998)。殺配偶犯之精神鑑定。台灣精神醫學，12(2)，130-141。
42. 葉碧翠(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台北大學犯罪學研究所。
43. 謝文彥(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所。
44. 謝文彥(2002)。殺妻犯罪行為之研究。2002年犯罪問題研究研討會，台北:
45. 魏仲亨(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所。

1. 劉姿妤,解景然(2019)。焦點解決短期治療在伴侶暴力酒癮相對人之探討與應用。諮商與輔導，408，32-35。
2. 馬宗潔、江建仁(2013)。與目睹家內凶殺案兒童工作經驗探討。臺灣社會工作學刊，11，115-144。
3. 潘淑滿、歐紫彤、陳杏容、林雅容、林東龍(2016)。親密關係暴力：臺灣女性之受暴與求助經驗。臺灣社會工作學刊，17，1-42。
4. 邱獻輝(2014)。被歧視與反擊：一位阿美族親密殺人者的生命敘說。臺北市立大學學報，45(2)，69-91。
5. 邱獻輝(2018)。從角色默契消失到敵意湧現的惡化歷程：認定伴侶不貞的男性親密殺人心理探究。教育心理學報，49(3)，461-486。
6. 葉光輝、邱獻輝(2014)。臉面在教唆殺妻歷程的心理意涵：華人臉面理論的應用。人文及社會科學集刊，26(3)，483-523。
7. 趙善如、黃楷婷、陳婕誼、林聖峯(2015)。屏東縣親密關係暴力高危機個案跨機構網絡會議在地運作之探究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，11(2)，1-40。
8. (2016)。暴力親密伴侶間的性忌妒議題。社區發展季刊，156，182-192。