以戶外冒險教育爲本的登山課程對復原力之影響

Effects of the outdoor-adventure-education-based Mountaineering Courses on Participants' Resillience

10.6222/pej.4303.201009.1009

謝智謀(Chih-Mou Hsieh)

冒險教育 ； 質性研究取向 ； 個案研究法 ； mountaineering education ； qualitative research approach ； adventure euducation

體育學報

43卷3期（2010 / 09 / 01）

127 - 146

繁體中文

目的：旨在探討以戶外冒險教育爲基礎的登山課程，對參與者復原力的影響。方法：採用質性研究取向的個案研究法，以14名復原力課程的研究參與者爲研究對象，進行四天的戶外冒險教育登山課程。全程透過研究者與觀察者做活動觀察紀錄，輔以學員在山上每日的反思日誌與團體分享錄音，最後，結合課程指導員、參與研究者的訪談，以分析戶外冒險教育對參與者復原力之影響。結果：以戶外冒險教育爲基礎的登山課程可以從以下4個方面引發參與者復原力內涵：「個人內在的復原力」、「社交與人際互動的復原力」、「指導員與夥伴的外在支持」與參與者的「宗教信仰」。結論：最後根據本研究之結論與討論，提出「延長未來設計課程時間」、「探討引發復原力的影響因素」以及「研究對象」及「觀察角色」等後續研究之建議，以期提供未來登山教育參考。

Purpose: To investigate the effects of the outdoor-adventure-education-based mountaineering courses on participants' resilience. Methods: This study adopted case study of qualitative research method. There were 14 participants who took part in the designed four-day backpacking program. The researcher analyzed the effects on participants' resilience with interviews of participants which were collected before and after the program, and with observations recorded by the researcher and an observer during the program. Results: The effects on Participants' resilience are classified into four phrases: ”internal personal strengths”, ”social and interpersonal skills”, ”external supports from instructors and group members”, and ”participant's religion”. Conclusion: Based on the findings, the researcher presents suggestions about ”longer program time design”, ”influential factors for resilience”, ”research participants” and ”role as observer” for adventure programming to act as reference for future mountaineering education.

1. 林玉茹(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，國立中正大學。
   連結：
2. Benard, B.(1991).Fostering resiliency in kids: Protective factors in the family, school, and community.Portland, OR:Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
3. Benard, B.,Marshall, K.(2001).NRRC Resilience Research for Prevention ProgramsNRRC Resilience Research for Prevention Programs,Minneapolis, MA:University of Minnesota.
4. Creswell, J. W.(1997).Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
5. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1990).Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.NY:Harper Perennial.
6. Ewert, A.(1989).Outdoor adventure pursuits: Foundations, models, and theories.Columbus, Ohio:Pub. Horizons.
7. Farmer, H. S.(1997).Diversity and women's career development.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
8. Glesne, C.,Peshkin, A.(1992).Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction.New York:Longman.
9. Goldenberg, M. A.(2001).Outdoor and risk educational practices.Defining best practices in boating, fishing, and stewardship education,Alexandria, VA:
10. Grotberg, E. H.(1995).The international resilience project: promoting resilience in children.Birmingham:Civitan International Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
11. Hattie, J.,Marsh, H.,Neill, J. T.,Richards, G.(1997).Adventure education and Outward Bound: Out-of-class experiences thutmake a lasting difference.Review of Educational Research,67(1),43-87.
12. Henderson, N.(1999).Resiliency in action: Fostering resiliency in children and youth: Four basic steps for families, educators, and other caring adults.Columbus, OH:
13. Lifton, R. J.(1993).The protean self: Human resilience in an age of transformation.New York:Basic Books.
14. Lomaranz, J.(ed.)(1998).Handbook of aging and mental health: An Integrative approach.New York:Plenum Press.
15. Miles, J. C.(ed.),Priest, S.(ed.)(1999).Adventure programming.State College, PA:Venture Publishing.
16. Miner, J.,Boldt, J.(1981).Outward Bound USA: Learning through experience in adventure-based education.New York:William Morrow.
17. Neill, J. T.,Dias, K. L.(2001).Adventure education and resilience: The double-edged sword.Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning,1(2),35-42.
18. Neill, J. T.,Dias, K. L.(2002).Social support helps people grow.Horizons,17,32-34.
19. Richards, G. E.(1977).Some educational implications and contributions of Outward Bound.Sydney:Australian Outward Bound Foundation.
20. Skehill, C. M.(2001).Austria,University of Canberra.
21. Walsh, V.,Golins, G.(1976).The exploration of the Outward Bound process.Garrison, NY:Outward Bound.
22. 何仲蓉(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化縣，國立彰化師範大學。
23. 吳香質(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化縣，國立彰化師範大學。
24. 周大堯(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北縣，輔仁大學。
25. 周奕伶(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化縣，國立彰化師範大學。
26. 陳姿璇(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南投縣，國立暨南國際大學。
27. 劉淑惠(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化縣，國立彰化師範大學。
28. 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北市:心理。
29. 顏郁心(2001)。國立彰化師範大學碩士論文。彰化縣:國立彰化師範大學。

1. 陳嘉彌、朱育慧(2016)。幼兒家長對幼師採行登山之冒險教育活動其反應探究。體驗教育學報，10，83-105。
2. 郭癸賓,李晟瑋(2019)。自造教育與探索體育理念連結之探討。中華體育季刊，33(3)，135-144。
3. 歐宗明(2012)。登山經驗的現象學探索─在身與心之間。運動文化研究，21，37-67。
4. 阮璟雅(2018)。從存在主義治療觀點探討登山的心理助益。諮商與輔導，395，37-41。
5. 溫卓謀,章勝傑(2019)。大學休閒水肺潛水課程參與者學習歷程的心流體驗與情緒經驗之研究。運動休閒管理學報，16(1)，1-22。
6. 吳崇旗(2014)。冒險教育登山課程對大學生生活效能與團隊凝聚力之成效。大專體育學刊，16(1)，1-13。
7. 謝智謀(2018)。海外遠征登山課程對受災原住民青少年復原力之影響。體育學報，51(1)，107-125。
8. 謝智謀、吳崇旗(2012)。單日繩索挑戰課程對莫拉克災區學童復原力之影響。體驗教育學報，6，29-44。
9. (2024)。荒野獨處經驗對山野活動課程參與者體驗價值之影響。體育學報，57(1)，77-98。