题名

日本產學合作之理論研究及政策實踐歷程

并列篇名

Japanese University-Industry Cooperation Model: Theoretical Research and Practical Progression

作者

溫肇東(Chao-Tung Wen)；樊學良(Hsueh-Liang Fan)

关键词

日本 ； 產學合作 ； 技術移轉 ； 知識移轉 ； University-industry Cooperation ； Japan ； Technology Transfer ； Knowledge Transfer

期刊名称

管理與系統

卷期/出版年月

20卷2期（2013 / 04 / 01）

页次

201 - 226

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

產學合作是大學貢獻社會的主要途徑，學校之科技與研發成果是驅動產業創新和國家經濟發展的關鍵因素。大學也能夠經由與企業互動的過程中，從事合作研發、知識分享和知識創造的活動，以累積更多具有經濟價值的研究成果。除了歐美主要國家以外，日本透過國家創新系統之建置以強化產官學間聯繫的歷程，也受到各國科技政策部門與管理學者所重視。本研究運用內容分析法與實地研究的方式，經蒐集相關資料後，從學校的角度勾勒日本產學合作之理論研究與政策實踐歷程的特徵，並討論其理論及實務意涵，供臺灣產學合作學術研究和政策擬定之參考。
英文摘要

The responsibilities of universities, apart from education and research, have gradually expanded to include the promotion of national economic development. University-industry cooperation is seen as a major avenue for universities to contribute to society. Through this process of cooperating with enterprises in collaborative research and development, knowledge creation, and commercialization of technology, educational institutions can build innovation capabilities and enhance their competitive advantages. Practical experience with Japanese university-industry cooperation has been a topic of interest for managerial scholars and science and technology policy-makers. The Taiwanese government, in preparation of related national policies, has modeled the Japanese experience with university-industry cooperation. The main purpose of this study was to use content analysis and field study to outline the practical characteristics of Japanese university-industry cooperation and theoretical research on this phenomenon from an integrated perspective. Our focus was to provide timely assistance to Taiwanese academic researchers and science and technology policy-makers in updating information related to this topic. This study used a factor model that combined models of technology, intellectual property management, and business management to discuss relevant managerial decision-making combined with practical implications and concrete suggestions to provide a better model for Taiwanese academic researchers and policy planners.
主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 統計
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 行政院國家科學委員會，科學技術基本法草案總說明 (核定本)，台北市：行政院國家科學委員會，民國86 年。
  2. Schumpeter, J. A. and Opie, R., The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Cambridge, Mass.,: Harvard University Press, 1934
  3. 黃惠敏，「日本國家科技預算遭砍科學界驚恐遺禍將來」，朝日新聞，民國98 年
  4. 日本文部科學省，平成21 年度｢産学官連携拠点｣に係る提案の公募結果について。民國99 年8月31 日，取自http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/21/06/1269989.htm
  5. 王萬雄，「日本技術移轉機構面臨營運危機」，日本經濟新聞，民國99 年
  6. Aldrich, H. E.,Sasaki, T.(1995).Research-and-Development Consortia in the United-States and Japan.Research Policy,24(2),301-316.
  7. Azagra-Caro, J. M.,Archontakis, F.,Gutierrez-Gracia, A.,Fernandez-de-Lucio, I.,(2006).Faculty Support for the Objectives of University-industry Relations versus Degree of R&D Cooperation: The Importance of Regional Absorptive Capacity.Research Policy,35(1),37-55.
  8. Baba, Y.,Shichijo, N.,Sedita, S. R.(2009).How do Collaborations with Universities Affect Firms' Innovative Performance? The Role of "Pasteur Scientists" in the Advanced Materials Field.Research Policy,38(5),756-764.
