不同起跑技術對慢速壘球壘間跑壘時間的影響

A Comparison of Base Running Starting Techniques in Slow Pitch Softball

10.6222/pej.4004.200712.1005

陳慧英(Huei-Ying Chen)

慢速壘球 ； 整體反應時間 ； 壘間跑壘 ； 起跑技術 ； slow pitch softball ； total response time ； base running ； starting technique

體育學報

40卷4期（2007 / 12 / 01）

51 - 62

繁體中文

Purpose: This study was employed choice reaction time to compare four starting techniques included cross-over step, jab-step, standing sprinter's start, and the momentum start to determine the fastest start technique for optimum speed in base running in slow pitch softball. Methods: The participants were 40 male college students who had been practiced these start techniques for 8 weeks. Total response time was recorded to the nearest 1/100 second using a Dekan Automatic Performance Analyzer arranged with two starting lights and a stop gate. Results: A one way repeated measures ANOVA indicated that there were significant different among four starting techniques (p＜ .01). After post hoc tests, the momentum start was significantly (p＜ .05) slower than the other starts compared while there were no significant differences among the other starts. F-value ranging from 0.08 to 1.41 (p＞ .05), obtained using the one way repeated measures ANOVA tests for multiple trial data, signified no trends among trials and high reliability of the testing procedures and equipment. Conclusions: The results suggested that the momentum start was the slowest among the four starts. There were no differences between the cross-over step, jab-step, and the standing sprinter's start techniques for speed in slow pitch softball bases running.

Purpose: This study was employed choice reaction time to compare four starting techniques included cross-over step, jab-step, standing sprinter's start, and the momentum start to determine the fastest start technique for optimum speed in base running in slow pitch softball. Methods: The participants were 40 male college students who had been practiced these start techniques for 8 weeks. Total response time was recorded to the nearest 1/100 second using a Dekan Automatic Performance Analyzer arranged with two starting lights and a stop gate. Results: A one way repeated measures ANOVA indicated that there were significant different among four starting techniques (p＜ .01). After post hoc tests, the momentum start was significantly (p＜ .05) slower than the other starts compared while there were no significant differences among the other starts. F-value ranging from 0.08 to 1.41 (p＞ .05), obtained using the one way repeated measures ANOVA tests for multiple trial data, signified no trends among trials and high reliability of the testing procedures and equipment. Conclusions: The results suggested that the momentum start was the slowest among the four starts. There were no differences between the cross-over step, jab-step, and the standing sprinter's start techniques for speed in slow pitch softball bases running.

1. 林國華、劉強(2006)。壘前與壘後起跑方式之生物力學分析。大專體育學刊，9(1)，47-55。
   連結：
2. Alston, W. E.(1972).The complete baseball handbook.Boston:Allen & Bacon.
3. Dugan, K.(1971).How to organize and coach winning baseball.New York:Parker.
4. Edwards, D. K.,Lindeburg, F.(1959).A comparison of the jab step vs. the cross-over step in running a short distance.Research Quarterly,40,284-287.
5. Israel, R. G.(1979).Time comparison among the cross-over and jab-step starts.Research Quarterly,50,521-523.
6. Israel, R. G.(1976).Time comparison among the cross-over step, jab-step, and two types of sprinter`s starts in base stealing.Research Quarterly,47,196-202.
7. Israel, R. G.(1980).Research findings comparing starts for base stealing.Journal of Physical Education and Recreation,51(2),62-63.
8. Israel, R. G.,Brown, R. L.(1981).Response time comparisons among four base running starting techniques in slow pitch softball.Research Quarterly,52(3),324-329.
9. Reiff, G. G.(1971).What research tells the coach about baseball.Washington, DC:American Alliance for Health Physical Education and Recreation.
10. Schmidt, R. A.(1988).Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis.
11. Siedentop, D.,Kaat, J.(1971).Winning baseball: Science and strategies.Glenview, Ill:Scott & Foresman Co..
12. Weiss, A. D.(1965).The locus of reaction time change with set, motivation and age.Journal of Gerontology,20,60-64.
13. Welford, A. T. (Ed.)(1980).Reaction times.New York:Academic Press.
14. 林清和(1996)。運動學習程式學。臺北市:文史哲。

1. 陳克舟、林國全、孟範武、何金山(2011)。敏捷訓練對優秀排球選手攔網反應時間之影響。運動研究，20(1)，20-28。
2. (2024)。跑壘情境對大專女子壘球選手跑壘速度之影響。體育學報，57(1)，43-52。