由王陽明的「知行合一」論身體自我與意識哲學

A Discussion of Bodily Self and Philosophy of Consciousness from the Stance of the ＂Unification of Knowing and Acting＂ in the Thought of Wang Yangming

宋灝(Mathias Obert)

意識哲學 ； 身體 ； 王陽明 ； 修養工夫 ； philosophy of consciousness ； body ； Wang Yangming ； self-cultivation

中山人文學報

39期（2015 / 07 / 01）

39 - 57

繁體中文

自從蘇格拉底開始，歐洲哲學，尤其是近代哲學為一種「精神主義」所籠罩，以致於思想脫離不開圍繞「意識我」為軸心而貶低身體的「意識哲學」這種思考架構。然而，特別是在現象學的引導之下，從尼采開始，當代歐洲思維持續不斷地試圖調整甚或突破近代認知論的遺產，致力將人人皆所有且所是的「身體自我」納入到哲學的省思脈絡。可是，重要的問題卻就在於此，這個身體自我究竟具有何種性質？它具有何種哲學地位？而且哲學能如何、該如何探討此身體自我？針對這樣的當代問題意識，本論文試圖採取一種跨文化哲學的路徑，借助王陽明的「心學」，在彷彿也是隸屬於意識哲學架構的陽明思想中突顯出身體自我以及身體的種種面向對修身工夫固有的重要性，以為將來的身體哲學拓開一個不再屬於認知論的思考脈絡：要從身體自我在倫理學視域中既有的地位和身份為出發點，探索身體如何當作主體通往世界的實踐性管道，以便由此觀點重新來商榷當代思維對身體現象所抱懷的關切。

Since Socrates, European philosophy, particularly post-medieval philosophy, has been subject to sort of a spiritualist prejudice, according to which thought has proven unable to get rid of a framework centered on the conscious I, systematically devaluating the body. Yet beginning with Nietzsche, also mainly lead by phenomenology, contemporary European thought continuously has been trying to adjust or overcome this heritage handed down by classical epistemology, attempting to integrate the very bodily self all of us have and are, into the field of reflection. However, here important questions arise, such as what nature does this bodily self actually consist of? What philosophical status should it be attributed? How can or should philosophy investigate into this bodily self? With respect to this contemporary complex of problems, this paper chooses a trans-cultural philosophical approach, taking advantage of the so-called ＂doctrine of the heart-mind＂ held by the Ming-confucian Wang Yangming. This is an attempt to elucidate, within the horizon of what is generally considered sort of a philosophy of consciousness framework, i.e. Yangming's thought, several aspects of the bodily self and its signification for self-cultivation. With respect to any future philosophy of the body, I try to advance an approach which is no longer dominated by classical epistemology: taking the ethical role the bodily self plays as starting point, this paper discusses how the body yields a practical relation between the subject and the world, in order to eventually, from this stance, reconsider present-day philosophers' interest for body phenomena.

1. 聶雅婷(2008)。身體意識的體現真理與生活世界—理論與實踐合一的化身—陽明學說。哲學論集，41，33-52。
   連結：
2. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945.
3. Husserl, Edmund,Biemel, Marly(Ed.)(1952).Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution.The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.
4. Husserl, Edmund,Fleischer, Margot(Ed.)(1966).Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs-und Forschungsmanuskripten, 1918-1926.The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.
5. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice(1969).La prose du monde.Paris:Gallimard.
6. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice(1964).Le visible et l'invisible.Paris:Gallimard.
7. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice(1964).L'Œil et l'esprit.Paris:Gallimard.
8. Nietzsche, Friedrich,Colli, Colli(Ed.),Montinari, Mazzino(Ed.)(1988).Kritische Studienausgabe.München:DTV.
9. 王陽明、黎明文化公司編輯部編(1986)。王陽明傳習錄及大學問。臺北=Taipei:黎明文化公司=Li Ming Cultural Enterprise。
10. 宋灝(2011)。轉化現象學與跨文化哲學思考。國立政治大學哲學學報，25，47-68。
11. 梅洛龐蒂、姜志輝譯(2003)。知覺現象學。北京=Beijing:商務印書館=Commerical Press。
12. 梅洛龐蒂、楊大春譯(2005)。世界的散文。北京=Beijing:商務印書館=Commerical Press。
13. 梅洛龐蒂、羅國祥譯(2008)。可見的與不可見的。北京=Beijing:商務印書館=Commerical Press。
14. 梅洛龐蒂、龔卓軍譯(2007)。眼與心。臺北=Taipei:典藏=Artouch。
15. 陳立勝(2011)。「身體」與「詮釋」：宋明儒學論集。臺北=Taipei:臺灣大學出版中心=National Taiwan Univerity Press。
16. 陳立勝(2005)。王陽明「萬物一體」論：從「身－體」的立場看。臺北=Taipei:臺灣大學出版中心=National Taiwan Univerity Press。

1. 陳廷嘉(2019)。對陽明神秘經驗問題的重新思考－以湯淺泰雄哲學為參照。當代儒學研究，27，203-233。
2. 楊建國(2021)。身體做為一種聲音—— 論駱以軍《我們》語言的幽默性與魅惑感。北市大語文學報，二十五，107-140。