體育課情境興趣量表中文化及信效度檢驗

Validation of the Chinese version of the situational interest scale

10.6222/pej.201909_52(3).0009

涂馨友(Hsin-Yu Tu)；盧俊宏(Frank Jing-Horng Lu)；楊明蓁(Ming-Chen Yang)

學習動機 ； 興趣 ； 臺灣學生 ； learning motivation ； interest ； Taiwan students

體育學報

52卷3期（2019 / 09 / 01）

389 - 404

繁體中文

緒論：本研究旨在中文化Chen, Drast,與Pangrazi（1999）發展之情境興趣量表（Situational Interest Scale, SIS），並檢驗其中文化後的信度與效度。方法：研究分為三個階段，階段一為英文版量表的中文翻譯，並以275位7－9年級國中學生為對象（男生152名、女生123名；平均年齡14.43±0.78歲），進行測量工具的驗證性因素分析；階段二以204位國小高年級學生為對象（男生113名、女生91名；，平均年齡11.48±0.50歲），與階段一國中學生的資料進行多群組分析（multiple group analysis）驗證測量工具在不同群組間的效度，並以27位8年級國中生（男14人、女13人，平均年齡13.15±0.36歲）以及57位國小高年級生（男生31人、女生26人；平均年齡11.39±0.56歲）進行再測信度分析；階段三以43位國小高年級學童（男23人、女20人；平均年齡10.35±0.32歲）驗證情境興趣各構面與情境興趣、技能的關係。結果：研究結果發現情境興趣量表（C-SIS）包含新奇、挑戰、專注需求、持續享受、探究意圖5個構面，加上整體情境興趣，共21題，各構面的測量模式與觀察資料有適當的適配度。本測量工具也具有跨群組不變性，適用於國小高年級學生，且各構面在兩周前後的再測信度分析，顯示具中高度的相關。最後，情境興趣各構面，除了挑戰之外，新奇、專注需求、持續享受、探究意圖與整體興趣有高度正相關，僅有探究意圖與技能呈正相關。結論：情境興趣量表經過中文化之後，具有不錯的信度和效度，未來研究可進一步運用情境興趣量表了解不同學習階段、學習內容、教學策略、分組形式等要素對學習者情境興趣的影響，幫助體育教師與研究者，提升學生的內在動機，以提升學習參與。

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to translate the Chinese version of the Situational Interest Scale (SIS, Chen, Drast & Pangrazi, 1999) and examine its reliability and validity. Method: Three stages were conducted in this study. At the first stage, the original SIS was translated into Chinese and administered to 275 7^(th) and 9^(th) grade of junior high school students (152 boys, 123 girls, 14.43 ± 0.78 years old) in order to perform a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). At the second stage, we sampled 204 5^(th) and 6^(th) grade of elementary school students (113boys, 91 girls, 11.48 ± 0.50 years old) to complete SIS and examine its cross-group invariance. Further, we recruited 27 8^(th) grade of junior high school students (14 boys, 13girls, 13.15 ± 0.36 years old) and 57 5^(th) and 6^(th) grade of elementary school students (31 boys, 26 girls, 11.39 ± 0.56 years old) for test-retest reliability analysis. At the third stage, we recruited 43 5^(th) and 6^(th) grade of elementary school students (23 boys, 20 girls, 10.35 ± 0.32 years old) to examine the relation between the Situational Interest and motor skill performance in physical education class. Results: It is indicated that the 21-item C-SIS comprised of five subscales including Novelty, Challenge, Attention Demand, Instant Enjoyment and Exploration Intention, and showed a good fit to the data observed. Further, the C-SIS demonstrated satisfactory cross-group invariance by using a sample of elementary school students, and all sources have high test-retest reliability. All dimensions, except for Challenges, were positively related to Total Interest. And only Exploration Intention and Skill had low and positive relationship in school physical education setting. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the SIS showed adequate psychometric properties and can be used to explore how students' situational interest influences physical activities. Also, PE teachers and researchers can use C-SIS to design learning tasks that appeal to student. Future studies are suggested to use the C-SIS to explore different learning phases, learning tasks, teaching strategies, groupings toward to learning achievement on students.

