海洋運動負責任環境行為與策略探討

An investigation on the strategies to enhance environment-responsible behaviors of the marine sports

10.3966/102473002017093103006

許振明(Jen-Ming Shiu)；陳建文(Chien-Wen Chen)；廖尹華(Yin-Hua Liaw)

貝爾格勒憲章 (Belgrade Charter) ； 環境保護 ； 永續發展 ； Belgrade Charter ； environmental protection ； sustainable development

中華體育季刊

31卷3期（2017 / 09 / 01）

237 - 248

繁體中文

臺灣四面環海且地處亞熱帶，豐厚海蝕地形、海底景觀及海域遊憩環境資源，海洋運動發展深具潛能，隨著政策推動及相關法令鬆綁，民眾從事海洋運動更蔚為風潮，惟環伺生態環境由於海洋運動普遍發展，區域開發與利用帶來海岸及海域等實質環境威脅。貝爾格勒憲章揭示環境教育目標在培養對環境負責公民，能對環境問題具覺知與敏感性、基本知識及關切的情感，並能主動參與環境改進與保護，具備辨認和解決環境問題的能力，進而主動參與各種解決環境問題。爰此，本文以文獻分析探討瞭解海洋運動負責任環境行為與策略，並歸納為生態管理、經濟行為、說服行動、政治行動、法律行動與教育行動等6 類負責任環境行為。據以建議政府及民間團體等利害關係人在開創發展海洋運動價值與觀念，利用海洋環境資源推展海洋運動發時，宜應樹立新環境典範及負責任環境行為，惟影響負責任環境行為變數眾多，有關單位應可透過規劃課程落實教育行動、研修法令嚴密法律行動、組織人力善盡生態管理、典範行銷宣導經濟行為、匯納聲浪善用說服行動及動員組織展現政治行動等策略，賡續海洋運動發展，永續海洋運動環境。

Taiwan island has great potential advantages for the development of marine sports in that it locates in the subtropical Pacific Rim and has rich marine abrasion landform, undersea landscapes, and environmental resources for marine sports. Marine sports have been an unmistakable trend as the promotions of related policies 8 and the relaxation of concerning regulations. However, as we take a closer look at the influences of the popularization of the marine sports and leisure activities, we find that the coastal and marine exploitation imposes threats on the environments. It also 11 causes negative impact on the whole society, culture and local economics. As stated in the Belgrade Charter ＂ The goal of environmental education is to develop a world population that is aware of, and concerned about, the environment and its associated problems, and which has the knowledge, skills, attitudes, motivations, and commitment to work individually and collectively toward solutions of current problems and the prevention of new ones＂. In this thesis, we analyzed concerning 17 literatures to help exploring the environment-responsible behaviors and strategies of marine sports, including six aspects such as: ecological management, economical behaviors, lobbying actions, political means, doings at law, and educational measures. Therefore, the stakeholders of not only the government but also the non-governmental organizations should set an new example to the people by treating the environments responsibly when they exploit the marine resources to promote marine sports. We conclude that the concerning authorities can sustain the development of marine sports and the corresponding environments by adopting the following strategies to enhance environment-responsible behaviors, such as carrying out educational actions with comprehensive curriculum plans, making stricter laws, organizing human resources to make better ecological management, and canvassing or mobilizing to show political actions.

