跨理論模式戒菸教育計畫介入應用於大專生之成效評價研究

The Effect and Evaluation of Smoking Cessation Program Based on Trantheoretical Model in College Students

10.7022/JHE.200506.0145

李淑卿(Shu-Ching Lee)；郭鐘隆(Jong-Long Guo)

大專生 ； 戒菸教育計畫 ； 每日吸菸量 ； 肺中一氧化碳 ； 跨理論模式 ； cigarettes per day ； college students ； smoking cessation program ； the level of carbon monoxide CO ； transtheoretical model TTM

衛生教育學報

23期（2005 / 06 / 01）

145 - 159

繁體中文

本研究旨在發展一套以跨理論模式為基礎的「戒菸教育計畫」，並進而探討其成效。研究採準實驗設計，以台北縣某技術學院79位吸菸學生為對象，非隨機分配至實驗組與對照組，實驗組提供以跨理論模式為基礎之團體衛生教育課程及個人化戒菸輔導，對照組則不予以任何介入。本研究介入結果：(1)確實能降低實驗組學生「每日吸菸量」、肺中「CO值」、「尼古丁依賴程度」指數；(2)實驗組學生戒菸改變階段由無意圖期、意圖期改變至準備期、行動期；(3)本計畫確實能提高實驗組學生「改變過程」得分，且和對照組學生有顯著性差異；(4)實驗組學生在「決定利益」項目和對照組有顯著性差異；「決定障礙」介入前後則沒有差異；(5)計畫介入確實能提高實驗組學生戒菸自我效能，且和對照組學生達顯著性差異。整體而言，本研究除了決定平衡中的障礙因素外，其他的依變項都顯示有良好的介入成效。

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of well-designed theory-oriented smoking cessation program for junior college students by applying transtheoretical model (TTM). A quasi-experimental design was employed in the study. The subjects were consisted of 79 smoking college students. The interventions for experimental group included 6-week structured courses, individual anti-smoking counseling and personalized anti-smoking handbook, on the other hand, the control group did not receive any intervention. The main findings in this study were as follows: (l) The program could significantly decrease the experimental students' cigarettes per day、the scores of Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence and the level of carbon monoxide (CO). (2) There was a significant impact in moving the smoking cessation stages forward for the experimental students. (3) There was a significant increase in the score of process of change in smoking cessation for subjects in the experimental group. (4) There was a significant increase in the scores of pros regarding smoking cessation for subjects in the experimental group compared to those in the control group, but not for cons. Overall, except to the scores of decisional balance for cons, other dependent variables showed significant impacts.

1. Adelman, W. P.,Duggan, A. K.,Hauptman, P.,Joffe, A.(2001).Effectiveness of a high school smoking cessation program.Pediatrics,107(4),50.
2. Coleman-Wallace, D.,Lee, J. W.,Montgomery, S.,Blix, G.,Wang, T. D.(1999).Evaluation of developmentally appropriate programs for adolescent tobacco cessation.Journal of School Health,69(8),314-319.
3. Hu, T. W.,Li Z.,Keeler, T. E.(1998).Teenage smoking, attempts to quit, and school performance.American Journal of Public Health,88(6),940-943.
4. Norman, G. J.,Velicer, W. F.,Fava, J. L.,Prochsska, J. O.(1998).Dynamic typology clustering within the stages of change for smoking cessation.Addictive Behaviors,23(2),139-153.
5. O`Neil, H. K.,Gillispie, M. A.,Slobin K.(2000).Stage of change and smoking cessation: Acomputeradministered intervention program for young adult.American Journal of Health Promotion,15(2),93-96.
6. Pallonen, U. E.,Prochaska, J. O.,Velicer, W. F.,Prokhorov, A. V.,Smith, N. F.(1998).Stage of acquisition and cessation for adolescent smoking: An empirical integration.Addictive Behaviors,23(3),303-324.
7. Prochaska, J.O.,DiClemente, C. C.(1983).Stage and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,51,390-395.
8. Prochaska, J.O.,Redding, C.A.,Ever, K. E.,Glanz K.,Lewis FM.(Eds),Rimer B. (Eds)(1996).Health Behavior and Health Education Theory, Research and Practice, 60-84.San Fancisco:Jossey-Bass In.
9. Prochaska, J.O.,Velicer, W. F.,DiClement, C. C.,Fava, J.(1988).Measuring processes of change: Applications to the cessation of smoking.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,56,520-526.
10. Quinlanv, K.B.,McCaul, K. D.(2000).Matched and mismatched interventions with young adult smokers: Testing a stage theory.Health Psychology,19(2),165-171.
11. 李景美、張鳳琴、賴香如、李碧霞、陳雯昭(2002)。台北縣高職一年級學生成癮物質濫用之危險與保護因子研究。衛生教育學報，17，73-88。
12. 李蘭(1999)。民國八十八年台灣地區成人及青少年之吸菸率與吸菸行爲調查：菸害防制法實施勿年後之初評。台北市:行政院衛生署委託研究報告。
13. 周碧瑟(1997)。青少年藥物濫用盛行率與危險因子的探討。學生輔導通訊，50，34-41。
14. 林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。
15. 財團法人基督復臨安息日會臺安醫院(1994)。吸菸自由－清新戒菸計畫主持人指導手冊。台北:時兆出版社。
16. 張惠芬(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台北護理學院護理學系研究所。
17. 黃蔚剛、邱志彥、譚文海、吳昭原(1988)。台灣地區大專學生的吸菸態度、行爲及其影響因素調查研究。衛生教育雜誌，9，35-51。
18. 魏美珠、林爲森(1999)。青少年戒菸教育介入成效之評估。嘉南學報，25，43-55。

1. 陳毓璟(2019)。大學生健康老化多元創意教學課程之成效研究：從健康覺察到行動。教育科學研究期刊，64(2)，161-190。
2. 戴春慧、黃立琪、陳錦茗、林瓊慧(2015)。精神科日間留院病人戒菸專案之成效。醫學與健康期刊，4(2)，77-91。
3. 黃秀媚、李景美(2015)。焦點解決取向團體輔導對高職學生戒菸成效之研究－計畫行為理論之應用。輔導與諮商學報，37(2)，23-55。
4. 羅惠丹、龍芝寧、鄭其嘉、廖信榮、黃秀媚、陳政友、康杏如、苗迺芳、林雅婷、李景美、李淑卿(2013)。高中職戒菸教育介入成效評估之研究─以新北市、臺北市八所高中職學生為例。學校衛生，63，1-23。
5. 鄭惠美、兵逸儂(2010)。北市士林區高中學生每日五蔬果教育介入成效研究。健康促進與衛生教育學報，33，21-46。