题名

反事實思考對談判情境中首次出價行為的學習效果

并列篇名

Learning Effects of Counterfactual Thinking on First Offer in Negotiation Context

DOI

10.29416/JMS.201701_24(1).0001

作者

陳淑貞(Shu-Chen Chen)；劉娜婷(Na-Ting Liu)

关键词

談判 ； 反事實思考 ； 首次出價行為 ； 學習效果 ； Negotiation ； Counterfactual Thinking ； First Offer Behavior ； Learning Effect

期刊名称

管理與系統

卷期/出版年月

24卷1期（2017 / 01 / 01）

页次

1 - 17

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究目的是探討先前談判經驗如何透過反事實思考，進而影響談判者後續的談判行為。本研究進行二次劇本式實驗，第一個研究檢驗談判結果的接近度是否會影響談判者向上式反事實思考的釋義認知。第二個研究是檢驗談判者的向上式反事實思考會如何改變談判者下一回合談判的首次開價行為，產生反事實思考的學習效果。本研究以136位MBA學生為研究樣本，如同預期，我們發現談判結果的接近度會影響地影響談判者的向上式反事實思考，談判結果接近度愈高時會引發談判者愈高程度的向上式反事實思考。再者我們發現，談判者的向上式反事實思考與後續談判行為 (首次開價行為) 間存在正向關係，也就是說，向上式反事實思考的釋義過程會對談判者下一次的談判行為產生學習效果。最後，本研究於結論中針對理論與實務提出相關討論。
英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore how prior negotiation experiences influence negotiators' subsequent negotiating behaviors through counterfactual thinking. We used 2 scenario experiments in this paper. In Study 1, we examined whether negotiation outcome closeness affects a negotiator's sense-making of upward counterfactual thinking. In Study 2, we examined whether negotiators' upward counterfactual thinking changes negotiators' first offer in the second-round negotiation to induce the learning effects of counterfactual thinking. 136 MBA students participated in this study. As predicted, we showed that prior experience (i.e., outcome closeness) triggers negotiators' upward counterfactual thinking. Greater outcome closeness activates more upward counterfactual thinking. Moreover, we found that negotiators' upward counterfactual thinking was positively related to their subsequent first offer in the next negotiation, that is, sense-making of upward counterfactual thinking could produce certain learning effects for negotiators. We conclude with a discussion of the study for theorists and practitioners.
主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 統計
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Appelt, K. C.,Higgins, E. T.(2010).My Way: How Strategic Preferences Vary by Negotiator Role and Regulatory Focus.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,46(6),1138-1142.
  2. Baumeister, R. F.,Vohs, K. D.,DeWall, C. N.,Zhang, L.(2008).How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, rather than Direct Causation.Personality and Social Psychology Review,11(2),167-203.
  3. Bazerman, M. H.,Magliozzi, T.,Neale, M. A.(1985).Integrative Bargaining in a Competitive Market.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,35,294-313.
  4. Blount, S.,Thomas-Hunt, M. C.,Neale, M. A.(1996).The Price is Right-Or is it? A Reference Point of Two-party Price Negotiations.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,68,1-12.
  5. Brett, J. M.,Shapiro, D. L.,Lytle, A. L.(1998).Breaking the Bonds of Reciprocity in Negotiations.Academy of Management Journal,41,410-424.
  6. DeWhirst, H. D.(1971).Influence of Perceived Information Sharing Norms on Communication Channel Utilization.Academy of Management Journal,14,305-315.
  7. Donohue, W. A.,Taylor, P. J.(2007).Role Effects in Negotiation: The One-down Phenomenon.Negotiation Journal,23,308-331.
  8. Epstude, K.,Roese, N. J.(2008).The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thoughts.Personality and Social Psychology Review,12(2),168-192.
  9. Frank, T.,Tapp, S. R.(2001).Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People.Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management,21(4),323-323.
  10. Galinsky, A. D.,Kray, L. J.(2004).From Thinking About What Might Have Been to Sharing What We Know: The Effects of Counterfactual Mind-sets on Information Sharing in Groups.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,40(5),606-618.
  11. Galinsky, A. D.,Mussweiler, T.(2001).First Offers as Anchors: The Role of Perspective-taking and Negotiator Focus.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81(4),657-669.
  12. Galinsky, A. D.,Seiden, V. L.,Kim, P. H.,Medvec, V. H.(2002).The Dissatisfaction of Having Your First Offer Accepted: the Role of Counterfactual Thoughts in Negotiations.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28(2),271-283.
  13. Higgins, E. T.(2002).How Self-Regulation Creates Distinct Values: The Case of Promotion and Prevention Decision Making.Journal of consumer psychology,12,177-191.
  14. Hsee, C. K.(1996).The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,67(3),247-257.
  15. Huber, V. L.,Neale, M. A.(1987).Effects of Self and Competitor's Goals on Performance in an Interdependent Bargaining Task.Journal of Applied Psychology,72,197-203.
  16. Ilana, R.(1996).Anchoring in Simulated Competitive Market Negotiation.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,67(1),16-25.
  17. Kahneman, D.,Miller, D.(1986).Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives.Psychological Review,93,136-153.
  18. Kray, L.,Galinsky, A. D.(2003).The Debiasing Effect of Counterfactual Mind-Sets: Increasing the Search for Disconfirmatory Information in Group Decisions.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,91,69-81.
