| 题名 |
以「逆轉收回」論海德格「時間性」與「任讓情境」思維 |
| 并列篇名 |
Discussing Martin Heidegger's Thought on ＂Timeliness＂ and ＂Releasement＂ from the Stance of ＂Reverting and Taking Back＂ |
| 作者 |
宋灝(Mathias Obert) |
| 关键词 |
時間性 ； 任讓 ； 逆轉收回 ； 弔詭 ； 海德格 ； timeliness ； yielding ； reverting and taking back ； paradox ； Heidegger |
| 期刊名称 |
中山人文學報 |
| 卷期/出版年月 |
49期（2020 / 07 / 01） |
| 页次 |
117 - 128 |
| 内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
| 中文摘要 |
針對為「未來部署」所迷惑而遺忘時間性的當代文明以及危機，本文首先以《存在與時間》為根據，分析海德格有關時間性觀念及時間性悖論所導出的省思，以便環繞海德格的「將來情境」為主軸，展開另類的未來觀。在此基礎上取自書法與書論的「逆轉收回」觀點展開更深的啟發。在這此討論的是，落實於運動上的「逆轉收回」隱含著同樣弔詭的時間性構造，因而此觀點適合再進一步釐清海德格的時間性思想。本文參考海德格後期思維上關鍵的兩個觀點，即「另一次的開端」與「任讓情境」。藉著這兩個概念，更深入地探索當代課題：人之存在作為「運動」如何可能藉由「任讓」的方式將此存在「逆轉收回」至一個原本的存在處境。 |
| 英文摘要 |
The present paper starts from the crisis of contemporary civilization, particularly its concern for the ＂dispositive of the future＂ and its blindness for authentic temporality. Firstly, it analyzes Martin Heidegger's path-breaking thought on timeliness and its inherent paradox, according to Being and Time, especially elaborating on the notion of future as ＂coming-towards.＂ On this basis, the paper then elucidates the crucial notion of ＂reverting and taking back,＂ as taken from the Chinese theory of brush writing. There it can be clearly shown how body movement and the paradoxical structure of timeliness are interwoven with each other. This part also sheds further light on Heidegger's view of timeliness. This paper combines these various insights with the late Heidegger's thought on ＂another beginning,＂ as well as ＂yieldingness.＂ This is to show how man's existence as movement may ＂yield to＂ itself, in order to eventually revert and take itself back into its original timeliness. From this perspective, existence understood as movement instead of being, might help overcoming the apparent paradox of timeliness, and this may even contribute somewhat to curing the contemporary malaise. |
| 主题分类 |
人文學 >
人文學綜合 人文學 > 歷史學 人文學 > 藝術 |
| 参考文献 |
|
