居民參與校園休閒活動社區意識之影響研究：以台北市國民中學為例

The Influnce of Recreation Activities in Taipei Middle Schools to Sense of Community

10.6222/pej.0036.200403.2017

李晶(Ching Li)

社區意識 ； 社區休閒 ； 中等學校行政 ； sense of community ； community recreation ； school administration

體育學報

36期（2004 / 03 / 01）

195 - 205

繁體中文

國民對休閒的需求漸漸提昇，國民中學所提供的休閒活動對當地居民而言可行性高，同時也可以與鄰居分享相同的興趣，進而對當地社區意識的凝聚有相當的助益。故本研究主要目的為評估國民中學的休閒活動對於社區意識凝聚的貢獻，探討參與休閒活動類型之頻率與形式對社區意識凝聚的影響。本研究資料收集的步驟包含以開放式問卷了解目前國民中學休閒活動的狀況。再以結構式問卷訪問學區內之居民，藉以評估國民中學休閒活動與社區意識的關係。本研究的成果發現受試者對國民中學辦理休閒活動的認同顯著影響社區意識，動態休閒活動參與頻率對社區意識亦有顯著影響。參與形式方面：自由形式、組織形式以及賽會形式對不同層面的社區意識有不同的影響。

In Taipei, the important part of urban community recreational activities is held in middle schools because recreational activities in middle schools are much more accessible than in other places. On the other hand, through these recreational activities, people can share their interests with their neighbors in their communities. Therefore, the recreational activities in Taipei middle school can contribute to the sense of community within their communities. This research attempts to study the types and formats of recreational activities, which can influence people to feel sense of community. The data collection applied both quality and quantity to define the recreational activities in Taipei middle schools and to determine the contributions of recreational activities in Taipei middle school to sense of community. There are three important results in this study. Participants, who more support recreational activities in middle schools, can feel more sense of community. The participation frequency of recreational activities significantly influenced sense of community. People who have participated open formatted, formal, and competitive activities can feel more sense of community.

1. Cordes, K. A., & Ibrahim, H. M.(1999).Application in recreation and leisure for today and the future.
2. Davidson, W. B., & Cotter, P. R.(1993).Psychological sense of community and support for public school taxes.American Journal of Community Psychology,27(1)
3. Edginton, C. R., & Hanaon, C. J., & Edgmton, S. R.(1999).Leisure programming: Concepts, trends, and professional practice.
4. Li, C.(1998).The EDRA (Environmental Design Research Association) 29th conference Press.
5. McMillan, D. W. & Chavis, D. M.(1986).Sense of community: A definition and theory.Journal of Community Psychology,14(1)
6. Nasar, J. L., & Julian, D. A.(1995).The psychological sense of community in the neighborhood.Journal of the American Planning Association,67(1)
7. 于明誠(1987)。都市計畫概要。
8. 李晶(2001)。學校提供社區居民休閒活動場地及類型現況調查-以臺北市國民中學為例。臺灣教育月刊，602
9. 臺北市政府社會局(1996)。台北市政府。
10. 劉麗雲(1997)。學校運動設施開放與社區發展。國民體育季刊，26(1)
11. 鄭光慶(1997)。學校運動設施開放問題與對策。國民體育季刊，26(1)
12. 鄭志富等人(1998)。教育部。
13. 鄭熙彥(1986)。能力自評及學校參與狀況乏研究。

1. Wu, Ming-Yeh,Tsai, Yung-Mei(2008).Effects of Socio-Spatial Factors on Community Attachment: A Study of the Urban Community in Shihlin.人口學刊,36,1-35.
2. 畢璐鑾、丘偉志(2005)。台灣健身俱樂部之契機與未來。大專體育，81，101-108。
3. 汪耀文(2014)。校園開放政策及其法令之研究分析。戶外遊憩研究，27(3)，1-30。
4. (2011)。以地方節慶探討地方依附、社區意識對節慶活動知覺效益之影響。造園景觀學報，17(3)，1-22。