策略性人力資源管理理論之驗證－普遍性、構形、及權變觀點

Tests of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management: Universalistic, Configurational, and Contingency Perspective

蕭婉鎔(Wan-Jung Hsiao)；黃同圳(Tung-Chun Huang)

普遍性觀點 ； 構形觀點 ； 權變觀點 ； 策略性人力資源 ； Universalistic Perspective ； Configurational Perspective ； Contingency Perspective ； Strategic Human Resource Management

管理與系統

16卷1期（2009 / 01 / 01）

1 - 23

繁體中文

本研究主要針對策略性人力資源管理的三種理論觀點，進行實證性驗證。首先藉由相關研究與文獻釐清普遍性觀點、構形觀點與權變觀點的主要差異，提出研究假設；並將人力資源管理系統分成五大系統，分別爲招募甄選、訓練發展、績效評估、薪資福利、與勞資關係，以驗證不同理論觀點的假設。研究結果發現，三種理論在解釋人力資源管理活動績效上皆有其貢獻。如同普遍性觀點所指出，本研究發現五大系統的高績效工作活動對人力資源管理效能皆有正向且顯著之影響；構形觀點所主張之當組織各項人力資源管理系統彼此的內部一致性愈高時，則人力資源管理效能也愈佳亦獲支持。本研究亦發現組織中人力資源管理活動的一致性程度會調節高績效工作活動與人力資源管理效能間的關係，因此，權變觀點的論點也獲致證實。

The aim of this study is to test the three theoretical perspectives in strategic human resource management simultaneously. Through literature review, we articulated the important differences among the universalistic, configurational, and contingency perspectives, and then expounded our hypotheses. Human resource management system was divided into five sub-systems: recruitment, training, appraisal, benefit, and labor relations. The results demonstrated that each perspective has its contribution to explore the relationship between high performance work practice and human resource management effectiveness. We found that the five sub-system of HRM all have positive effects on HRM effectiveness which support the argument of universal perspective. The finding of the higher the consistency of HRM system, the better HR effectiveness, evidenced the argument of configuration perspective. As to contingency perspective, the moderating effect of HR internal fit was found to be significant on the relationship between the high performance work practice and HR effectiveness. Among them, contingency theory has the strongest power in explaining the variance of human resource effectiveness.

1. Aebi, R.,Neusser, K.,Steiner, P.(2001).Improving Models of Income Dynamics using Cross-Section Information.
2. Aebi, R.,Neusser, K.,Steiner, P.(1999).Evaluating Theories of Income Dynamics: A Probabilistic Approach.
3. Aebi, R.,Neusser, K.,Steiner, P.(2000).Where Did the Middle Class Go? An Investigation into the Dynamics of the US Income DistributionWhere Did the Middle Class Go? An Investigation into the Dynamics of the US Income Distribution,未出版
4. Albarran, I.,Ayuso, M.,Guillen, M.,Monteverde, M.(2002).Measuring Longevity and Disability in the Spanish Population with Residual Life Expectancy.International Congress on Insurance: Insurance: Mathematics & Economics.
5. Arber, S.,Cooper, H.(1999).Gender Difference in Health in Later Life: The New Paradox.Social Science & Medicine,48,61-76.
6. Belkin, B.,Suchower, S. J.,Forest, L. R.(1998).A One-Parameter Representation of Credit Risk and Transition Matrices.CreditMetrics Monitor,3rd Quarter,45-56.
7. Breslow, L.,Breslow, N.(1993).Health Practices and Disability: Some Evidence from Alameda County.Preventive Medicine,22,86-95.
8. Golan, A.,Judge, G.,Robinson, S.(1994).Recovering Information from Incomplete or Partial Multi-sectoral Economic Data.Review of Economics and Statistics,76(3),541-549.
9. Israel, R. B.,Rosenthal, J. S.,Wei, J. Z.(2001).Finding Generators For Markov Chains Via Empirical Transition Matrices, With Applications to Credit Ratings.Mathematical Finance,11(2),245-265.
10. Jarrow, R. A.,Lando, D.,Turnbull, S. M.(1997).A Markov Model for the Term Structure of Credit Risk Spreads.Review Financial Studies,10,481-523.
11. Johnson, T.,Capel, J.(1992).Research Triangle Park.NC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality and Standards.
12. NCEA(2000).Options for Development of Parametric Probability Distributions for Exposure Factors.National Center for Environmental Assessment,July
13. Raina, P.,Dukshire, S.,Lindsay, J.,Chamber, L. W.(1998).Chronic Conditions and Disabilities Among Seniors: An Analysis of Population-Based Health and Activity Limitation Surveys.Ann Epidemiol,8(6),402-409.
14. Rossi, J. S.(2000).Analysis of Stage of Change: Summary and Recommendations for BCC.
15. Shannon, C. E.(1948).A Mathematical Theory of Communication.Bell Systems Technical Journal,27,379-243.
16. Spathelf, P.,Duurlo, M. A.(2001).Transition Matrix for Modeling the Dynamics of a Subtropical Seminatural Forest in Southern Brazil.Forest Ecology and Management,151,139-149.
17. Trede, M.(1998).Making Mobility Visible: A Graphical Device.Economics Letters,59,77-82.
18. 中華民九十一年台灣地區人力運用調查報告

1. 蔡明達(2010)。運動產業人力資源管理之策略性思維。長榮運動休閒學刊，4，1-6。
2. 陳婷惠、李家琪(2016)。策略性人力資本配置與經營績效之關聯性分析。組織與管理，9(1)，39-88。
3. 黃啟晉(2015)。機制設計理論與策略性人力資源管理實務的整合分析―以學校場域為例。學校行政，96，70-89。
4. 趙志揚、楊主恩、洪麗淇(2017)。訓練成效評估模式之發展─以個案B公司為例。管理實務與理論研究，11(4)，1-20。