科技與技術：跆拳道電子護具之比賽技術的田野研究

Technology and skill: A field study of the impact on taekwondo competitive skills by using electronic protective gear

10.3966/102472972016064902005

李亦芳(Yi-Fang Li)；蔡秀華(Hsiu-Hua Tsai)；程瑞福(Jui-Fu Chen)

電子護具 ； 跆拳道 ； 比賽技術 ； electronic protection/ electronic protective gears ； taekwondo ； competitive skills

體育學報

49卷2期（2016 / 06 / 01）

177 - 193

繁體中文

緒論：跆拳道正式使用電子護具進行比賽已實施8年之久，雖然電子護具明顯影響跆拳道的比賽型態，但學術研究中卻缺乏以電子護具為主題的研究，而其中更缺少來自選手與教練的親身經驗。故本研究將以田野研究方式從實際經驗出發，旨在探討電子護具使用後對於跆拳道比賽技術的影響，進一步理解科技與技術之間的關係。方法：在訓練場與比賽場進行長時間的田野觀察，並針對國內外資深跆拳道選手與教練進行半結構式訪談，以了解各電子護具之比賽技術內容。結果：一、電子護具更換快速且感應特性皆不同。二、Lajust電子護具之比賽技術為：主攻上端、重擊中端、手部防禦效果提升，而旋踢技術效果降低且收腿速度放慢，以及透過水份可增加電子傳導感應效果。三、Daedo電子護具之比賽技術為主攻上端、踩點、壓、刷、推、勾與中端內跨、且因手部防禦效果提高而使比賽節奏變慢，以及隨著電子襪更新感應得分愈顯困難。四、KP & P電子護具之比賽技術為主攻上端、重擊中端、單拍打法、收腿技術恢復效果，而踩點與手部防禦的效果卻逐漸降低，然而2014年仍有多數選手未使用過KP & P故缺乏此套護具的因應策略。五、科技引導跆拳道比賽技術的轉變，跆拳道比賽技術隨著電子護具的更換而改變。結論：科技不僅促使新技術的發展甚至產生新的比賽優勢，並引發長期訓練所建立的技術與知識因更換護具而逐漸失效的新隱憂，科技已成為引導技術轉變的重要角色。

Introduction: The electronic protective gears have been used for 8 years in Taekwondo competitions. Even though electronic protective gears have significant influence to Taekwondo competition skill, but still, there are few studies for electronic gears in academic field, and they are short of competitors and coaches experience. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand the interactions between technology and skill by investigate the impact on competitive skills of using electronic protective gear in Taekwondo competitions. Methods: Semi-structured interview and Field research was adopted in this study. This research took place at training camp and competition by interviews taekwondo competitors and taekwondo coaches in order to understand the competitive skills of using electronic protective gear. Results: The results indicate that, 1. Electronic protective gears replace fast, and the sensing system is different from each other. 2. The competitive skills in Lajust electronic protective gear include: head kick, strong kick and hand defense skill become more important, round middle kick is lesser useful, snapped leg cannot be too fast, and the sense ability can use water to increase the probability of induction score. 3. The competitive skills in Daedo electronic protective gear including: head kick, ＂tread＂, ＂push＂, ＂brush＂, ＂touch＂, ＂ sweep ＂ and middle crescent kick. The competition's rhythm became slower due to hand defense became more effective. As the electronic socks evolutionary the scoring became more difficult and hand defense skill were very useful. 4. The competitive skills in KP&P electronic protective gear including: head kick, strong kick and snapped leg, single kick, the ＂tread＂, ＂push＂, ＂touch＂ and the hand defense skill became lesser useful. However, there are many competitors had never use KP &P before 2014. Therefore, competitors and coaches do not have enough KP &P's counter measures. 5. Technology leads the transformation of taekwondo competition skill. Conclusion: Technology impels the development of new competition skill, makes new competition advantages, and causes the underlying apprehensive of skills and knowledge established by long term of training become less effectiveness. Technology has become the key of competition skill transformation.

