精神暴力自我評估量表編制

Development of the Psychological Violence Self-Assessment Scale in Taiwan

10.30074/FJMH.202309_36(3).0003

曾秀雲(HSIU-YUN TSENG)；王浩威(HAO-WEI WANG)

心理／情緒虐待 ； 高壓管控 ； 精神暴力 ； 親密暴力 ； coercive control ； intimate partner violence ； psychological violence ； psychological/emotional abuse

中華心理衛生學刊

36卷3期（2023 / 09 / 01）

293 - 322

繁體中文;英文

研究目的：親密暴力是侵犯人權與心理衛生的重要問題。本研究編製精神暴力自我評估量表，提供當事人具有信效度的精神暴力自我評估工具，鼓勵當事人在匿名的處境下，進行多面向的自我評估，了解個人所面臨精神暴力的處境。研究方法：本研究採問卷調查法，分為四個階段編製量表。前三階段邀請助人工作者進行親密暴力評估，確認量表題項。第四階段，邀請180位受害當事人填寫問卷（37位男性，平均38.56歲；143位女性，平均35.79歲），並驗證量表的信效度與適配度。研究結果：精神暴力自我評估量表分為「語言貶抑」、「攻擊威脅」、「控制隔離」及「情緒威脅」四個構面，具有信度與效度，且提供良好的適配度。多群組分析進一步驗證本量表具有性別恆等性。ROC曲線分析驗證本量表具有良好的篩檢力，並提供適切的評估。研究結論：本研究區分出「高風險」與「低風險」確實可以反映精神暴力嚴重程度的高低，亦幫助當事人自我評估精神暴力的危險程度。

Purpose: Intimate partner violence is an important issue in human rights and mental health. We developed the psychological violence self-assessment scale to provide victims with a reliable and valid anonymous tool to help them assess their level of risk for psychological violence. Methods: We developed the scale in 4 stages. In the first 3 stages, different groups of social workers, psychological counselors, clinical psychologists, teachers, and medical staff completed an intimate partner violence assessment to confirm the items to be included on the scale. In the fourth stage, 180 victims (37 males, mean age 38.56; 143 females, mean age 35.79) to completed the questionnaire. We used CFA to verify its reliability and validity, and multi-group analysis and ROC curve analysis to test gender invariance and screening ability. Results: We identified 4 reliable and valid dimensions for the scale with good fit: derogatory speech, intimidation, forced isolation, and emotional threats. The analysis demonstrated gender invariance and verified that the scale has good screening ability and can provide appropriate assessment. Conclusions: The distinction between high and low risk as measured by the new tool indicates the level of severity of psychological violence that the victim has experienced. This tool can help individuals to recognize their level of risk.

