高中學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標之建構

Construction of Evaluation Indicators for School-Based Physical Education Curriculum Development in Senior High Schools

10.6222/pej.4404.201112.0906

潘義祥(Yi-Hsiang Pan)

德懷術 ； 課程革新 ； 教育指標 ； Delphi technique ； curriculum innovation ； educational indicators

體育學報

44卷4期（2011 / 12 / 01）

571 - 591

繁體中文

目的：因應普通高級中學體育課程綱要之實施，建構學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標，以作為高中學校本位體育課程發展評估之依據。方法：本研究採用焦點團體訪談與德懷術等方法，焦點團體訪談共有40位學者專家，分成3個小組，歷經3次座談；德懷術共計19位學者專家，歷經3次問卷調查。結果：研究結果顯示高中學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標共含4個一級指標、14個二級指標、55個三級指標，一級指標分成課程籌畫、課程設計、課程實施、課程評鑑4個構面。課程籌畫構面包含組織建置與運作、背景分析與需求評估、體育課程願景與特色等3個二級指標；課程設計構面包含體育課程目標、體育課程架構、體育課程內容、體育學習評量等4個二級指標；課程實施構面包含課程實施前的準備、體育教學活動的實施、學習評量的執行、課程實施的因應等4個二級指標。課程評鑑包含學生學習成效、課程滿意程度、評鑑結果與回饋利用等3個二級指標。結論：本研究所建構的高中學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標，是具有內在品質的評鑑工具，可做為高中學校本位體育課程發展評估之用。

Purpose: To construct a set of evaluation indicators for school-based physical education curriculum development in senior high schools (EI-SBPECDSHS). Methods: The construction of the EI-SBPECDSHS was informed by focus group interviews and the Delphi technique. 40 physical education scholars and experts were assigned into 3 groups in the first stage and subsequently went through three focus group discussion sessions to form the preliminary EI-SBPECDSHS. The second stage involved 19 physical education scholars and experts who employed the Delphi technique to construct the final EI-SBPECDSHS. Results: The results indicated that EI-SBPECDSHS included 4 first-level indicators, 14 second-level indicators and 55 third-level indicators. The first-level indicators were classified into curriculum preparation, curriculum design, curriculum implementation, and curriculum evaluation. The curriculum preparation dimension contained 3 second-level indicators which included organization establishment and operation, background analysis and requirement estimation, physical education curriculum vision and feature. This curriculum design dimension contained physical education curriculum objective, physical education curriculum framework, physical education curriculum content, and learning assessment. The curriculum implementation dimension contained 4 second-level indicators including teaching preparation, implementation of teaching, implementation of assessment, and response of curriculum implementation. The curriculum evaluation dimension contained 3 second-level indicators including learning effect, curriculum satisfaction, evaluative result and feedback application. Conclusion: The EI-SBPECDSHS is a good evaluation tool, it could be used on analyzing the school-based physical education curriculum development in senior high schools.

