運動員認同概念與測驗初探

A Measurement on Identity of Athlete

10.6222/pej.0033.200209.2414

何全進(Chuan-Chin Ho)；盧俊宏(Jing-Horng Lu)

運動員認同 ； athletic identity

體育學報

33期（2002 / 09 / 01）

147 - 154

繁體中文

本研究的主要目的在修訂運動員認同量表（Athletic Identity Measurement Scale, AIMS；Brewer,Raalte＆Linder,1993）為中文版，以探索性因素分析分析其信度與效度，並且探討量表在運動員與非運動員及不同性別上的差異。本研究以台灣體育學院運動代表隊102位學生和中興大學非運動代表隊學生176位學生為對象（男=152；女=126），施以中文版運動員認同量表測驗。結果發現中文版運動員認同量表建構效度（56.23%）為原作者所接受範圍，且內部一致性為.91，所以，本研究修訂之中文版運動員認同量表具初步之信度與效度，可作為國內研究運動員認同測量工具。本研究進一步探討運動員與非運動員、不同性別在量表上之差異，結果發現運動員比非運動員得分高且有達P＜.05的顯著差異水準，男生比女生得分高且有達P＜.05的顯著差異水準。根據研究結果及文獻，運動員認同可提供國內研究者未來在（一）運動員退休的適應，（二）運動員傷後反應，（三）運動心理學相關研究如動機、自我效能、歸因等研究方向參考，自我概念是許多元素的結合，也是多層面的概念，運動員認同是否是單一向度可加以探討，總之，從運動員認同與運動行為情緒的影響皆是可研究的方向。

The purpose of this study aims to modify Athletic Identity Measurement Scale into Chinese version, and by means of exploratory factor analysis to analyze the reliability and validity of the version and then apply the scale to measure the gender differences between athletes and non- athletes. The measured subjects include both 102 athletes of National Taiwan College of Physical Education and 176 non- athletes of National Chung Hsing University - male is 152 and female 126. After the application the result of the measurement whose construct validity reaches 56.23% is within the orginal writer's testing validity ,and the consistence of this version is as high as.91.Therefore ,this modified version used to measure the further used to measure the reliability and validity of athletic identity is trustworthy and could be further use as a measurement to testify the identity of athletes in Taiwan. In addition to this measurement, this study explores the gender difference between athletes and non-athletes .We result shows that the measured athletes score higher grades than the non-athletes ,and the difference reaches p ＜.05;also,the male athletes score higher grades than the female ones, and the difference reaches p＜ .05. According to this study and other related reference, Athletic Identity Measurement Scale could adapted by Taiwan researches to study (l) the adaptability of the retired athletes (2) the reaction of the wounded athletes (3) sports psychology and its related concerns such as motivation, self efficacy, attribution etc. In short, the identity of athletes and the influences from their behavior and mood are worthy of being explored and researched.

1. Brewer, B. W.,Raalte, J. L. V.,Linder, D. E.(1993).Athletic Identity:Hercules, Musclesor Achilles Heel?.International Journal of Sport Psychology,24
2. Cooley, C. H.(1902).Human Nature and the Social Order.
3. Danish, S. J.(1985).Musing about personal competence: The contributions of sport, health, and fitness.American Journal of Community Psychology,11
4. Fox, K. R.,Corbin, C.B.(1986).In J. Watkins|T. Reilly|L. Burwitz(Eds.), Sports Science.
5. Lantz, C. D.,Schroeder, P.J.(1999).Endorsement of masculine and ferminine gender roles : differences between participation in and identification with the athletic role.Journal of Sport Behavior,22
6. Markus, H.(1997).Self-schemata and processing information about the self.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,35
7. Pearlin, L.I.(1983).In H.B. Kaplan (Ed.), Psychosocial Stress: Trends in Theory and Research.
8. Pearson, R.E.,Petitpas, A.(1990).Transitions of athletes: Developmentaland preventive perspectives.Journal of Counseling and Development,69
9. Petitpas, A.(1987).Unpublished manuscript, Spring-field College.
10. Rosenberg, M.(1965).Conceiving the self.
11. Webb, W.M.,Nasco, S.A.,Riley, S.,Headrick, B.(1998).Athletic identity and reactions to retirement from sports.Journal of Sport Behavior,21
12. Wiechman, S.A.,Williams, J.(1997).Relation of athletic identity to injury andmood disturbance.Journal of Sport Behavior,20

1. 許雅雯,林雨德(2020)。運動員認同、自我複雜度與生涯發展－調查及實驗研究。體育學報，53(3)，341-353。
2. 許育光,刑志彬(2020)。台灣運動心理學研究回顧：主題焦點與年代趨勢之社會網絡分析。中華心理學刊，62(2)，299-320。
3. 許自雄,季力康(2021)。運動員認同與心理堅韌性之關係：內在動機的中介效果。運動研究，30(2)，1-11。
4. 黃崇儒、洪聰敏(2017)。以跨理論模式探討大學運動員之生涯準備狀況與因應策略的差異。大專體育學刊，19(4)，329-340。
5. 劉兆達、許玫琇、張富鈞(2015)。大專運動員之運動員認同、社會支持、生涯信念及生涯發展之研究。臺灣體育學術研究，59，01-20。
6. 盧俊宏(2018)。國際期刊對心理測驗與量表編製的新挑戰：更多心理計量學證據要求的趨勢。大專體育學刊，20(4)，i-vi。
7. 盧俊宏、陳龍弘、卓國雄(2006)。Raedeke和Smith運動員倦怠問卷(ABQ)之信效度研究。體育學報，39(3)，83-94。
8. 盧俊宏、許雅雯(2010)。健身運動認定量表心理計量檢定與效度驗證。體育學報，43(3)，47-62。
9. 陸玟吉(2018)。大專運動員運動樂趣、運動員認同、運動承諾與生涯發展之關係。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，17(1)，1-13。
10. 謝沛書(2007)。運動認定量表中文版編製與修訂之研究。運動與遊憩研究，1(4)，88-95。
11. 謝沛書、廖主民(2005)。運動認定的概念與測量。大專體育，76，126-132。
12. (2024)。技擊運動員賽前減重需求與心理壓力：運動員認同的調節效果。臺灣運動心理學報，24(1)，1-18。