以動態能力觀點探討產學研發合作行為

A Study of Industry-university Collaborative Behavior from the Perspective of Dynamic Capability

許瓊文(Chiung-Wen Hsu)；張保隆(Pao-Long Chang)

產學合作 ； 研發合作 ； 合作行為 ； 動態能力 ； Industry-university Collaboration ； R&D Collaboration ； Collaborative Behavior ； Dynamic Capability

管理與系統

20卷1期（2013 / 01 / 01）

1 - 26

繁體中文

產學合作是國家創新系統的重要環結，對於科技資源有限的台灣，更須重視產學合作關係。近年開放式創新概念的興起，產學研發合作成為企業從外部取得科技資源的重要發展策略。然而，產學研發合作的成效仍被普遍認為尚存改善空間，故本研究主要目的在於建構一個解釋台灣產學研發合作能力模式，期使藉由合作能力的建立，促成產學研發合作的行為。本研究主要採取兩階段方法，首先以問卷調查方法探討何種企業特徵具有較高產學研發合作的傾向，其次以企業深度訪談方法探討為何具備這些特徵的企業具有較高傾向進行產學研發合作。本研究結果顯示科技企業、規模較大企業、研發能量較大企業有較高傾向進行產學研發合作，而其主要原因在於這類型企業較有機會具備辨識環境需求能力、建立社群網絡關係能力、吸收學界資源能力、溝通協調能力，亦即當企業具足此四項能力時，企業在面對動態環境變化下，較傾向採取產學研發合作加以因應，將學界資源轉化為企業競爭優勢。本研究結果在學理上提供一個解釋企業產學研發合作行為的途徑，在實務上本研究所建構的四項能力，則可提供企業建立產學研發合作管理制度的參考依據，使企業可以有效應用學界資源。

Industry-university collaborations are regarded as a key component for developing a national innovation system. Taiwan, which has limited resources, should place more emphasis on fostering such collaborations. This has also become a critical strategy for companies to obtain technology resources externally with the emergence of open innovation concepts. However, it is believed there is further scope for improving the effectiveness of industry-university collaboration. This study aims to construct a model that explains the capabilities of industry-university collaboration on research and development (R&D) in Taiwan. Firms can facilitate the process of collaboration through the construction of collaborative capabilities. The research process was undertaken in two stages. First, a survey questionnaire was used to explore firms' characteristics that determine their motivation toward industry-university collaboration on R&D. In addition, in-depth interviews were conducted to illustrate the reasons for undertaking collaborations. The findings show that firms with high technology, that are large in size, and have high demand in terms of R&D capacity are more willing to enter into such collaborations on R&D. These firms are also inclined to have four types of abilities: the ability to identify environmental demand, to form social networks, to absorb academic resources, and to communicate and coordinate effectively. Endowed with these four capabilities, these firms are shown to have high motivation to undertake industry-university collaborations on R&D in order to deal with dynamic changes in the environment. Collaborations are also considered beneficial for transforming academic resources into competitive corporate advantages. The research findings have contributed to extending the theoretical foundation of collaborative capabilities between industries and universities as well as providing explanations for their behaviors. In terms of business implications, the four capabilities identified can serve as guidelines for firms to manage their industry-university collaborations on R&D and to use academic resources in an effective manner.