  19. Kray, L.,Galinsky, A. D.,Markman, K.(2007).Adding Versus Subtracting What Might Have Been: The Impact of Counterfactual Activation on Integrative Negotiations.paper presented at the IACM,Budapest, Hungary:
  20. Kray, L.,Galinsky, A. D.,Wong, E. M.(2006).Thinking Within the Box: The Relational Processing Style Elicited by Counterfactual Mind-Sets.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,91(1),33-48.
  21. Landman, J.(1993).Regret: The persistence of the possible.New York: NY:Oxford University Press.
  22. Lewicki, R. J.,Saunders, D. M.,Minton, J. W.(2000).Negotiation: Reading, Exercises, and Cases.Singapore:McGraw-Hill.
  23. Loewenstein, J.,Thompson, L.(2000).The Challenge of Learning.Negotiation Journal,16,399-408.
  24. Mandel, D. R.,Lehman, D. R.(1996).Counterfactual Thoughts and Ascriptions of Cause and Preventability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71,450-463.
  25. Markman, K. D.,Lindberg, M. J.,Kray, L. J.(2007).Implications of Counterfactual Structure for Creative Generation and Analytical Problem Solving.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,33(3),312-324.
  26. Medvec, V. H.,Madey, S. F.,Gilovich, T.(1995).When Less is More: Counterfactual Thoughts and Satisfaction among Olympic Athletes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69,603-610.
  27. Medvec, V. H.,Savitsky, K.(1997).When Doing Better Means Feeling Worse: The Effects of Categorical Cutoff Points on Counterfactual Thoughts and Satisfaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72,1284-1296.
  28. Meyers-Levy, J.,Maheswaran, D.(1992).When Timing Matters: The Influence of Temporal Distance on Consumers' Affective and Persuasive Responses.Journal of Consumer Research,19,424-33.
  29. Moons, W. G.,Mackie, D. M.(2009).Thinking Straight While Seeing Red: The Influence of Anger on Information Processing.Personality and Social Psychology,33(5),706-720.
  30. Morris, M. W.,Moore, P. C.(2000).The Lessons We (Don't) Learn: Counterfactual Thoughts and Organizational Accountability After a Close Call.Administrative Science Quarterly,45(4),737-765.
  31. Mussweiler, T.,Strack, F.,Pfeiffer, T.(2000).Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect: Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective Accessibility.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,26,1142-1150.
  32. Nasco, S. A.,Marsh, K. L.(1999).Gaining Control Through Counterfactual Thoughts.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,25,556-556.
  33. Neale, M. A.,Bazerman, M. H.(1985).When Will Externally Set Aspiration Levels Improve Negotiator Performance? A Look at Integrative Behavior in a Competitive Market.Journal of Occupational Behavior,6,19-32.
  34. Neale, M. A.,Huber, V. L.,Northcraft, G. B.(1987).The Framing of Negotiations: Contextual Versus Task Frames.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,39,228-241.
  35. Olk, P.,Elvira, M.(2001).Friends and Strategic Agents: The Role of Friendship and Discretion in Negotiating Strategic Alliances.Group & Organization Management,26(2),124-164.
  36. Peng, C.,Dunn, J.,Conlon, D. E.(2011).When Vigilance Prevails: Regulatory Focus in Negotiations with External Goals.24th International Association of Conflict Management,Istanbul, Turkey:
  37. Pruitt, D. G.,Syna, H.(1985).Mismatching the Opponent's Offers in Negotiation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,21(2),103-113.
  38. Roese, N. J.(1997).Counterfactual Thoughts.Psychological Bulletin,121,133-148.
  39. Roese, N. J.(1994).The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thoughts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,66,805-818.
  40. Roese, N. J.,Olson, J. M.(1995).Outcome Controllability and Counterfactual Thoughts.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,21,620-628.
  41. Roese, N. J.,Olson, J. M.(1997).Counterfactual Thoughts: The Intersection of Affect and Function.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,San Diego: CA:
  42. Sanna, L. J.,Turley-Ames, K. J.(2000).Counterfactual Intensity.European Journal of Social Psychology,30,273-296.
  43. Skinner, B. F.(1971).Contingencies of Reinforcement.East Norwalk, CT:Appleton-Century-Croft.
  44. Strack, F.,Mussweiler, T.(1997).Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73,437-446.
  45. Thompson, L.,Loewenstein, J.,Gentner, D.(2000).Avoiding Missed Opportunities in Managerial Life: Analogical Training More Powerful Than Individual Case Training.Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes,82,60-75.
  46. Trötschel, R.,Bündgens, S.,Hüffmeier, J.,Loschelder, D. D.(2013).Promoting Prevention Success at the Bargaining Table: Regulatory Focus in Distributive Negotiations.Journal of Economic Psychology,38,26-39.
  47. Wood, R.,Bandura, A.(1989).Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management.Academy of Management Review,14(3),361-384.
print cancel