  9. Bercovitz, J. E. L.,Feldman, M. P.(2007).Fishing Upstream: Firm Innovation Strategy and University Research Alliances.Research Policy,36(7),930-948.
  10. Branscomb, L. M.,Kodama, F.,Florida, R. L.(1999).Industrializing Knowledge : University-industry Linkages in Japan and the United States.Cambridge, Ma.:MIT Press.
  11. Breznitz, S. M.,O''Shea, R. P.,Allen, T. J.(2008).University Commercialization Strategies in the Development of Regional Bioclusters.Journal of Product Innovation Management,25(2),129-142.
  12. Bruneel, J.,D''Este, P.,Salter, A.(2010).Investigating the Factors that Diminish the Barriers to University-industry Collaboration.Research Policy,39(7),858-868.
  13. Carayannis, E. G.,Jorge, J.(1998).Bridging Government-university-industry Technological Learning Disconnects: A Comparative Study of Training and Development Policies and Practices in the US, Japan, Germany, and France.Technovation,18(6-7),383-407.
  14. Chesbrough, H. W.(2006).Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape.Boston, Mass.:Harvard Business School Press.
  15. Christensen, C. M.(2006).The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption.Journal of Product Innovation Management,23(1),39-55.
  16. Cohen, W. M.,Nelson, R. R.,Walsh, J. P.(2002).Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D.Management Science,48(1),1-23.
  17. Cooke, P.,Morgan, K.(1998).The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation.Oxford England:Oxford University Press.
  18. Cummings, W. K.(1994).From Knowledge Seeking to Knowledge Creation-The Japanese University Challenge.Higher Education,27(4),399-415.
  19. Das, T. K.,Teng, B. S.(2000).A resource-based Theory of Strategic Alliances.Journal of Management,26(1),31-61.
  20. Etzkowitz, H.,Leydesdorff, L.(2000).The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of University-industry-government Relations.Research Policy,29(2),109-123.
  21. Fagerberg, J.(Ed.),Mowery, D. C.(Ed.),Nelson, R. R.(Ed.)(2004).Oxford Handbook of Innovation.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  22. Fontana, R.,Geuna, A.,Matt, M.(2006).Factors Affecting University-industry R&D Projects: The Importance of Searching, Screening and Signalling.Research Policy,35(2),309-323.
  23. Freeman, C.(1987).Technology, Policy, and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan.London:Pinter Publishers.
  24. Fukugawa, N.(2005).Characteristics of Knowledge Interactions between Universities and Small Firms in Japan.International Small Business Journal,23(4),379-401.
  25. Furman, J. L.,Porter, M. E.,Stern, S.(2002).The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity.Research Policy,31(6),899-933.
  26. Genus, A.,Coles, A. M.(2008).Rethinking the Multi-level Perspective of Technological Transitions.Research Policy,37(9),1436-1445.
  27. Geuna, A.,Nesta, L. J. J.(2006).University Patenting and its Effects on Academic Research: The Emerging European Evidence.Research Policy,35(6),790-807.
  28. Granstrand, O.(1999).Internationalization of Corporate R&D: A Study of Japanese and Swedish Corporations.Research Policy,28(2-3),275-302.
  29. Höffe, O.(2010).Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: The Foundation of Modern Philosophy.Dordrecht:Springer.
  30. Holsti, O. R.(1969).Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities.Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley Pub. Co..
