寓居於「家」：由關係脈絡探究癌症喪親者的悲悼心思及其流變

The Journey of Becoming and Being- In-The-Home: Exploring Two Siblings' Bereavement Experiences and Life Situatedness to Their Death Father

10.30074/FJMH.201909_32(3).0005

林耀盛(Yaw-Sheng Lin)；高舒(Shu Kao)

喪親 ； 家 ； 現象學心理學 ； 對偶經驗 ； 居家感 ； bereavement ； home ； phenomenological psychology ； dyadic perspective ； homelikeness

中華心理衛生學刊

32卷3期（2019 / 09 / 01）

329 - 354

繁體中文

研究目的：文化脈絡顯示「關係」是悲悼研究重要主題，本研究聚焦於關係面向探討喪親者的悲悼心理經驗及其關係場域「家」的變化。研究方法：以一對喪父的兄妹為受訪者，於父親過世一年期間，各自進行兩次訪談。資料蒐集後，以現象學心理學方法與家庭為單位的對偶研究，貼近受訪者經驗處境現象。研究結果：兄妹受訪者雙元經驗的置身結構與時間性脈絡，涵蓋關係的位移、喪親者生命史、時空交織的記憶情感、家的不可分割性等現象結構，並顯示其面對親人過世，起初傾向藉由鞏固自身主觀界定、情感寄託的「家」，找尋內在居家感。然而，存有的居家感源於變化的位址，喪親者內在居家感的歸返，終在關係經驗及生活世界的流動中，朝向域外。本研究提出以存有論關照喪親經驗的可能視域及相關討論。研究結論：兩位受訪者間異同經驗，呈顯家作為一種「居家感」的重要意涵，並帶出「生命境位的否面性」與「流變經驗的倫理性」現象及其臨床反思。

Purpose: We aimed to enrich understanding of the subjective experience of grief of bereaved siblings after the cancer death of their father. Methods: A brother and sister who lost their father to cancer were interviewed twice individually about a half year after their father passed away, with a 6-month follow-up. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a phenomenological dyadic approach. Results: The analysis revealed four general structures which is relational transformation, life history review of the bereaved, affective memories embedded in temporality and spatiality, and the context of home in the narrative data. The siblings initially stuck to their personal sense of home to regain homelikeness that is a homelike being-in-the-world in which the lived body in most cases has a transparent quality as the point of access to the world in understanding activities after the death event. The feeling of homelikeness is embedded in a becoming process; it is not a stable state. The siblings eventually faced the changes, the negativity or absent side related to their home, and then needed to embrace outside experiences. Conclusions: Homelikeness is the underlying transformative structure of home. Death shed light on the essential negativity of life, and the ethical relational experience between the bereaved and the deceased. The clinical implications and research suggestions from this study are discussed.