1. 許振明(2012)。新環境典範與海洋運動及觀光遊憩發展芻議。中華體育季刊，26(4)，465-475。
   連結：
2. 中華民國交通部 (2004)。水域遊憩活動管理辦法。臺北市：作者。
3. 行政院環境保護署 (2016)。國家環境教育綱領。臺北市：作者。
4. Alavalapati, J. R. R.,Adamowicz, W. L.(2000).Tourism impact modeling for resource extraction regions.Annals of Tourism Research,27(1),188-202.
5. Allan, J. D.,Flecker, A. S.(1993).Biodiversity conservation in running waters.BioScience,43,32-43.
6. Barbour, I. G.(1980).Technology, environment, and human values.Westport, CT:Praeger.
7. Hines, J. M.(1985).An analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale,1984).Dissertation Abstracts International,46(3),655A.
8. Hines, J. M.,Hungerford, H. R.,Tomera, A. N.(1986).Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis.The Journal of Environmental Education,18(2),1-8.
9. Hsu, S. J.,Roth, R. E.(1998).An assessment of environmental literacy and analysis of predictors of responsible environmental behavior held by secondary teachers in the Hualien area of Taiwan.Environmental Education Research,4(3),229-249.
10. Hudspeth, T.(1983).Citizen participation in environmental and natural resource planning, decision making and policy formulation.Current issues in Environmental Education and Environmental Studies,VIII,23-36.
11. Hungerford, H. R.,Peyton, R. B.(1976).Teaching environmental education.Portland, ME:J. Weston Walch.
12. Hungerford, H. R.,Peyton, R. B.,Wilke, R. J.(1980).Goals for curriculum development in environment education.The Journal of Environment Education,11(3),42-47.
13. Hungerford, H. R.,Tomera, A.(1985).Science methods for the elementary school.Champaign, IL:Stipes Publishing.
14. Hungerford, H. R.,Volk, T. L.(1990).Changing learner behavior through environmental education.The Journal of Environmental Education,21(3),8-22.
15. Marcinkowski, T. J.(1988).An analysis of correlates and predictor of responsible environmental behavior(Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1988).Dissertation Abstracts International,49(12),3677-A.
16. Pojman, L. P.(Ed)(1994).Environmental ethics.Boston, MA:Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
17. Shin, D. S.(2000).Environmental education course development for preservice secondary school science teachers in the Republic of Korea.The Journal of Environmental Education,31(4),11-18.
18. Sia, A. P.,Hungerford, H. R.,Tomera, A. N.(1985).Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: An analysis.The Journal of Environmental Education,17(2),31-40.
19. Sitarz, D.(1993).Ageda 21: The earth summit strategy to save our planet.Boulder, CO:Earthpress.
20. Smith-Sebasto, N. J.,D'Costa, A.(1995).Designing a Likert-type scale to predict environmentally responsible behavior in undergraduate students: A multistep process.The Journal of Environmental Education,27(1),14-20.
21. Tarrant, M. A.,Cordell, H. K.(1997).The effect of respondent characteristics on environmental attitude-behavior correspondence.Environmental Management,30,618-637.
22. Wilson, E. O.(1992).The diversity of life.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
23. 牟鐘福(2003)。我國海域運動發展之研究。臺北市:行政院體育委員會。
24. 行政院海洋事務推動委員會(2006)。海洋政策白皮書。臺北市:作者。
25. 行政院體育委員會(2004)。,臺北市:作者。
26. 呂光洋(1991)。Biodiversity─生物歧異度、生物龐雜度、生物多樣性。大自然季刊，31，4-9。
27. 呂信樺(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，中國文化大學。
28. 巫昌陽(2007)。墾丁國家公園發展海洋運動觀光對當地衝擊之影響。國民體育季刊，36(3)，60-67。
29. 巫昌陽(2010)。高高屏地區大專校院學生海洋運動參與行為與阻礙之研究。休閒與社會研究，2，27-44。
30. 李昱叡(2006)。臺灣海洋運動永續發展之遠景與策略。教育資料與研究，70，67-86。
31. 李海清(2007)。臺灣海洋運動可用資源與發展機會。國民體育季刊，36(3)，44-52。
32. 林兩儀(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄縣，義守大學。
33. 林哲宏、李昱叡(2007)。臺灣海洋運動之推動與展望。國民體育季刊，154，9-14。
34. 邱文彥(1997)。海岸開發政策對環境之影響。臺灣經濟預測與政策，28(1)，171-199。
35. 邱展文(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺東市，國立臺東大學。
36. 洪心蓮(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
37. 張怡萱、林喻東、鄧書麟、劉癸君(2011)。新環境典範態度與負責任環境行為關係之探討─以嘉義樹木園的遊客為例。林業研究季刊，33(2)，13-28。
38. 教育部(2007)。海洋教育政策白皮書。臺北市:作者。
39. 莊慶達、胡興華、邱文彥、高松根、何立德、碧菡(2016)。海洋觀光休閒之理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
40. 許世璋(2001)。我們真能教育出可解決環境問題的公民嗎？論環境教育與環境行動。中等教育，2，54-71。
41. 陳翎慧(2009)。新竹市，玄奘大學。
42. 楊冠政(1992)。環境行為相關變項之類別與組織。環境教育季刊，15，10-24。
43. 劉照金(2007)。臺灣海洋運動觀光發展現況之分析。國民體育季刊，36(3)，22-31。
44. 劉修祥、許逸萍(2007)。從市場失靈概念談推展海洋運動觀光。國民體育季刊，154，38-43。
45. 蔡長清(2002)。海洋觀光遊憩特性與管理課題之基礎探討。高雄應用科技大學學報，32，171-190。

1. 許振明(2019)。海洋運動發展策略評估。臺灣體育運動管理學報，19(2)，253-294。