英文摘要
|
Purpose: This study aimed to discuss the mechanical property of the tennis strings with different structures. The structures of the frequently used strings includes monofilament string (Performance), multifilament string (Sensation), Polyester string (Polymax Ⅱ) and Kevlar string. We investigated the performances in ultimate strength, stiffness, change in stiffness and extensibility of these strings. Methods: The experiments were performed in a laboratory with controlled temperature and humidity. We use the universal testing machine (AG-1, Shimadzu, Japan) to test the tensile load-deformation property of each string. The increasing elongation and loads for each string were recorded for analysis. The ultimate strength, stiffness, and change in stiffness were calculated to compare between different strings. Results: The multifilament string (Sensation) has the highest ultimate strength and stiffness performance while the monofilament string (Kevlar) has the least. However, on the other hand, the extensibility of the Performance string was the best while the Sensation string was the least among the four types of the strings. Conclusion: The mechanical properties of these four types of the strings were significantly different. The multifilament string (Sensation) possessed the highest strength and stiffness performance and the least extensibility, which would help maintaining string tension. However, in order to achieve the optimal economical efficiency and exercise performance, we suggest the novice players should use Performance string. With increasing power stroke, they can change to Polyester and Kevlar. As for the professional tennis players or powerful athletes, Sensation string should be a good choice for maintaining stroke stability and promoting performance.
|
参考文献
|
-
詹一民、林秀真(2005)。不同結構網球線自然退磅之探討。體育學報,49(3),41-56。
連結:
-
Baker, J.,Wilson, B.(1978).The effect of tennis racket stiffness and string tesion on ball velocity after impact.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,49(3),255-259.
-
Bower, R.,Cross, R.(2003).Player sensitivity to changes in string tension in a tennis racket.Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport,6(1),120-131.
-
Brody, H.(1987).Model of tennis racket impact.International Journal of Sport Biomechanics,5(4),451-456.
-
Cross, R.(2000).Flexible beam analysis of string tension and frame stiffness on racket performance.Sports Engineering,3,111-112.
-
Cross, R.,Bower, R.(2001).Measurement of string sension in tennis racket.Sports Engineering,4,165-175.
-
Cross, R.,Lindsey, C.,Andruczyk, D.(2000).Laboratory testing of tennis strings.Sports Engineering,3,219-230.
-
Dusek, D.(1999).Strings fever.Tennis Magazine,64-66.
-
Dusek, D.(2000).Strings attached.Tennis Magazine,53-55.
-
Groppel, J. L.,Shin, I. S.,Thomas, J. A.,Welk, G. J.(1987).The effect of string type and tension on impact in midsized and oversized tennis racket.International Journal of Sports Biomechanics,3,40-46.
-
丁麗芬、周中明(2001)。新型網球對球拍碰撞之動力學分析。北體學報,9,219-234。
-
石世濱、相子元(1997)。網線材質張力及拍面大小對網球拍彈性恢復係數之影響。體育學報,22,189-200。
-
江中皓(1994)。不同網線與網線張力對網球初學者技能之相關研究。醒吾學報,18,404-436。
-
林寶城(1996)。不同網球拍拍線截面對擊球時所產生之動力效應。體育學報,21,137-150。
-
林寶城(1993)。網球拍勁度對擊球時所產生的動力學振動響應。國立政治大學學報,66,145-202。
-
張思敏(1999)。大專男子網球選手對球拍線之認知與使用變化之自覺量表分析之研究。大專體育,46,57-64。
-
許樹淵、張思敏、張清泉、田文政(2000)。網球技術理論與實際。臺北市:中華民國網球協會。
|