以生態取向探討女性負重跨越溝渠的知覺學習

Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning in Gap-crossing by Female With Bearing Weight

10.6222/pej.4304.201012.0803

高雁翎(Yen-Lin Kao)；張智惠(Chih-Hui Chang)

知覺學習 ； 跨越能力 ； 環境賦使 ； perceptual learning ； crossability ； affordance

體育學報

43卷4期（2010 / 12 / 01）

25 - 38

繁體中文

目的：本研究旨以負重方式探討身體屬性改變對覺知跨越溝渠的環境賦使的影響，身體屬性的改變是否可以直接引起個體的知覺學習。方法：以28位，年齡18~24歲的女性為實驗參加者。加附實驗參加者體重30%重量的鉛塊於腰部改變其身體屬性，實驗過程包含在有、無負重狀態下，判斷最大可跨越距離與最適宜可跨越距離，兩者皆為重覆量數，試作次數的安排均經過平衡消去。實驗的自變項為負重狀態與判斷情況，依變項為知覺跨越距離與實際跨越距離。結果：（一）個體在無負重時，可準確覺知本身的跨越能力，但負重時則低估本身的能力；（二）負重30%體重重量對知覺跨越能力的影響為降低可跨步距離；（三）呈現方向影響個體的知覺判斷，兩者交互作用達顯著，且漸減的知覺距離比漸增的知覺距離還遠。結論：本研究驗證了Gibson所主張之環境賦使的概念，在無負重情況中，個體可以準確覺知與環境間的關係。在新關係中（負重），個體則立即覺知與環境間關係的改變，但個體低估可跨越的距離，此低估的情況可能是個體與環境互動機會不足所致。

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of changed body properties on perceiving affordances for gap-crossing. Methods: Twenty eight female undergraduate students (aged 18~24 years) voluntarily to participate. Participants were required to bear plumbo-block in the waist, which was about 30% of their body weights, and judge their maximal stepping length and optimal stepping length. Results: Findings were as the following: (1) participants accurately perceived their crossability without bearing weight, but underestimated their crossability when bearing weight; (2) perceived stepping length were reduced when bearing 30% of body weight; (3) direction of presentation affected the judgments; perceived distance was further in the descending series than in the ascending series. Conclusion: This study investigated perceptual learning of gap-crossing while the properties of individuals changed. People perceived the modification of their body weight immediately; however, they tended to underestimate their crossability when bearing weight. The underestimation might result from lack of enough interaction with the environment.

1. 彭國威、卓俊伶、楊梓楣(2009)。伸手抓取動作之身體尺度比率界限。體育學報，42(3)，63-75。
   連結：
2. 黃嘉笙、楊梓楣、黃嘉君(2009)。器物慣量與操作方式引致長度及環境賦使知覺。體育學報，42(4)，55-69。
   連結：
3. Adolph, K. E.,Avolio, A. M.(2000).Walking infants adapt locomotion to changing body dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,26,1148-1166.
4. Cornus, S.,Montagne, G.,Laurent, M.(1999).Perception of a stepping-across affordance.Ecological Psychology,11,249-267.
5. Gibson, E. J.(2000).Perceptual learning in development: Some basic concepts.Ecological Psychology,12,295-302.
6. Gibson, E. J.,Pick, A. D.(2000).An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development.New York:Oxford University Press.
7. Gibson, J. J.(1979).The ecological approach to visual perception.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Goh, J. H.,Thambyah, A.,Bose, K.(1998).Effects of varying backpackloads on peak forces in the lumbosacral spine during walking.Clinical Biomechanics,13(1),26-31.
9. Hirose, N.,Nishio, A.(2001).The process of adaptation to perceiving new action capabilities.Ecological Psychology,13,49-69.
10. Hong, Y.,Brueggemann, G. P.(2000).Changes in gait patterns in 10-year-old boys with increasing loads when walking on a treadmill.Gait & Posture,11,254-259.
11. Jiang, Y.,Mark, L. S.(1994).The effect of gap depth on the perception of whether a gap is crossable.Perception & Psychophysics,56,691-700.
12. Joh, A. S.,Adolph, K. E.(2006).Learning from falling.Child Development,77,89-102.
13. Konczak, J.,Meeuwsen, H. J.,Cress, M. E.(1992).Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,18,691-697.
14. Mark, L. S.(1987).Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,13,361-370.
15. Mark, L. S.,Jiang, Y.,King, S. S.,Paasche, J.(1999).The impact of visual exploration on judgments of whether a gap is crossable.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,25,287-295.
16. Pufall, P. B.,Dunbar, C.(1992).Perceiving whether or not the world affords stepping onto and over: A developmental study.Ecological Psychology,4,17-38.
17. Richardson, M. J.,Marsh, K, L.,Baron, R. M.(2007).Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,33,845-859.
18. Schmuckler, M. A.(1996).Development of visually guided locomotion: Barrier crossing by toddlers.Ecological Psychology,8,209-236.
19. Stoffregen, T. A.,Yang, C. M.,Bardy, B. G.(2005).Affordance judgments and nonlocomotor body movement.Ecological Psychology,17,75-104.
20. Wang, Y. T.,Pascoe, D. D.,Weimar, W.(2001).Evaluation of book backpack load during walking.Ergonomics,44(9),858-869.
21. Warren,W. H.,Whang, S.(1987).Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,13,371-383.
22. Wraga, M.(1999).The role of eye height in perceiving affordances and object dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,61,490-507.
23. 陳力豪(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學。

1. 楊梓楣、黃嘉笙、黃嘉君、施長志(2016)。平衡因應行為的年齡差異：以知覺—行動配連觀點檢證移動室情境之視覺光流操弄效果。體育學報，49(4)，403-414。