前期時間對不同年齡兒童訊息處理能力的影響

Effects of Foreperiod Time on the Ability of Information Processing in Middle/Late Children

10.6222/pej.4302.201006.1106

賴鳳梅(Feng-Mei Lai)；陳重佑(Chung-Yu Chen)；涂阿絹(A-Chuan Tu)；周桂名(Kuei-Ming Chou)

中晚期兒童 ； 反應時間 ； 年齡差異 ； 預警階段 ； 全部反應時間 ； middle/late child ； reaction time ； age-related difference ； vigilance stage ； response time

體育學報

43卷2期（2010 / 06 / 01）

71 - 81

繁體中文

目的：本研究的主要目的乃通過簡單聽覺反應時間測試手段，探討長短前期時間的操弄對於中晚期兒童訊息處理能力的影響，並比較前期時間長短影響注意力的年齡差異。方法：研究以8歲、10歲與12歲的兒童共192名爲自願實驗參與者，並要求實驗參與者分別在前期時間平均6秒與30秒的情境下，在出現音源刺激時按壓觸動開關以測驗全部反應時間，Catsys 2000神經行爲評估系統則用以產生刺激訊號的操控與反應時間的收集。結果：研究結果顯示在短前期情境10歲組兒童的反應時間顯著慢於12歲組，而長前期情境則10歲組與12歲組的反應時間未有統計的顯著差異，10歲組與12歲組兒童的反應時間變異性則未有年齡差異存在；8歲組兒童的反應時間與反應時間變異性也都顯著大於10歲組與12歲組兒童。結論：當前期時間過長時，12歲兒童的訊息處理能力也會退化至10歲兒童，說明了12歲兒童訊息處理能力仍處於不穩定的階段。

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference of information processing and the age through the manipulation of long or short foreperiod time in the approach of simple auditory reaction time test for middle/late children. Method: Eight-year-old, ten-year-old, and twelve-year-old children, 192 in total, were recruited as the voluntary participants in this study. Every participant was asked to press a switch to assess the response time after the stimulus of voice that following the warning signal around 6 second and 30 second. The Catsys 2000 system was used to generate the signal of stimulus and to acquire the information of reaction time. Results: The results showed the reaction time in ten-year-old children were slower than twelve-year-old children in the condition of short foreperiod, but not in the condition of long foreperiod. There was no statistical difference between ten-year-old and twelve-year-old children for the variability of reaction time. The reaction time and variability of reaction time in eight-year-old children were the highest significantly. Conclusion: It indicate the ability of information processing for twelve-year-old children regress same as ten-year-old children under the condition of long foreperiod. The ability of information processing is an unstable stage in the age of twelve.

1. 洪聰敏、豐東洋(2003)。運動員與非運動員訊息處理資研究。體育學報，35，117-126。
   連結：
2. 楊坤祥、陳錦龍、洪聰敏、豐東洋(2001)。黃色與白色對反應時間和事件關聯電位之影響。體育學報，31，59-70。
   連結：
3. Aguilar, D.,Sigford, K. E.,Soontarapornchai, K.,Nguyen, D. V.,Adams, P. E.,Yuhas, J. M.(2008).A quantitative assessment of tremor and ataxia in FMR1 premutation carriers using CATSYS.American Journal of Medical Genetics: Part A,146A,629-635.
4. Davidson, M. C.,Amso, D.,Anderson, L. C.,Diamond, A.(2006).Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching.Neuropsychologia,44,2037-2078.
5. Delalle, I.,Evers, P.,Kostovic, I.,Uylings, H. B.(1997).Laminar distribution of neuropeptide Y-immunoreactive neurons in human prefrontal cortex during development.Journal of Comparative Neurology,379,515-522.
6. Eason, R. G.,Beardshall, A.,Jaffee, S.(1965).Performance and physiological indicants of activation in a vigilance situation.Perceptual & Motor Skills,20,3-13.
7. Eversheim, U.,Bock, O.(2002).The role of precues in the preparation of motor responses in humans.Journal of Motor Behavior,34,271-276.
8. Grouios, G.(1992).On the reduction of reaction time with mental practice.Journal Sport Behavior,15(2),141-157.
9. Horn, T. S.(ed.)(1992).Advances in sport psychology.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
10. Huttenlocher, P. R.,Dabholkar, A. S.(1997).Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex.Journal of Comparative Neurology,387,167-178.
11. Los, S. A.,Knol, D. L.,Boers, R. M.(2001).The foreperiod effect revisited: Conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation.Acta Psychologica,106,121-145.
12. Magill, R. A.(2007).Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (8th ed.).New York:Mcgraw-Hill.
13. Mattes, S.,Ulrich, R.(1997).Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,59,1089-1097.
14. Olivier, I.,Audiffren, M.,Ripoll, H.(1998).Age-related differences in the preparatory processes of motor programming.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,69,49-65.
15. Olivier, I.,Rival, C.(2002).Foreperiod duration and motor preparation during childhood.Neuroscience Letters,319,125-128.
16. Sage, G. H.(1984).Motor learning and control: A neuropsychological approach.Dubuque, IA:William C. Brown.
17. Schmidt, R. A.,Lee, T. D.(2005).Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.).Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
18. Stuss, D. T.,Alexander, M. P.,Shallice, T.,Picton, T. W.,Binns, M. A.,Macdonald, R.(2005).Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed.Neuropsychologia,43,396-417.
19. Sugden, D. A.(1980).Movement speed in children.Journal of Motor Behavior,12,125-132.
20. Vallesi, A.,Shallice, T.(2007).Developmental dissociations of preparation over time: Deconstructing the variable foreperiod phenomena.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,33,1377-1388.
21. Vallesi, A.,Shallice, T.,Walsh, V.(2007).Role of the prefrontal cortex in the foreperiod effect: TMS evidence for dual mechanisms in temporal preparation.Cerebral Cortex,17,466-474.
22. 溫卓謀、林清和(1998)。不同年段與運動訓練有無知國小男童單純及選擇反應時間之比較研究。體育學報，24，185-192。