不同動作頻率被動反覆衝擊式肌力訓練法訓練效果之比較研究

The Comparative Research on the Results of Passive Repeatedly Plyometric Training with Different Motion Frequency

10.6222/pej.0037.200409.2424

張木山(Mu-San Chang)；董俊男(Chun-Nan Tung)

不同動作頻率 ； 衝擊式訓練 ； 訓練效果 ； different motion frequency ； Plyometric training ； training effects

體育學報

37期（2004 / 09 / 01）

289 - 301

繁體中文

This research is based on plyometric training theory. The experimental tool is a passive repeatedly plyometric machine. The purpose of this research is to establish a theoretical basis for passive repeatedly plyometric training on strength and power. The research is also to compare and analyze the effects with different variables (different training frequency; different motion frequency and load-control with increasing speed) on strength and power. This research was a one-year program. The first step was to use different motion frequency training ( 30 RPM、60 RPM、90 RPM、120 RPM、150 RPM) and load-control with increasing speed (from 30 RPM→60 RPM→90 RPM→120 RPM→150 RPM) . Subjects are 48 Physical Education Department students at Hualien Teachers College. Subjects were divided into six groups. They trained three times a week for eight weeks. SPSS for Windows 10.0 version was used for statistical analysis. The results are: 1. Although some items didn’t reach significance, but every group showed improvement after training. 2. The group trained with load-control increasing speed has the best effect. Four sports ability tests reached significant differences (p＜.05) 3. There are significant differences (p＜.05) in vertical jump, 30-meter run, and 1RM squat, except standing jump. 4. Among the training methods, 120 RPM can help to promote speed the most. 5. To promote strength, load-control with increasing speed was the best training method. 6. Load-control with increasing speed method can help both bounce jump ability and strength. Conclusions: The best way to promote strength was load-control with increasing speed training. The result agree with the physical training principle of progressing increasing over-loading.

This research is based on plyometric training theory. The experimental tool is a passive repeatedly plyometric machine. The purpose of this research is to establish a theoretical basis for passive repeatedly plyometric training on strength and power. The research is also to compare and analyze the effects with different variables (different training frequency; different motion frequency and load-control with increasing speed) on strength and power. This research was a one-year program. The first step was to use different motion frequency training ( 30 RPM、60 RPM、90 RPM、120 RPM、150 RPM) and load-control with increasing speed (from 30 RPM→60 RPM→90 RPM→120 RPM→150 RPM) . Subjects are 48 Physical Education Department students at Hualien Teachers College. Subjects were divided into six groups. They trained three times a week for eight weeks. SPSS for Windows 10.0 version was used for statistical analysis. The results are: 1. Although some items didn’t reach significance, but every group showed improvement after training. 2. The group trained with load-control increasing speed has the best effect. Four sports ability tests reached significant differences (p＜.05) 3. There are significant differences (p＜.05) in vertical jump, 30-meter run, and 1RM squat, except standing jump. 4. Among the training methods, 120 RPM can help to promote speed the most. 5. To promote strength, load-control with increasing speed was the best training method. 6. Load-control with increasing speed method can help both bounce jump ability and strength. Conclusions: The best way to promote strength was load-control with increasing speed training. The result agree with the physical training principle of progressing increasing over-loading.

1. Bauer, T.(1986).Power training for rugby.National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal,9,28-32.
2. Chu, D. A.,Plummer, L.(1984).The language of plyometrics.National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal,6(5),30-31.
3. Lundin, P.(1992).A review of plyometric training.National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal,7,69-74.
4. Miller, B. P.(1982).The effect of plyometric training on the vertical jump performance of adult female subjects.British Journal of Sports Medicine,16,113.
5. Poprawski, B.(1987).Aspects of strength, power and speed in shot put training.National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal,9,39-41.
6. Rodgers, K. L.,Berger, R.A.(1974).Motor-unit involvement and tension during maximum voluntary concentric, eccentric, and isometric contractions of the elbow flexors.Medicine Science and Sports,6,253-259.
7. Sale, D.(1988).Neural adaptation to resistance training.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,20,135-144.
8. Westcott, W. L.(1987).Strength fitness: Physiological principles and training techniques(2nd ed.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
9. 陳全壽、相子元(2001)。被動反擊衝擊式肌力增強器之設計與理論驗證。
10. 黃彬彬、林正常(1984)。運動與動力。健行。
11. 溫怡英(2000)。比較陳氏肌力增強器不同運動型態之下肢肌電活動。國立體育學院。
12. 劉德智(1998)。陳氏被動反覆衝擊式肌力增強器介紹及對肌力動力訓練效果之研究。桃園:國立體育學院。
13. 蔡昆霖、溫怡英、陳全壽(1999)。1999大專體育學術研討會論文集。輔大。
14. 蔡崇濱(1989)。增強式運動對大學排球運動員腿部動力及扣球起跳動力因素之訓練效果研究。臺南市:供學。
15. 謝素貞(1998)。陳氏被動反覆衝擊式肌力增強器對優秀全能選手馬君萍肌力肌耐力爆發力與運動表現之影響。桃園:國立體育學院。

1. 劉兆達、陳浚良(2007)。被動反覆衝擊式肌力訓練對爆發力及腿肌力之效果～以台北市立體育學院排球選手爲例。排球教練科學，9，63-71。
2. 羅興樑、蔡琪揚、李雲光(2015)。輪椅籃球運動介紹及選手核心肌群訓練。中華體育季刊，29(4)，281-286。
3. (2023)。女子排球選手運用震動式頻率訓練對於彈跳能力之研究。交大體育學刊，19，45-55。
4. (2024)。以六週增強式訓練與重量訓練對於運動表現之影響－以輔仁大學大專甲組田徑運動員為例。輔仁大學體育學刊，23，108-124。