使用AHP為基礎的群體決策法去評估與選擇行銷策略

Fuzzy AHP-based GDM Method for Assessing and Selecting Marketing Strategies

余強生(Chian-Son Yu)

行銷策略 ； 層級分析法 ； 群體共識 ； Marketing Strategy ； Analytic Hierarchy Process ； Group Consensus

管理與系統

12卷2期（2005 / 04 / 01）

123 - 150

繁體中文

傳統的統計分析技術，由於缺乏一套客觀與透明的群體決策共識達成機制，去處理成員間的衝突與看法上的不一致，以致行銷部門最後決選出來的行銷方案，往往在充滿被質疑、無法團結一致與同心協力的環境下執行。也因此，本文提出一個模糊層級分析群體決策法，可讓每一位參與決策的人員都感受到被尊重、而且有一套公平與透明的機制，逐漸地縮小決策者間的衝突與看法上的不一致。據此，最後所選出來的方案，將可在內部最小阻力與最小分裂的情況下得以被執行。

The traditional statistics techniques, the final group option is frequently debatable and stuck in a harassing working environment owing to lack of a objective and transparent group consensus reaching process to deal with contradictory and conflicting judgments among marketing members. Accordingly, the proposed fuzzy AHP-based group decision making (GDM) method aims to which enable each group member is made to feel respected, judgments are articulated fairly, and the interactive solution process is completely transparent. Therefore, the final chosen solution would be executed smoothly and with a minimum of internal disruption.

1. Aczel, J.,Saaty, T. L.(1983).Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,27,93-102.
2. Author N(2001).A report by Taiwan`s Food Research and Development Institute.Taiwan:Hsinchu.
3. Author, N.(2001).A report by Taiwan`s Food Research and Development Institute.Taiwan:Hsinchu.
4. Badri, M. A.(2001).A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems.International Journal of Production Economic,72,27-40.
5. Bryson, N.(1996).Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process: exploring the consensus-relevant information content.Computer and Operational Research,23,27-35.
6. Bryson, N.(1995).A goal programming method for generating priority vectors.Journal of Operational Research Society,46,461-468.
7. Bryson, N.,Mobolurin, A.,Ngwenyama, O.(1995).Modeling pairwise comparisons on ratio scales.European Journal of Operational Research,83,639-654.
8. Bult, J. R.,Foekens, E. W.(1993).An analytic approach to marketing decisions.International Journal of Research in Marketing,10(4),407-410.
9. Chen, S. J.,Hwang, C. L.(1992).Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making.Berlin:Springer.
10. Davies, M. A. P.(1994).Using the AHP in marketing decision making.Journal of Marketing Management,10,57-73.
11. Dyer, R. F.,Forman, E. H.(1991).An Analytic Application to Marketing Decisions.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
12. Dyer, R. F.,Forman, E. H.,Mustafa, M. A.(1992).Decision support for media selection using the analytic hierarchy process.Journal of Advertising,21(1),59-62.
13. Fichtner, J.(1986).On deriving priority vectors from matrices of pairwise comparisons.Social Economic Planning Sciences,20(6),341-345.
14. Hwang, C. L.,Yoon, K.(1981).Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications.Berlin:Spring-Verlag.
15. Kacprzyk, J.,Fedrizzi, M.,Nurmi, H.(1992).Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,49,21-31.
16. Keane, J. G.(1969).Some observations on marketing research in top management decision making.Journal of Marketing,33(4),10-16.
17. Li, H. L.,Yu, C. S.,Hung, T. W.(2001).A goal programming method for solving AHP problems.Management Research,1(1),33-54.
18. Meade, L. M.,Presley, A.(2002).R&D project selection using the analytic network process.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,49(1),59-66.
19. Numi, H.(1983).Voting procedures: a summary analysis.British Journal of Political Science,13,181-208.
20. Numi, H.(1986).Problems of finding optimal voting and representation systems.European Journal of Operational Research,24(1),91-98.
21. Numi, H.(1982).Imprecise notions in individual and group decision theory: resolution of allies` paradox and related problems.Stochastic,6,283-303.
22. Saaty, T. L.(1988).Multi Criteria Decision Making: the Analytic Hierarchy Process.Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.
23. Yu, C. S.,Li, H. L.(2001).An algorithm for generalized fuzzy binary linear programming problems.European Journal of Operational Research,133(3),42-57.

1. (2011)。國立大學相關基金會監督管理機制與會計資訊揭露之探討。教育政策論壇，14(2)，91-116。