社會資本、制度創新與九二一災後集合住宅重建

Social Capital, Institutional Innovation, and Condominium Apartments Rebuilding of the 1999 Chi-chi Earthquake in Taiwan

10.30074/FJMH.201912_32(4).0001

周偉賢(WAI-IN CHAO)；林宗弘(THUNG-HONG LIN)

社會資本 ； 韌性 ； 住宅重建 ； 災難 ； 921地震 ； Social Capital ； Resilience ； Condominium Apartments Rebuilding ； Disaster ； Chi-Chi Earthquake

中華心理衛生學刊

32卷4期（2019 / 12 / 01）

367 - 405

繁體中文

研究目的：本研究關注社會資本對921災後集合住宅重建的影響。過去災難社會學文獻認為社會資本作為準公共財，有助於推動災後重建；另外，921震後集合住宅重建的文獻指出，震後頒佈的暫行條例，制度上的創新有助社會資本在重建中發揮正面作用。本文使用社區層級的社會資本測量變項和長期追蹤資料，分析社會資本對921震後集合住宅重建的影響。研究方法：本文使用了三種社會資本的分析架構，分別是牽絆式（bonding）、橫跨式（bridging）、縱連式（linking）三個面向，以台灣921震後集合住宅重建作為測量災後韌性的指標，利用1999至2013年的面版數據（panel data），透過迴歸模型探討社會資本對災後集合住宅重建的效果。研究結果：統計結果顯示，各受災社區大樓的組織活動，如組織更新會和受災聯盟的新聞次數越多，越能有效提高重建成功的機率；而政治人物到現場勘查受災社區大樓的新聞次數越多，亦能有效地提高重建成功的機會，但只有縣市長、立委層級的政治人物勘查有明顯作用。研究結論：社會資本對推動921災後集合住宅重建成功有正面影響力。另外，本文與既有文獻符合，發現921震災重建基金會的補助是集合住宅重建成功的重要成因。台灣震後特定時空下的制度創新，對建立災區重建的韌性具有重要的參考價值。

Purpose: This essay aims to investigate the relationship between social capital and condominium apartments rebuilding of Chi-chi Earthquake (1999) in Taiwan. Several studies have revealed that The Temporary Statute for 921 Earthquake Reconstruction (921 Foundation) had provided significant support to condominium apartments rebuilding. However, data about the efficacy of the institutional innovation and social capital are limited. Methods: This paper studied 138 condominium apartments rebuilding as a longitudinal data in 13 years. Our study uses the analysis frame recognized by existing researches that social capital can be classified into three types: bonding, bridging and linking. It also argues the social capital would affect the housing reconstruction. Results: Statistical results show a positive correlation between social capital and the probability of reconstruction completed. Accumulations of organization events and politicians' visits as the measurements of social capital from the newspaper database have a positive effect on condominium apartments rebuilding. Conclusions: In sum, this finding broadly supports the disaster studies related to social capital with resilience. The 921 Foundation is also proven as a major actor in increasing the probability of condominium apartments rebuilding completed. This research has shown that social capital matters for post-disaster recovery.

