運動動機量表第二版之構念效度

The construct validity of revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II)

10.3966/102472972016094903004

李烱煌(Chiung-Huang Li)

自我決定理論 ； 自主調節型式 ； 控制調節型式 ； self-determination theory ； autonomous regulatory pattern ； controlled regulatory pattern

體育學報

49卷3期（2016 / 09 / 01）

289 - 302

繁體中文

緒論：運動動機量表 (Pelletier, Fortier, Vallerand, Tuson, Briere, & Blais, 1995) 是最常被廣泛使用的工具之一，以自我決定理論的觀點對於選手們為何參與運動的動機提供豐富的知識基礎，不過這份量表卻面臨到許多心理計量的挑戰和批評，因此Pelletier, Rocchi,Vallerand, Deci, 與Ryan (2013) 提出具體的解決方案，處理運動動機量表的潛在問題，參與者皆為成年人，利用他們的資料發展出一份具有效度和信度的測量工具；亦即運動動機量表第二版。因此，本研究的目的是延展Pelletier 等的研究，藉由兩組青少年的獨立樣本驗證中文化運動動機量表第二版的結構效度和信度。方法：本研究共徵募430 名中學運動員為研究對象，主要的統計方法是驗證性因素分析、簡單相關分析以及多元迴歸分析。結果：運動動機量表第二版具有可接受的因素效度、區別效度、收歛效度、組合信度以及跨性別和跨學制的恆等性，內在動機、整合調節、認同調節、內射調節、外在調節和無動機之間的關係以及它們與基本心理需求和康寧/病寧指標之間的關係皆呈現一種擬單工組型，符合自我決定理論，其律則效度獲得支持。結論：運動動機量表第二版是一份具有心理計量品質的問卷，適用於測量運動選手在運動動機上的採用情形。

Introduction: Sport Motivation Scale (SMS, Pelletier, Fortier, Vallerand, Tuson, Briere, & Blais, 1995) is the most wildly used motivational instrument, in which an extensive knowledge base regarding why athletes participate in sporting activities from the perspectives of self-determination theory has been created. However, this scale has faced some challenges and criticisms about its psychometric properties, Pelletier, Rocchi, Vallerand, Deci, and Ryan (2013) provided concrete solutions to deal with the potential problems existed in SMS and developed a valid and reliable measurement, SMS-II using separate samples of adults. The purpose of this study was to extend the study of Pelletier et al. and examine the construct validity and reliability of Chinese version of the Revised Sport Motivation Scale (SMS-II, Pelletier, et al., 2013) via two independent samples of adolescent athletes. Methods: 430 adolescent athletes were recruited to participate this study. Main statistic analyses included confirmatory factor analyses, simple correlation, and multiple regression analyses. Results: The results of confirmatory factor analyses showed that the hypothesized model of SMS-II had acceptable factorial validity, discriminant validity, convergent validity, cross-groups invariance, and construct reliability. The correlational results provided the nomoligical validity for SMS-II according to a quasi simplex pattern as expected by self-determination theory found in the relations among the subscales of intrinsic motivation, integrated regulation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation and the relations of these six subscales to basic psychological needs and well-/ill-being indexes. Conclusion: According to these results, SMS-II has a good psychometric property and is suitable to measure the adoption of athletes' multiple types of sport motivation.

1. 李烱煌(2013)。修正四向度競技運動成就目標量表暨其建構效度之驗證。體育學報，46，241-256。
   連結：
2. 林季燕、季力康(2003)。運動動機量表之編製－信度與效度分析。臺灣運動心理學報，2，15-32。
   連結：
3. 盧俊宏、陳龍弘、卓國雄(2006)。Raedeke 和Smith 運動員倦怠問卷（ABQ）之研究。體育學報，39，83-94。
   連結：
4. 蘇美如、黃英哲(2009)。國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係－應用自我決定理論。臺灣運動心理學報，14，19-32。
   連結：
5. Adie, J. W.,Duda, J. L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2010).Achievement goals, competition appraisals, and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players over two competitive seasons.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,32,555-579.
6. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16,76-94.
7. Bollen K. A.(Ed.),Long J. S.(Ed.)(1993).Testing structural equation models.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
8. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
9. Chatzisarantis, N.(Ed.),Hagger, M.(Ed.)(2007).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport.IL:Human Kinetics.
10. Cheung, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9,233-255.
11. Cresswell, S.,Eklund, R.(2005).Motivation and burn out among top amateur rugby players.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,37,469e477.
12. Deci, E. L.(Ed.),Ryan, R. M.(Ed.)(2002).Handbook of self-determination research.Rochester:New York Press.
13. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and the self-determination of human behavior.New York:Plenum Press.
14. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
15. Hairs, J. F. Jr.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.New York:Macmillan.
16. Kenny, D. A.(1979).Correlation and causality.New York:Wile.
17. Lonsdale, C.,Hodge, K.,Rose, E. A.(2008).The behavioral regulation in sport questionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,30,323-355.
18. Mallett, C.,Kawabata, M.,Newcombe, P.,Otero-Forero, A.,Jackson, S.(2007).Sport motivation scale-6 (SMS-6): A revised six-factor sport motivation scale.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,8,600-614.
19. Martens, M. P.,Webber, S. N.(2002).Psychometic properties of the Sport Motivation Scale: An evalution with college varsity athletes from the US.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,24,254-270.
20. Pelletier, L.,Fortier, M.,Vallerand, R.,Tuson, K.,Brière, N.,Blais, M.(1995).Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The sport motivation scale (SMS)..Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,17,35-54.
21. Pelletier, L.,Rocchi, M.,Vallerand, R.,Deci, E.,Ryan, R.(2013).Validation of the revised sport sport motivation scale (SMS-II)..Psychology of Sport and Exercise,14,329-341.
22. Raedeke, T. D.,Smith, A. L.(2001).Develpoment and preliminary validation of an athlete burnout measure.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,23,281-306.
23. Reinboth, M.,Duda, J. L.(2006).Perceived motivational dimate, need sati faction and indices of well-being in team sports: A longitudinal perspective.Psychology of Sports and Exercise,7,269-286.
24. Roberts, G. C.(Ed.)(2001).Advances in motivation in sport and exercise.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
25. Ryan, R. M.,Frederick, C.(1997).On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being.Journal of Personality,65,529-565.
26. Sheldon, K.,Ryan, R.,Deci, E.,Kasser, T.(2004).The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It's both what you pursue and why you pursue it.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,30,475-486.
27. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2003).Predicting motivational regulations in physical education: The interplay between dispositional goal orientations, motivational climate and perceived competence.Journal of Sports Sciences,19,397-409.
28. Standage, M.,Duda, J. L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2005).A test of self-determination theory in school physical education.British Journal of Education Psychology,75,411-433.
29. Vandenberg, R. J.,Lance, C. E.(2000).A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices,and recommendations for organizational research.Organizational Research Methods,3,4-69.
30. Zanna, M.(Ed)(1997).Advances in experimental social psychology.New York:Academic Press.

1. 聶喬齡,徐碧昭,李炳昭(2023)。以集群分析方式檢驗華人家長式領導在運動員基本心理需求與動機和動機相關變項間差異情形。體育學報，56(1)，125-142。
2. 蘇玫尹、曾郁嫻、吳明翰(2018)。體育課程實施課後運動評分後大專生運動行為的變化。臺大體育學報，34，1-13。