不同重高指數大學女性新生健康體能之比較研究

A research into the health-related physical fitnessof the college female freshmen under different weight-for-length indexes

10.6222/pej.0033.200209.2402

梁龍鏡(Lung-Ching Liang)

重高指數 ； 健康體能 ； 大學,新生 ； weiht-for-length index ； health-related physical fitness ； college ； freshmen

體育學報

33期（2002 / 09 / 01）

11 - 19

繁體中文

”本研究是以373名之大學女性新生（身高159.21 ±5.16公分，體重51.17 ± 6.92公斤）為研究對象，分別給予重高指數（weight-for-length index，簡稱WLI）測量和健康體能測驗，並且依據重高指數區分成三組，分別為偏低組（0.89與0.89以下；102人）、正常組（0.90－1.09；213人）、偏高組（1.10與1.10以上；58人）。根據測驗所得資料，經由單因子變異數分析，得到以下之結果： 一、在柔軟性表現上，於不同重高指數各組間沒有顯著的差異。 二、BMI（身體質量指數）在不同重高指數各兩組間，都有顯著之差異（p＜.05）。 三、在腹肌耐力之表現上，重高指數正常組顯著優於偏低組（p＜.05）；正常組與偏高組間，以及偏低組與偏高組間，則沒有顯著之差異。 四、在瞬發力之表現上，重高指數偏低組與正常組，分別顯著優於偏高組（p＜.05）；偏低組與正常組則沒有顯著之差異。 五、在心肺耐力之表現上，重高指數偏低組與正常組，分別顯著優於偏高組（p＜.05）；偏低組與正常組則沒有顯著之差異。”

The subjects of this research were 373 college female freshmen(159.21 ±5.16cm in height and 51.17 ± 6.92 kg in weight). After measuring health-related physical fitness, they were divided into 3 groups, i.e., the bottom class (at or below 0.89, 102 persons), the normal class (0.90-1.90,213 persons) and the top class (at 1.10 or more, 58 persons) according to the weight-for-length indexes (WLI). The results, after being analyzed through one-way ANOVA, was as follows. 1. In flexibility performance there was no significant difference among the three groups. 2. There was significant difference in BMI between the bottom class and the normal class, the normal class and the top class, the bottom class and the top class (p＜.05). 3. In abdominal performance the normal weight-for-length index class was significantly better than the bottom class(p＜.05).However, there wasn't any significant difference between the normal class and the top class. Neither was it between the bottom class and the top class. 4. In anaerobic power performance the bottom and normal weight-for-length index classes were significantly better than the top class (p＜.05). There was no significant difference between the bottom class and the normal class. 5. In cardiorespiratory endurance performance the bottom and normal weight-for length index classes were significantly better than the top class (p＜.05). There was no significant difference between the bottom class and the normal class.

1. AAHPERD(1980).Health related physical fitness.
2. AAHPERD(1976).Youth fitness test manual.
3. Caspersen, C.J.,Powell, K.E.,Christenson, G. M>(1985).Physical activity exercise, and physical fitness : Definitions and distinctions for health-related research.Public Health Report,100
4. DuRant, R.H.,Linder C.W.(1981).An evaluation of five indexes of relative body weight for use with children.Journal American Diet Association,78
5. Riendeau, R.P.,Welch, B.E.,Crisp, C.E.,Crowley, L.V.,Griffin, P.E.,Brockett J.E.(1958).Relationships of body fat to motor fitness test scores.Research Quarterly,29(2)
6. Rowlands, A.V.,Eston, R.G.,Ingledew, D.K.(1999).Relationship between activity levels, aerobic fitness, and body fat in 8-to 10-yr-old children.Journal of Applied Physiology,86(4)
7. 方進隆(1993)。健康體能的理論與實際。
8. 方進隆、陳玉英(1991)。中華民國大專院校體育總會八十年度體育學術研討會專刊。
9. 吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用實務。
10. 李燕嗚(1995)。花蓮市高中生肥胖盛率之分析 : 重高指數及體質指數之比較。中華家醫誌，5(3)
11. 林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。
12. 姜義村(1996)。中國文化大學運動教練研究所碩士論文。
13. 教育部(1995)。中華民國國民體能測驗手冊。
14. 郭志輝(1988)。中華民國大專院校體育總會七十七年度體育學術研討會專刊。
15. 陳偉德、江界山、黃伯超(1999)。改訂的生長曲線圖 : 台灣地區。中臺灣醫誌，4
16. 陳偉德、吳康文、宓麗麗、劉瑞蘭(1993)。重高指數 : 簡易而準確之小兒體重評估法。臺灣醫誌，92
17. 蔡乃川(1998)。國立台灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文。
18. 鄭健民(1994)。工專學生身體質量指數(BMI) 與1600公尺成績之相關。中華民國體育學會體育學報，18

1. Yu, Shu,Yin, Teresa J. C.,Wu, Fei-Ling,Liu, Ying-Lung(2005).Effects of a Weight-Loss Program for Obese Children: A "Mix of Attributes" Approach.The Journalof Nursing Research,13(1),21-30.