1. 毛彥明、陳詩欣、徐台閣(2007)。跆拳道規則修訂對選手比賽的影響。中華體育季刊，21(1)，92-99。
   連結：
2. 邱共鉦、蔡明志、陳淑貞、吳燕妮(2007)。95年全中運高中男子組跆拳道比賽各量級金牌選手技術分析之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊，6，189-198。
   連結：
3. 鄭大為、魏香明(2007)。跆拳道技擊競賽規則的改變對競賽及訓練的影響。大專體育，93，39-44。
   連結：
4. 蕭景琪、湯文慈(2009)。跆拳道近期競賽攻擊特徵與踢擊技術動作之探討。中華體育季刊，23(4)，68-76。
   連結：
5. KP&P (2014). KP&P is E-body protector. Retrieved from http://www.kpnp.net/?page_id=1175&lang=en
6. World Taekwondo Federation (2013). Taekwondo history. Retrieved from http://www.worldtaewondofederationnet.taekwondo-history
7. World taekwondo media (2014). Daedo, prepared to detect any forgery and falsification of its electronic foot protectors. Retrieved from http://www.wtkmedia.com/daedo-prepared-to-detect-any-forgery-and-falsification-of-itselectronic-foot-protectors/
8. Babbie, E.(2009).The Practice of social research.New York, NY:Cengage Learning.
9. Kvale, S.(1996).Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.Oaks, CA:Sage.
10. Lincoln, Y. S.(1995).Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research [Electronic version].Journal of Qualitative Inquiry,1(3),275-289.
11. Lofland, J.,Snow, D. A.,Anderson, L.,Lofland, L. H.(2006).Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Thomson.
12. Roh, J. O.,Watkinson, E. J.(2002).Video analysis of blows to the head and face at the 1999 World Taekwondo Championships.Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness,42(3),348-353.
13. World Taekwondo Federation(2001).Competition rules and interpretation.Korea:Author.
14. World Taekwondo Federation(2009).Competition rules and interpretation.Korea:Author.
15. World Taekwondo Federation(1986).Competition rules.Korea:Author.
16. 周桂名、陳維智、蔡明昌(2010)。Lajust 電子謢具對跆拳道比賽影響之技術分析─以2010 年亞運會初選暨亞洲盃國家代表隊選拔賽為例。競技運動，12(1)，1-9。
17. 洪俊安、石濠誠、周桂名、河龍成(2006)。第二屆總統盃跆拳道錦標賽─新規則驟死戰分析研究。競技運動，8(2)，6-15。
18. 陳淑貞、王朝仁、邱共鉦、陳文進(2007)。2006年全國中等學校運動會高女組跆拳道對打之攻擊技術、型態與得分率之分析研究。淡江體育，10，135-144。
19. 曾敬翔(2012)。桃園縣=Taoyuan county，國立體育大學=National Taiwan sport university。
20. 蔡明志、江界山、陳鴻雁(1998)。跆拳道優秀選手比賽之各類攻擊動作型態之攻擊率、得分率及成功率之分析研究─以第28 屆全國大專運動會跆拳道比賽為例。大專體育，37，75-82。
21. 薛肇璿(2012)。桃園縣=Taoyuan county，國立體育大學=National Taiwan Sport University。

1. 蔡明志、白子杰(2018)。2016年世界跆拳道比賽規則修訂之探討。輔仁大學體育學刊，17，294-309。
2. 李亦芳(2016)。科技爭霸戰，跆拳道比賽不再是你想的那樣！。中華體育季刊，30(4)，303-303。
3. 蕭新榮、湯文慈、許志文、張榮三、林羿君(2017)。不同旋踢擊角度對電子護具感應數值之影響。運動表現期刊，4(2)，105-110。
4. 蕭新榮、湯文慈、許志文、張榮三、林羿君(2017)。旋踼踼擊不同護具位置對得分判定之影響。華人運動生物力學期刊，14(2)，8-13。