1. 吳杰穎,曾志雄(2006)。影響921震災災後集合住宅都市更新重建之幾個因素探討。建築與規劃學報，7(2)，135-153。
   連結：
2. 吳英璋,許文耀(2004)。災難心理反應及其影響因子之文獻探討。臨床心理學刊，1(2)，85-96。
   連結：
3. 林冠慧,林宗弘,胡伯維,張宜君,葉錦勳,詹忠翰,劉季宇(2017)。地震，屋毀與傷亡：集集地震風險的因果分析。都市與計劃，44(1)，83-112。
   連結：
4. 林照真(2013)。台灣電視新聞之災難報導：以〔莫拉克〕風災為例。新聞學研究，115，141-185。
   連結：
5. 林耀盛,陳淑惠,洪福建,曾旭民(2005)。差異的聲音：不同性別震災受創者心理社會反應之比較分析。臨床心理學刊，2(1)，31-40。
   連結：
6. 張宜君,林宗弘(2012)。不平等的災難：921地震下的受災風險與社會階層化。人文及社會科學集刊，24(2)，193-231。
   連結：
7. 許文耀(2003)。資源流失，因應，社會支持與九二一地震災民的心理症狀之關係。中華心理學刊，45(3)，263-277。
   連結：
8. 許文耀,曾幼涵(2003)。九二一地震後災民的資源變化與心理症狀間的關係。中華心理衛生學刊，16(2)，1-19。
   連結：
9. 許文耀,曾幼涵(2004)。災難因子與心理症狀間之關係─以921地震為例。臨床心理學刊，1(1)，30-39。
   連結：
10. 郭禹彤,林鴻洲(2018)。臺灣報紙對空難新聞報導之研究—以復興臺北空難與華航澎湖空難為例。人文社會科學研究，12(1)，1-25。
    連結：
11. 陳志柔(2017)。有效治理的桎梏：當代中國集體抗爭與國家反應。台灣社會學，33，113-164。
    連結：
12. 陳建良,林祖嘉(2004)。九二一地震災後個別住宅重建動態資料分析及其成果檢討。住宅學報，13(2)，63-88。
    連結：
13. 黃俊豪,何明修(2015)。馬政府時期的環境抗爭樣貌（2008-2012）：一個抗爭事件的分析。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌，53(2)，177-216。
    連結：
14. 葉高華(2013)。社會脆弱性可解釋九二一地震死亡率分布嗎？。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌，51(1)，135-153。
    連結：
15. 劉華真(2011)。消失的農漁民：重探台灣早期環境抗爭。台灣社會學，21，1-49。
    連結：
16. 賴美蓉(2002)。居民對921災後社區住宅重建之意願調查分析。都市與計劃，29(4)，533-550。
    連結：
17. 羅廷瑛,張景媛(2001)。921地震災區寄讀學童經歷地震災難及參與心理重建團體心理轉變之歷程分析。教育心理學報，33(1)，31-45。
    連結：
18. Abramson, D. M.,Grattan, L. M.,Mayer, B.,Colten, C. E.,Arosemena, F. A.,BedimoRung, A.,Lichtveld, M.(2015).The resilience activation framework: A conceptual model of how access to social resources promotes adaptation and rapid recovery in post-disaster settings.The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research,42(1),42-57.
19. Aldrich, D. P.(2012).Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery.Chicago:University of Chicago.
20. Aldrich, D. P.,Crook, K.(2008).Strong civil society as a double-edged sword: Siting trailers in post-Katrina New Orleans.Political Research Quarterly,61(3),379-389.
21. Aldrich, D. P.,Meyer, M. A.(2015).Social capital and community resilience.American Behavioral Scientist,59(2),254-269.
22. Aldrich, D. P.,Sawada, Y.(2015).The physical and social determinants of mortality in the 3.11 tsunami.Social Science & Medicine,124,66-75.
23. Anbarci, N.,Escaleras, M.,Register, C. A.(2005).Earthquake fatalities: The interaction of nature and political economy.Journal of Public Economics,89(9-10),1907-1933.
24. Andrews, K. T.,Caren, N.(2010).Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda.American Sociological Review,75(6),841-866.
25. Birkland, T. A.(2006).Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events.Georgetown University Press.
26. Bolin, R.(1985).Disasters and long-term recovery policy: a focus on housing and families.Review of Policy Research,4(4),709-715.
27. Bonanno, G. A.,Galea, S.,Bucciarelli, A.,Vlahov, D.(2007).What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,75(5),671-682.
28. Chen, W. S.,Huang, B. S.,Chen, Y. G.,Lee, Y. H.,Yang, C. N.,Lo, C. H.,Chang, H. C.,Sung, Q. C.,Huang, N. W.,Lin, C. C.,Sung, S. H.,Lee, K. J.(2001).1999 Chi-Chi earthquake: A case study on the role of thrust-ramp structures for generating earthquakes.Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America,91(5),986-994.
29. Clapham, D.(2010).Happiness, well-being and housing policy.Policy & Politics,38(2),253-267.
30. Coleman, J. S.(1988).Social capital in the creation of human capital.American Journal of Sociology,94,S95-S120.
