臺灣股市三大法人持股調整、群聚效應、回饋交易、串流行為與群聚之動量持續性

Herding Effect, Feedback Trading, Cascading, and Momentum by Share Ownership Adjustments of Three Major Institutional Investors in Taiwan Stock Market

盧陽正(Yang-Cheng Lu)；翁振益(Jehn-Yih Wong)；方豪(Hao Fang)

三大法人 ； 群聚效應 ； 回饋交易 ； 串流 ； 報酬持續性量 ； Rhree Major Types of Institutional Investors ； Herding Effect ； Feedback Trading ； Cascading ； Return Persistence

管理與系統

15卷4期（2008 / 10 / 01）

523 - 543

繁體中文

本研究探討臺灣股市中三大法人持股調整行爲，是否產生群聚效應(herding effect)、回饋交易(feedback trading)、串流(cascading)及群聚影響價格(herding impacting price)等行爲。本研究的實證結果發現，臺灣股市中外資及投信持股之調整將伴隨群聚效應，而自營商持股改變則不具群聚效應。外資及投信的持股改變與證券超常報酬率間的群聚效應，主要係導源於”外資及投信持股改變影響股票超常報酬率之現象”。外資及投信持股調整會伴隨正向回饋交易及串流行爲；而自營商持股之改變則會伴隨負向的回饋交易且未具串流行爲。外資及投信法人之串流行爲相較其正向回饋交易之影響爲大。就臺灣股市整體而言，外資持股調整所引起的超常報酬的動量或反向效應，相對小於以本土法人持股調整爲依據的動量或反向效應，而其正超常報酬的持續性則較長。由三大法人持股改變顯著驅動超常報酬率之現象，隱含了臺灣股市並不具有完全效率性，投資人可以正向或反向地追隨三大法人持股改變的訊號調整投資組合，創造出顯著的平均報酬。

This study explores whether share ownership adjustments by the three major types of institutional investors in the Taiwan stock market would produce herding effect, feedback trading, cascading and herding impacting price. Empirical results of this study find that share ownership adjustments by foreign investors and securities investment trusts would accompany with herding effect, whereas changes in share ownership by dealers would not produce any herding effect. The herding effect between changes in share ownership by foreign investors and securities investment trusts and abnormal returns primarily stems from ”abnormal returns driven by changes in share ownership by foreign investors and securities investment trusts”. Further, share ownership adjustments by foreign investors and securities investment trusts would accompany positive feedback trading and cascading, whereas changes in share ownership by dealers would accompany negative feedback trading and no cascading. Cascading by foreign investors and securities investment trusts has a greater impact than its positive feedback trading. In the Taiwan stock market, the momentum or contrarian effect in abnormal returns derived from share ownership adjustments by foreign investors is smaller than that derived from share ownership adjustments by local institutional investors; however, the persistence in positive abnormal returns of foreign investors lasts longer. Changes in three major institutional investors' share ownership clearly drive abnormal returns, implying the market inefficiency existing in the Taiwan stock market. Investors are able to follow the signals derived from changes in three major institutional investors' share ownership or operate in the reverse to create portfolios and generate significant abnormal returns.

1. 李春安、賴藝文(2005)。股市劇烈變動區間台灣股票市場與本國機構投資人從眾行爲之研究。台灣管理學刊，5(2)，231-266。
   連結：
2. Bikhchandani, S.,Hirshleifer, D.,Welch, I.(1992).A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades.Journal of Political Economy,100,992-1026.
3. Bikhchandani, S.,Sharma, S.(2001).Herd Behavior in Financial Markets, Staff Papers.International Monetary Fund,47,279-310.
4. Borensztein, E.,Gelos, R. G.(2003).A Panic-Prone Pack? The Behavior of Emerging Market Mutual Funds, Staff Papers.International Monetary Fund,50,43-63.
5. Cai, F.,Kaul, G.,Zheng, L.(2000)."Institutional Trading and Stock Returns," Working paper.University of Michigan.
6. Chari, V. V.,Kehoe, P.(1999).Financial Crises as Herds, Mimeo.Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
7. De Long, J. B.,Shleifer, A.,Summers, L. H.,Waldmann, R. J.(1990).Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets.Journal of Political Economy,98,703-738.
8. Fama, E.,MacBeth, J.(1973).Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.Journal of Political Economy,81,607-636.
9. Froot, K. A.,Scharfstein, D. S.,Stein, J. C.(1992).Herd on the Street: Informational Inefficiencies in a Market with Short-Term Speculation.Journal of Finance,47,1461-1484.
10. Granger, C. W. J.(1969).Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods.Econometrica,37,424-438.
11. Grinblatt, M.,Titman, S.,Wermer, R.(1995).Momentum Investment Strategies, Portfolio Performance, and Herding: A Study of Mutual Fund Behavior.American Economic Review,85,1088-1105.
12. Hirshleifer, D.,Subrahmanyam, A.,Titman, S.(1994).Security Analysis and Trading Patterns when Some Investors Receive Information before Others.Journal of Finance,49,1665-1698.
13. Jones, S. L.,Winters, D. B.(1999).Delayed Reaction in Stocks with the Characteristics of Past Winners: Implications for Momentum, Value, and Institutional Following.Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics,38,21-39.
14. Lakonishok, J.,Shleifer, A.,Vishny, R. W.(1992).The Impact of Institutional Trading on Stock Prices.Journal of Financial Economics,32,23-43.
15. Nofsinger, J. R.,Sias, R. W.(1999).Herding and Feedback Trading by Institutional and Individual Investors.Journal of Finance,54,2263-2295.
16. Sias, R. W.(2004).Institutional Herding.The Review of Financial Studies,17,165-206.
17. Sias, R.,Starks, L.,Titman, S.(2002).The Price Impact of Institutional Trading,” Working paper.Washington State University and University of Texas.
18. 李光輝、歐興祥、張炳耀(2000)。外資與我國股市互動關係之探討。中央銀行季刊，22(4)，67-79。
19. 張宮熊(2000)。臺灣股票市場三大法人與一般投資人間資訊傳遞結構之研究－以農曆新年效應爲例。證券金融，64，87-105。
20. 許鈺珮、廖彥豪(2005)。三大機構投資人買賣超與台灣加權股價指數互動關係之研究。證券金融，114，56-67。

1. 蔡侑達、陳瑞璽、洪碧霞(2015)。公開資訊觀測站訊息如何影響股票報酬?臺灣股票市場日內及日間資料分析。證券市場發展季刊，27(2)，125-184。
2. 李貴富(2020)。採行國際財務報導準則對公司的外資及其投資效率之影響。證券市場發展季刊，32(2)，1-38。
3. 聶建中,許景翔,李靜慧(2023)。台灣類股股價對外資持股策略之牛熊市非線性影響。Journal of Data Analysis，18(1)，1-24。
4. 蕭榮烈,林靖,何靜嫺,王如琦(2019).The Impact of Foreign Investor Sentiment on Taiwan's Stock and Futures Markets.財務金融學刊,27(1),105-158.
5. 周冠男、池祥萱、王韻怡(2016)。行為財務學文獻回顧與展望：台灣市場之研究。經濟論文叢刊，44(1)，1-55。
6. (2018)。法人在初次上市櫃股票短期報酬中獲利程度之研究。中華管理評論，21(1)，208-232。
7. (2024)。存股策略與股權結構分析－以泛金融官股為例。商管科技季刊，25(1)，33-65。