中文摘要
|
Purpose: This study was to understand the reception effects of Chinese Taipei and other teams in 2006 Women's Volleyball World Championship. Method: The subjects were 10 teams which included Chinese Taipei and 9 opponents. The research method was the video analysis and the 9 matches and 34 sets were analyzed by mean, percentage, standard deviation, and two-way ANOVA. Results: Were in the following: (a) Most of the balls for Chinese Taipei were received by main-attackers, and assistant attackers, and those for other opponents were received by libero and main-attackers. In addition, the successive rate of reception for Chinese Taipei was 67.7%, and it for other teams was 73.2%. Furthermore, the failed rate of reception for Chinese Taipei was 4.1%, and it for other teams was 4.0%. (b) There was no significant different in reception effects between Chinese Taipei and other teams (F=0.49, p>.05). However, the reception effects of the libero and assistant-attackers were better than those of the main-attackers and fast-attackers. In addition, the reception effects for different type attackers of Chinese Taipei and other teams had no interaction. Conclusion: It advised to increase the reception rate for the libero in the future, to enhance the successive reception rate of the libero, and to improve the reception effects of main-attackers and fast-attackers in training.
|
英文摘要
|
Purpose: This study was to understand the reception effects of Chinese Taipei and other teams in 2006 Women's Volleyball World Championship. Method: The subjects were 10 teams which included Chinese Taipei and 9 opponents. The research method was the video analysis and the 9 matches and 34 sets were analyzed by mean, percentage, standard deviation, and two-way ANOVA. Results: Were in the following: (a) Most of the balls for Chinese Taipei were received by main-attackers, and assistant attackers, and those for other opponents were received by libero and main-attackers. In addition, the successive rate of reception for Chinese Taipei was 67.7%, and it for other teams was 73.2%. Furthermore, the failed rate of reception for Chinese Taipei was 4.1%, and it for other teams was 4.0%. (b) There was no significant different in reception effects between Chinese Taipei and other teams (F=0.49, p>.05). However, the reception effects of the libero and assistant-attackers were better than those of the main-attackers and fast-attackers. In addition, the reception effects for different type attackers of Chinese Taipei and other teams had no interaction. Conclusion: It advised to increase the reception rate for the libero in the future, to enhance the successive reception rate of the libero, and to improve the reception effects of main-attackers and fast-attackers in training.
|