體育與運動科學研究現況的批判與省思

Status Quo of Physical Education and Sport Science Research: Critique and Reflection

10.6222/pej.4403.201109.1101

卓俊伶(Hank Jwo)

身體活動 ； 體育 ； 運動科學 ； 科學研究 ； 國科會 ； physical activity ； physical education ； sport science ； scientific research ； National Science Council

體育學報

44卷3期（2011 / 09 / 01）

315 - 332

繁體中文

體育與運動科學是一個以身體活動爲本質，跨學科與跨專業的學域，各學科研究所建構的知識體系，具有獨特性。本文以臺灣體育與運動科學研究爲範圍，提出國科會體育學專題研究計畫與兩個主要學術期刊的計量分析，發現體育與運動科學研究呈正面發展之現況，續之以批判思考方式，對體育學報與大專體育學刊已刊登論文，提出可資改善之處與建議。最後，對體育與運動科學研究的省思，提出：（一）考量以人與身體活動爲本的科學研究，有其個人知識與不易絕對客觀的限制；（二）建議採行實證手段，並且進行轉譯研究；與（三）遵守學術研究倫理規範的重要性。

Physical education and sport science, with physical activity as nature, is considered as a cross-disciplinary and cross-professional field of study. The body of knowledge constructed by disciplinary research has its uniqueness. This paper delimited to physical education and sport science research in Taiwan. Research projects in Physical Education Section, National Science Council and two major academic journals were quantitatively analyzed. A positive current developmental status of physical education and sport science was found. Some room for improvement in published papers from Physical Education Journal and Sports and Exercise Research were identified through application of critical thinking. Lastly, reflections were made to the study of physical education and sport science, which included (1) While human beings and physical activity are considered as essentials in scientific study, limitations of personal knowledge and difficulty of absolute objectivity should be considered, (2) Evidence-based approach and translational research are recommended, and (3) The importance of observing research ethical guidelines.

1. 林嘉志、李再立、張馨文(2010)。臺、美、英、澳之綜合大學運動科學課程比較。大專體育學刊，12(1)，1-10。
   連結：
2. 洪聰敏、黃毅志(2009)。國內體育學術期刊評比研究。大專體育學刊，11(1)，1-15。
   連結：
3. 行政院國家科學委員會（2011）。學術補助獎勵查詢。2011 年6 月30 日，取自行政院國家科學委員會，網址https://nscnt12.nsc.gov.tw/was2/award/AsAwardMultiQuery.aspx
4. Abernethy, B.,Kippers, V.,Mackinnon, L. T.,Neal, R. J.,Hanrahan, S.(1997).The biophysical foundations of human movement.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
5. American Psychological Association(2010).Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
6. Boyer, E. L.(1990).Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate.Princeton, NJ:Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
7. Corbin, C. B.(1993).The field of physical education: Common goals, not common roles.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance,64(79),84-87.
8. Corbin, C. B.(1966).The professional process.The Physical Educator,23,173-174.
9. Forscher, B. K.(1963).Chaos in the brickyard [Letter to the editor]..Science,142,339.
10. Heppner, P. P.,Heppner, M. J.(2004).Writing and publishing your thesis, dissertation and research: A guide for students in the helping professions.Belmont, CA:Brooks/Cole.
11. Kuhn, T. S.(1996).The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.).Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
12. Martens, R.(1987).Science, knowledge, and sport psychology.The Sport Psychologist,1,29-55.
13. Massengale, J.D.(Ed.),Swanson, R.A.(Ed.)(1997).The history of exercise and sport science.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
14. Meltzoff, J.(1997).Critical thinking about research: Psychology and related fields.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
15. Newell, K. M.(1990).Physical education in higher education: Chaos out of order.Quest,42,227-242.
16. Polanyi, M.(1958).Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
17. Resnik, D. B.(1998).The ethics of science: An introduction.New York:Routledge.
18. Robson, C.(2002).Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.).Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
19. Thomas, J. R.,Nelson, J. K.,Silverman, S. J.(2011).Research methods in physical activity (6th ed.).Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
20. Thomas, J. R.,Salazar, W.,Landers, D. M.(1991).What is missing in p < .05? Effect size..Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,62,344-348.
21. Woolf, S. H.(2008).The meaning of translational research and why it matters.Journal of American Medical Association,299,211-213.
22. 卓俊伶(2003)。身體活動相關學域之現況。中華民國大專院校九十二年度體育學術研討會大會手冊，臺北市:

1. 郭怡秀(Yi-Hsiu Kuo);陳昭宇(Chao-Yu Chen)(2021)。臺灣探索教育研究現況之分析：以2010～2020碩博士論文為例。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊。20(2)。1-15。