高雄市國民小學推動游泳政策成效之研究

Effect of Promoting the Swimming Policy among Elementary Schools in Kaohsiung City

10.6222/pej.4004.200712.1009

鄭勵君(Lih-Jiun Jeng)；林正隆(Chang-Long Lin)；邱金松(King-Song Chou)

高雄市國民小學 ； 游泳政策 ； 游泳能力 ； elementary schools in Kaohsiung City ； swimming policy ； swimming ability

體育學報

40卷4期（2007 / 12 / 01）

105 - 113

繁體中文

本研究係高雄市政府政策執行者進行實施成效評估。目的：一、瞭解國小學生是否會游泳之現況；二、比較有無游泳池與是否會游泳的差異性；三、比較不同行政區域與是否會游泳的差異性；四、比較不同性別與是否會游泳的差異性；五、比較不同年段與是否會游泳的差異性。方法：兼採問卷之分層隨機(stratified random)抽樣與普查資料之事後回溯法(ex-post facto research)，以SPSS 12.0軟體進行統計分析。結果：一、會游泳的比率僅10.83%，約九成的小朋友不會游泳，値得「海洋首都」的教育當局探討；二、有游泳池的國小，約七成的學生不會游泳，投資報酬率需檢討；三、接近海邊的學生游泳能力較差値得注意；四、游泳能力男優於女生，人人都應加強游泳能力；五、會游泳比率因年段遞增而升高。結論：一、學生會游泳比率偏低，是否游泳政策不明確、家長過度保護、學校師資、游泳場地、設備不足等，値得進一步探究；二、中央與地方需貫徹提升學生游泳能力計畫，並加強宣導，以落實政策之實施。

This study was an evaluation by the policy executing officer of Kaohsiung City Government. Purposes: (1) to understand the current status of students' overall swimming capability, (2) to survey the relationship between the existence of swimming pools and the swimming capability, (3) to compare the swimming capabilities among the different local administrative areas, (4) to find correlation of the swimming capabilities with sexualities, (5) to distinguish students' swimming capabilities in different ages. Methods: Based on both the stratified random with questionnaires and the ex-post facto research method with survey data, which were done by SPSS 12.0. Results: (1) Only 10.83% pupil students in Kaohsiung city, the so-called ”Ocean Capital”, are capable of swimming, (2) There are about 70% students incapable of swimming in the elementary schools with swimming pools, which shows a low ROI in using swimming facilities, (3) The pupil students living near the beaches are weaker in swimming capability than those living inland, (4) The boys are superior in swimming to the girls, and (5) Students' overall swimming capability increases with ages. Conclusions: (1) The students' overall swimming capability is obviously low, and the causes could be an inappropriate swimming policy, the parents' overprotection, the lack of trainers, the swimming pool and insufficient facilities. (2) Both the central and local governments should work together to effectively realize the promoting policy of students' swimming.

1. 陳冠錦(2002)。從「提昇學生游泳能力中程計畫」至落實學校游泳教學的具體措施。中華體育季刊，16(1)，129-136。
   連結：
2. 劉兆達、林德隆、陳和睦(2005)。學生游泳能力調查：以國民中學擁有游泳池學校為例。大專體育學刊，7(4)，87-96。
   連結：
3. The swimming activities and water safety
4. Slater J.(2000).Pupils miss out swim lessons.The educational times (Supplement),4386(5),1-2.
5. 國人死因統計資料
6. 周志強(2006)。臺東市，國立臺東大學。
7. 林玲珠(2002)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
8. 94學校體育統計年報
9. 教育部(2000)。提昇學生游泳能力中程計劃。臺北市:教育部。
10. 教育部(2005)。推動學生游泳能力暨學生水域運動發展研討會議手冊，臺北市:
11. 教育部(2002)。91年度提昇學生游泳能力計畫期末報告書。臺北市:教育部。
12. 陳秀華(2004)。臺北市，臺北市立體育學院。
13. 陳武聰(2003)。屏東市，國立屏東師範學院。

1. 劉兆達、許玫琇(2015)。推動學校水域運動安全教育之策略。臺灣體育學術研究，58，135-146。