社區組織間連結及組織結盟之相關因素探討－以北區社區健康營造中心為例

Factors Associated with inter-organizational Linkages of Community coalitions-northern Community Health Building Centers in Taiwan as an Example

10.7022/JHE.200512.0211

劉潔心(Chieh-Hsing Liu)；張麗春(Li-Chun Chang)；楊智琳(Ju-Lin Yang)；林恰君(I-Chiung Lin)；陳嘉玲(Chia-Ling Chen)

社區結盟 ； 社區健康營造中心 ； Community coalition ； Community health building center

衛生教育學報

24期（2005 / 12 / 01）

211 - 231

繁體中文

本研究的目的是透過社區營造的運作過程、組識結構、成員態度來瞭解與組織連結與組織結盟間的關係，除了瞭解目前台灣地區社區的營運狀況，並更深入探討影響國內社區組織之組織連結與擴大組織結盟的重要影響因素。本研究採橫斷式調查法，研究對象的選取，以北部地區41家社區健康營造中心的成員為母群體，運用深度訪談、再以系統分層隨機抽樣法，最後取20家社區健康營造中心成員為樣本，進行結構式問卷調查，共發出565份問卷，回收358份有效問卷，有效問卷回收率為63.4%。 研究結果發現：1．在運作過程的因素方面，「溝通型態」與「社區參與助力」與「組織連結與組織結盟」成正相關。2．在「組識結構」的因素方面，「組識行政運作」與「組織連結程度」、「擴大組織結盟」均成正相關。3．分析「社區組織連結」的重要預測因子，發現「組織行政運作」、「成員滿意度」、「組織氣氛」、「成員知識與技能」能有效預測組織連結，其共同解釋力為19%，其中又以「組織行政運作」的解釋力為最高，達13%。4．分析「社區組織結盟」的重要預測因子，發現「組織行政運作」、「成員滿意度」、「組織氣氣」、「成員知識與技能」能有效預測組織結盟，其共同解釋力為16%，其中又以「組織行政運作」的解釋力為最高，達12%。 根據研究結果，提出以下幾點建議，以作為未來衛生機關及相關單位，推動社區組織連結及擴大組織結盟實務時的參考：1．強化社區組織行政運作功能，以促進社區資源整合；2．強化營造中心的組織分工，並促進營造中心職位功能發揮；3．改善組織內溝通方式；4．適當成員投入時間，營造良好組織氣氛。

The purpose of this study is to investigate factors associated with inter-organizational linkages of community coalitions through examining community operational process, organization structures, and members' attitudes. It not only intends to understand the community organizing status in Taiwan but also to thoroughly investigate significant factors that are associated with inter-organizational linkages of community organizations and the expansion of community coalitions. A cross-sectional study design was adopted in the present study. Stratified random sampling was used to derive the sample for this study. The study population was defined as the 41 centers for community health development in Northern Taiwan. Study participants were recruited from members of 20 centers randomly selected from the 4lcenters. A total of 565 structured questionnaires were mailed out to participants and 358 questionnaires were returned, yielding a response rate of 63.4%. Important findings include: (1) In the dimension of operational process, communication and community participation and benefits were positively associated with the extent of inter-organizational linkages. (2) In the dimension of organization structure, organization administrative operation was positively associated with the extent of inter-organizational linkages and the expansion of community coalitions. (3) Organization administrative operation, member satisfaction, organizational climate, and capacity building of members were significant predictors of inter-organization linkages of community, accounting for 19 percent of total variation. Organization administrative operation alone explained 13 percent of total variation. (4) Organization administrative operation, member satisfaction, organizational climate, and capacity building of members were significant predictors of the expansion of community coalitions, accounting for 16 percent of total variation. Organization administrative operation alone explained 12 percent of total variation. We propose a number of recommendations based on the research findings for the reference of health departments and related sectors in promoting inter-organizational linkages of community and the expansion of community coalitions: (1) strengthening community organization administrative functions to integrate community resources; (2) augmenting organization division of community building center and encouraging every position in the community center to fully play its role; (3) improving communication within the organization; (4) appropriate paid staff hours and building good organizational climate.

1. 黃松共、吳永鐘(2002)。台灣地區社區健康營造中心運作現況初探－以兩梯次159家社區健康營造中心爲例。醫務管理期刊，4(1)，13-38。
   連結：
2. 樓美玲(2001)。健康社區營造－以福興里糖尿病患者的社區照顧方案爲例。弘光學報，38，31-36。
   連結：
3. Butterfoss, F. D.,Kegler, M. C.,Diclemente, R. J.,Crosby, R. A.,Kelger, M. C. (Ed.)(1997).Toward a comprehensive understanding of community coalitions.San Francisco:A Wiley company.
4. Florin, P.,Mitchell, R.,Stevenson, J.(1993).Identifing training and technical assistanve needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach.Health education research,8(3),417-432.
5. Florin, P.,Mitchell, R.,Stevenson, J.,Klein, I.(2000).Predicting intermediate outcomes for prevention coalitions: developmental perspective.Evaluation and Program Planning,23,341-346.
6. Kegler, M. C.,Steckler, A.,McLeroy, K.,Malek, S. H.(1998).Factors that contribute to effective community health Promotion Coalition: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalition in North Carolina.Health education and behavior,25(3),338-353.
7. Krejcie, R. V.,Morgan, D. W.(1970).Determining sample size for research activities.Educational and psychological measurement,30,607-610.
8. Mayer, J. P.,Soweid, R.,Dabney, S.,Brownson, C.,Goodman, R. M.,Rrownson, R. C.(1998).Am J Health Behav: Practices of Successful Community Coalitions.A Multiple Case Study,22(5),368-377.
9. Penner, S.(1995).A study of coalitions among HIV/AIDS service organizatgions.Sociological Perspective,38,217-239.
10. Rissel, C.,Bracht, N.,Bracht, N. (Ed.)(1998).Assessing community needs, resources, and readiness.London:SAGE Publication.
11. Wandersman, A.,Goodman, R. M.,Butterfoss, F. D.,Minkler, M. (Ed.)(1997).Understanding coalitions and how they operate.London:Rutgers university.
12. 行政院衛生署(1999)。辦理社區健康營造計劃。台北:衛生署保健處。
13. 張淑芳、陳靜敏、陳品玲、楊榮森(2001)。北市某社區婦女骨質疏鬆症之預防知識、健康信念、行爲現況及相關因素探討。醫護科技學刊，3(4)，303-314。
14. 陳再晉(2001)。營造健康社區。台灣醫學，5(2)，194-197。
15. 陳毓璟、黃松元(2003)。台北市社區健康營造推動的現況與困難之研究。衛生教育學報，19，179-211。
16. 曾華源(2002)。推動志願服務以增進社區發展。社區發展季刊，100，137-147。
17. 楊美燕、楊瑞珍、劉影梅、黃璉華(2001)。社區健康營造理論與社區護理實務的結合。醫護科技學刊，3(4)，358-364。
18. 謝菊英(2001)。愛滋感染者的新生活－社區照顧模式。愛滋病防治，34，6-10。
19. 羅瑞煌(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學工業工程及管理研究所碩士論文。

1. 張宏政、張宏政(2007)。基層農業推廣組織參與台灣鄉村社區營造之研究。社區發展季刊，120，312-329。