  31. Johnson, W. H. A.(2008).Roles, Resources and Benefits of Intermediate Organizations Supporting Triple Helix Collaborative R&D: The Case of Precarn.Technovation,28(8),495-505.
  32. Kaufmann, A.,Todtling, F.,(2001).Science-industry Interaction in the Process of Innovation: The Importance of Boundary-crossing between Systems.Research Policy,30(5),791-804.
  33. Kerlinger, F. N.,Lee, H. B.(2000).Foundations of Behavioral Research.Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt College Publishers.
  34. Kitagawa, F.(2005).Regionalization of Innovation Policies: The Case of Japan.European Planning Studies,13(4),601-618.
  35. Kitamura, K.(1997).Policy Issue in Japanese Higher Education.Higher Education,34(2),141-150.
  36. Kneller, R.(2003).Autarkic Drug Discovery in Japanese Pharmaceutical Companies: Insights into National Differences in Industrial Innovation.Research Policy,32(10),1805-1827.
  37. Kobayashi, S.(2000).Applying Audition Systems from the Performing Arts to R&D Funding Mechanisms: Quality Control in Collaboration among the Academic, Public, and Private sectors in Japan.Research Policy,29(2),181-192.
  38. Kodama, T.(2008).The Role of Intermediation and Absorptive Capacity in Facilitating University-industry Linkages - An Empirical Study of TAMA in Japan.Research Policy,37(8),1224-1240.
  39. Lee, K. J.,Ohta, T.,Kakehi, K.(2010).Formal Boundary Spanning by Industry Liaison Offices and the Changing Pattern of University-industry Cooperative Research: The Case of the University of Tokyo.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,22(2),189-206.
  40. Leydesdorff, L.,Meyer, M.,(2010).The Decline of University Patenting and the End of the Bayh-Dole Effect.Scientometrics,83(2),355-362.
  41. Lundvall, B.-A.(1992).National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning.London:Pinter Publishers.
  42. Lynskey, M. J.(2004).Determinants of Innovative Activity in Japanese Technology-based Start-up Firms.International Small Business Journal,22(2),159-196.
  43. Martinelli, A.,Meyer, M.,von Tunzelmann, N.,(2008).Becoming an Entrepreneurial University? A Case Study of Knowledge Exchange Relationships and Faculty Attitudes in a Medium-sized, Research-oriented University.Journal of Technology Transfer,33(3),259-283.
  44. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology(2008).White paper on science and technology.Japan:Research and Coordination Division, Science and Technology Policy Bureau.
  45. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology(2006).White paper on science and technology.Japan:Research and Coordination Division, Science and Technology Policy Bureau.
  46. Motohashi, K.(2005).University-industry Collaborations in Japan: The Role of New Technology-based Firms in Transforming the National Innovation System.Research Policy,34(5),583-594.
  47. Nelson, R. R.(1993).National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis.New York:Oxford University Press.
  48. Nonaka, I. O.,Takeuchi, H.,(1995).The Knowledge-creating Company : How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation.New York:Oxford University Press.
  49. Okada, Y.,Kushi, T.(2004).OPIR Paper SeriesOPIR Paper Series,Tokyo:Graduate Schools of Economic.
  50. Pertuze, J. A.,Calder, E. S.,Greitzer, E. M.,Lucas, W. A.,(2010).Best Practices for Industry-University Collaboration.Mit Sloan Management Review,51(4),83-90.
  51. Romer, P. M.(1990).Endogenous Technological-Change.Journal of Political Economy,98(5),S71-S102.