1. 王文宜, W. Y.,陳宥宜, Y. Y.,戴育宏, Y. H.,吳志銘, C. M.(2017)。體育課介入不同教師自主支持環境對學童體育課情境動機之差異。臺灣運動教育學報，12(1)，39-55。
   連結：
2. 余雅婷, Y. T.,黃美瑤, M. Y.,周建智, C. C.,林錚, C.(2016)。概念構圖教學對學童籃球技能與問題解決能力的影響。大專體育學刊，18(1)，27-40。
   連結：
3. 涂馨友, H. Y.,周建智, C. C.,張思敏, S. M.(2014)。合作式概念構圖教學對學童批判思考能力與動作技能之影響。體育學報，47(2)，291-301。
   連結：
4. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance(1984).AAHPERD skills test manual: Basketball for boys and girls.Reston, VA:AAHPERD.
5. Chen, A.,Darst, P. W.(2002).Individual and situational interest: The role of gender and skill.Contemporary Educational Psychology,27,250-269.
6. Chen, A.,Darst, P. W.,Pangrazi, R. P.(2001).An examination of situational interest and its sources.British Journal of Educational Psychology,71,383-400.
7. Chen, A.,Darst, P. W.,Pangrazi, R. P.(1999).What constitutes situational interest? Validating a construct in physical education.Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science,3,157-180.
8. Chen, A.,Wang, Y.(2017).The role of interest in physical education: A review of research evidence.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,36,313-322.
9. Chen, S.,Chen, A.,Zhu, X.(2012).Are K-12 learners motivated in physical education? A meta-analysis.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,83(1),36-48.
10. Chen, S.,Sun, H.,Zhu, X.,Chen, A.(2014).Relationship between motivation and learning in physical education and after-school physical activity.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,85(4),468-477.
11. Comrey, A. L.(1988).Factor analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,56,754-761.
12. Deci, E. L.(1992).The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective.The role of interest in learning and development,Hillsdale, NJ:
13. Ding, H.,Sun, H.,Chen, A.(2013).Impact of expectancy-value and situational interest motivation specificity on physical education outcomes.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,32,253-269.
14. Dohn, N. B.,Madsen, P. T.,Malte, H.(2009).The situational interest of undergraduate students in zoo physiology.Advances in Physiology Education,33(3),196-201.
15. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with observable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
16. Hidi, S.,Renninger, K. A.(2010).The four-phase model of interest development.Educational Psychologist,41,111-127.
17. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6,1-55.
18. Little, T. D.(1997).Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analysis of cross-cultural data: Practice and theoretical issues.Multivariate Behavioral Research,32,53-76.
19. McDonald, R. P.,Ho, M. R.(2002).Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.psychological methods,7(1),64-82.
20. Renninger, K. A.,Hidi, S. E.(2016).The power of interest for motivation and engagement.New York, NY:Routledge.
21. Rotgansa, J. I.,Schmidt, H. G.(2017).Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest.Contemporary Educational Psychology,49,175-184.
22. Roure, C.,Kermarrec, G.,Pasco, D.(2017).Effects of situational interest dimensions on students’ learning strategies in physical education.European Physical Education Review,1-14.
23. Roure, C.,Pasco, D.(2018).Exploring situational interest sources in the French physical education context.European Physical Education Review,24(1),3-20.
24. Roure, C.,Pasco, D.(2018).The impact of learning task design on students’ situational interest in physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,37(1),24-34.
25. Roure, C.,Pasco, D.,Kermarrec, G.(2016).Validation de l’échelle française mesurant l’intérêt en situation, en éducation physique.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science,48(2),112-120.
26. Shen, B.,Chen, A.,Guan, J.(2007).Using achievement goals and interest to predict learning in physical education.Journal of Experimental Education,75,89-108.
27. Sun, H.(2012).Exergaming impact on physical activity and interest in elementary school children.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,83,212-220.
28. Sun, H.,Gao, Y.(2016).Impact of an active educational video game on children's motivation, science knowledge, and physical activity.Journal of Sport and Health Science,5,239-245.
29. Zhu, X.,Chen, A.,Ennis, C.D.,Sun, H.,Hopple, C.,Bonello, M.,Kim, S.(2009).Student situational interest, cognitive engagement, and learning achievement in physical education.Contemporary Educational Psychology,34,221-229.
30. 吳明隆, M. L.(2009).結構方程模式：AMOS 的操作與應用.臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wunan.
31. 吳明隆, M. L.,涂金堂, J. T.(2012).SPSS 與統計應用分析.臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wunan.
32. 鄭瑞洲, J. C.,洪振方, C. F.,黃台珠, T. C.(2011)。情境興趣─制式與非正式課程科學學習的交會點。科學教育月刊，340，2-10。

1. 陳春安(Chun-An Chen);邱榮貞(Jung-Chen Chiu)(2023)。大學體育課情境興趣與學習滿意度之研究－以樂趣化籃球課程設計為例。成大體育學刊。55(1)。1-16。