1. 王佩玲(2015)。如影隨形的暴力：親密伴侶跟蹤行為。社會政策與社會工作學刊，19(1)，1-44。
   連結：
2. 王珮玲(2009)。親密關係暴力危險評估：實務操作方法的探討。社會政策與社會工作學刊，13(1)，141-184。
   連結：
3. 王珮玲(2012)。臺灣親密關係暴力危險評估表 (TIPVDA) 之建構與驗證。社會政策與社會工作學刊，16(1)，1-58。
   連結：
4. 沈瓊桃(2013)。大專青年的約會暴力經驗與因應策略初探。中華心理衛生學刊，26(1)，1-31。
   連結：
5. 沈瓊桃,趙雨龍,高建秀(2019)。兩岸三地青少年約會暴力盛行率及其與憂鬱情緒關係之探討。台灣公共衛生雜誌，38(3)，280-288。
   連結：
6. 林明傑,吳啟安(2018)。高致命危險案件之快速篩檢指標與分類研究。犯罪學期刊，20(2)，53-76。
   連結：
7. 戴世玫(2016)。臺灣婚姻暴力圖像：從父權家族系統受暴網的觀點出發。社會政策與社會工作學刊，20(2)，43-82。
   連結：
8. Bentler, P. M.(1990).Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological Bulletin,107(2),238-246.
9. Campbell, J. C.(2002).Health consequences of intimate partner violence.The Lancet,359(9314),1331-1336.
10. Carney, M. M.,Barner, J. R.(2012).Prevalence of partner abuse: Rates of emotional abuse and control.Partner Abuse,3(3),286-335.
11. Cheung, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9(2),233-255.
12. Corbally, M.(2015).Accounting for intimate partner violence: A biographical analysis of narrative strategies used by men experiencing IPV from their female partners.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,30(17),3112-3132.
13. Dokkedahl, S. B.,Kirubakaran, R.,Bech-Hansen, D.,Kristensen, T. R.,Elklit, A.(2022).The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: a systematic review with meta-analyses.Systematic Reviews,11(1),1-16.
14. Douglas, E. M.,Hines, D. A.(2011).The helpseeking experiences of men who sustain intimate partner violence: An overlooked population and implications for practice.Journal of Family Violence,26(6),473-485.
15. Dutton, M. A.,Goodman, L. A.(2005).Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization.Sex Roles,52(11),743-756.
16. European Institute of Gender Equality (2017). Glossary of definitions of rape, femicide and intimate partner violence. Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/publications/glossary-definitions-rape-femicide-and-intimate-partner-violence
17. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights(2014).Violence against women: An EU-wide survey: Main results.FRA, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.
18. Fawcett, T.(2006).An introduction to ROC analysis.Pattern Recognition Letters,27(8),861-874.
19. Follingstad, D. R.(2007).Rethinking current approaches to psychological abuse: Conceptual and methodological issues.Aggression and Violent Behavior,12(4),439-458.
20. Follingstad, D. R.,Coyne, S.,Gambone, L.(2005).A representative measure of psychological aggression and its severity.Violence and Victims,20(1),25-38.
21. Frieze, I. H.(2005).Female violence against intimate partners: An introduction.Psychology of Women Quarterly,29(3),229-237.
22. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2009).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
23. Hamberger, L. K.(2005).Men’s and women’s use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples: Toward a gender-sensitive analysis.Violence and Victims,20(2),131-152.
24. Hanley, J. A.,McNeil, B. J.(1982).The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology,143(1),29-36.
25. Heise, L.,Pallitto, C.,García-Moreno, C.,Clark, C. J.(2019).Measuring psychological abuse by intimate partners: Constructing a cross-cultural indicator for the sustainable development goals.SSM-Population Health,9,100377.
26. Jacobson, N. S.,Gottman, J. M.(1998).When men batter women: New insights into ending abusive relationships.Simon and Schuster.
27. Johnson, M. P.(2008).A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violence resistance, and situational couple violence.Northeastern University Press.
28. Karakurt, G.,Silver, K. E.(2013).Emotional abuse in intimate relationships: The role of gender and age.Violence and Victims,28(5),804-821.
29. MacCallum, R. C.,Hong, S.(1997).Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI.Multivariate Behavioral Research,32,193-210.
30. Martín-Fernández, M.,Gracia, E.,Lila, M.(2019).Psychological intimate partner violence against women in the European Union: a cross-national invariance study.BMC Public Health,19(1),1-11.
31. McHugh, M. C.,Rakowski, S.,Swiderski, C.(2013).Men’s experience of psychological abuse: Conceptualization and measurement issues.Sex Roles: A Journal of Research,69(3),168-181.
32. Murphy, C. M.,Hoover, S. A.(1999).Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct.Violence and Victims,14(1),39-53.
33. Rice, M. E.,Harris, G. T.(1995).Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,63(5),737.
34. Schumacker, R. E.,Lomax, R. G.(2004).A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling.Psychology Press.
35. Shepard, M. F.,Campbell, J. A.(1992).The Abusive Behavior Inventory: A measure of psychological and physical abuse.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,7(3),291-305.
36. Smith, S. G., Chen, J., Basile, K. C., Gilbert, L. K., Merrick, M. T., Patel, N., Walling, M., & Jain, A. (2017). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010-2012 State Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
37. Stark, E.(2007).Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life.Oxford U. Press.
38. Stark, E.(2013).The dangers of dangerousness assessment.Family & Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly,6(2),13-22.
39. Straus, M. A.,Hamby, S. L.,Boney-McCoy, S. U. E.,Sugarman, D. B.(1996).The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data.Journal of Family Issues,17(3),283-316.
40. Tolman, R. M.(1999).The validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory.Violence and Victims,14(1),25-37.
41. Walker, L. E.(1979).The battered woman.Harper & Row.
42. Wareham, J.,Wagers, S. M.,Rodriguez, L. M.,Neighbors, C.(2022).An exploration of measurement invariance across sex in intimate partner violence perpetration.Victims & Offenders,17(2),161-181.
43. World Health Organization(2021).Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women.
44. 王麗容,陳芬苓,王雲東(2012)。內政部委託研究成果報告內政部委託研究成果報告,內政部。
45. 林明傑,簡蕾如,史玉山(2003)。內政部委託研究成果報告內政部委託研究成果報告,內政部。
46. 姚淑文(2017).校園親密關係暴力事件實務處理手冊.教育部.
47. 黃芳銘(2003).結構方程模式：理論與應用.五南.
48. 潘淑滿、林東龍、林雅容、陳杏容 (2015)。103 年度「臺灣婦女遭受親密關係暴力統計資料調查」。衛福部委託研究計畫成果報告，計畫編號：M03C3422。
49. 潘淑滿、林東龍、林雅容、劉一龍 (2021)。109 年度「臺灣婦女遭受親密關係暴力統計調查計畫」。衛福部委託研究計畫成果報告，計畫編號：M09C7266。
50. 衛福部 (2021 年 11 月 26 日 )。30 秒精神暴力自我檢測量表。衛生福利部保護服務司 / 家定暴力防治 / 宣導專區 https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dops/cp-1158-64153-105.html