1. (2004)。創新經濟成功密碼。經濟部技術處。
2. 國科會，「科學技術統計要覽：2009年版」，行政院國家科學委員會，民國98年。
3. Barney, J. B.(1991).Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.Journal of Management,17(1),99-120.
4. Bekkers, R.,Bodas Freitas, I. M.(2008).Analysing Knowledge Transfer Channels between Universities and Industry: To What Degree do Sectors Also Matter?.Research Policy,37(10),1837-1853.
5. Blyler, M.,Coff, R. W.(2003).Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties that Split Pies.Strategic Management Journal,24(7),677-686.
6. Capron, H.,Cincera, M.(2003).Industry-university S&T Transfers, Belgian Evidence on CIS Data.Brussels Economic Review,46(3),58-85.
7. Chandler, A. D., Jr.(1977).The Visible Hand.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
8. Cohen, W.,Levinthal, D.(1990).Absorptive Capability: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1),128-152.
9. Cohen, W.,Nelson, R.,Walsh, J.(2002).Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial.R&D Management Science,48(1),1-23.
10. Cohendet, P.,Meyer-Krahmer, F.(2001).The Theoretical and Policy Implications of Knowledge Codification.Research Policy,30(9),1563-1591.
11. Cohendet, P.,Steinmueller, W. E.(2000).The Codification of Knowledge: A Conceptual and Empirical Exploration.Industrial and Corporate Change,9(2),195-209.
12. Colombo, M.,Gerrone, P.(1996).Technological Cooperative Agreements and Firm's R&D Intensity: A Note on Causality Relations.Research Policy,25(6),923-932.
13. Danneels, E.(2002).The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences.Strategic Management Journal,23(12),1095-1121.
14. Eisenhardt K. M.,Martin J.(2000).Dynamic Capabilities: What are They?.Strategic Management Journal,21(10-11),1105-1121.
15. Fontana, R.,Geuna, A.,Mart, M.(2006).Factors Affecting University-industry R&D Projects: The Importance of Searching, Screening and Signaling.Research Policy,35(2),309-323.
16. Frye, J.(1993).University-industry Cooperative Research Yields Dividends.International Journal of Technology Management,8(6-8),577-586.
17. Hagedoorn, J.,Link, A.,Vonortas, N.(2000).Research Partnerships.Research Policy,29(4),567-586.
18. Handscombe, R. D.,Patterson, E. A.(2000).The Strategic Mismatch of Industrial and University Research.International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management,2(1-7),1013-1023.
19. Helfat, C. E.(1997).Know-how and Asset Complementarity and Dynamic Capability Accumulation: The Case of R&D.Strategic Management Journal,18(5),339-360.
20. Kleinknecht, A.(Ed.),Mohnen, P.(Ed.)(2001).Innovation and Firm Performance, Econometric Explorations of Survey Data.London:Palgrave.
21. Kleinknecht, A.,Van Reijnen, J.(1992).Why do Firms Cooperate on R&D: An Empirical Study.Research Policy,21(4),347-360.
22. Leonard-Barton D.(1992).Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.Strategic Management Journal,13(S1),111-125.
23. Mertinelli, A.,Meyer, M.,von Tunzelmann, N.(2008).Becoming an Entrepreneurial University? A Case Study of Knowledge Exchange Relationships and Faculty Attitudes in a Medium-sized, Research-oriented University.The Journal of Technology Transfer,33(3),259-283.
24. Meyer-Krahmer, F.,Schmoch, U.(1998).Science-based Technologies: University-Industry Interactions in Four Fields.Research Policy,27(8),835-851.
25. Mody, A.(1993).Learning through Alliances.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,20(2),151-170.
26. Mohnen, P.,Hoareau, C.(2003).What Type of Enterprises Forges Close Links with Universities and Government labs? Evidence from CIS2.Managerial and Decision Economics,24(2-3),133-146.
27. Mowery, D.(1983).The Relationship between Intrafirm and Contractual Forms of Industrial Research in American Manufacturing, 1900-1940.Exploration in Economic History,20(4),351-74.
28. Nahapiet, J.,Ghoshal, S.(1998).Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage.Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
29. Nelson, R.(1993).National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis.Oxford University Press.
30. OECD(1999).University Research in Transition.Paris:
31. Osborn, R.,Hagedoorn, J.(1997).The Institutionalization and Evolutionary Dynamics of Inter-organizational Alliances and Networks.Academy of Management Journal,40(2),261-278.
32. Pavlou(2004).University of Southern California.
33. Peters, L.,Fusfeld, H.(1982).,USA:National Science Foundation.
34. Rapport, B.,Webster, A.,Charles, D.(1999).Making Sense of Diversity and Reluctance: Academic-industrial Relations and Intellectual Property.Research Policy,28(8),873-890.
35. Santoro, M.,Chakrabarti, A.(2002).Firm Size and Technology Centrality in Industry-university Interactions.Research Policy,31(7),1163-1180.
36. Schartinger, D.,Rammera. C.,Fischer, M. M.,Fröhlich, J.(2008).Knowledge Interactions between Universities and Industry in Austria: Sectoral Patterns and Determinants.Research Policy,31(3),303-328.
37. Siegel, D. S.,Waldman, D. A.,Atwater, L. E.,Link, A. N.(2003).Commercial Knowledge Transfers from Universities to Firms: Improving the Effectiveness of University-industry Collaboration.Journal of High Technology Management Research,14(1),111-133.
38. Teece, D. J.(2007).Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Micro-Foundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance.Strategic Management Journal,28(13),1319-1350.
39. Teece, D. J.,Pisano, G.,Shuen, A.(1997).Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.Strategic Management Journal,18(7),509-533.
40. Veugelers, R.,Cassiman, B.(2005).R&D Cooperation between Firms and Universities: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing.International Journal of Industrial Organization,23(5),355-379.
41. Wang, C. L.,Ahmed, P. K.(2007).Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda.International Journal of Management Reviews,9(1),31-51.
42. Wernerfelt, B.(1984).A Resource-based View of the Firm.Strategic Management Journal,5(2),171-180.
43. Winter, S. G.(2003).Understanding Dynamic Capabilities.Strategic Management Journal,24(10),991-996.
44. Zahra, S. A.,George, G.(2002).Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualisation, and Extension.Academic Management Review,27(2),185-203.
45. Zahra, S. A.,Sapienza, H. J.,Davidsson, P.(2006).Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda.Journal of Management Studies,43(4),917-955.
46. 吳豐祥、李秋緯(2004)。我國產學合作的發展再探。科技發展政策報導，705-718。
47. 劉瑞華、游啟聰、蕭筑云(2003)。產學合作的問題與對策分析。2003國家科技政策與國際競爭力研討會論文集

1. 蕭志同、劉佳怡、劉仲戌(2017)。社會企業之永續經營模式：以里仁公司為例。管理與系統，24(3)，455-476。
2. 薛招治、鄭意婷、陳麗萍(2014)。創造有效知識移轉機制建立持續產學合作關係。產業管理評論，7(2)，9-22。
3. 鍾喜梅,詹淑婷,葉匡時(2021)。私立大學的制度邏輯與社會資本對產學合作績效之影響。中山管理評論，29(1)，103-150。