1999至2003年台灣地區管理學門學術期刊發表成果分析

Management Research Paper Status Assessment and Analysis in Taiwan: A Survey from 1999 to 2003

陳禹辰(Yu-Chen Chen)；簡志宏(Chi-Hong Chien)；陳彥良(Yan-Lian Chen)

SCI/SSCI ； 期刊分級 ； 大學評鑑 ； 學門評鑑 ； 管理學門 ； SCI/SSCI ； Journal Classification ； Evaluation of University ； Evaluation of Discipline ； Management Discipline

管理與系統

12卷4期（2005 / 10 / 01）

99 - 127

繁體中文

學術期刊發表的質與量的評鑑，是學術界相當重視之議題，也是各大學研究品質績效的重要基礎。有鑑於此，梁定澎等學者於2003年針對管理學門不同領域的國際期刊完成一份期刊評鑑報告。本研究以其成果為基礎，以1999至2003五年間台灣地區管理學門發表之文獻，分析台灣管理領域的學術表現。結果發現，(1)台灣文獻總數量的成長率高於全球成長率，而成長率的增長主要來自於資管及一般管理領域的貢獻；(2)就全球而言，生管、資管及一般管理三個領域的論文較為豐富，且呈現微幅上升的趨勢；但台灣比較偏重在生管及資管；(3)台灣文獻數量佔全球的比例雖逐年微幅上升，但比例仍偏低，生管是表現最好的領域，資管則成長最為快速，成為管理學域中最具競爭力的兩個領域；(4)就個別大學而言，私立學校及科技大學一般都只能在單一領域有較好的表現，而國立大學則較能普遍涉入多個領域。生管領域由交大及成大遙遙領先；資管領域若不計入電機資訊學院的發表，以中山、中央表現最佳；財會領域由政大與台大掄元。在將行銷及一般管理合併為企管領域之後，政大名列第一，有趣的是交大與清華兩所傳統理工學校亦名列前茅。此外，我們亦發現台大在A級論文的發表數量遙遙領先其他大學。

The quality and quantity of papers published in academic journals is an important base for evaluating universities' research performance. In a recent research, Liang et al. (2003) proposed academic journal ranking lists for the major fields in management discipline. According to these ranking lists, this study surveys the publishing status of Taiwan's Management discipline in the duration from 1999 to 2003, as well as assesses the research performance of each area. The results reveal many interesting phenomena, including: (1) the annual growth rate of papers published by Taiwan's researchers is higher than that of the globe; this increasing mainly came from the areas of information and general management; (2) the areas of production management (PM), information management (IM), and general management (GM) contributed the largest percentage of total papers published in the globe, but papers published by Taiwan's scholars mainly came from areas of PM and IM; (3) the percentage of articles published by Taiwan's scholars to that of the globe, though increased slightly, was still small. The PM area constitutes the largest percentage of total published papers, but the IM area has the highest annual growth rate. Hence, these two fields were the most competitive areas in the management discipline of Taiwan; (4) As to the performance of each respective university, this study found that national universities were always better performed in areas more than private and technological universities were. National Chiao-Tung and Cheng-Kung Universities did the best in the PM field. National Sun Yat-Sen and Central Universities performed very well in the IM field. National Cheng-Chi University achieves the top performance in the business administration field, it is also interesting to note that National Chiao-Tung and Tsing-Hwa university, traditionally better performed in science and engineering fields, were also performed very well in this area. National Cheng-Chi and Taiwan universities were the top performers in the finance-&-accounting field. Finally, we found that National Taiwan University has the most number of top ranked journal papers.

1. 全國學術電子資訊資源共享聯盟網站，Web of Since簡介
2. Boffo, S.,Chave, D.,Kaukonen, E.,Opdal, L.R.(1999).The Evaluation of Research in European Universities.European Journal of Education,34,325-334.
3. Eiffinger, M. A. M.(1997).The Evaluation of Scientific Research: Selected Experiences,.Paris:OECD.
4. Frazer, M.(1997).Report on the Modalities of External Evaluation of Higher Education in Europe: 1995-1997.Higher Education in Europe,22,349-401.
5. Journal Quality List
6. Kokko, H.,Sutherland, W. J.(1999).What Do Impact Factors Tell Us?.Trends in Ecology & Evolution,14,382-384.
7. Moore, W. J.,Newman, R. J.,Turnbull, G. K.(2001).Academic Pay and Productivity: A Tale of Two Countries.Louisiana State University.
8. Nord, J. H.,Nord, G. D.(1995).MIS Research: Journal Status Assessment and Analysis.Information & Management,29,29-42.
9. 王保進(2003)。大學院校品質指標建立之理論與實際學術研討會。
10. 吳壽山、許和鈞、楊馥如、葉立仁(2002)。我國管理領域學術研究成果統計報告。人文與社會科學簡訊，4(3)
11. 大學學門評鑑制度規劃與實施作業之研擬
12. 梁定澎(2003)。管理學門國際期刊分級之研究。
13. 陳禹辰、皮世明、范錚強(1996)。我國資訊管理研究方向與方法－碩士論文之分析。資訊管理研究，1(1)，1-18。
14. 黃旭男、洪廣朋、郭嘉欣(2003)。我國博碩士論文在電子商務上之研究現況與趨勢。管理與系統，10(2)，149-182。
15. 黃政傑、李隆盛(1998)。大學校務綜合評鑑指標建構之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心。
16. 楊玉惠(2003)。大學學門評鑑制度規劃之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
17. 楊孝榮(1993)。社會及行為科學研究法。台北:東華書局。
18. 劉京玫(2001)。國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所未出版碩士論文。
19. 蘇錦麗(1997)。高等教育評鑑－理論與實際。台北:五南出版。

1. 簡禎富、許鉅秉、林國義、吳政鴻(2016)。台灣生產與作業管理之相關期刊文獻回顧與前瞻：從工業3.0 到工業3.5。管理學報，33(1)，87-103。
2. 蘇中信,洪宗德,吳訂宜(2012)。內容分析法之回顧與分析：以台灣商管期刊為對象。弘光學報，68，1-20。
3. 蕭義棋,趙義隆,葉峻賓(2021)。若即若離？探索TSSCI商管社群網絡結構及知識活動－編輯群重疊的策略觀點。管理與系統，28(2)，115-155。
4. 謝宗憲、唐震(2009)。以TSSCI為例探討學術共同著作現象。企業管理學報，81，43-83。