  52. Rothaermel, F. T.,Agung, S. D.,Jiang, L.(2007).University Entrepreneurship: A Taxonomy of the Literature.Industrial and Corporate Change,16(4),691-791.
  53. Saxenian, A.(1994).Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  54. Shibayama, S.,Saka, A.(2010).,Tokyo:Research Unit for Science and Technology Analysis and Indicators, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy=NISTEP.
  55. Spencer, J. W.(2001).How Relevant is University-based Scientific Research to Private High-technology Firms? A United States-Japan Comparison.Academy of Management Journal,44(2),432-440.
  56. Sun, Y.,Negishi, M.(2010).Measuring the Relationships among University, Industry and Other Sectors in Japan's National Innovation System: A Comparison of New Approaches with Mutual Information Indicators.Scientometrics,82(3),677-685.
  57. Sun, Y.,Negishi, M.,Nishizawa, M.(2007).Coauthorship Linkages between Universities and Industry in Japan.Research Evaluation,16(4),299-309.
  58. Van Looy, B.,Callaert, J.,Debackere, K.(2006).Publication and Patent Behavior of Academic Researchers: Conflicting, Reinforcing or Merely Co-existing?.Research Policy,35(4),596-608.
  59. Van Looy, B.,Debackere, K.,Callaert, J.,Tijssen, R.,van Leeuwen, T.(2006).Scientific Capabilities and Technological Performance of National Innovation Systems: An Exploration of Emerging Industrial Relevant Research Domains.Scientometrics,66(2),295-310.
  60. Walsh, J. P.,Baba, Y.,Goto, A.,Yasaki, Y.(2008).Promoting University-industry Linkages in Japan: Faculty Responses to a Changing Policy Environment.Prometheus,26(1),39-54.
  61. Walsh, J. P.,Cohen, W. M.,Cho, C.(2007).Where Excludability Matters: Material versus Intellectual Property in Academic Biomedical Research.Research Policy,36(8),1184-1203.
  62. Wen, J.,Kobayashi, S.(2001).Exploring Collaborative R&D Network: Some New Evidence in Japan.Research Policy,30(8),1309-1319.
  63. Woolgar, L.(2007).New Institutional Policies for University-industry Links in Japan.Research Policy,36(8),1261-1274.
  64. Yammarino, F.(Ed.),Dansereau, F.(Ed.)(2006).Multi-Level Issues in Social Systems.Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  65. Yusuf, S.(2008).Intermediating Knowledge Exchange between Universities and Businesses.Research Policy,37(8),1167-1174.
  66. 日本工業技術廳(1951)。研究白皮書。東京:同作者。
  67. 日本科學技術廳(2001)。科學技術白書。東京:同作者。
  68. 王偉霖、劉江彬(2010)。國際技術移轉制度理論與實務。台北市:華泰文化。
  69. 王碧玲(2009)。日本產學群聚之建立模式─以TAMA為例。科技發展政策報導，1 月號，72-77。
  70. 任燿廷(2010)。日本的創新體系改革及產學合作政策（上）。臺灣經濟金融月刊，46(1)，73-98。
  71. 沈淑菁(2010)。日本JST理事長北澤宏一談推動日本科技發展之願景。科學振興機構，2010(1 月號)
  72. 拓墣產業研究所(2007)。日本產業應用創新之案例研究：東北及關西地區。台北市:同作者。
  73. 洪世章、林于婷(2003)。國家創新系統：概念、成因與效果。研考雙月刊，27(4)，24-33。
  74. 財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心(2009)。日本科技政策暨政策形成機制─邁向知識經濟社會。台北市:同作者。
  75. 張俊芳(2007)。日本國家創新系統的歷史演進（上）：二戰前。中國青年科技，157，53-60。
  76. 張俊芳(2007)。日本國家創新系統的歷史演進（下）：二戰後。中國青年科技，158，41-60。
  77. 溫肇東(2004)。科技管理與大學衍生企業在日本的發展。政大智慧財產評論，2(1)，74-96。
  78. 謝國雄(2010)。從社會學博士生的供需到下一代臺灣社會學家的訓練。人文與社會科學簡訊，11(3)，48-54。
被引用次数
  1. 黃淑惠、陳俊良、林伯賢(2017)。快樂之旅還是壓抑的學習過程？以整合型文化創意設計課程研究為例。文化創意產業研究學報，7(3)，89-98。
  2. 劉芷宜,范晏儒(2018)。科專成果運用法制之整合－以技術移轉相關規範為核心。科技法律透析，30(11)，53-72。
  3. 譚君怡,羅仕昌,于乃明(2022)。日本高等教育導入「交叉契約制」深化產學合作之研究：以大阪大學為例。教育科學研究期刊，67(2)，95-124。
  4. 蕭堯仁,陳幼蘭(2019)。篩選產學合作夥伴及協商資源配置之機制。科技管理學刊，24(2)，31-59。
  5. 鍾喜梅,詹淑婷,葉匡時(2021)。私立大學的制度邏輯與社會資本對產學合作績效之影響。中山管理評論，29(1)，103-150。
print cancel