31. Cutter, S. L.(1996).Societal responses to environmental hazards.International Social Science Journal,48(150),525-536.
32. Elliott, J. R.,Haney, T. J.,Sams-Abiodun, P.(2010).Limits to social capital: Comparing network assistance in two New Orleans neighborhoods devastated by Hurricane Katrina.The Sociological Quarterly,51(4),624-648.
33. Evans, G. W.,Wells, N. M.,Moch, A.(2003).Housing and mental health: A review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique.Journal of Social Issues,59(3),475-500.
34. Granvoetter, M. S.(1973).The strength of weak ties.American Journal of Sociologiy,78(6),1360-1380.
35. Hirayama, Y.(2000).Collapse and reconstruction: Housing recovery policy in Kobe after the Hanshin Great Earthquake.Housing Studies,15(1),111-128.
36. Hirschman, A. O.(1970).Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University.
37. Hobfoll, S. E.(2012).Conservation of resources and disaster in cultural context: The caravans and passageways for resources.Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes,75(3),227-232.
38. Hollifield, M.,Gory, A.,Siedjak, J.,Nguyen, L.,Holmgreen, L.,Hobfoll, S.(2016).The benefit of conserving and gaining resources after trauma: A systematic review.Journal of Clinical Medicine,5(11),104.
39. IPCC(2012).Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
40. King, G.,Keohane, R. O.,Verba, S.(1994).Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
41. Koopmans, R.(1993).The Dynamics of Protest Waves: West Germany, 1965 to 1989.American Sociological Review,58(5),637-658.
42. Koopmans, R.,Statham, P.(1999).Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches.Mobilization: An International Quarterly,4(2),203-221.
43. Kriesi, H.,Koopmans, R.,Duyvendak, J. W.,Giugni, M.(1995).New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
44. Lin, K. H.,Chang, Y. C.,Liu, G. Y.,Chan, C. H.,Lin, T. H.,Yeh, C. H.(2015).An interdisciplinary perspective on social and physical determinants of seismic risk.Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,15,2173-2182.
45. Lin, K. H.,Lee, H. C.,Lin, T. H.(2017).How does resilience matter? An empirical verification of the relationships between resilience and vulnerability.Natural Hazards,1-22.
46. Lin, N.(1999).Social networks and status attainment.Annual Review of Sociology,25(1),467-487.
47. Lin, T. H.(2015).Governing natural disasters: state capacity, democracy, and human vulnerability.Social Forces,93(3),1267-1300.
48. Ma, K. F.,Lee, C. T.,Tsai, Y. B.,Shin, T. C.,Mori, J.(1999).The Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake: Large surface displacements on an inland thrust fault.Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union,80(50),605-611.
49. McAdam, D.(1999).Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
50. Merdjanoff, A. A.(2013).There's no place like home: Examining the emotional consequences of Hurricane Katrina on the displaced residents of New Orleans.Social Science Research,42(5),1222-1235.
51. Norris, F. H.,Kaniasty, K.(1996).Received and perceived social support in times of stress: A test of the social support deterioration deterrence model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71(3),498-511.
52. Oliver, P. E.,Myers, D. J.(1999).How events enter the public sphere: Conflict, location, and sponsorship in local newspaper coverage of public events.American Journal of Sociology,105(1),38-87.
53. Peacock, W. G.,Ragsdale, K.(1997).Social Systems, Ecological Networks and Disasters: Toward a socio-political ecology of disasters.Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters,New York:
