兒童版運動情境2×2成就目標量表之建構效度研究

Factorial Validity of the Children's 2×2 Achievement Goal in Sport Questionnaire

10.6222/pej.4101.200803.0704

卓國雄(Kuo-Hsiung Cho)；盧俊宏(Frank Jing-Horng Lu)

複核效化 ； 結構方程模式 ； 學童運動員 ； cross-validity ； structural equation modeling ； youth athletes

體育學報

41卷1期（2008 / 03 / 01）

37 - 50

繁體中文

目的：本研究乃在檢驗修訂的兒童版運動情境2×2成就目標量表之建構效度和穩定性。方法：採以二批不同的獨立樣本進行二階段結構方程模式分析。第一階段選取第一批370位男女國小學童運動員（男=255；女=115），平均年齡為11.5 ± 0.6歲為樣本，用以進行驗證性因素分析考驗量表的建構效度。第二批獨立樣本也是370位（男=242；女=128），平均年齡為11.6 ± 0.6歲，主要是進行第二階段複核效化的檢驗。結果：二階段的分析顯示，本量表具有可接受的建構效度內部面向證據，以及具有跨樣本的量表穩定性。結論：此修訂量表是一份適合作為評估本地國小學童運動員四向度成就目標的測量工具。

Purpose: The current study was to examine the factorial validity and stability of a revised version of the Children's 2×2 Achievement Goal in Sport Questionnaire (CAGSQ). Methods: This study included two stages with two independent samples for the analyses. The first sample consisted of 370 elementary students (225 males and 115 females, mean age 11.54±0.61 years) who involving in variety competitive sports using confirmatory factor analysis to test the factorial validity of the CAGSQ. Results: Structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that the CAGSQ had appropriate structural validity and reliability. In the second stage, another 370 elementary students (242 males and 128 females, mean age 11.60 ± 0.62 years) were sampled to cross-validate the predictive power. Results indicated that model's stability and predictive power were acceptable. Conclusion: The presented study suggested that future study may apply this revised version of the Children's 2×2 Achievement Goal in Sport Questionnaire (CAGSQ) to examine related issues in Taiwan.

1. 李燜煌、季力康、江衍宏(2005)。2×2運動成就目標理論量表之建構效度。大專體育學刊，7(4)，61-70。
   連結：
2. 程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報：教育類，48(1)，15-40。
   連結：
3. 黃芳銘、楊金寶、許福生(2005)。在學青少年生活痛苦指標發展之研究。師大學報教育類，50(2)，97-119。
   連結：
4. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423.
5. Browne, M. W.,Cudeck, R.,K. A. Bollen,J. S. Long (Eds.)(1993).Testing structural equation models.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
6. Campbell, D. T.,Stanley, J. C.(1963).Experimental and quasi-expermenlal designs for research.Chicago, IL:Rand Mcnally.
7. Carr, S.(2006).An examination of multiple goals in children`s physical education: Motivational effects of goal profiles and the role of perceived climate in multiple goal development.Journal of Sports Sciences,24(3),281-297.
8. Conroy, D. E.,Elliot, A. J.,Hofer, S. M.(2003).A 2x2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport: Evidence for factorial invariance, temporal stability, and external validity.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,25,456-476.
9. Elliot, A. J.(1999).Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals.Educational Psychologist,34(3),169-189.
10. Elliot, A. J.,McGregor, H. A.(2001).A 2x2 achievement goal framework.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,80,501-519.
11. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
12. Hair, J. F. Jr.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
13. Hoelter, J. W.(1983).The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices.Sociolagical Methods and Research,11,325-344.
14. Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.),Panter, A. T.(1995).Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
15. Jörekog K. G.(1970).A general method for analysis of covariance structures.Biometrika,57,239-251.
16. MacCallum, R. C.,Rosnowski, M.,Mar, C. M.,Reith, J. V.(1994).Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models.Multivariate Behavioral Reasearch,29,1-32.
17. Nicholls, J.(1989).The competitive ethos and democratic education.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
18. Nicholls, J.(1984).Achievement motivation: Conception of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.Psychological Review,91,328-346.
19. Pintrich, P.(2000).An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,92-104.
20. Pintrich, P.,M. Boekaerts,M. Zeidner (Eds.)(2000).Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research and applications.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
21. Wang, C. K. J.,Biddle, S. J. H.,Elliot, A. J.(2007).The 2x2 achievement goal framework in a physical education context.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,8(2),147-168.
22. 李仁豪、余民寧(2003)。2×2成就目標理論架構之驗證。國立政治大學教育與心理研究，26，433-470。
23. 黃芳銘(2006)。社會科學統訓方法學－結構方程模式。臺北市:五南。
24. 謝岱陵(2003)。臺南市，國立成功大學。

1. 蔡俊傑、蔡文勝(2011)。2×2兒童健身運動動機氣候量表之編製。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，25(2)，45-62。
2. 蔡俊傑、莊惟臣(2010)。測量不變性在體育統計測驗的簡介。大專體育，111，46-51。
3. 陳文長、徐偉庭、周宏室(2012)。青少年版肢體動覺智慧量表之發展。體育學報，45(2)，157-166。
4. 劉仲矩,廖淑華(2020)。公司治理美學資本與組織文化、利害關係人認同關聯之研究。輔仁管理評論，27(2)，69-102。
5. 盧俊宏(2018)。國際期刊對心理測驗與量表編製的新挑戰：更多心理計量學證據要求的趨勢。大專體育學刊，20(4)，i-vi。
6. 聶喬齡、周明賢(2011)。成就目標理論之探討。中華體育季刊，25(3)，518-528。
7. 鄭桂玫、潘豐泉、徐茂洲(2011)。2004-2009 結構方程模式在體育領域論文運用之探討。運動休閒管理學報，8(2)，19-37。
8. 卓國雄(2016)。運動情境中害怕失敗與2×2 成就目標之因果關係驗證。國立臺灣體育運動大學學報，5(1)，47-75。
9. 卓國雄(2017)。學童選手害怕失敗、能力知覺與自我設限的關係：2 × 2 成就目標之中介效果。臺灣運動心理學報，17(1)，1-22。