台灣大學大一新生知覺體育教學滿意度之研究

A Study of College Students' Satisfaction Level on Physical Education Teaching

10.6222/pej.0028.200003.4025

盧居褔(Chu-Fu Lu)

事前期望 ； 事後感受 ； 體育教學滿意度 ； expectation ； perception ； physical education teaching satisfaction

體育學報

28期（2000 / 03 / 01）

251 - 260

繁體中文

The purposes of this study were to investigate college students’ satisfaction level on PE teaching. The concepts and the methods used in this study were from the theory of consumer behavior including consumer need, a conceptual model of service quality, expectant-indeterminate consumer satisfaction, and the cognition of evaluation viewpoint. “Survey of college students’ PE teaching satisfaction” designed by the researcher of this study was used as the research instrument. The 718 first grade students of National Taiwan University in the second semester of 1998 school year served as the subjects of this study. The obtained data were analyzed by factor analysis, t-test, and ANOVA. The following results were found under this study: 1. There were 14 teaching factors included in college PE teaching. 2. There were significant differences on the level of satisfaction of 5 PE teaching factors between male and female students (P＜.01, p＜.05). Male students were only satisfied with teaching results on the grade factor. Female students were satisfied with teaching results on the 4 of PE teaching factors. 3. There were significant differences on the level of satisfaction of 7 PE teaching factors among 4 different groups students (P＜ .01, p＜ .05). The ball group students were only satisfied with teaching results on the grade factor. The feat group students were satisfied with teaching results on the 3 of PE teaching factors. The physical fitness group students were satisfied with teaching results on the 6 of PE teaching factors. The recreational games group students were satisfied with teaching results on the 3 of PE teaching factors.

The purposes of this study were to investigate college students’ satisfaction level on PE teaching. The concepts and the methods used in this study were from the theory of consumer behavior including consumer need, a conceptual model of service quality, expectant-indeterminate consumer satisfaction, and the cognition of evaluation viewpoint. “Survey of college students’ PE teaching satisfaction” designed by the researcher of this study was used as the research instrument. The 718 first grade students of National Taiwan University in the second semester of 1998 school year served as the subjects of this study. The obtained data were analyzed by factor analysis, t-test, and ANOVA. The following results were found under this study: 1. There were 14 teaching factors included in college PE teaching. 2. There were significant differences on the level of satisfaction of 5 PE teaching factors between male and female students (P＜.01, p＜.05). Male students were only satisfied with teaching results on the grade factor. Female students were satisfied with teaching results on the 4 of PE teaching factors. 3. There were significant differences on the level of satisfaction of 7 PE teaching factors among 4 different groups students (P＜ .01, p＜ .05). The ball group students were only satisfied with teaching results on the grade factor. The feat group students were satisfied with teaching results on the 3 of PE teaching factors. The physical fitness group students were satisfied with teaching results on the 6 of PE teaching factors. The recreational games group students were satisfied with teaching results on the 3 of PE teaching factors.

1. Brown, R.(1979).Perceptions of teaching-learning style: The mediating process in student evaluation of instruction.CEDR Quarterly,12(4)
2. Fiedler, M.L.(1975).Bidirectionality of influence in classroom interaction.Journal of Educational Psychology,67
3. Kohlan, R.G.(1973).A comparison of faculty evaluations early and late in the course.Journal of Higher Education,44
4. Muller, J.A.(1991).in the conceptualization of consumer satisfaction and dissatisfaction. H.Kieth Hunt (ed.).
5. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithami, V.A.,Berry, L.L.(1985).A conceptual model of services quality and its implication for future research.Journal of Marketing Research,49
6. Remmers,H.H.,Elliott, D.N.(1955).In Remmers, H.H. & Gage, N.L. (Eds). Education Measurement & Evaluation.
7. 亓湘(1992)。體育興趣選項「初級現代舞組」學生評鑑教師教學之研究。台大體育，20
8. 吳惠櫻(1993)。輔仁大學體育正課興趣選項韻律組學生選項動機調查分析之研究。輔大體苑，36
9. 李金泉(1995)。SPSS/PC+實務與應用統計分析。
10. 阮如鈞(1982)。大專院校七十一年度體育學術研討會專刊。
11. 姚漢禱(1989)。大學體育中學生評鑑教師教學之研究。中華民國體育學會體育學報，11
12. 張妙瑛(1987)。大專院校體育總會七十六年度體育學術研討會專刊。
13. 張思敏(1997)。博士論文(未出版)。
14. 陳文長(1995)。大學生對興趣分組體育課滿意度量表之信度效度分析。體育論叢，5(1)
15. 陳文長(1995)。大專院校八十四年度體育學術研討會專刊。
16. 陳密桃(1985)。大學生對教師教學行為的知覺與反應之分析研究。教育學刊，6
17. 單小琳(1980)。政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
18. 黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。
19. 楊志顯(1996)。輔仁大學體育課程滿意量表研製。大專體育，26
20. 葉重新(1987)。政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
21. 廖欽清(1987)。我國大學院校學生課外體育活動之分析與討論。輔大體苑，63
22. 劉照金(1997)。大學生對與趣分組體育課涉入程度與滿意程度之相關研究。大專院校八十六年度體育學術研討會專刊，9
23. 盧居福(1998)。台大學生網球選課需求型態及需求滿意度之研究。中華民國體育學會體育學報，26
24. 盧居福(1999)。大專院校八十八年度體育學術研討會專刊。
25. 盧居福、韓大衛(1998)。「大學體育教學滿意度量表」之編製。大專體育，40

1. 陳美莉(2001)。國立臺灣大學體育教學因素與教學滿意度—落差理論之驗證。體育學報，30，21-31。
2. 韓大衛、盧居福、黃英哲、李坤培、王傑賢(2005)。臺灣地區大學生知覺體育教學滿意度之研究。臺大體育學報，7，89-101。
3. 黃泰盛(2014)。暑期游泳班教學滿意度對學習成效之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，13(1)，78-88。
4. 黃相瑋(2009)。大專體育教師建立教學口碑之重要性。大專體育，101，53-61。
5. 林錫波(2003)。不同目標取向與自覺運動能力的大學生對體育課需求的事前期望、事後感受與滿意度之研究。體育學報，35，95-105。
6. 湯慧娟、陳忠強、宋一夫(2010)。水域活動課程需求與滿意度之相關研究─以義守大學通識博雅課程為例。人文與社會，2(6)，63-78。
7. (2003)。台大學生對體育課上課場地滿意度之研究—以「綜合體育館柔道教室」爲例。臺大體育學報，6，109-127。
8. (2003)。臺灣大學體適能課程學生之教學評量及運動行爲之研究—計劃行爲理論之應用。臺大體育學報，5，81-102。