1. 余德慧,李維倫,林耀盛,余安邦,陳淑惠,許敏桃,石世明(2004)。倫理療癒作為建構臨床心理學本土化的起點。本土心理學研究，22，253-352。
   連結：
2. 李維倫,賴憶嫺(2009)。現象學方法論：存在行動的投入。中華輔導與諮商學報，25，275-321。
   連結：
3. 林耀盛(2006)。聆聽受苦之聲：從「咱們」關係析究慢性病照顧。應用心理研究，29，183-212。
   連結：
4. 林耀盛(2005)。說是一物即不中：從倫理性轉向療癒觀點反思震災存活者的悲悼歷程。本土心理學研究，23，259-317。
   連結：
5. 林耀盛,李維倫(2018)。受苦現象與哀傷情感：人文臨床心理學取向的探問。中華心理衛生學刊，31(3)，215-225。
   連結：
6. 林耀盛,邱子芸(2015)。臨終處境的陪伴轉化：癌末病患及其照顧者心理經驗與存在現象探究。中華心理衛生學刊，28(2)，189-219。
   連結：
7. 高舒,林耀盛(2018)。哀悼時刻：照顧者從臨床陪伴到「後臨終」情感現象的心理轉化經驗。中華心理衛生學刊，31(3)，275-301。
   連結：
8. 楊凱麟(2006)。二（特異）點與一（抽象）線──德勒茲思想的一般拓樸學。台大文史哲學報，64，173-189。
   連結：
9. Bennett, K. M.,Vidal-Hall, S.(2000).Narratives of death: A qualitative study of widowhood in later life.Ageing and Society,20(4),413-428.
10. Davis, D. H.(2004).Dementia: Sociological and philosophical constructions.Social Science & Medicine,58(2),369-378.
11. Denzin, N. K.(Ed.),Lincoln, Y. S.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of qualitative research.London:SAGE Publications.
12. Derrida, J.,Collins, G.(Trans.)(1997).Politics of Friendship.London:Verso.
13. Field, N. P.,Gao, B.,Paderna, L.(2005).Continuing bonds in bereavement: An attachment theory based perspective.Death Studies,29,277-299.
14. Heidegger, M.,Macquarrie, J.(Trans.),Robinson, E.(Trans.)(1962).Being and time.New York:Harper & Row.
15. Hsu, M. T.,Kahn, D. L.,Huang, C. M.(2002).No more the same: The lives of adolescents in Taiwan who have lost fathers.Family Community Health,25(1),43-56.
16. Kissane, D. W.,Bloch, S.,McKenzie M,McDowall, A. C.,Nitzan, R.(1998).Family grief therapy: A preliminary account of a new model to promote healthy family functioning during palliative care and bereavement.Psycho-Oncology,7,14-25.
17. Klass, D.(2006).Continuing conversation about continuing bonds.Death Studies,30,843-858.
18. Klass, D.(Ed.),Silverman, P.(Ed.),Nickman, S. L.(Ed.)(1996).Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief.Washington DC:Taylor & Francis.
19. Lee, W. L.(2009).Psychotherapy as a locale for ethical care: The reaching into situated negativity.Schutzian Research. A Yearbook of Lifeworldly Phenomenology and Qualitative Social Science,1,67-83.
20. McCarthy, J. R.,Prokhovnik, R.(2014).Embodied relationality and caring after death.Body & Society,20(2),18-43.
21. Neimeyer, R. A.(Ed.)(2001).Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss.Washington, DC, US:American Psychological Association.
22. Prigerson, H. G.,Horowitz, M. J.,Jacobs, S. C.,Parkes, C. M.,Aslan, M.,Goodkin, K.,Maciejewski, P. K.(2009).Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11.PLoS Medicine,6(8),1-12.
23. Royse, D.,Thyer, B. A.,Padgett, D. K.,Logan, TK.(2006).Program evaluation: An introduction.United States:Thomson Brooks/ Cole.
24. Sanderson, C.,Lobb, E. A.,Mowll, J.,Butow, P. N.,McGowan, N.,Price, M. A.(2013).Signs of post-traumatic stress disorder in caregivers following an expected death: A qualitative study.Palliative Medicine,27(7),625-631.
25. Sarafino, E. P.,Smith, T. W.(2014).Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions.New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
26. Shear, M. K.,Simon, N.,Wall, M.,Zisook, S.,Neimeyer, R.,Duan, N.,Keshaviah, A.(2011).Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5.Depression and Anxiety,28(2),103-117.
27. Soler, C.,Fink, B.(Trans.)(2016).Lacanian affects: The function of affect in Lacan's work.Sussex:Routledge.
28. Stolorow, R. D.(2011).World, affectivity, trauma: Heidegger and post-Cartesian psychoanalysis.New York:Routledge.
29. Strachey, J.(Ed. Trans.)(1957).The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XIV).London:Hogarth Press.
30. Strachey, J.(Ed. Trans.)(1955).The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume XVII (1917-1919): An infantile neurosis and other works.London:Hogarth Press.
31. Stroebe, M.,Gergen, M. M.,Gergen, K. J.,Stroebe, W.(1992).Broken hearts or broken bonds: Love and death in historical perspective.American Psychologist,47,1205-1212.
32. Van Parys, H.,Provoost, V.,De Sutter, P.,Pennings, G.,Buysse, A.(2017).Multi family member interview studies: A focus on data analysis.Journal of Family Therapy,39(3),386-401.
33. Worden, J. W.(2008).Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for the mental health practitioner.New York:Springer.
34. 余德慧（編）(2002).台灣巫宗教的心靈療遇.台北:心靈工坊.
35. 余德慧,李宗燁(2002).生命史學.台北:東大圖書公司.
36. 李維倫(2016)。從實證心理學到實踐心理學：現象學心理學的本土化知識之道。台灣心理諮商季刊，8(2)，1-15。
37. 林耀盛(2000)。地震之後，千禧之始：重探「心理（學）」與「諮商（學）」的共構關係。應用心理學研究，5，165-193。
38. 林耀盛(2016)。實證論陰影及其超越：迂迴或直面。臺灣心理諮商季刊，8(2)，36-43。
39. 林耀盛(2018)。倫理的不及處？創傷與哀傷的透工／體驗。言語、意義與行動：華人倫理實踐論壇，台北:
40. 侯懿真(2006)。高雄市，高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所。
41. 陳正國（譯）,Bauman, Z.(1997).生與死的雙重變奏：人類生命策略的社會學詮釋.台北市:東大.
42. 項退結(1990).海德格.台北:東大圖書公司.
43. 潘慧玲(2003)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11(1)，115-143。
44. 蔡佩真(2012)。華人家庭關係脈絡中悲傷表達模式之探討：以台灣經驗為例。台灣心理諮商季刊，4(1)，16-38。
45. 賴俊雄（編）(2009).他者哲學：回歸列維納斯.台北:麥田,城邦文化.
46. 龔卓軍（譯）,王靜慧（譯）,Bachelard, G.(2003).空間詩學.台北:張老師文化.

1. 陳薈雅,林耀盛,李宛霖(2022)。寂靜、切近與綿延：癌末病患照顧者悲傷時間性探究。中華心理學刊，64(2)，151-173。
2. 李宛霖(2021)。重返「本土契合性」論辯：默會之知的實踐智慧。本土心理學研究，55，3-33。
3. 劉淑慧,林耀盛,李維倫(2021)。主編的話－現象學心理學的臺灣實踐。中華輔導與諮商學報，61，1-19。