1. 陳司衛(2006)。臺東地區綜合高中二年級學生選修體育課程考量因素之調查研究。體育學報，39(3)，103-117。
   連結：
2. 游家政(2008)。學校本位課程評鑑的回顧與展望。課程與教學季刊，12(1)，25-48。
   連結：
3. 楊宗文、邱金松(2007)。體育後設評鑑標準之建構。大專體育學刊，9(4)，99-112。
   連結：
4. 甄曉蘭、鐘靜(2002)。學校本位課程發展相關問題及其相應措施之研究。師大學報，47(1)，1-16。
   連結：
5. 歐用生(2008)。學校本位課程評鑑的視野—雲林縣學校優質轉型經驗的省思。課程與教學季刊，12(1)，1-24。
   連結：
6. 潘義祥(2010)。高中體育教師專業指標之建構與驗證。大專體育學刊，12(3)，11-23。
   連結：
7. Brady, L.(1992).Curriculum development.Sydney:Prenrice Hall.
8. Caldwell, B. J.,Spinks, J. M.(1992).Leading self-managing school.Washington, DC:Taylor & Francis Group.
9. Clayton, M. J.(1997).Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education.Educational Psychology,17(4),373-386.
10. Diegmueller, K.(1991).Backed by N. E. A., Memphis schools serve as laboratories for reforms.Education Week,10(20),12-13.
11. Finger, G.,Russell, N.(1994).School evaluation using fourth generation evaluation: A case study.Evaluation Journal of Australasia,6(1),43-54.
12. Gopinathan, S.,Deng, Z.(2006).Fostering school-based curriculum development in the context of new educational initiatives in Singapore.Planning and Changing,37(1),93-110.
13. Juang, Y. R.,Liu, T. C.,Chan, T. W.(2008).Computer-supported teacher development of pedagogical content knowledge through developing school-based curriculum.Educational Technology and Society,11(2),149-170.
14. Kennedy, K. J.,Sabar, N.,Shafriri, N.(1985).Knowledge utilization and the process of curriculum development: A report.Journal of Curriculum Studies,17(1),103-106.
15. Kim, S. N.(2005).The developmental directions and tasks of the school based curriculum management system in Korea.Asia Pacific Education Review,6(1),41-49.
16. Lai, W.,Wong, Y.(2007).Challenges and strategies to educational change: Introducing school-based curriculum.New Horizons in Education,55(2),78-96.
17. Li, H.(2006).School-based curriculum development: An interview study of Chinese kindergartens.Early Childhood Education Journal,33(4),223-229.
18. Lo, Y. C.(1999).School-based curriculum development: The Hong Kong experience.The Curriculum Journal,10(3),420-442.
19. Lund, J.,Tannehill, D.(2010).Introduction to standards-based curriculum development.Standards-based physical education curriculum development,Sudlbury, MA:
20. Marsh, C.,Day, C.,Hannay, L.,McCutcheon, G.(1990).Reconceptualizing school-based curriculum development.New York:The Falmer Press.
21. Murphy, J.(1993).Restructuring schools.London:Villiers House.
22. OCED(1979).School-based curriculum development.Paris:OCED.
23. Polesel, J.(2008).Democratising the curriculum or training the children of the poor: School-based vocational training in Australia.Journal of Education Policy,23(6),615-632.
24. Raskin, M. S.(1994).The Delphi study in field instruction revisite experts consensns on issues and research.Journal of Social Work Education,30(1),75-89.
25. Rink, J. E.(2009).Designing the Physical Education curriculum.New York:McGraw-Hill.
26. Sabar, N.(1985).School-based curriculum development: Reflections form an international seminar.Journal of Curriculum Studies,17(4),413-433.
27. Skilbeck, M.(1984).School-based curriculum development.London:Harper & Row.
28. Spring, J. H.(1994).American education.New York:McGraw-Hill.
29. Stufflebeam, D. L.,Foley, W. J.,Gephart, W. J.,Hammond, L. R.,Merriman, H. O.,Provus, M. M.(1971).Educational evaluation and decision-making in education.Itasca, IL:Peacock.
30. Tinning, R.(2010).Pedagogy and human movement: Theory, practice, research.New York:Routledge.
31. Tomas, I. D.(1978).A decision framework for school-based decision making.The Australian Science Teachers Journal,24(2),63-68.
32. Wohlstetter, P.,Odden, A.(1992).Rethinking school-based management policy and research.Educational Administration Quarterly,28(4),529-549.
33. 李勝雄(2006)。健康與體育學習領域學校本位課程發展評鑑指標建構之研究。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
34. 林靜萍(2007)。國中健康與體育領域學校本位課程發展之行動研究—以運動教育模式為例。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
35. 張嘉育(1999)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所。
36. 教育部(2004)。普通高級中學課程暫行綱要。臺北市:教育部。
37. 郭昭佑、陳美如(2001)。學校本位課程發展指標初探。師大學報，46(2)，193-212。
38. 陳金春(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
39. 陳銘偉(2004)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
40. 潘慧玲、楊錦心、高新建、郭昭佑、黃馨慧、江惠真(2004)。教育部委託專案報告教育部委託專案報告,臺北市:臺灣師大教育研究中心。

1. 賴姍姍,賴永成,黃筱淳(2022)。學生參與體育特色課程運動樂趣對學習滿意度之研究－以明德高中為例。運動休閒餐旅研究，17(2)，1-15。
2. 賴香如、周維倫、卓俊辰、李碧霞、吳德敏(2014)。國中健康與體育學習領域自尊教學指標之建構與國中教師和學者看法比較。學校衛生，65，1-28。
3. 潘義祥、劉季諺、胡育霖、林章榜(2011)。中學生身體自我概念與運動參與之研究－以屏東縣一所完全中學為例。臺灣運動教育學報，6(2)，52-72。
4. 吳宗諺(2021)。108課綱高中階段課程評鑑指標之分析。學校行政，132，185-205。