54. Putnam, R. D.(1995).Bowling alone: America's declining social capital.Journal of Democracy,6(1),65-78.
55. Putnam, R. D.,Leonardi, R.,Nanetti, R. Y.(1994).Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy.Princeton:Princeton University.
56. Rodriguez, H.(Ed.),Quarantelli, E. L.(Ed.),Dynes, R. R.(Ed.)(2007).Handbook of disaster research.New York, NY:Springer.
57. Satyanath, S.,Voigtländer, N.,Voth, H. J.(2017).Bowling for fascism: Social capital and the rise of the Nazi Party.Journal of Political Economy,125(2),478-526.
58. Shirley, W. L.,Boruff, B. J.,Cutter, S. L.(2012).Social vulnerability to environmental hazards.Hazards Vulnerability and Environmental Justice,London:
59. Shorter, E.,Tilly, C.(1974).Strikes in France, 1830-1968.London:Cambridge University Press.
60. Silver, B. J.(2003).Forces of labor: workers’ movements and globalization since 1870.Cambridge University Press.
61. Sippel, L.,Pietrzak, R.,Charney, D.,Mayes, L.,Southwick, S.(2015).How does social support enhance resilience in the trauma-exposed individual?.Ecology and Society,20(4)
62. Sylvestre, J.,Nelson, G.,Sabloff, A.,Peddle, S.(2007).Housing for people with serious mental illness: A comparison of values and research.American Journal of Community Psychology,40(1-2),125-137.
63. Tilly, C.(1978).From Mobilization to Revolution.MA:Addison-Wesley Pub. Co..
64. Tilly, C.,Tilly, L. A.,Tilly, R. H.(1975).The rebellious century: 1830-1930.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
65. Tse, C. W.,Wei, J.,Wang, Y.(2013).Social capital and disaster recovery: Evidence from Sichuan earthquake in 2008.Washington, DC:Center for Global Development.
66. Woolcock, M.,Narayan, D.(2000).Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, policy.The World Bank Research Observer,15(2),225-249.
67. Wu, J. Y.,Lindell, M. K.(2004).Housing reconstruction after two major earthquakes: The 1994 Northridge earthquake in the United States and the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan.Disasters,28(1),63-81.
68. 內政部營建署(2006).921震災住宅重建進度總結報告.台北:內政部營建署.
69. 內政部營建署(2006a)。中華民國臺灣地區住宅調查報告。台北：內政部營建署。
70. 行政院九二一震災災後重建推動委員會(2006).九二一震災重建經驗.台北:國史館臺灣文獻館.
71. 李宗義,林宗弘,謝志誠(2011)。重建信任網絡：九二一地震後集合住宅的重建成敗。台灣社會學2011年度學術研討會，台北:
72. 周桂田（編）(2016).永續與綠色治理新論.台北:台灣大學風險社會與政策研究中心.
73. 林宗弘(2012)。災後重建的政治：中國512地震與臺灣921地震的比較。臺灣社會學刊，50，57-110。
74. 林昭遠,劉昌文(2005).九二一震災災後重建實錄.台北:五南.
75. 財團法人九二一重建基金會(2002).921震災重建基金會捐款運用報告.台北:財團法人九二一重建基金會.
76. 財團法人九二一震災重建基金會(2009)。築巢專案—協助受災集合式住宅(社區)更新重建方案。取自http://www.taiwan921.lib.ntu.edu.tw/921pdf/FH8907.pdf，擷取日期(2019.10.01)。
77. 國家地震工程研究中心(1999).九二一集集大地震全面勘災報告—社會經濟震害調查.
78. 張劭農,黃雅盈,丁致成(2010).家園重生：100個災後重建的故事1994-2008.台北:內政部營建署.
79. 張宜君,林宗弘(2013)。數據的災難？九二一震災社會調查資料庫的現狀與限制。思與言，51(1)，269-312。
80. 張蒼松(2009).種一棵家族樹.台北:台大出版中心.
81. 郭顏慧(2013)。震損重建14年富景天下歡喜入厝(2013年9月20日)。自由時報，取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/715439，擷取日期(2019.10.01)。
82. 陳俐蓉(2003)。新北市，輔仁大學社會工作研究所。
83. 陳韻如,沈幼蓀,陳雅蓁(2011)。街頭抗爭的暴力邏輯。臺灣社會學刊，46，167-205。
84. 湯京平,蔡允棟,黃紀(2002)。災難與政治：九二一地震中的集體行為與災變情境的治理。政治科學論叢，16，139-162。
85. 臧國仁,鍾蔚文(2000)。災難事件與媒體報導：相關研究簡述。新聞學研究，62，143-151。
86. 謝志誠(2001).九二一災後社區更新重建手冊修訂版.台北:財團法人九二一震災重建基金會.
87. 謝志誠(2010)。集合住宅自力更新重建之民間經驗。社區發展季刊，131，211-229。
88. 謝志誠，美麗之殿？美麗結局？921&88數位典藏。取自http://www.taiwan921.lib.ntu.edu.tw/newpdf/ST023-02.html，擷取日期(2019.10.01)。
89. 謝國興,馮燕(2000).921震災捐款監督報告書.台北:全國民間災後重建聯盟.

1. (2020)。建構韌實力（Resilient Power）：全球疫情下臺灣的公民社會與創新福利國家。臺灣社會學刊，67，203-212。